Generating obstacle conditions for requirements completeness
Missing requirements are known to be among the major causes of software failure. They often result from a natural inclination to conceive over-ideal systems where the software-to-be and its environment always behave as expected. Obstacle analysis is a goal-anchored form of risk analysis whereby exce...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 715 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 705 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Alrajeh, D. Kramer, J. van Lamsweerde, A. Russo, A. Uchitel, S. |
description | Missing requirements are known to be among the major causes of software failure. They often result from a natural inclination to conceive over-ideal systems where the software-to-be and its environment always behave as expected. Obstacle analysis is a goal-anchored form of risk analysis whereby exceptional conditions that may obstruct system goals are identified, assessed and resolved to produce complete requirements. Various techniques have been proposed for identifying obstacle conditions systematically. Among these, the formal ones have limited applicability or are costly to automate. This paper describes a tool-supported technique for generating a set of obstacle conditions guaranteed to be complete and consistent with respect to the known domain properties. The approach relies on a novel combination of model checking and learning technologies. Obstacles are iteratively learned from counterexample and witness traces produced by model checking against a goal and converted into positive and negative examples, respectively. A comparative evaluation is provided with respect to published results on the manual derivation of obstacles in a real safety-critical system for which failures have been reported. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227147 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6227147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6227147</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6227147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i1997-23f0c96ea76e5720f4c30c16392f41fad5cf95eece51e6d21a9d016c3d6326a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURs2fRCh5AMSSF0i49zq2Y4kFRaVUqsQAzJVxrpFRk5Q4DLw9lSjTGY7ON3xC3CBUiGDv1u3LsiJAqjSRwdqciCustZEI2sCpyFCppkQidSZya5p_p_W5yIAMlIqUuRR5Sp8AgGhqS00m7lc88OTmOHwU43uand9x4cehi3Mch1SEcSom_vqOE_c8zOng-v2O50OV0rW4CG6XOD9yId4el6_tU7l5Xq3bh00Z0VpTkgzgrWZnNCtDEGovwaOWlkKNwXXKB6uYPStk3RE62wFqLzstSTspF-L2bzcy83Y_xd5NP9vjEfIXGYFNfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Generating obstacle conditions for requirements completeness</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Alrajeh, D. ; Kramer, J. ; van Lamsweerde, A. ; Russo, A. ; Uchitel, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alrajeh, D. ; Kramer, J. ; van Lamsweerde, A. ; Russo, A. ; Uchitel, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Missing requirements are known to be among the major causes of software failure. They often result from a natural inclination to conceive over-ideal systems where the software-to-be and its environment always behave as expected. Obstacle analysis is a goal-anchored form of risk analysis whereby exceptional conditions that may obstruct system goals are identified, assessed and resolved to produce complete requirements. Various techniques have been proposed for identifying obstacle conditions systematically. Among these, the formal ones have limited applicability or are costly to automate. This paper describes a tool-supported technique for generating a set of obstacle conditions guaranteed to be complete and consistent with respect to the known domain properties. The approach relies on a novel combination of model checking and learning technologies. Obstacles are iteratively learned from counterexample and witness traces produced by model checking against a goal and converted into positive and negative examples, respectively. A comparative evaluation is provided with respect to published results on the manual derivation of obstacles in a real safety-critical system for which failures have been reported.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-5257</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467310666</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467310662</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1225</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467310670</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467310654</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467310673</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467310659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Analytical models ; Computational modeling ; Encoding ; goal-oriented requirements engineering ; inductive learning ; Knowledge based systems ; Learning systems ; model checking ; model synthesis ; obstacle ; Requirements completeness ; risk identification ; Semantics ; Software</subject><ispartof>2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2012, p.705-715</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6227147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6227147$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alrajeh, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lamsweerde, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchitel, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Generating obstacle conditions for requirements completeness</title><title>2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)</title><addtitle>ICSE</addtitle><description>Missing requirements are known to be among the major causes of software failure. They often result from a natural inclination to conceive over-ideal systems where the software-to-be and its environment always behave as expected. Obstacle analysis is a goal-anchored form of risk analysis whereby exceptional conditions that may obstruct system goals are identified, assessed and resolved to produce complete requirements. Various techniques have been proposed for identifying obstacle conditions systematically. Among these, the formal ones have limited applicability or are costly to automate. This paper describes a tool-supported technique for generating a set of obstacle conditions guaranteed to be complete and consistent with respect to the known domain properties. The approach relies on a novel combination of model checking and learning technologies. Obstacles are iteratively learned from counterexample and witness traces produced by model checking against a goal and converted into positive and negative examples, respectively. A comparative evaluation is provided with respect to published results on the manual derivation of obstacles in a real safety-critical system for which failures have been reported.</description><subject>Analytical models</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Encoding</subject><subject>goal-oriented requirements engineering</subject><subject>inductive learning</subject><subject>Knowledge based systems</subject><subject>Learning systems</subject><subject>model checking</subject><subject>model synthesis</subject><subject>obstacle</subject><subject>Requirements completeness</subject><subject>risk identification</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>0270-5257</issn><issn>1558-1225</issn><isbn>9781467310666</isbn><isbn>1467310662</isbn><isbn>1467310670</isbn><isbn>1467310654</isbn><isbn>9781467310673</isbn><isbn>9781467310659</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1OwzAURs2fRCh5AMSSF0i49zq2Y4kFRaVUqsQAzJVxrpFRk5Q4DLw9lSjTGY7ON3xC3CBUiGDv1u3LsiJAqjSRwdqciCustZEI2sCpyFCppkQidSZya5p_p_W5yIAMlIqUuRR5Sp8AgGhqS00m7lc88OTmOHwU43uand9x4cehi3Mch1SEcSom_vqOE_c8zOng-v2O50OV0rW4CG6XOD9yId4el6_tU7l5Xq3bh00Z0VpTkgzgrWZnNCtDEGovwaOWlkKNwXXKB6uYPStk3RE62wFqLzstSTspF-L2bzcy83Y_xd5NP9vjEfIXGYFNfQ</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Alrajeh, D.</creator><creator>Kramer, J.</creator><creator>van Lamsweerde, A.</creator><creator>Russo, A.</creator><creator>Uchitel, S.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Generating obstacle conditions for requirements completeness</title><author>Alrajeh, D. ; Kramer, J. ; van Lamsweerde, A. ; Russo, A. ; Uchitel, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i1997-23f0c96ea76e5720f4c30c16392f41fad5cf95eece51e6d21a9d016c3d6326a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analytical models</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Encoding</topic><topic>goal-oriented requirements engineering</topic><topic>inductive learning</topic><topic>Knowledge based systems</topic><topic>Learning systems</topic><topic>model checking</topic><topic>model synthesis</topic><topic>obstacle</topic><topic>Requirements completeness</topic><topic>risk identification</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alrajeh, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lamsweerde, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchitel, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alrajeh, D.</au><au>Kramer, J.</au><au>van Lamsweerde, A.</au><au>Russo, A.</au><au>Uchitel, S.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Generating obstacle conditions for requirements completeness</atitle><btitle>2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)</btitle><stitle>ICSE</stitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>705</spage><epage>715</epage><pages>705-715</pages><issn>0270-5257</issn><eissn>1558-1225</eissn><isbn>9781467310666</isbn><isbn>1467310662</isbn><eisbn>1467310670</eisbn><eisbn>1467310654</eisbn><eisbn>9781467310673</eisbn><eisbn>9781467310659</eisbn><abstract>Missing requirements are known to be among the major causes of software failure. They often result from a natural inclination to conceive over-ideal systems where the software-to-be and its environment always behave as expected. Obstacle analysis is a goal-anchored form of risk analysis whereby exceptional conditions that may obstruct system goals are identified, assessed and resolved to produce complete requirements. Various techniques have been proposed for identifying obstacle conditions systematically. Among these, the formal ones have limited applicability or are costly to automate. This paper describes a tool-supported technique for generating a set of obstacle conditions guaranteed to be complete and consistent with respect to the known domain properties. The approach relies on a novel combination of model checking and learning technologies. Obstacles are iteratively learned from counterexample and witness traces produced by model checking against a goal and converted into positive and negative examples, respectively. A comparative evaluation is provided with respect to published results on the manual derivation of obstacles in a real safety-critical system for which failures have been reported.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227147</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-5257 |
ispartof | 2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2012, p.705-715 |
issn | 0270-5257 1558-1225 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6227147 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Analytical models Computational modeling Encoding goal-oriented requirements engineering inductive learning Knowledge based systems Learning systems model checking model synthesis obstacle Requirements completeness risk identification Semantics Software |
title | Generating obstacle conditions for requirements completeness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A27%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Generating%20obstacle%20conditions%20for%20requirements%20completeness&rft.btitle=2012%2034th%20International%20Conference%20on%20Software%20Engineering%20(ICSE)&rft.au=Alrajeh,%20D.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.spage=705&rft.epage=715&rft.pages=705-715&rft.issn=0270-5257&rft.eissn=1558-1225&rft.isbn=9781467310666&rft.isbn_list=1467310662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227147&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6227147%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1467310670&rft.eisbn_list=1467310654&rft.eisbn_list=9781467310673&rft.eisbn_list=9781467310659&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6227147&rfr_iscdi=true |