Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats

This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Maeda, K.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue
container_start_page 177
container_title
container_volume
creator Maeda, K.
description This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured during the execution to compare all object serialization libraries. Some libraries show the performance penalty. But it is clear that there is no best solution. Each library makes good in the context it was developed.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/DICTAP.2012.6215346
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6215346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6215346</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6215346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c140t-f23609d72eaa0cc7ac6da43a0d0befd6ed3af9ee177457e9ffd7d50c71adac023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9Lw0AUxFdEUGo-QS_7AUx9u5tkm2OJ_yrRFqzQW3nZfQtb0kR2o6Cf3mB7cS7D_A7DMIxNBcyEgPL2blltFuuZBCFnhRS5yoozlpR6LrJCK9BKivN_Wc0vWRLjHkZpGEl-xbZrCq4PB-wMcfrC9hMH33e8d7xv9mQGHil4bP3Pkbe-CRg8Re47vn2pb_jz2-qVY2d54zsM3_yvbYjX7MJhGyk5-YS9P9xvqqe0Xj0uq0WdGpHBkDqpCiitloQIxmg0hcVMIVhoyNmCrEJXEgmts1xT6ZzVNgejBVo0INWETY-9noh2H8EfxhG70x_qF_VaVY4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Maeda, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maeda, K.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured during the execution to compare all object serialization libraries. Some libraries show the performance penalty. But it is clear that there is no best solution. Each library makes good in the context it was developed.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781467307338</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467307335</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467307321</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467307327</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467307343</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467307345</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/DICTAP.2012.6215346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Computers ; Java ; JSON ; Libraries ; object serialization ; performance evaluation ; Protocols ; XML</subject><ispartof>2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP), 2012, p.177-182</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c140t-f23609d72eaa0cc7ac6da43a0d0befd6ed3af9ee177457e9ffd7d50c71adac023</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6215346$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6215346$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maeda, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats</title><title>2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP)</title><addtitle>DICTAP</addtitle><description>This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured during the execution to compare all object serialization libraries. Some libraries show the performance penalty. But it is clear that there is no best solution. Each library makes good in the context it was developed.</description><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Java</subject><subject>JSON</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>object serialization</subject><subject>performance evaluation</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>XML</subject><isbn>9781467307338</isbn><isbn>1467307335</isbn><isbn>9781467307321</isbn><isbn>1467307327</isbn><isbn>1467307343</isbn><isbn>9781467307345</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE9Lw0AUxFdEUGo-QS_7AUx9u5tkm2OJ_yrRFqzQW3nZfQtb0kR2o6Cf3mB7cS7D_A7DMIxNBcyEgPL2blltFuuZBCFnhRS5yoozlpR6LrJCK9BKivN_Wc0vWRLjHkZpGEl-xbZrCq4PB-wMcfrC9hMH33e8d7xv9mQGHil4bP3Pkbe-CRg8Re47vn2pb_jz2-qVY2d54zsM3_yvbYjX7MJhGyk5-YS9P9xvqqe0Xj0uq0WdGpHBkDqpCiitloQIxmg0hcVMIVhoyNmCrEJXEgmts1xT6ZzVNgejBVo0INWETY-9noh2H8EfxhG70x_qF_VaVY4</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Maeda, K.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats</title><author>Maeda, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c140t-f23609d72eaa0cc7ac6da43a0d0befd6ed3af9ee177457e9ffd7d50c71adac023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Java</topic><topic>JSON</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>object serialization</topic><topic>performance evaluation</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>XML</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maeda, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maeda, K.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats</atitle><btitle>2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP)</btitle><stitle>DICTAP</stitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>177</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>177-182</pages><isbn>9781467307338</isbn><isbn>1467307335</isbn><eisbn>9781467307321</eisbn><eisbn>1467307327</eisbn><eisbn>1467307343</eisbn><eisbn>9781467307345</eisbn><abstract>This paper compares twelve libraries of object serialization from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Those are object serialization in XML, JSON and binary formats. Using each library, a common example is serialized to a file. The size of the serialized file and the processing time are measured during the execution to compare all object serialization libraries. Some libraries show the performance penalty. But it is clear that there is no best solution. Each library makes good in the context it was developed.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/DICTAP.2012.6215346</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9781467307338
ispartof 2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP), 2012, p.177-182
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6215346
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Computers
Java
JSON
Libraries
object serialization
performance evaluation
Protocols
XML
title Performance evaluation of object serialization libraries in XML, JSON and binary formats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A07%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20object%20serialization%20libraries%20in%20XML,%20JSON%20and%20binary%20formats&rft.btitle=2012%20Second%20International%20Conference%20on%20Digital%20Information%20and%20Communication%20Technology%20and%20it's%20Applications%20(DICTAP)&rft.au=Maeda,%20K.&rft.date=2012-05&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=177-182&rft.isbn=9781467307338&rft.isbn_list=1467307335&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/DICTAP.2012.6215346&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6215346%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781467307321&rft.eisbn_list=1467307327&rft.eisbn_list=1467307343&rft.eisbn_list=9781467307345&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6215346&rfr_iscdi=true