Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty

Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of moralit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on affective computing 2012, Vol.3 (4), p.434-442
1. Verfasser: Guarini, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 442
container_issue 4
container_start_page 434
container_title IEEE transactions on affective computing
container_volume 3
creator Guarini, M.
description Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of morality will not be applicable to machines. In other words, it will turn out that when we design machines at a level of sophistication such that ethical constraints must be built into their behavior, Kant's understanding of morality will not be helpful. Specifically, the notion of duty as involving some sort of internal conflict can be jettisoned. The argument in this paper is that there are aspects of duty that can be preserved for machine ethics. The goal will not be to defend any of the details of Kant's position. Rather, it is to motivate some ways of thinking about duty that may be useful for machine ethics.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.27
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6263246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6263246</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_T_AFFC_2012_27</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-bc94265494262e28a982feee859229b26eb69aa275c854a367e54aed9e24ce473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj09LxDAQxYMouKx79eIlX6A1mfxp462021VY8VLPIY1TNuK20lRhv70tK-Ic5g28eTP8CLnlLOWcmfsmKeq6TIFxSCG7ICtupEkEk-ry33xNNjG-s7mEEBqyFcnLoXdT-EZahSP2MQx9pENHn50_hB7pdjoEHx9oQSvsZh8Xs_qaTjfkqnMfETe_uiav9bYpH5P9y-6pLPaJB2WmpPVGglZy6YCQO5NDh4i5MgCmBY2tNs5BpnyupBM6w1nwzSBIjzITa5Ke7_pxiHHEzn6O4ejGk-XMLui2sQu6XdAtLIG7cyDMb_6WNWgBUosfEvtS8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Guarini, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guarini, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of morality will not be applicable to machines. In other words, it will turn out that when we design machines at a level of sophistication such that ethical constraints must be built into their behavior, Kant's understanding of morality will not be helpful. Specifically, the notion of duty as involving some sort of internal conflict can be jettisoned. The argument in this paper is that there are aspects of duty that can be preserved for machine ethics. The goal will not be to defend any of the details of Kant's position. Rather, it is to motivate some ways of thinking about duty that may be useful for machine ethics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-3045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-3045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.27</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITACBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Cognition ; Desire-obligation conflict ; duty ; Emotion recognition ; Ethics ; Human factors ; machine ethics ; Man machine systems ; obligation-obligation conflict ; Robots</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on affective computing, 2012, Vol.3 (4), p.434-442</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-bc94265494262e28a982feee859229b26eb69aa275c854a367e54aed9e24ce473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-bc94265494262e28a982feee859229b26eb69aa275c854a367e54aed9e24ce473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6263246$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,794,4012,27906,27907,27908,54741</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6263246$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guarini, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty</title><title>IEEE transactions on affective computing</title><addtitle>T-AFFC</addtitle><description>Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of morality will not be applicable to machines. In other words, it will turn out that when we design machines at a level of sophistication such that ethical constraints must be built into their behavior, Kant's understanding of morality will not be helpful. Specifically, the notion of duty as involving some sort of internal conflict can be jettisoned. The argument in this paper is that there are aspects of duty that can be preserved for machine ethics. The goal will not be to defend any of the details of Kant's position. Rather, it is to motivate some ways of thinking about duty that may be useful for machine ethics.</description><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Desire-obligation conflict</subject><subject>duty</subject><subject>Emotion recognition</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>machine ethics</subject><subject>Man machine systems</subject><subject>obligation-obligation conflict</subject><subject>Robots</subject><issn>1949-3045</issn><issn>1949-3045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj09LxDAQxYMouKx79eIlX6A1mfxp462021VY8VLPIY1TNuK20lRhv70tK-Ic5g28eTP8CLnlLOWcmfsmKeq6TIFxSCG7ICtupEkEk-ry33xNNjG-s7mEEBqyFcnLoXdT-EZahSP2MQx9pENHn50_hB7pdjoEHx9oQSvsZh8Xs_qaTjfkqnMfETe_uiav9bYpH5P9y-6pLPaJB2WmpPVGglZy6YCQO5NDh4i5MgCmBY2tNs5BpnyupBM6w1nwzSBIjzITa5Ke7_pxiHHEzn6O4ejGk-XMLui2sQu6XdAtLIG7cyDMb_6WNWgBUosfEvtS8Q</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Guarini, M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty</title><author>Guarini, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-bc94265494262e28a982feee859229b26eb69aa275c854a367e54aed9e24ce473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Desire-obligation conflict</topic><topic>duty</topic><topic>Emotion recognition</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>machine ethics</topic><topic>Man machine systems</topic><topic>obligation-obligation conflict</topic><topic>Robots</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guarini, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on affective computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guarini, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on affective computing</jtitle><stitle>T-AFFC</stitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>434</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>434-442</pages><issn>1949-3045</issn><eissn>1949-3045</eissn><coden>ITACBQ</coden><abstract>Immanuel Kant is one of the giants of moral theorizing in the western philosophical tradition. He developed a view of moral imperatives and duty that continues to inspire thought up to the present. In a thought-provoking series of papers, Anthony Beavers argues that Kant's conception of morality will not be applicable to machines. In other words, it will turn out that when we design machines at a level of sophistication such that ethical constraints must be built into their behavior, Kant's understanding of morality will not be helpful. Specifically, the notion of duty as involving some sort of internal conflict can be jettisoned. The argument in this paper is that there are aspects of duty that can be preserved for machine ethics. The goal will not be to defend any of the details of Kant's position. Rather, it is to motivate some ways of thinking about duty that may be useful for machine ethics.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.27</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1949-3045
ispartof IEEE transactions on affective computing, 2012, Vol.3 (4), p.434-442
issn 1949-3045
1949-3045
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6263246
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Cognition
Desire-obligation conflict
duty
Emotion recognition
Ethics
Human factors
machine ethics
Man machine systems
obligation-obligation conflict
Robots
title Conative Dimensions of Machine Ethics: A Defense of Duty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A05%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conative%20Dimensions%20of%20Machine%20Ethics:%20A%20Defense%20of%20Duty&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20affective%20computing&rft.au=Guarini,%20M.&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=434&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=434-442&rft.issn=1949-3045&rft.eissn=1949-3045&rft.coden=ITACBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.27&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_T_AFFC_2012_27%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6263246&rfr_iscdi=true