Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics
Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Bissessar, D. Gorodnichy, D. O. Stoianov, A. Thieme, M. |
description | Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks. In this paper, the results of independent third-party evaluation of a commercial biometric PET product are presented. The GenKey "BioCryptic® ID Management System" is evaluated against a benchmark commercial product, Neurotechnology VeriFinger version 6.3. The database contained approximately 20,000 flat fingerprint images from 1,200 subjects. For a two-finger, two images per finger enrollment, the best results are: at FMR = 0.1%, FNMR = 1.54% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system; at FMR = 0.01%, FNMR = 2.41% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system. The results also suggest that specific subjects are substantially more likely than others to cause false matches. Security issues of the PET system are briefly discussed but no security evaluation is performed. The study demonstrates the viability of fingerprint-based PETs from a matching accuracy perspective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/CISDA.2012.6291517 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6291517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6291517</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6291517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-b760800a71aa708679ecc7412855a8ee02b49041a6c1606baeb981e533b6f87c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81Kw0AURkdUsNa8gG7mBRLvnZnMD65CrFoouLD7MjPctCNNIpkg9O0VrKuPszmcj7F7hAoR3GO7_nhuKgEoKi0c1mgu2C0qbSQqrOUlK5yx_6zdFVsIKVyphTY3rMj5EwAkWmuNXLCnJmfKuadh5mPHv6b07eOJ03DwQ0zDns8UD8N4HPeJMu_GiYc09jRPKeY7dt35Y6bivEu2fVlt27dy8_66bptNmRzMZTAaLIA36L0Bq42jGI1CYevaWyIQQTlQ6HVEDTp4Cs4i1VIG3VkT5ZI9_GkTEe1-C3s_nXbn6_IHVblKeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Bissessar, D. ; Gorodnichy, D. O. ; Stoianov, A. ; Thieme, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bissessar, D. ; Gorodnichy, D. O. ; Stoianov, A. ; Thieme, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks. In this paper, the results of independent third-party evaluation of a commercial biometric PET product are presented. The GenKey "BioCryptic® ID Management System" is evaluated against a benchmark commercial product, Neurotechnology VeriFinger version 6.3. The database contained approximately 20,000 flat fingerprint images from 1,200 subjects. For a two-finger, two images per finger enrollment, the best results are: at FMR = 0.1%, FNMR = 1.54% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system; at FMR = 0.01%, FNMR = 2.41% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system. The results also suggest that specific subjects are substantially more likely than others to cause false matches. Security issues of the PET system are briefly discussed but no security evaluation is performed. The study demonstrates the viability of fingerprint-based PETs from a matching accuracy perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-6267</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467314169</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467314161</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467314153</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467314176</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467314152</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 146731417X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/CISDA.2012.6291517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Benchmark testing ; Biometric Encryption ; Biometrics ; Fingerprint recognition ; Performance Evaluation ; Positron emission tomography ; Privacy ; Security</subject><ispartof>2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications, 2012, p.1-9</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6291517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2051,27904,54898</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6291517$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bissessar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorodnichy, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoianov, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics</title><title>2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications</title><addtitle>CISDA</addtitle><description>Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks. In this paper, the results of independent third-party evaluation of a commercial biometric PET product are presented. The GenKey "BioCryptic® ID Management System" is evaluated against a benchmark commercial product, Neurotechnology VeriFinger version 6.3. The database contained approximately 20,000 flat fingerprint images from 1,200 subjects. For a two-finger, two images per finger enrollment, the best results are: at FMR = 0.1%, FNMR = 1.54% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system; at FMR = 0.01%, FNMR = 2.41% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system. The results also suggest that specific subjects are substantially more likely than others to cause false matches. Security issues of the PET system are briefly discussed but no security evaluation is performed. The study demonstrates the viability of fingerprint-based PETs from a matching accuracy perspective.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Benchmark testing</subject><subject>Biometric Encryption</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Fingerprint recognition</subject><subject>Performance Evaluation</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Security</subject><issn>2329-6267</issn><isbn>9781467314169</isbn><isbn>1467314161</isbn><isbn>1467314153</isbn><isbn>9781467314176</isbn><isbn>9781467314152</isbn><isbn>146731417X</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j81Kw0AURkdUsNa8gG7mBRLvnZnMD65CrFoouLD7MjPctCNNIpkg9O0VrKuPszmcj7F7hAoR3GO7_nhuKgEoKi0c1mgu2C0qbSQqrOUlK5yx_6zdFVsIKVyphTY3rMj5EwAkWmuNXLCnJmfKuadh5mPHv6b07eOJ03DwQ0zDns8UD8N4HPeJMu_GiYc09jRPKeY7dt35Y6bivEu2fVlt27dy8_66bptNmRzMZTAaLIA36L0Bq42jGI1CYevaWyIQQTlQ6HVEDTp4Cs4i1VIG3VkT5ZI9_GkTEe1-C3s_nXbn6_IHVblKeg</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Bissessar, D.</creator><creator>Gorodnichy, D. O.</creator><creator>Stoianov, A.</creator><creator>Thieme, M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics</title><author>Bissessar, D. ; Gorodnichy, D. O. ; Stoianov, A. ; Thieme, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-b760800a71aa708679ecc7412855a8ee02b49041a6c1606baeb981e533b6f87c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Benchmark testing</topic><topic>Biometric Encryption</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Fingerprint recognition</topic><topic>Performance Evaluation</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Security</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bissessar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorodnichy, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoianov, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bissessar, D.</au><au>Gorodnichy, D. O.</au><au>Stoianov, A.</au><au>Thieme, M.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics</atitle><btitle>2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications</btitle><stitle>CISDA</stitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>2329-6267</issn><isbn>9781467314169</isbn><isbn>1467314161</isbn><eisbn>1467314153</eisbn><eisbn>9781467314176</eisbn><eisbn>9781467314152</eisbn><eisbn>146731417X</eisbn><abstract>Biometric privacy-enhancing technologies (PET) include two major groups: Biometric Encryption and Cancelable Biometrics. They enhance both privacy and security of a biometric system, thus embodying the Privacy by Design principles in a way that benefits the individual and minimizes the privacy risks. In this paper, the results of independent third-party evaluation of a commercial biometric PET product are presented. The GenKey "BioCryptic® ID Management System" is evaluated against a benchmark commercial product, Neurotechnology VeriFinger version 6.3. The database contained approximately 20,000 flat fingerprint images from 1,200 subjects. For a two-finger, two images per finger enrollment, the best results are: at FMR = 0.1%, FNMR = 1.54% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system; at FMR = 0.01%, FNMR = 2.41% for the PET System and FNMR = 1.74% for the benchmark system. The results also suggest that specific subjects are substantially more likely than others to cause false matches. Security issues of the PET system are briefly discussed but no security evaluation is performed. The study demonstrates the viability of fingerprint-based PETs from a matching accuracy perspective.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/CISDA.2012.6291517</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2329-6267 |
ispartof | 2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications, 2012, p.1-9 |
issn | 2329-6267 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6291517 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Accuracy Benchmark testing Biometric Encryption Biometrics Fingerprint recognition Performance Evaluation Positron emission tomography Privacy Security |
title | Assessment of privacy enhancing technologies for biometrics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A56%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20privacy%20enhancing%20technologies%20for%20biometrics&rft.btitle=2012%20IEEE%20Symposium%20on%20Computational%20Intelligence%20for%20Security%20and%20Defence%20Applications&rft.au=Bissessar,%20D.&rft.date=2012-07&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=2329-6267&rft.isbn=9781467314169&rft.isbn_list=1467314161&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/CISDA.2012.6291517&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6291517%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1467314153&rft.eisbn_list=9781467314176&rft.eisbn_list=9781467314152&rft.eisbn_list=146731417X&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6291517&rfr_iscdi=true |