Mel domain objective speech quality evaluation measure performance

Effectively the objective evaluation of voice quality, comparative analysis of the MFSC as characteristic parameter of Mel-SD and MFCC for the characteristic parameters of Mel-CD, feature extraction filter structure change of the two measure, and Mel-SD compression factor to be studied. Test studies...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Wenlian Zhan, Zhulin Shen
Format:	Tagungsbericht
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Correlation Filter banks Frequency domain analysis Mel frequency cepstral coefficient Nonlinear distortion Optimization Speech
Online-Zugang:	Volltext bestellen
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	464
container_issue
container_start_page	459
container_title
container_volume
creator	Wenlian Zhan Zhulin Shen
description	Effectively the objective evaluation of voice quality, comparative analysis of the MFSC as characteristic parameter of Mel-SD and MFCC for the characteristic parameters of Mel-CD, feature extraction filter structure change of the two measure, and Mel-SD compression factor to be studied. Test studies have shown that, Mel-SD performance is better than Mel-CD also has the robustness of the structural change of the filter banks; Mel-CD is more sensitive to changes in filter structure, with the number of filters in the number of filters for over 13 the increase in performance degradation. Mel-SD in the case given the number of filters, the best compression factor. Within a certain range, the compression factor is not serious. The best compression factor in line with psychoacoustic static measurements of the experimental conclusions of the approximate expression. Parameter Optimization of Mel-CD and Mel-SD for the objective evaluation of the quality of voice communication systems in interference conditions, the results show that the Mel-SD performance is better than Mel-CD and the PESQ performance of the Mel-CD is quite PESQ.
doi_str_mv	10.1109/ICALIP.2012.6376661
format	Conference Proceeding
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6376661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6376661</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6376661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-90c31685518536612ff183cf8b018b43613671ebd6dc5d01c922702c82f4c3fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j8tOwzAURI0QElDyBd34BxLutRM_llABrVQEi-4rx7kWrvIij0r9e4ooq9Es5ugMY0uEDBHs42b1tN18ZgJQZEpqpRRescRqg7nSElCL4prd_xepblkyjgcAOK8VWHXHnt-p5lXXuNjyrjyQn-KR-NgT-S_-Pbs6TidOR1fPbopdyxty4zwQ72kI3dC41tMDuwmuHim55ILtXl92q3W6_Xj7FUyjhSm14CUqUxRoCnn2FCGgkT6YEtCUuVQolUYqK1X5ogL0VggNwhsRci9DJRds-YeNRLTvh9i44bS_vJY_wqlLFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Mel domain objective speech quality evaluation measure performance</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Wenlian Zhan ; Zhulin Shen</creator><creatorcontrib>Wenlian Zhan ; Zhulin Shen</creatorcontrib><description>Effectively the objective evaluation of voice quality, comparative analysis of the MFSC as characteristic parameter of Mel-SD and MFCC for the characteristic parameters of Mel-CD, feature extraction filter structure change of the two measure, and Mel-SD compression factor to be studied. Test studies have shown that, Mel-SD performance is better than Mel-CD also has the robustness of the structural change of the filter banks; Mel-CD is more sensitive to changes in filter structure, with the number of filters in the number of filters for over 13 the increase in performance degradation. Mel-SD in the case given the number of filters, the best compression factor. Within a certain range, the compression factor is not serious. The best compression factor in line with psychoacoustic static measurements of the experimental conclusions of the approximate expression. Parameter Optimization of Mel-CD and Mel-SD for the objective evaluation of the quality of voice communication systems in interference conditions, the results show that the Mel-SD performance is better than Mel-CD and the PESQ performance of the Mel-CD is quite PESQ.</description><identifier>ISBN: 1467301736</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467301732</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467301725</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467301744</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467301749</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467301728</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICALIP.2012.6376661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Correlation ; Filter banks ; Frequency domain analysis ; Mel frequency cepstral coefficient ; Nonlinear distortion ; Optimization ; Speech</subject><ispartof>2012 International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing, 2012, p.459-464</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6376661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6376661$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wenlian Zhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhulin Shen</creatorcontrib><title>Mel domain objective speech quality evaluation measure performance</title><title>2012 International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing</title><addtitle>ICALIP</addtitle><description>Effectively the objective evaluation of voice quality, comparative analysis of the MFSC as characteristic parameter of Mel-SD and MFCC for the characteristic parameters of Mel-CD, feature extraction filter structure change of the two measure, and Mel-SD compression factor to be studied. Test studies have shown that, Mel-SD performance is better than Mel-CD also has the robustness of the structural change of the filter banks; Mel-CD is more sensitive to changes in filter structure, with the number of filters in the number of filters for over 13 the increase in performance degradation. Mel-SD in the case given the number of filters, the best compression factor. Within a certain range, the compression factor is not serious. The best compression factor in line with psychoacoustic static measurements of the experimental conclusions of the approximate expression. Parameter Optimization of Mel-CD and Mel-SD for the objective evaluation of the quality of voice communication systems in interference conditions, the results show that the Mel-SD performance is better than Mel-CD and the PESQ performance of the Mel-CD is quite PESQ.</description><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Filter banks</subject><subject>Frequency domain analysis</subject><subject>Mel frequency cepstral coefficient</subject><subject>Nonlinear distortion</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Speech</subject><isbn>1467301736</isbn><isbn>9781467301732</isbn><isbn>9781467301725</isbn><isbn>1467301744</isbn><isbn>9781467301749</isbn><isbn>1467301728</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j8tOwzAURI0QElDyBd34BxLutRM_llABrVQEi-4rx7kWrvIij0r9e4ooq9Es5ugMY0uEDBHs42b1tN18ZgJQZEpqpRRescRqg7nSElCL4prd_xepblkyjgcAOK8VWHXHnt-p5lXXuNjyrjyQn-KR-NgT-S_-Pbs6TidOR1fPbopdyxty4zwQ72kI3dC41tMDuwmuHim55ILtXl92q3W6_Xj7FUyjhSm14CUqUxRoCnn2FCGgkT6YEtCUuVQolUYqK1X5ogL0VggNwhsRci9DJRds-YeNRLTvh9i44bS_vJY_wqlLFg</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Wenlian Zhan</creator><creator>Zhulin Shen</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Mel domain objective speech quality evaluation measure performance</title><author>Wenlian Zhan ; Zhulin Shen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-90c31685518536612ff183cf8b018b43613671ebd6dc5d01c922702c82f4c3fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Filter banks</topic><topic>Frequency domain analysis</topic><topic>Mel frequency cepstral coefficient</topic><topic>Nonlinear distortion</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Speech</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wenlian Zhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhulin Shen</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wenlian Zhan</au><au>Zhulin Shen</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Mel domain objective speech quality evaluation measure performance</atitle><btitle>2012 International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing</btitle><stitle>ICALIP</stitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>459</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>459-464</pages><isbn>1467301736</isbn><isbn>9781467301732</isbn><eisbn>9781467301725</eisbn><eisbn>1467301744</eisbn><eisbn>9781467301749</eisbn><eisbn>1467301728</eisbn><abstract>Effectively the objective evaluation of voice quality, comparative analysis of the MFSC as characteristic parameter of Mel-SD and MFCC for the characteristic parameters of Mel-CD, feature extraction filter structure change of the two measure, and Mel-SD compression factor to be studied. Test studies have shown that, Mel-SD performance is better than Mel-CD also has the robustness of the structural change of the filter banks; Mel-CD is more sensitive to changes in filter structure, with the number of filters in the number of filters for over 13 the increase in performance degradation. Mel-SD in the case given the number of filters, the best compression factor. Within a certain range, the compression factor is not serious. The best compression factor in line with psychoacoustic static measurements of the experimental conclusions of the approximate expression. Parameter Optimization of Mel-CD and Mel-SD for the objective evaluation of the quality of voice communication systems in interference conditions, the results show that the Mel-SD performance is better than Mel-CD and the PESQ performance of the Mel-CD is quite PESQ.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICALIP.2012.6376661</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier	ISBN: 1467301736
ispartof	2012 International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing, 2012, p.459-464
issn
language	eng
recordid	cdi_ieee_primary_6376661
source	IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects	Correlation Filter banks Frequency domain analysis Mel frequency cepstral coefficient Nonlinear distortion Optimization Speech
title	Mel domain objective speech quality evaluation measure performance
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A33%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Mel%20domain%20objective%20speech%20quality%20evaluation%20measure%20performance&rft.btitle=2012%20International%20Conference%20on%20Audio,%20Language%20and%20Image%20Processing&rft.au=Wenlian%20Zhan&rft.date=2012-07&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=459-464&rft.isbn=1467301736&rft.isbn_list=9781467301732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICALIP.2012.6376661&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6376661%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781467301725&rft.eisbn_list=1467301744&rft.eisbn_list=9781467301749&rft.eisbn_list=1467301728&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6376661&rfr_iscdi=true