Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty
Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of moralit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on affective computing 2012, Vol.3 (4), p.434-442 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 442 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 434 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on affective computing |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Guarini, M. |
description | Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of morality will not be applicable to machines. In other words, it will turn out that when we design machines at a level of sophistication such that ethical constraints must be built into their behavior, Kant's understanding of morality will not be helpful. Specifically, the notion of duty as involving some sort of internal conflict can be jettisoned. The argument in this paper is that there are aspects of duty that can be preserved for machine ethics. The goal will not be to defend any of the details of Kant's position. Rather, it is to motivate some ways of thinking about duty that may be useful for machine ethics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.27 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6263246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6263246</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_T_AFFC_2012_27</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-bc94265494262e28a982feee859229b26eb69aa275c854a367e54aed9e24ce473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj09LxDAQxYMouKx79eIlX6A1mfxp462021VY8VLPIY1TNuK20lRhv70tK-Ic5g28eTP8CLnlLOWcmfsmKeq6TIFxSCG7ICtupEkEk-ry33xNNjG-s7mEEBqyFcnLoXdT-EZahSP2MQx9pENHn50_hB7pdjoEHx9oQSvsZh8Xs_qaTjfkqnMfETe_uiav9bYpH5P9y-6pLPaJB2WmpPVGglZy6YCQO5NDh4i5MgCmBY2tNs5BpnyupBM6w1nwzSBIjzITa5Ke7_pxiHHEzn6O4ejGk-XMLui2sQu6XdAtLIG7cyDMb_6WNWgBUosfEvtS8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Guarini, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guarini, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of morality will not be applicable to machines. In other words, it will turn out that when we design machines at a level of sophistication such that ethical constraints must be built into their behavior, Kant's understanding of morality will not be helpful. Specifically, the notion of duty as involving some sort of internal conflict can be jettisoned. The argument in this paper is that there are aspects of duty that can be preserved for machine ethics. The goal will not be to defend any of the details of Kant's position. Rather, it is to motivate some ways of thinking about duty that may be useful for machine ethics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-3045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-3045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.27</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITACBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Cognition ; Desire-obligation conflict ; duty ; Emotion recognition ; Ethics ; Human factors ; machine ethics ; Man machine systems ; obligation-obligation conflict ; Robots</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on affective computing, 2012, Vol.3 (4), p.434-442</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-bc94265494262e28a982feee859229b26eb69aa275c854a367e54aed9e24ce473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-bc94265494262e28a982feee859229b26eb69aa275c854a367e54aed9e24ce473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6263246$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,794,4012,27906,27907,27908,54741</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6263246$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guarini, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty</title><title>IEEE transactions on affective computing</title><addtitle>T-AFFC</addtitle><description>Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of morality will not be applicable to machines. In other words, it will turn out that when we design machines at a level of sophistication such that ethical constraints must be built into their behavior, Kant's understanding of morality will not be helpful. Specifically, the notion of duty as involving some sort of internal conflict can be jettisoned. The argument in this paper is that there are aspects of duty that can be preserved for machine ethics. The goal will not be to defend any of the details of Kant's position. Rather, it is to motivate some ways of thinking about duty that may be useful for machine ethics.</description><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Desire-obligation conflict</subject><subject>duty</subject><subject>Emotion recognition</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>machine ethics</subject><subject>Man machine systems</subject><subject>obligation-obligation conflict</subject><subject>Robots</subject><issn>1949-3045</issn><issn>1949-3045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj09LxDAQxYMouKx79eIlX6A1mfxp462021VY8VLPIY1TNuK20lRhv70tK-Ic5g28eTP8CLnlLOWcmfsmKeq6TIFxSCG7ICtupEkEk-ry33xNNjG-s7mEEBqyFcnLoXdT-EZahSP2MQx9pENHn50_hB7pdjoEHx9oQSvsZh8Xs_qaTjfkqnMfETe_uiav9bYpH5P9y-6pLPaJB2WmpPVGglZy6YCQO5NDh4i5MgCmBY2tNs5BpnyupBM6w1nwzSBIjzITa5Ke7_pxiHHEzn6O4ejGk-XMLui2sQu6XdAtLIG7cyDMb_6WNWgBUosfEvtS8Q</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Guarini, M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty</title><author>Guarini, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-bc94265494262e28a982feee859229b26eb69aa275c854a367e54aed9e24ce473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Desire-obligation conflict</topic><topic>duty</topic><topic>Emotion recognition</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>machine ethics</topic><topic>Man machine systems</topic><topic>obligation-obligation conflict</topic><topic>Robots</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guarini, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on affective computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guarini, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on affective computing</jtitle><stitle>T-AFFC</stitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>434</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>434-442</pages><issn>1949-3045</issn><eissn>1949-3045</eissn><coden>ITACBQ</coden><abstract>Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of morality will not be applicable to machines. In other words, it will turn out that when we design machines at a level of sophistication such that ethical constraints must be built into their behavior, Kant's understanding of morality will not be helpful. Specifically, the notion of duty as involving some sort of internal conflict can be jettisoned. The argument in this paper is that there are aspects of duty that can be preserved for machine ethics. The goal will not be to defend any of the details of Kant's position. Rather, it is to motivate some ways of thinking about duty that may be useful for machine ethics.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.27</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1949-3045 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on affective computing, 2012, Vol.3 (4), p.434-442 |
issn | 1949-3045 1949-3045 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6263246 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Cognition Desire-obligation conflict duty Emotion recognition Ethics Human factors machine ethics Man machine systems obligation-obligation conflict Robots |
title | Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A05%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conative%20Dimensions%20of%20Machine%20Ethics:%20A%20Defense%20of%20Duty&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20affective%20computing&rft.au=Guarini,%20M.&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=434&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=434-442&rft.issn=1949-3045&rft.eissn=1949-3045&rft.coden=ITACBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.27&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_T_AFFC_2012_27%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6263246&rfr_iscdi=true |