Comparison between body fat measurements obtained by portable ultrasound and caliper in young adults
The objective of this study was to compare and correlate the Portable Ultra Sound (US) measuring technique to the skinfold measuring technique (SF) to estimate body fat percentage (%F) in young adults. Sixty military were evaluated, all males, divided in two groups: Group 1 (normal) composed by 30 m...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1955 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 1952 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | 2012 |
| creator | Ulbricht, L. Neves, E. B. Ripka, W. L. Romaneli, E. F. R. |
| description | The objective of this study was to compare and correlate the Portable Ultra Sound (US) measuring technique to the skinfold measuring technique (SF) to estimate body fat percentage (%F) in young adults. Sixty military were evaluated, all males, divided in two groups: Group 1 (normal) composed by 30 military with Body Mass Index (BMI) until 24.99 kg/m 2 and Group 2 (overweight) composed by 30 military with BMI >; 25 kg/m 2 . Weight, height, skinfolds and ultrasound were measured in 9 points (triceps, subscapular, biceps, chest, medium axillary, abdominal, suprailiac, thigh and calf). Body fat average values obtained by skinfold thickness and ultrasound measurements were 13.25 ± 6.32 % and 12.73 ± 5.95 % respectively. Despite significant differences in measurements of each anatomical site, it was possible to verify that the total final body fat percentage calculated by both techniques did not present significant differences and that overweight group presented greater similarity between the values obtained using caliper and ultrasound equipment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346337 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6346337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6346337</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>23366298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i301t-5337bd3f6750fdea063cfbd136e0dff1cf0902e46a227fd4b193d5844d17a7fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtLAzEQheMNrbU_QATJH9iaSbJJ9lGXeoGKLwq-laSZyMre2GyR_fcGWh0YDpzzMXCGkGtgSwBW3K1eH8olZ8CXSkglhD4ii0IbkLnWoI2GYzKDPDeZVJCfkEuQXEoJUKjTFLBCZsrozwuyiPGbpTFgBJPn5IILoRQvzIz4smt6O1Sxa6nD8QcxaecnGuxIG7RxN2CD7Rhp50Zbteipm2jfDaN1NdJdPQ42drvWU5t2a-uqx4FWLZ2S-UWtT0S8ImfB1hEXB52Tj8fVe_mcrd-eXsr7dVYJBmOWp4bOi6B0zoJHy5TYBudBKGQ-BNgGVjCOUlnOdfDSQSF8bqT0oK0OKObkdn-337kG_aYfqsYO0-avbgJu9kCFiP_x4bniF-JVaGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison between body fat measurements obtained by portable ultrasound and caliper in young adults</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Ulbricht, L. ; Neves, E. B. ; Ripka, W. L. ; Romaneli, E. F. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ulbricht, L. ; Neves, E. B. ; Ripka, W. L. ; Romaneli, E. F. R.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to compare and correlate the Portable Ultra Sound (US) measuring technique to the skinfold measuring technique (SF) to estimate body fat percentage (%F) in young adults. Sixty military were evaluated, all males, divided in two groups: Group 1 (normal) composed by 30 military with Body Mass Index (BMI) until 24.99 kg/m 2 and Group 2 (overweight) composed by 30 military with BMI >; 25 kg/m 2 . Weight, height, skinfolds and ultrasound were measured in 9 points (triceps, subscapular, biceps, chest, medium axillary, abdominal, suprailiac, thigh and calf). Body fat average values obtained by skinfold thickness and ultrasound measurements were 13.25 ± 6.32 % and 12.73 ± 5.95 % respectively. Despite significant differences in measurements of each anatomical site, it was possible to verify that the total final body fat percentage calculated by both techniques did not present significant differences and that overweight group presented greater similarity between the values obtained using caliper and ultrasound equipment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-687X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-170X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424441196</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424441198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4615</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457717871</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457717875</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346337</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23366298</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - physiology ; Anthropometry ; Biomedical measurements ; Body composition ; Body Mass Index ; Correlation ; Educational institutions ; Estimation ; Healthcare ; Humans ; Male ; Portable Ultrasound ; Reference Standards ; Skinfold Thickness ; Thigh ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonic variables measurement ; Ultrasonics - instrumentation ; Ultrasonics - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012, Vol.2012, p.1952-1955</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6346337$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6346337$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23366298$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ulbricht, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, E. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripka, W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romaneli, E. F. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between body fat measurements obtained by portable ultrasound and caliper in young adults</title><title>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</title><addtitle>EMBC</addtitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to compare and correlate the Portable Ultra Sound (US) measuring technique to the skinfold measuring technique (SF) to estimate body fat percentage (%F) in young adults. Sixty military were evaluated, all males, divided in two groups: Group 1 (normal) composed by 30 military with Body Mass Index (BMI) until 24.99 kg/m 2 and Group 2 (overweight) composed by 30 military with BMI >; 25 kg/m 2 . Weight, height, skinfolds and ultrasound were measured in 9 points (triceps, subscapular, biceps, chest, medium axillary, abdominal, suprailiac, thigh and calf). Body fat average values obtained by skinfold thickness and ultrasound measurements were 13.25 ± 6.32 % and 12.73 ± 5.95 % respectively. Despite significant differences in measurements of each anatomical site, it was possible to verify that the total final body fat percentage calculated by both techniques did not present significant differences and that overweight group presented greater similarity between the values obtained using caliper and ultrasound equipment.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue - physiology</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Biomedical measurements</subject><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Healthcare</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Portable Ultrasound</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Skinfold Thickness</subject><subject>Thigh</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic variables measurement</subject><subject>Ultrasonics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Ultrasonics - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><issn>1558-4615</issn><isbn>1424441196</isbn><isbn>9781424441198</isbn><isbn>9781457717871</isbn><isbn>1457717875</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kFtLAzEQheMNrbU_QATJH9iaSbJJ9lGXeoGKLwq-laSZyMre2GyR_fcGWh0YDpzzMXCGkGtgSwBW3K1eH8olZ8CXSkglhD4ii0IbkLnWoI2GYzKDPDeZVJCfkEuQXEoJUKjTFLBCZsrozwuyiPGbpTFgBJPn5IILoRQvzIz4smt6O1Sxa6nD8QcxaecnGuxIG7RxN2CD7Rhp50Zbteipm2jfDaN1NdJdPQ42drvWU5t2a-uqx4FWLZ2S-UWtT0S8ImfB1hEXB52Tj8fVe_mcrd-eXsr7dVYJBmOWp4bOi6B0zoJHy5TYBudBKGQ-BNgGVjCOUlnOdfDSQSF8bqT0oK0OKObkdn-337kG_aYfqsYO0-avbgJu9kCFiP_x4bniF-JVaGg</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Ulbricht, L.</creator><creator>Neves, E. B.</creator><creator>Ripka, W. L.</creator><creator>Romaneli, E. F. R.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Comparison between body fat measurements obtained by portable ultrasound and caliper in young adults</title><author>Ulbricht, L. ; Neves, E. B. ; Ripka, W. L. ; Romaneli, E. F. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i301t-5337bd3f6750fdea063cfbd136e0dff1cf0902e46a227fd4b193d5844d17a7fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - physiology</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Biomedical measurements</topic><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Healthcare</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Portable Ultrasound</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Skinfold Thickness</topic><topic>Thigh</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic variables measurement</topic><topic>Ultrasonics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Ultrasonics - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ulbricht, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, E. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripka, W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romaneli, E. F. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ulbricht, L.</au><au>Neves, E. B.</au><au>Ripka, W. L.</au><au>Romaneli, E. F. R.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison between body fat measurements obtained by portable ultrasound and caliper in young adults</atitle><btitle>2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</btitle><stitle>EMBC</stitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><spage>1952</spage><epage>1955</epage><pages>1952-1955</pages><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><eissn>1558-4615</eissn><isbn>1424441196</isbn><isbn>9781424441198</isbn><eisbn>9781457717871</eisbn><eisbn>1457717875</eisbn><abstract>The objective of this study was to compare and correlate the Portable Ultra Sound (US) measuring technique to the skinfold measuring technique (SF) to estimate body fat percentage (%F) in young adults. Sixty military were evaluated, all males, divided in two groups: Group 1 (normal) composed by 30 military with Body Mass Index (BMI) until 24.99 kg/m 2 and Group 2 (overweight) composed by 30 military with BMI >; 25 kg/m 2 . Weight, height, skinfolds and ultrasound were measured in 9 points (triceps, subscapular, biceps, chest, medium axillary, abdominal, suprailiac, thigh and calf). Body fat average values obtained by skinfold thickness and ultrasound measurements were 13.25 ± 6.32 % and 12.73 ± 5.95 % respectively. Despite significant differences in measurements of each anatomical site, it was possible to verify that the total final body fat percentage calculated by both techniques did not present significant differences and that overweight group presented greater similarity between the values obtained using caliper and ultrasound equipment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>23366298</pmid><doi>10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346337</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 1094-687X |
| ispartof | 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012, Vol.2012, p.1952-1955 |
| issn | 1094-687X 1557-170X 1558-4615 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6346337 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | Adipose Tissue - physiology Anthropometry Biomedical measurements Body composition Body Mass Index Correlation Educational institutions Estimation Healthcare Humans Male Portable Ultrasound Reference Standards Skinfold Thickness Thigh Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonic variables measurement Ultrasonics - instrumentation Ultrasonics - methods Young Adult |
| title | Comparison between body fat measurements obtained by portable ultrasound and caliper in young adults |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A33%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20body%20fat%20measurements%20obtained%20by%20portable%20ultrasound%20and%20caliper%20in%20young%20adults&rft.btitle=2012%20Annual%20International%20Conference%20of%20the%20IEEE%20Engineering%20in%20Medicine%20and%20Biology%20Society&rft.au=Ulbricht,%20L.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=2012&rft.spage=1952&rft.epage=1955&rft.pages=1952-1955&rft.issn=1094-687X&rft.eissn=1558-4615&rft.isbn=1424441196&rft.isbn_list=9781424441198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346337&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_6IE%3E23366298%3C/pubmed_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781457717871&rft.eisbn_list=1457717875&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/23366298&rft_ieee_id=6346337&rfr_iscdi=true |