Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics

Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Bissessar, D., Gorodnichy, D. O., Stoianov, A., Thieme, M.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title
container_volume
creator Bissessar, D.
Gorodnichy, D. O.
Stoianov, A.
Thieme, M.
description Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks. In this paper, the results of independent third-party evaluation of a commercial biometric PET product are presented. The GenKey "BioCryptic® ID Management System" is evaluated against a benchmark commercial product, Neurotechnology VeriFinger version 6.3. The database contained approximately 20,000 flat fingerprint images from 1,200 subjects. For a two-finger, two images per finger enrollment, the best results are: at FMR = 0.1%, FNMR = 1.54% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system; at FMR = 0.01%, FNMR = 2.41% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system. The results also suggest that specific subjects are substantially more likely than others to cause false matches. Security issues of the PET system are briefly discussed but no security evaluation is performed. The study demonstrates the viability of fingerprint-based PETs from a matching accuracy perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/CISDA.2012.6291517
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6291517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6291517</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6291517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-b760800a71aa708679ecc7412855a8ee02b49041a6c1606baeb981e533b6f87c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81Kw0AURkdUsNa8gG7mBRLvnZnMD65CrFoouLD7MjPctCNNIpkg9O0VrKuPszmcj7F7hAoR3GO7_nhuKgEoKi0c1mgu2C0qbSQqrOUlK5yx_6zdFVsIKVyphTY3rMj5EwAkWmuNXLCnJmfKuadh5mPHv6b07eOJ03DwQ0zDns8UD8N4HPeJMu_GiYc09jRPKeY7dt35Y6bivEu2fVlt27dy8_66bptNmRzMZTAaLIA36L0Bq42jGI1CYevaWyIQQTlQ6HVEDTp4Cs4i1VIG3VkT5ZI9_GkTEe1-C3s_nXbn6_IHVblKeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Bissessar, D. ; Gorodnichy, D. O. ; Stoianov, A. ; Thieme, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bissessar, D. ; Gorodnichy, D. O. ; Stoianov, A. ; Thieme, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks. In this paper, the results of independent third-party evaluation of a commercial biometric PET product are presented. The GenKey "BioCryptic® ID Management System" is evaluated against a benchmark commercial product, Neurotechnology VeriFinger version 6.3. The database contained approximately 20,000 flat fingerprint images from 1,200 subjects. For a two-finger, two images per finger enrollment, the best results are: at FMR = 0.1%, FNMR = 1.54% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system; at FMR = 0.01%, FNMR = 2.41% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system. The results also suggest that specific subjects are substantially more likely than others to cause false matches. Security issues of the PET system are briefly discussed but no security evaluation is performed. The study demonstrates the viability of fingerprint-based PETs from a matching accuracy perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-6267</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467314169</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467314161</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467314153</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467314176</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467314152</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 146731417X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/CISDA.2012.6291517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Benchmark testing ; Biometric Encryption ; Biometrics ; Fingerprint recognition ; Performance Evaluation ; Positron emission tomography ; Privacy ; Security</subject><ispartof>2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications, 2012, p.1-9</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6291517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2051,27904,54898</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6291517$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bissessar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorodnichy, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoianov, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics</title><title>2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications</title><addtitle>CISDA</addtitle><description>Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks. In this paper, the results of independent third-party evaluation of a commercial biometric PET product are presented. The GenKey "BioCryptic® ID Management System" is evaluated against a benchmark commercial product, Neurotechnology VeriFinger version 6.3. The database contained approximately 20,000 flat fingerprint images from 1,200 subjects. For a two-finger, two images per finger enrollment, the best results are: at FMR = 0.1%, FNMR = 1.54% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system; at FMR = 0.01%, FNMR = 2.41% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system. The results also suggest that specific subjects are substantially more likely than others to cause false matches. Security issues of the PET system are briefly discussed but no security evaluation is performed. The study demonstrates the viability of fingerprint-based PETs from a matching accuracy perspective.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Benchmark testing</subject><subject>Biometric Encryption</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Fingerprint recognition</subject><subject>Performance Evaluation</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Security</subject><issn>2329-6267</issn><isbn>9781467314169</isbn><isbn>1467314161</isbn><isbn>1467314153</isbn><isbn>9781467314176</isbn><isbn>9781467314152</isbn><isbn>146731417X</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j81Kw0AURkdUsNa8gG7mBRLvnZnMD65CrFoouLD7MjPctCNNIpkg9O0VrKuPszmcj7F7hAoR3GO7_nhuKgEoKi0c1mgu2C0qbSQqrOUlK5yx_6zdFVsIKVyphTY3rMj5EwAkWmuNXLCnJmfKuadh5mPHv6b07eOJ03DwQ0zDns8UD8N4HPeJMu_GiYc09jRPKeY7dt35Y6bivEu2fVlt27dy8_66bptNmRzMZTAaLIA36L0Bq42jGI1CYevaWyIQQTlQ6HVEDTp4Cs4i1VIG3VkT5ZI9_GkTEe1-C3s_nXbn6_IHVblKeg</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Bissessar, D.</creator><creator>Gorodnichy, D. O.</creator><creator>Stoianov, A.</creator><creator>Thieme, M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics</title><author>Bissessar, D. ; Gorodnichy, D. O. ; Stoianov, A. ; Thieme, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-b760800a71aa708679ecc7412855a8ee02b49041a6c1606baeb981e533b6f87c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Benchmark testing</topic><topic>Biometric Encryption</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Fingerprint recognition</topic><topic>Performance Evaluation</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Security</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bissessar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorodnichy, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoianov, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bissessar, D.</au><au>Gorodnichy, D. O.</au><au>Stoianov, A.</au><au>Thieme, M.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics</atitle><btitle>2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications</btitle><stitle>CISDA</stitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>2329-6267</issn><isbn>9781467314169</isbn><isbn>1467314161</isbn><eisbn>1467314153</eisbn><eisbn>9781467314176</eisbn><eisbn>9781467314152</eisbn><eisbn>146731417X</eisbn><abstract>Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks. In this paper, the results of independent third-party evaluation of a commercial biometric PET product are presented. The GenKey "BioCryptic® ID Management System" is evaluated against a benchmark commercial product, Neurotechnology VeriFinger version 6.3. The database contained approximately 20,000 flat fingerprint images from 1,200 subjects. For a two-finger, two images per finger enrollment, the best results are: at FMR = 0.1%, FNMR = 1.54% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system; at FMR = 0.01%, FNMR = 2.41% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system. The results also suggest that specific subjects are substantially more likely than others to cause false matches. Security issues of the PET system are briefly discussed but no security evaluation is performed. The study demonstrates the viability of fingerprint-based PETs from a matching accuracy perspective.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/CISDA.2012.6291517</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2329-6267
ispartof 2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications, 2012, p.1-9
issn 2329-6267
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6291517
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Accuracy
Benchmark testing
Biometric Encryption
Biometrics
Fingerprint recognition
Performance Evaluation
Positron emission tomography
Privacy
Security
title Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A56%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20privacy%20enhancing%20technologies%20for%20biometrics&rft.btitle=2012%20IEEE%20Symposium%20on%20Computational%20Intelligence%20for%20Security%20and%20Defence%20Applications&rft.au=Bissessar,%20D.&rft.date=2012-07&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=2329-6267&rft.isbn=9781467314169&rft.isbn_list=1467314161&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/CISDA.2012.6291517&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6291517%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1467314153&rft.eisbn_list=9781467314176&rft.eisbn_list=9781467314152&rft.eisbn_list=146731417X&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6291517&rfr_iscdi=true