A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz
In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Troger, H. Pelger-Alzner, B. |
description | In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared to the AUC. Excellent signal quality can be reached using the digital quadrature modulation. A MER above 46 dB and an EVM below 0.52 % was measured. Fewer parts are needed in comparison with the AUC and the power consumption is nearly equal. In the next years the sampling frequency of DACs will further increase and will make additional frequency ranges accessible to DUC architectures. Therefore DUC is an interesting alternative for new transmitter designs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ICWITS.2012.6417685 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6417685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6417685</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6417685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-f7db7b26a9801bd864490e20b21f1f0a834f67658fad5f29a1f7dcbbe2bce75c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UM1OAjEYrDEmKu4TcPleYNe2u9ufIyEKJCQexHgkbfcr1MAWu4sJPr1LwNP8ZGYOQ8iY0YIxqp8X08_F6r3glPFCVEwKVd-QTEvFKiFLqislbsnjv5DqnmRd90UpHdqSMv1Augm4uD-YFLrYQvTQhISuB9OaXdwM0AzOJvRmB8dD7mL7g6kLQ9Qktw39ED0mhNBCv0XwCb-P2LoTJNNuzjrugRUaZvNf6CPwQp7pE7nzZtdhdsUR-Xh9WU3n-fJttphOlnlgsu5zLxsrLRdGK8pso0RVaYqcWs4889SosvJCilp509Sea8OGhrMWuXUoa1eOyPiyGxBxfUhhb9Jpff2p_AP6OFy2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Troger, H. ; Pelger-Alzner, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Troger, H. ; Pelger-Alzner, B.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared to the AUC. Excellent signal quality can be reached using the digital quadrature modulation. A MER above 46 dB and an EVM below 0.52 % was measured. Fewer parts are needed in comparison with the AUC and the power consumption is nearly equal. In the next years the sampling frequency of DACs will further increase and will make additional frequency ranges accessible to DUC architectures. Therefore DUC is an interesting alternative for new transmitter designs.</description><identifier>ISBN: 1467309478</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467309479</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467309486</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467309486</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467309462</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 146730946X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICWITS.2012.6417685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Digital video broadcasting ; Modulation ; OFDM ; Phase noise ; Power demand ; Power generation ; Radio frequency</subject><ispartof>2012 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS), 2012, p.1-4</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6417685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6417685$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Troger, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelger-Alzner, B.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz</title><title>2012 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS)</title><addtitle>ICWITS</addtitle><description>In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared to the AUC. Excellent signal quality can be reached using the digital quadrature modulation. A MER above 46 dB and an EVM below 0.52 % was measured. Fewer parts are needed in comparison with the AUC and the power consumption is nearly equal. In the next years the sampling frequency of DACs will further increase and will make additional frequency ranges accessible to DUC architectures. Therefore DUC is an interesting alternative for new transmitter designs.</description><subject>Digital video broadcasting</subject><subject>Modulation</subject><subject>OFDM</subject><subject>Phase noise</subject><subject>Power demand</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><isbn>1467309478</isbn><isbn>9781467309479</isbn><isbn>9781467309486</isbn><isbn>1467309486</isbn><isbn>9781467309462</isbn><isbn>146730946X</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UM1OAjEYrDEmKu4TcPleYNe2u9ufIyEKJCQexHgkbfcr1MAWu4sJPr1LwNP8ZGYOQ8iY0YIxqp8X08_F6r3glPFCVEwKVd-QTEvFKiFLqislbsnjv5DqnmRd90UpHdqSMv1Augm4uD-YFLrYQvTQhISuB9OaXdwM0AzOJvRmB8dD7mL7g6kLQ9Qktw39ED0mhNBCv0XwCb-P2LoTJNNuzjrugRUaZvNf6CPwQp7pE7nzZtdhdsUR-Xh9WU3n-fJttphOlnlgsu5zLxsrLRdGK8pso0RVaYqcWs4889SosvJCilp509Sea8OGhrMWuXUoa1eOyPiyGxBxfUhhb9Jpff2p_AP6OFy2</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Troger, H.</creator><creator>Pelger-Alzner, B.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz</title><author>Troger, H. ; Pelger-Alzner, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-f7db7b26a9801bd864490e20b21f1f0a834f67658fad5f29a1f7dcbbe2bce75c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Digital video broadcasting</topic><topic>Modulation</topic><topic>OFDM</topic><topic>Phase noise</topic><topic>Power demand</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Troger, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelger-Alzner, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Troger, H.</au><au>Pelger-Alzner, B.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz</atitle><btitle>2012 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS)</btitle><stitle>ICWITS</stitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><isbn>1467309478</isbn><isbn>9781467309479</isbn><eisbn>9781467309486</eisbn><eisbn>1467309486</eisbn><eisbn>9781467309462</eisbn><eisbn>146730946X</eisbn><abstract>In this paper the common AUC architecture was compared with the DUC with respect to MER, EVM, output power and power consumption. After a detailed discussion of the theory, the measurement setups were described and afterwards the measurement results discussed. The DUC offers some advantages compared to the AUC. Excellent signal quality can be reached using the digital quadrature modulation. A MER above 46 dB and an EVM below 0.52 % was measured. Fewer parts are needed in comparison with the AUC and the power consumption is nearly equal. In the next years the sampling frequency of DACs will further increase and will make additional frequency ranges accessible to DUC architectures. Therefore DUC is an interesting alternative for new transmitter designs.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICWITS.2012.6417685</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISBN: 1467309478 |
ispartof | 2012 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS), 2012, p.1-4 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6417685 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Digital video broadcasting Modulation OFDM Phase noise Power demand Power generation Radio frequency |
title | A comparison of direct analog and digital up-conversion architecture in the frequency range from 1.9 GHz to 2.7 GHz |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A21%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20direct%20analog%20and%20digital%20up-conversion%20architecture%20in%20the%20frequency%20range%20from%201.9%20GHz%20to%202.7%20GHz&rft.btitle=2012%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Wireless%20Information%20Technology%20and%20Systems%20(ICWITS)&rft.au=Troger,%20H.&rft.date=2012-11&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.isbn=1467309478&rft.isbn_list=9781467309479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICWITS.2012.6417685&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6417685%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781467309486&rft.eisbn_list=1467309486&rft.eisbn_list=9781467309462&rft.eisbn_list=146730946X&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6417685&rfr_iscdi=true |