Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace

Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2012-01, Vol.2012, p.4505-4508
Hauptverfasser: Harley, L. R., Grullon, S. A., Harbert, S. D., Holmes, J., Britton, D. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4508
container_issue
container_start_page 4505
container_title 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
container_volume 2012
creator Harley, L. R.
Grullon, S. A.
Harbert, S. D.
Holmes, J.
Britton, D. F.
description Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and accuracy of the ShapeTape system as a potential solution. This was accomplished by comparing kinematic data from the ShapeTape against the Vicon system. Subjects performed cyclical movements along a plane angled 45° up from the horizontal using their right arms. Results revealed that the ShapeTape kinematic data was significantly larger than the Vicon data, yet statistically reliable.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346968
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6346968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6346968</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>23366929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i367t-983280cd5cc54fc5d5d2b67b4519bfb3a782eabda378d24810ef06704364a67b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNtKw0AQhtcTttY-gAiyL5C6s-e9tKVVoeKFFbwre4pdbZOQpErf3mCrAz9z8X0MzI_QFZARADG306fxZEQJ0JFkXBqpj9DQKA1cKAVKKzhGfRBCZ1yCOEEXwCnnHMDI0w4QwzOp1VsPDZvmg3SjQTPCz1GPMialoaaPZtMvu97aNpUFLnPcriJ-WdkqLrrgvKxx027DLhXv2KVyE_3KFsk3OBW_6ndZf1Zr6-MlOsvtuonDwx6g19l0MXnI5s_3j5O7eZaYVG1mNKOa-CC8Fzz3IohAnVSOCzAud8wqTaN1wTKlA-UaSMyJVIQzyW3nsQG62d-ttm4Tw7Kq08bWu-XfQ51wvRdSjPEfH-pjP8aqXBI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Harley, L. R. ; Grullon, S. A. ; Harbert, S. D. ; Holmes, J. ; Britton, D. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harley, L. R. ; Grullon, S. A. ; Harbert, S. D. ; Holmes, J. ; Britton, D. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and accuracy of the ShapeTape system as a potential solution. This was accomplished by comparing kinematic data from the ShapeTape against the Vicon system. Subjects performed cyclical movements along a plane angled 45° up from the horizontal using their right arms. Results revealed that the ShapeTape kinematic data was significantly larger than the Vicon data, yet statistically reliable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-687X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-170X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424441196</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424441198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4615</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457717871</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457717875</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346968</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23366929</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Arm - physiology ; Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation ; Biomechanics ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Female ; Fiber Optic Technology - instrumentation ; Humans ; Joints - physiology ; Kinematics ; Male ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation ; Movement - physiology ; Occupational Medicine - instrumentation ; Optical fiber sensors ; Optical fibers ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Shape measurement</subject><ispartof>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012-01, Vol.2012, p.4505-4508</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6346968$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2056,27924,54919</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6346968$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23366929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harley, L. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grullon, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbert, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, D. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace</title><title>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</title><addtitle>EMBC</addtitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><description>Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and accuracy of the ShapeTape system as a potential solution. This was accomplished by comparing kinematic data from the ShapeTape against the Vicon system. Subjects performed cyclical movements along a plane angled 45° up from the horizontal using their right arms. Results revealed that the ShapeTape kinematic data was significantly larger than the Vicon data, yet statistically reliable.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fiber Optic Technology - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joints - physiology</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Occupational Medicine - instrumentation</subject><subject>Optical fiber sensors</subject><subject>Optical fibers</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Shape measurement</subject><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><issn>1558-4615</issn><isbn>1424441196</isbn><isbn>9781424441198</isbn><isbn>9781457717871</isbn><isbn>1457717875</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kNtKw0AQhtcTttY-gAiyL5C6s-e9tKVVoeKFFbwre4pdbZOQpErf3mCrAz9z8X0MzI_QFZARADG306fxZEQJ0JFkXBqpj9DQKA1cKAVKKzhGfRBCZ1yCOEEXwCnnHMDI0w4QwzOp1VsPDZvmg3SjQTPCz1GPMialoaaPZtMvu97aNpUFLnPcriJ-WdkqLrrgvKxx027DLhXv2KVyE_3KFsk3OBW_6ndZf1Zr6-MlOsvtuonDwx6g19l0MXnI5s_3j5O7eZaYVG1mNKOa-CC8Fzz3IohAnVSOCzAud8wqTaN1wTKlA-UaSMyJVIQzyW3nsQG62d-ttm4Tw7Kq08bWu-XfQ51wvRdSjPEfH-pjP8aqXBI</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Harley, L. R.</creator><creator>Grullon, S. A.</creator><creator>Harbert, S. D.</creator><creator>Holmes, J.</creator><creator>Britton, D. F.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace</title><author>Harley, L. R. ; Grullon, S. A. ; Harbert, S. D. ; Holmes, J. ; Britton, D. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i367t-983280cd5cc54fc5d5d2b67b4519bfb3a782eabda378d24810ef06704364a67b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fiber Optic Technology - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joints - physiology</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Occupational Medicine - instrumentation</topic><topic>Optical fiber sensors</topic><topic>Optical fibers</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Shape measurement</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harley, L. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grullon, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbert, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, D. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harley, L. R.</au><au>Grullon, S. A.</au><au>Harbert, S. D.</au><au>Holmes, J.</au><au>Britton, D. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace</atitle><jtitle>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</jtitle><stitle>EMBC</stitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><spage>4505</spage><epage>4508</epage><pages>4505-4508</pages><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><eissn>1558-4615</eissn><isbn>1424441196</isbn><isbn>9781424441198</isbn><eisbn>9781457717871</eisbn><eisbn>1457717875</eisbn><abstract>Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and accuracy of the ShapeTape system as a potential solution. This was accomplished by comparing kinematic data from the ShapeTape against the Vicon system. Subjects performed cyclical movements along a plane angled 45° up from the horizontal using their right arms. Results revealed that the ShapeTape kinematic data was significantly larger than the Vicon data, yet statistically reliable.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>23366929</pmid><doi>10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346968</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1094-687X
ispartof 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012-01, Vol.2012, p.4505-4508
issn 1094-687X
1557-170X
1558-4615
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6346968
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Accuracy
Adult
Arm - physiology
Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation
Biomechanics
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure Analysis
Female
Fiber Optic Technology - instrumentation
Humans
Joints - physiology
Kinematics
Male
Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation
Movement - physiology
Occupational Medicine - instrumentation
Optical fiber sensors
Optical fibers
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Shape measurement
title Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A09%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20ShapeTape%20for%20studying%20biomechanics%20in%20the%20workplace&rft.jtitle=2012%20Annual%20International%20Conference%20of%20the%20IEEE%20Engineering%20in%20Medicine%20and%20Biology%20Society&rft.au=Harley,%20L.%20R.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=2012&rft.spage=4505&rft.epage=4508&rft.pages=4505-4508&rft.issn=1094-687X&rft.eissn=1558-4615&rft.isbn=1424441196&rft.isbn_list=9781424441198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346968&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_6IE%3E23366929%3C/pubmed_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781457717871&rft.eisbn_list=1457717875&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/23366929&rft_ieee_id=6346968&rfr_iscdi=true