A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz

In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Troger, H., Pelger-Alzner, B.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title
container_volume
creator Troger, H.
Pelger-Alzner, B.
description In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared to the AUC. Excellent signal quality can be reached using the digital quadrature modulation. A MER above 46 dB and an EVM below 0.52 % was measured. Fewer parts are needed in comparison with the AUC and the power consumption is nearly equal. In the next years the sampling frequency of DACs will further increase and will make additional frequency ranges accessible to DUC architectures. Therefore DUC is an interesting alternative for new transmitter designs.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICWITS.2012.6417685
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6417685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6417685</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6417685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-f7db7b26a9801bd864490e20b21f1f0a834f67658fad5f29a1f7dcbbe2bce75c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UM1OAjEYrDEmKu4TcPleYNe2u9ufIyEKJCQexHgkbfcr1MAWu4sJPr1LwNP8ZGYOQ8iY0YIxqp8X08_F6r3glPFCVEwKVd-QTEvFKiFLqislbsnjv5DqnmRd90UpHdqSMv1Augm4uD-YFLrYQvTQhISuB9OaXdwM0AzOJvRmB8dD7mL7g6kLQ9Qktw39ED0mhNBCv0XwCb-P2LoTJNNuzjrugRUaZvNf6CPwQp7pE7nzZtdhdsUR-Xh9WU3n-fJttphOlnlgsu5zLxsrLRdGK8pso0RVaYqcWs4889SosvJCilp509Sea8OGhrMWuXUoa1eOyPiyGxBxfUhhb9Jpff2p_AP6OFy2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Troger, H. ; Pelger-Alzner, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Troger, H. ; Pelger-Alzner, B.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared to the AUC. Excellent signal quality can be reached using the digital quadrature modulation. A MER above 46 dB and an EVM below 0.52 % was measured. Fewer parts are needed in comparison with the AUC and the power consumption is nearly equal. In the next years the sampling frequency of DACs will further increase and will make additional frequency ranges accessible to DUC architectures. Therefore DUC is an interesting alternative for new transmitter designs.</description><identifier>ISBN: 1467309478</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467309479</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467309486</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467309486</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467309462</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 146730946X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICWITS.2012.6417685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Digital video broadcasting ; Modulation ; OFDM ; Phase noise ; Power demand ; Power generation ; Radio frequency</subject><ispartof>2012 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS), 2012, p.1-4</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6417685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6417685$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Troger, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelger-Alzner, B.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz</title><title>2012 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS)</title><addtitle>ICWITS</addtitle><description>In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared to the AUC. Excellent signal quality can be reached using the digital quadrature modulation. A MER above 46 dB and an EVM below 0.52 % was measured. Fewer parts are needed in comparison with the AUC and the power consumption is nearly equal. In the next years the sampling frequency of DACs will further increase and will make additional frequency ranges accessible to DUC architectures. Therefore DUC is an interesting alternative for new transmitter designs.</description><subject>Digital video broadcasting</subject><subject>Modulation</subject><subject>OFDM</subject><subject>Phase noise</subject><subject>Power demand</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><isbn>1467309478</isbn><isbn>9781467309479</isbn><isbn>9781467309486</isbn><isbn>1467309486</isbn><isbn>9781467309462</isbn><isbn>146730946X</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UM1OAjEYrDEmKu4TcPleYNe2u9ufIyEKJCQexHgkbfcr1MAWu4sJPr1LwNP8ZGYOQ8iY0YIxqp8X08_F6r3glPFCVEwKVd-QTEvFKiFLqislbsnjv5DqnmRd90UpHdqSMv1Augm4uD-YFLrYQvTQhISuB9OaXdwM0AzOJvRmB8dD7mL7g6kLQ9Qktw39ED0mhNBCv0XwCb-P2LoTJNNuzjrugRUaZvNf6CPwQp7pE7nzZtdhdsUR-Xh9WU3n-fJttphOlnlgsu5zLxsrLRdGK8pso0RVaYqcWs4889SosvJCilp509Sea8OGhrMWuXUoa1eOyPiyGxBxfUhhb9Jpff2p_AP6OFy2</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Troger, H.</creator><creator>Pelger-Alzner, B.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz</title><author>Troger, H. ; Pelger-Alzner, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-f7db7b26a9801bd864490e20b21f1f0a834f67658fad5f29a1f7dcbbe2bce75c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Digital video broadcasting</topic><topic>Modulation</topic><topic>OFDM</topic><topic>Phase noise</topic><topic>Power demand</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Troger, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelger-Alzner, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Troger, H.</au><au>Pelger-Alzner, B.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz</atitle><btitle>2012 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS)</btitle><stitle>ICWITS</stitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><isbn>1467309478</isbn><isbn>9781467309479</isbn><eisbn>9781467309486</eisbn><eisbn>1467309486</eisbn><eisbn>9781467309462</eisbn><eisbn>146730946X</eisbn><abstract>In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared to the AUC. Excellent signal quality can be reached using the digital quadrature modulation. A MER above 46 dB and an EVM below 0.52 % was measured. Fewer parts are needed in comparison with the AUC and the power consumption is nearly equal. In the next years the sampling frequency of DACs will further increase and will make additional frequency ranges accessible to DUC architectures. Therefore DUC is an interesting alternative for new transmitter designs.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICWITS.2012.6417685</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 1467309478
ispartof 2012 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS), 2012, p.1-4
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6417685
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Digital video broadcasting
Modulation
OFDM
Phase noise
Power demand
Power generation
Radio frequency
title A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A21%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20direct%20analog%20and%20digital%20up-conversion%20architecture%20in%20the%20frequency%20range%20from%201.9%20GHz%20to%202.7%20GHz&rft.btitle=2012%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Wireless%20Information%20Technology%20and%20Systems%20(ICWITS)&rft.au=Troger,%20H.&rft.date=2012-11&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.isbn=1467309478&rft.isbn_list=9781467309479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICWITS.2012.6417685&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6417685%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781467309486&rft.eisbn_list=1467309486&rft.eisbn_list=9781467309462&rft.eisbn_list=146730946X&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6417685&rfr_iscdi=true