Novel cross correlation technique allows crosstalk resistant reflex detection from surface EMG

Existing methods for withdrawal reflex detection from surface electromyography (sEMG) do not consider the potential presence of electrical crosstalk, which in practical applications may entail reduced detection accuracy. This study estimated muscle fiber conduction velocities (CV) for the tibialis a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2012-01, Vol.2012, p.3531-3534
Hauptverfasser: Jensen, M. B., Frahm, K. S., Biurrun Manresa, Jose, Andersen, O. K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3534
container_issue
container_start_page 3531
container_title 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
container_volume 2012
creator Jensen, M. B.
Frahm, K. S.
Biurrun Manresa, Jose
Andersen, O. K.
description Existing methods for withdrawal reflex detection from surface electromyography (sEMG) do not consider the potential presence of electrical crosstalk, which in practical applications may entail reduced detection accuracy. This study estimated muscle fiber conduction velocities (CV) for the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) muscles of both genuine reflexes and identified crosstalk, measured during antagonistic reflex responses. These estimations were used to develop and assess a novel method for reflex detection resistant to crosstalk. Cross correlations of two single differential (SD) sEMG signals recorded along the muscle fibers were performed and two features were extracted from the resulting correlograms (average CV and maximal cross correlation). Reflex detection based on evaluation of the extracted features was compared to a conventional reflex detection method (thresholding of interval peak z-scores), applied on both SD and double differential (DD) sEMG. Intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) was used as validation for reflex detection. Apparent CV due to electrical crosstalk alone were more than one order of magnitude higher than CV estimated for genuine reflexes. Conventional reflex detection showed excellent sensitivity but poor specificity (0.19-0.76) due to the presence of crosstalk. In contrast, cross correlation analysis allowed reflex detection with significantly improved specificity (0.91-0.97). The developed methodology may be readily implemented for more reliable reflex detection.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346728
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6346728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6346728</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>23366689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i371t-e18408fc6faa083ac40bc9c9c70d02f5dbea226f8048f07ca9225da12652c2e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN1OAjEQhetfBJEHMCamL7DYabtt91IIognojSZeSUp3GlcXFtvFn7e3EXTmYk5yvjnJDCFnwAYArLgcz4ajAWfAB0pIpbnZI_1CG5C51qCNhn3ShTw3mVSQH5ATkFxKCVCow2SwQmbK6KcO6cf4ylIZMILJY9LhQiilTNElz3fNB9bUhSZG6poQsLZt1axoi-5lVb1vkNq6bj7jFmlt_UYDxiqpVZuUr_GLlpjo3y0fmiWNm-CtQzqeTU7Jkbd1xP5u9sjj9fhhdJNN7ye3o6tpVgkNbYZgJDPeKW8tM8I6yRauSK1ZybjPywVazpU3TBrPtLMF53lpgaucO45G9MjFNne9WSyxnK9DtbThe_53aALOt0CFiP_27q3iB0CPZhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel cross correlation technique allows crosstalk resistant reflex detection from surface EMG</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Jensen, M. B. ; Frahm, K. S. ; Biurrun Manresa, Jose ; Andersen, O. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jensen, M. B. ; Frahm, K. S. ; Biurrun Manresa, Jose ; Andersen, O. K.</creatorcontrib><description>Existing methods for withdrawal reflex detection from surface electromyography (sEMG) do not consider the potential presence of electrical crosstalk, which in practical applications may entail reduced detection accuracy. This study estimated muscle fiber conduction velocities (CV) for the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) muscles of both genuine reflexes and identified crosstalk, measured during antagonistic reflex responses. These estimations were used to develop and assess a novel method for reflex detection resistant to crosstalk. Cross correlations of two single differential (SD) sEMG signals recorded along the muscle fibers were performed and two features were extracted from the resulting correlograms (average CV and maximal cross correlation). Reflex detection based on evaluation of the extracted features was compared to a conventional reflex detection method (thresholding of interval peak z-scores), applied on both SD and double differential (DD) sEMG. Intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) was used as validation for reflex detection. Apparent CV due to electrical crosstalk alone were more than one order of magnitude higher than CV estimated for genuine reflexes. Conventional reflex detection showed excellent sensitivity but poor specificity (0.19-0.76) due to the presence of crosstalk. In contrast, cross correlation analysis allowed reflex detection with significantly improved specificity (0.91-0.97). The developed methodology may be readily implemented for more reliable reflex detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-687X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-170X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424441196</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424441198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4615</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457717871</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457717875</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346728</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23366689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Adult ; Correlation ; Crosstalk ; Electrodes ; Electromyography ; Electromyography - methods ; Estimation ; Humans ; Male ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscles ; Reflex ; Sensitivity and specificity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012-01, Vol.2012, p.3531-3534</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6346728$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6346728$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23366689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jensen, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frahm, K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biurrun Manresa, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, O. K.</creatorcontrib><title>Novel cross correlation technique allows crosstalk resistant reflex detection from surface EMG</title><title>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</title><addtitle>EMBC</addtitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><description>Existing methods for withdrawal reflex detection from surface electromyography (sEMG) do not consider the potential presence of electrical crosstalk, which in practical applications may entail reduced detection accuracy. This study estimated muscle fiber conduction velocities (CV) for the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) muscles of both genuine reflexes and identified crosstalk, measured during antagonistic reflex responses. These estimations were used to develop and assess a novel method for reflex detection resistant to crosstalk. Cross correlations of two single differential (SD) sEMG signals recorded along the muscle fibers were performed and two features were extracted from the resulting correlograms (average CV and maximal cross correlation). Reflex detection based on evaluation of the extracted features was compared to a conventional reflex detection method (thresholding of interval peak z-scores), applied on both SD and double differential (DD) sEMG. Intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) was used as validation for reflex detection. Apparent CV due to electrical crosstalk alone were more than one order of magnitude higher than CV estimated for genuine reflexes. Conventional reflex detection showed excellent sensitivity but poor specificity (0.19-0.76) due to the presence of crosstalk. In contrast, cross correlation analysis allowed reflex detection with significantly improved specificity (0.91-0.97). The developed methodology may be readily implemented for more reliable reflex detection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Crosstalk</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Reflex</subject><subject>Sensitivity and specificity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><issn>1558-4615</issn><isbn>1424441196</isbn><isbn>9781424441198</isbn><isbn>9781457717871</isbn><isbn>1457717875</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN1OAjEQhetfBJEHMCamL7DYabtt91IIognojSZeSUp3GlcXFtvFn7e3EXTmYk5yvjnJDCFnwAYArLgcz4ajAWfAB0pIpbnZI_1CG5C51qCNhn3ShTw3mVSQH5ATkFxKCVCow2SwQmbK6KcO6cf4ylIZMILJY9LhQiilTNElz3fNB9bUhSZG6poQsLZt1axoi-5lVb1vkNq6bj7jFmlt_UYDxiqpVZuUr_GLlpjo3y0fmiWNm-CtQzqeTU7Jkbd1xP5u9sjj9fhhdJNN7ye3o6tpVgkNbYZgJDPeKW8tM8I6yRauSK1ZybjPywVazpU3TBrPtLMF53lpgaucO45G9MjFNne9WSyxnK9DtbThe_53aALOt0CFiP_27q3iB0CPZhg</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Jensen, M. B.</creator><creator>Frahm, K. S.</creator><creator>Biurrun Manresa, Jose</creator><creator>Andersen, O. K.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Novel cross correlation technique allows crosstalk resistant reflex detection from surface EMG</title><author>Jensen, M. B. ; Frahm, K. S. ; Biurrun Manresa, Jose ; Andersen, O. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i371t-e18408fc6faa083ac40bc9c9c70d02f5dbea226f8048f07ca9225da12652c2e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Crosstalk</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Reflex</topic><topic>Sensitivity and specificity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jensen, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frahm, K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biurrun Manresa, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, O. K.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jensen, M. B.</au><au>Frahm, K. S.</au><au>Biurrun Manresa, Jose</au><au>Andersen, O. K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel cross correlation technique allows crosstalk resistant reflex detection from surface EMG</atitle><jtitle>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</jtitle><stitle>EMBC</stitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><spage>3531</spage><epage>3534</epage><pages>3531-3534</pages><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><eissn>1558-4615</eissn><isbn>1424441196</isbn><isbn>9781424441198</isbn><eisbn>9781457717871</eisbn><eisbn>1457717875</eisbn><abstract>Existing methods for withdrawal reflex detection from surface electromyography (sEMG) do not consider the potential presence of electrical crosstalk, which in practical applications may entail reduced detection accuracy. This study estimated muscle fiber conduction velocities (CV) for the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) muscles of both genuine reflexes and identified crosstalk, measured during antagonistic reflex responses. These estimations were used to develop and assess a novel method for reflex detection resistant to crosstalk. Cross correlations of two single differential (SD) sEMG signals recorded along the muscle fibers were performed and two features were extracted from the resulting correlograms (average CV and maximal cross correlation). Reflex detection based on evaluation of the extracted features was compared to a conventional reflex detection method (thresholding of interval peak z-scores), applied on both SD and double differential (DD) sEMG. Intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) was used as validation for reflex detection. Apparent CV due to electrical crosstalk alone were more than one order of magnitude higher than CV estimated for genuine reflexes. Conventional reflex detection showed excellent sensitivity but poor specificity (0.19-0.76) due to the presence of crosstalk. In contrast, cross correlation analysis allowed reflex detection with significantly improved specificity (0.91-0.97). The developed methodology may be readily implemented for more reliable reflex detection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>23366689</pmid><doi>10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346728</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1094-687X
ispartof 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012-01, Vol.2012, p.3531-3534
issn 1094-687X
1557-170X
1558-4615
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6346728
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Adult
Correlation
Crosstalk
Electrodes
Electromyography
Electromyography - methods
Estimation
Humans
Male
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Muscles
Reflex
Sensitivity and specificity
Young Adult
title Novel cross correlation technique allows crosstalk resistant reflex detection from surface EMG
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T04%3A22%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20cross%20correlation%20technique%20allows%20crosstalk%20resistant%20reflex%20detection%20from%20surface%20EMG&rft.jtitle=2012%20Annual%20International%20Conference%20of%20the%20IEEE%20Engineering%20in%20Medicine%20and%20Biology%20Society&rft.au=Jensen,%20M.%20B.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=2012&rft.spage=3531&rft.epage=3534&rft.pages=3531-3534&rft.issn=1094-687X&rft.eissn=1558-4615&rft.isbn=1424441196&rft.isbn_list=9781424441198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346728&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_6IE%3E23366689%3C/pubmed_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781457717871&rft.eisbn_list=1457717875&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/23366689&rft_ieee_id=6346728&rfr_iscdi=true