Specification and synthesis of hardware checkpointing and rollback mechanisms
The increasing pressure to make hardware resilient to runtime failures has prompted development of design techniques for specific classes of systems, e.g. processors and routers. However, these techniques come at increased design and verification costs, thus limiting their broader application. In th...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1232 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1226 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Chan, Carven Schwartz-Narbonne, Daniel Sethi, Divjyot Malik, Sharad |
description | The increasing pressure to make hardware resilient to runtime failures has prompted development of design techniques for specific classes of systems, e.g. processors and routers. However, these techniques come at increased design and verification costs, thus limiting their broader application. In this work we describe a methodology for general RTL designs based on the widely usable checkpointing and rollback resiliency mechanism. We take a modeling and language approach that provides an appropriate set of abstractions for the resiliency logic. This cleanly separates the main design behavior from the resiliency behavior, leading to ease of design. Further, as the language abstractions can be automatically synthesized into resiliency logic, our methodology can merge with existing design flows. The concerns of verifying this additional resiliency logic can be addressed by synthesizing behavioral assertions capturing correct behavior. We demonstrate the use of this methodology on four examples, with synthesis for performance and area to estimate the overhead of the additional synthesis logic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1145/2228360.2228585 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>acm_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6241661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6241661</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>acm_books_10_1145_2228360_2228585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a247t-4564d2ad965f9eac39ace61d681922aefdf28d4a9123f06612b416306b9b39a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtPwzAUhY0AiVI6M7BkZEnxtR0nHlHFSypiACQ268YPYpqX4kio_56UdmBkOjr3fLrDR8gl0CWAyG4YYwWXdLnLrMiOyPl0pRxAqfz4bzkhM5rzIgVKP87IIsYvSikAo1kuZ-T5tXcm-GBwDF2bYGuTuG3HysUQk84nFQ72GweXmMqZTd-Fdgzt5y83dHVdotkkjTMVtiE28YKceqyjWxxyTt7v795Wj-n65eFpdbtOkYl8TEUmhWVolcy8cmi4QuMkWFmAYgydt54VVqACxj2VElgpQHIqS1VOrOBzcrX_G5xzuh9Cg8NWSzZREqb1er-iaXTZdZuogeqdNX2wpg_WJnT5T1SXQ3Ce_wDDcmj2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Specification and synthesis of hardware checkpointing and rollback mechanisms</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Chan, Carven ; Schwartz-Narbonne, Daniel ; Sethi, Divjyot ; Malik, Sharad</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Carven ; Schwartz-Narbonne, Daniel ; Sethi, Divjyot ; Malik, Sharad</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing pressure to make hardware resilient to runtime failures has prompted development of design techniques for specific classes of systems, e.g. processors and routers. However, these techniques come at increased design and verification costs, thus limiting their broader application. In this work we describe a methodology for general RTL designs based on the widely usable checkpointing and rollback resiliency mechanism. We take a modeling and language approach that provides an appropriate set of abstractions for the resiliency logic. This cleanly separates the main design behavior from the resiliency behavior, leading to ease of design. Further, as the language abstractions can be automatically synthesized into resiliency logic, our methodology can merge with existing design flows. The concerns of verifying this additional resiliency logic can be addressed by synthesizing behavioral assertions capturing correct behavior. We demonstrate the use of this methodology on four examples, with synthesis for performance and area to estimate the overhead of the additional synthesis logic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-100X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1450311997</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781450311991</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1450311997</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781450311991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/2228360.2228585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY, USA: ACM</publisher><subject>Algorithm design and analysis ; backward error recovery ; Bit error rate ; Checkpointing ; CpR-Verilog ; Hardware ; Hardware -- Electronic design automation -- Hardware description languages and compilation ; Hardware -- Electronic design automation -- High-level and register-transfer level synthesis ; Hardware -- Hardware validation -- Functional verification ; Hardware design languages ; Radiation detectors ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>DAC Design Automation Conference 2012, 2012, p.1226-1232</ispartof><rights>2012 ACM</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6241661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,796,2058,27925,54758,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6241661$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Carven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz-Narbonne, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Divjyot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Sharad</creatorcontrib><title>Specification and synthesis of hardware checkpointing and rollback mechanisms</title><title>DAC Design Automation Conference 2012</title><addtitle>DAC</addtitle><description>The increasing pressure to make hardware resilient to runtime failures has prompted development of design techniques for specific classes of systems, e.g. processors and routers. However, these techniques come at increased design and verification costs, thus limiting their broader application. In this work we describe a methodology for general RTL designs based on the widely usable checkpointing and rollback resiliency mechanism. We take a modeling and language approach that provides an appropriate set of abstractions for the resiliency logic. This cleanly separates the main design behavior from the resiliency behavior, leading to ease of design. Further, as the language abstractions can be automatically synthesized into resiliency logic, our methodology can merge with existing design flows. The concerns of verifying this additional resiliency logic can be addressed by synthesizing behavioral assertions capturing correct behavior. We demonstrate the use of this methodology on four examples, with synthesis for performance and area to estimate the overhead of the additional synthesis logic.</description><subject>Algorithm design and analysis</subject><subject>backward error recovery</subject><subject>Bit error rate</subject><subject>Checkpointing</subject><subject>CpR-Verilog</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Hardware -- Electronic design automation -- Hardware description languages and compilation</subject><subject>Hardware -- Electronic design automation -- High-level and register-transfer level synthesis</subject><subject>Hardware -- Hardware validation -- Functional verification</subject><subject>Hardware design languages</subject><subject>Radiation detectors</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>0738-100X</issn><isbn>1450311997</isbn><isbn>9781450311991</isbn><isbn>1450311997</isbn><isbn>9781450311991</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkDtPwzAUhY0AiVI6M7BkZEnxtR0nHlHFSypiACQ268YPYpqX4kio_56UdmBkOjr3fLrDR8gl0CWAyG4YYwWXdLnLrMiOyPl0pRxAqfz4bzkhM5rzIgVKP87IIsYvSikAo1kuZ-T5tXcm-GBwDF2bYGuTuG3HysUQk84nFQ72GweXmMqZTd-Fdgzt5y83dHVdotkkjTMVtiE28YKceqyjWxxyTt7v795Wj-n65eFpdbtOkYl8TEUmhWVolcy8cmi4QuMkWFmAYgydt54VVqACxj2VElgpQHIqS1VOrOBzcrX_G5xzuh9Cg8NWSzZREqb1er-iaXTZdZuogeqdNX2wpg_WJnT5T1SXQ3Ce_wDDcmj2</recordid><startdate>20120603</startdate><enddate>20120603</enddate><creator>Chan, Carven</creator><creator>Schwartz-Narbonne, Daniel</creator><creator>Sethi, Divjyot</creator><creator>Malik, Sharad</creator><general>ACM</general><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120603</creationdate><title>Specification and synthesis of hardware checkpointing and rollback mechanisms</title><author>Chan, Carven ; Schwartz-Narbonne, Daniel ; Sethi, Divjyot ; Malik, Sharad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a247t-4564d2ad965f9eac39ace61d681922aefdf28d4a9123f06612b416306b9b39a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Algorithm design and analysis</topic><topic>backward error recovery</topic><topic>Bit error rate</topic><topic>Checkpointing</topic><topic>CpR-Verilog</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Hardware -- Electronic design automation -- Hardware description languages and compilation</topic><topic>Hardware -- Electronic design automation -- High-level and register-transfer level synthesis</topic><topic>Hardware -- Hardware validation -- Functional verification</topic><topic>Hardware design languages</topic><topic>Radiation detectors</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Carven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz-Narbonne, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Divjyot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Sharad</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Carven</au><au>Schwartz-Narbonne, Daniel</au><au>Sethi, Divjyot</au><au>Malik, Sharad</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Specification and synthesis of hardware checkpointing and rollback mechanisms</atitle><btitle>DAC Design Automation Conference 2012</btitle><stitle>DAC</stitle><date>2012-06-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>1226</spage><epage>1232</epage><pages>1226-1232</pages><issn>0738-100X</issn><isbn>1450311997</isbn><isbn>9781450311991</isbn><eisbn>1450311997</eisbn><eisbn>9781450311991</eisbn><abstract>The increasing pressure to make hardware resilient to runtime failures has prompted development of design techniques for specific classes of systems, e.g. processors and routers. However, these techniques come at increased design and verification costs, thus limiting their broader application. In this work we describe a methodology for general RTL designs based on the widely usable checkpointing and rollback resiliency mechanism. We take a modeling and language approach that provides an appropriate set of abstractions for the resiliency logic. This cleanly separates the main design behavior from the resiliency behavior, leading to ease of design. Further, as the language abstractions can be automatically synthesized into resiliency logic, our methodology can merge with existing design flows. The concerns of verifying this additional resiliency logic can be addressed by synthesizing behavioral assertions capturing correct behavior. We demonstrate the use of this methodology on four examples, with synthesis for performance and area to estimate the overhead of the additional synthesis logic.</abstract><cop>New York, NY, USA</cop><pub>ACM</pub><doi>10.1145/2228360.2228585</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0738-100X |
ispartof | DAC Design Automation Conference 2012, 2012, p.1226-1232 |
issn | 0738-100X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6241661 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Algorithm design and analysis backward error recovery Bit error rate Checkpointing CpR-Verilog Hardware Hardware -- Electronic design automation -- Hardware description languages and compilation Hardware -- Electronic design automation -- High-level and register-transfer level synthesis Hardware -- Hardware validation -- Functional verification Hardware design languages Radiation detectors Semantics |
title | Specification and synthesis of hardware checkpointing and rollback mechanisms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A51%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acm_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Specification%20and%20synthesis%20of%20hardware%20checkpointing%20and%20rollback%20mechanisms&rft.btitle=DAC%20Design%20Automation%20Conference%202012&rft.au=Chan,%20Carven&rft.date=2012-06-03&rft.spage=1226&rft.epage=1232&rft.pages=1226-1232&rft.issn=0738-100X&rft.isbn=1450311997&rft.isbn_list=9781450311991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/2228360.2228585&rft_dat=%3Cacm_6IE%3Eacm_books_10_1145_2228360_2228585%3C/acm_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1450311997&rft.eisbn_list=9781450311991&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6241661&rfr_iscdi=true |