Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace
Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2012-01, Vol.2012, p.4505-4508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4508 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 4505 |
container_title | 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society |
container_volume | 2012 |
creator | Harley, L. R. Grullon, S. A. Harbert, S. D. Holmes, J. Britton, D. F. |
description | Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and accuracy of the ShapeTape system as a potential solution. This was accomplished by comparing kinematic data from the ShapeTape against the Vicon system. Subjects performed cyclical movements along a plane angled 45° up from the horizontal using their right arms. Results revealed that the ShapeTape kinematic data was significantly larger than the Vicon data, yet statistically reliable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346968 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6346968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6346968</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>23366929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i367t-983280cd5cc54fc5d5d2b67b4519bfb3a782eabda378d24810ef06704364a67b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNtKw0AQhtcTttY-gAiyL5C6s-e9tKVVoeKFFbwre4pdbZOQpErf3mCrAz9z8X0MzI_QFZARADG306fxZEQJ0JFkXBqpj9DQKA1cKAVKKzhGfRBCZ1yCOEEXwCnnHMDI0w4QwzOp1VsPDZvmg3SjQTPCz1GPMialoaaPZtMvu97aNpUFLnPcriJ-WdkqLrrgvKxx027DLhXv2KVyE_3KFsk3OBW_6ndZf1Zr6-MlOsvtuonDwx6g19l0MXnI5s_3j5O7eZaYVG1mNKOa-CC8Fzz3IohAnVSOCzAud8wqTaN1wTKlA-UaSMyJVIQzyW3nsQG62d-ttm4Tw7Kq08bWu-XfQ51wvRdSjPEfH-pjP8aqXBI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Harley, L. R. ; Grullon, S. A. ; Harbert, S. D. ; Holmes, J. ; Britton, D. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harley, L. R. ; Grullon, S. A. ; Harbert, S. D. ; Holmes, J. ; Britton, D. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and accuracy of the ShapeTape system as a potential solution. This was accomplished by comparing kinematic data from the ShapeTape against the Vicon system. Subjects performed cyclical movements along a plane angled 45° up from the horizontal using their right arms. Results revealed that the ShapeTape kinematic data was significantly larger than the Vicon data, yet statistically reliable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-687X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-170X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424441196</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424441198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4615</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457717871</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457717875</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346968</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23366929</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Arm - physiology ; Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation ; Biomechanics ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Female ; Fiber Optic Technology - instrumentation ; Humans ; Joints - physiology ; Kinematics ; Male ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation ; Movement - physiology ; Occupational Medicine - instrumentation ; Optical fiber sensors ; Optical fibers ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Shape measurement</subject><ispartof>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012-01, Vol.2012, p.4505-4508</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6346968$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2056,27924,54919</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6346968$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23366929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harley, L. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grullon, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbert, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, D. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace</title><title>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</title><addtitle>EMBC</addtitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><description>Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and accuracy of the ShapeTape system as a potential solution. This was accomplished by comparing kinematic data from the ShapeTape against the Vicon system. Subjects performed cyclical movements along a plane angled 45° up from the horizontal using their right arms. Results revealed that the ShapeTape kinematic data was significantly larger than the Vicon data, yet statistically reliable.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fiber Optic Technology - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joints - physiology</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Occupational Medicine - instrumentation</subject><subject>Optical fiber sensors</subject><subject>Optical fibers</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Shape measurement</subject><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><issn>1558-4615</issn><isbn>1424441196</isbn><isbn>9781424441198</isbn><isbn>9781457717871</isbn><isbn>1457717875</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kNtKw0AQhtcTttY-gAiyL5C6s-e9tKVVoeKFFbwre4pdbZOQpErf3mCrAz9z8X0MzI_QFZARADG306fxZEQJ0JFkXBqpj9DQKA1cKAVKKzhGfRBCZ1yCOEEXwCnnHMDI0w4QwzOp1VsPDZvmg3SjQTPCz1GPMialoaaPZtMvu97aNpUFLnPcriJ-WdkqLrrgvKxx027DLhXv2KVyE_3KFsk3OBW_6ndZf1Zr6-MlOsvtuonDwx6g19l0MXnI5s_3j5O7eZaYVG1mNKOa-CC8Fzz3IohAnVSOCzAud8wqTaN1wTKlA-UaSMyJVIQzyW3nsQG62d-ttm4Tw7Kq08bWu-XfQ51wvRdSjPEfH-pjP8aqXBI</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Harley, L. R.</creator><creator>Grullon, S. A.</creator><creator>Harbert, S. D.</creator><creator>Holmes, J.</creator><creator>Britton, D. F.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace</title><author>Harley, L. R. ; Grullon, S. A. ; Harbert, S. D. ; Holmes, J. ; Britton, D. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i367t-983280cd5cc54fc5d5d2b67b4519bfb3a782eabda378d24810ef06704364a67b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fiber Optic Technology - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joints - physiology</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Occupational Medicine - instrumentation</topic><topic>Optical fiber sensors</topic><topic>Optical fibers</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Shape measurement</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harley, L. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grullon, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbert, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, D. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harley, L. R.</au><au>Grullon, S. A.</au><au>Harbert, S. D.</au><au>Holmes, J.</au><au>Britton, D. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace</atitle><jtitle>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</jtitle><stitle>EMBC</stitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><spage>4505</spage><epage>4508</epage><pages>4505-4508</pages><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><eissn>1558-4615</eissn><isbn>1424441196</isbn><isbn>9781424441198</isbn><eisbn>9781457717871</eisbn><eisbn>1457717875</eisbn><abstract>Motion capture systems may be difficult to use in harsh environments such as a poultry plant, and therefore should be self-contained, portable, unobtrusive, and not interfere with or be degraded by plant machinery or processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and accuracy of the ShapeTape system as a potential solution. This was accomplished by comparing kinematic data from the ShapeTape against the Vicon system. Subjects performed cyclical movements along a plane angled 45° up from the horizontal using their right arms. Results revealed that the ShapeTape kinematic data was significantly larger than the Vicon data, yet statistically reliable.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>23366929</pmid><doi>10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346968</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1094-687X |
ispartof | 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012-01, Vol.2012, p.4505-4508 |
issn | 1094-687X 1557-170X 1558-4615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6346968 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Accuracy Adult Arm - physiology Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation Biomechanics Equipment Design Equipment Failure Analysis Female Fiber Optic Technology - instrumentation Humans Joints - physiology Kinematics Male Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation Movement - physiology Occupational Medicine - instrumentation Optical fiber sensors Optical fibers Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Reliability Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Shape measurement |
title | Evaluation of the ShapeTape for studying biomechanics in the workplace |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A09%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20ShapeTape%20for%20studying%20biomechanics%20in%20the%20workplace&rft.jtitle=2012%20Annual%20International%20Conference%20of%20the%20IEEE%20Engineering%20in%20Medicine%20and%20Biology%20Society&rft.au=Harley,%20L.%20R.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=2012&rft.spage=4505&rft.epage=4508&rft.pages=4505-4508&rft.issn=1094-687X&rft.eissn=1558-4615&rft.isbn=1424441196&rft.isbn_list=9781424441198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346968&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_6IE%3E23366929%3C/pubmed_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781457717871&rft.eisbn_list=1457717875&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/23366929&rft_ieee_id=6346968&rfr_iscdi=true |