Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats
This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured d...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 182 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Maeda, K. |
description | This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured during the execution to compare all object serialization libraries. Some libraries show the performance penalty. But it is clear that there is no best solution. Each library makes good in the context it was developed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/DICTAP.2012.6215346 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6215346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6215346</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6215346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c140t-f23609d72eaa0cc7ac6da43a0d0befd6ed3af9ee177457e9ffd7d50c71adac023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9Lw0AUxFdEUGo-QS_7AUx9u5tkm2OJ_yrRFqzQW3nZfQtb0kR2o6Cf3mB7cS7D_A7DMIxNBcyEgPL2blltFuuZBCFnhRS5yoozlpR6LrJCK9BKivN_Wc0vWRLjHkZpGEl-xbZrCq4PB-wMcfrC9hMH33e8d7xv9mQGHil4bP3Pkbe-CRg8Re47vn2pb_jz2-qVY2d54zsM3_yvbYjX7MJhGyk5-YS9P9xvqqe0Xj0uq0WdGpHBkDqpCiitloQIxmg0hcVMIVhoyNmCrEJXEgmts1xT6ZzVNgejBVo0INWETY-9noh2H8EfxhG70x_qF_VaVY4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Maeda, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maeda, K.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured during the execution to compare all object serialization libraries. Some libraries show the performance penalty. But it is clear that there is no best solution. Each library makes good in the context it was developed.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781467307338</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467307335</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467307321</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467307327</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467307343</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467307345</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/DICTAP.2012.6215346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Computers ; Java ; JSON ; Libraries ; object serialization ; performance evaluation ; Protocols ; XML</subject><ispartof>2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP), 2012, p.177-182</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c140t-f23609d72eaa0cc7ac6da43a0d0befd6ed3af9ee177457e9ffd7d50c71adac023</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6215346$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6215346$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maeda, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats</title><title>2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP)</title><addtitle>DICTAP</addtitle><description>This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured during the execution to compare all object serialization libraries. Some libraries show the performance penalty. But it is clear that there is no best solution. Each library makes good in the context it was developed.</description><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Java</subject><subject>JSON</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>object serialization</subject><subject>performance evaluation</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>XML</subject><isbn>9781467307338</isbn><isbn>1467307335</isbn><isbn>9781467307321</isbn><isbn>1467307327</isbn><isbn>1467307343</isbn><isbn>9781467307345</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE9Lw0AUxFdEUGo-QS_7AUx9u5tkm2OJ_yrRFqzQW3nZfQtb0kR2o6Cf3mB7cS7D_A7DMIxNBcyEgPL2blltFuuZBCFnhRS5yoozlpR6LrJCK9BKivN_Wc0vWRLjHkZpGEl-xbZrCq4PB-wMcfrC9hMH33e8d7xv9mQGHil4bP3Pkbe-CRg8Re47vn2pb_jz2-qVY2d54zsM3_yvbYjX7MJhGyk5-YS9P9xvqqe0Xj0uq0WdGpHBkDqpCiitloQIxmg0hcVMIVhoyNmCrEJXEgmts1xT6ZzVNgejBVo0INWETY-9noh2H8EfxhG70x_qF_VaVY4</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Maeda, K.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats</title><author>Maeda, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c140t-f23609d72eaa0cc7ac6da43a0d0befd6ed3af9ee177457e9ffd7d50c71adac023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Java</topic><topic>JSON</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>object serialization</topic><topic>performance evaluation</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>XML</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maeda, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maeda, K.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats</atitle><btitle>2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP)</btitle><stitle>DICTAP</stitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>177</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>177-182</pages><isbn>9781467307338</isbn><isbn>1467307335</isbn><eisbn>9781467307321</eisbn><eisbn>1467307327</eisbn><eisbn>1467307343</eisbn><eisbn>9781467307345</eisbn><abstract>This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured during the execution to compare all object serialization libraries. Some libraries show the performance penalty. But it is clear that there is no best solution. Each library makes good in the context it was developed.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/DICTAP.2012.6215346</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISBN: 9781467307338 |
ispartof | 2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP), 2012, p.177-182 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6215346 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Computers Java JSON Libraries object serialization performance evaluation Protocols XML |
title | Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A07%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20object%20serialization%20libraries%20in%20XML,%20JSON%20and%20binary%20formats&rft.btitle=2012%20Second%20International%20Conference%20on%20Digital%20Information%20and%20Communication%20Technology%20and%20it's%20Applications%20(DICTAP)&rft.au=Maeda,%20K.&rft.date=2012-05&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=177-182&rft.isbn=9781467307338&rft.isbn_list=1467307335&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/DICTAP.2012.6215346&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6215346%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781467307321&rft.eisbn_list=1467307327&rft.eisbn_list=1467307343&rft.eisbn_list=9781467307345&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6215346&rfr_iscdi=true |