Tuning of reinforcement learning parameters applied to OLSR using a cognitive network design tool

In wireless mesh networks, with the standard Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) metric (i.e. hop count), traffic is routed on the shortest path without considering factors such as traffic distribution and link capacities. Consequently, some nodes may get overloaded from the uneven utilization of ne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: McAuley, A., Sinkar, K., Kant, L., Graff, C., Patel, M.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2791
container_issue
container_start_page 2786
container_title
container_volume
creator McAuley, A.
Sinkar, K.
Kant, L.
Graff, C.
Patel, M.
description In wireless mesh networks, with the standard Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) metric (i.e. hop count), traffic is routed on the shortest path without considering factors such as traffic distribution and link capacities. Consequently, some nodes may get overloaded from the uneven utilization of network resources. OLSR can be modified to use other link cost metrics, with route selection based on lowest cost path. With delay as the metric, OLSR reduces average round trip time but the load-aware routes may cause wide variance in delay and packet reordering due to route oscillations. We describe a new hybrid routing approach that combines the strength of a) link state routing (e.g. fast convergence), b) load-aware routing (e.g., avoiding congested paths) and c) cognitive routing (e.g. learning to avoid path oscillations). In particular, we investigate the use of Q-learning with OLSR to increase network capacity and reduce congestion delay. We present simulation results for a 36 node dynamic mobile ad hoc network, with standard OLSR, a non-cognitive load-aware OLSR (OLSR-D) and our new hybrid cognitive load-aware OLSR (OLSR-Q). We show that OLSR-Q >; OLSR-D >; OLSR in terms of reducing delay and increasing network capacity. Furthermore, we show that, unlike conventional cognitive Q-routing protocols, our hybrid approach does not reduce performance at low load. Although OLSR-Q can significantly reduce delay and improve capacity, the learning time can reduce connectivity and the distribution of more link state information can reduce raw link capacity. We show how adding OLSR, OLSR-D and OLSR-Q as routing options into the Cognitive Network Engineering Design Analytic Toolset (C-NEDAT), we can select the best routing protocol and parameters (e.g., learning rate) for a given network and its mission. We verify simulation performance improvements by implementing the OLSR-Q in on a 9 node wireless testbed.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/WCNC.2012.6214275
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6214275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6214275</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6214275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-c99476c942b3906c5f8aefa0821cb4a72f928c4c7dafda8657be1f7a274f96383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMlOwzAURc0k0ZZ-AGLjH0ixn-clipikikpQxLJynefKkCaRk4L4eyjD6i7O0VlcQs45m3HO3OVL-VDOgHGYaeASjDogYy61EUwKBYdkxJWyBWgOR2TqjP1n2h7vGahCKM5PybjvXxkDpqQcEb_cNanZ0DbSjKmJbQ64xWagNfr8Qzqf_RYHzD31XVcnrOjQ0sX86ZHu-r3gaWg3TRrSO9IGh482v9EK-7RpvsW2PiMn0dc9Tv92Qp5vrpflXTFf3N6XV_MicaOGIjgnjQ5Owlo4poOK1mP0zAIPa-kNRAc2yGAqHytvtTJr5NF4MDI6LayYkIvfbkLEVZfT1ufP1d9V4gsEC1op</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Tuning of reinforcement learning parameters applied to OLSR using a cognitive network design tool</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>McAuley, A. ; Sinkar, K. ; Kant, L. ; Graff, C. ; Patel, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>McAuley, A. ; Sinkar, K. ; Kant, L. ; Graff, C. ; Patel, M.</creatorcontrib><description>In wireless mesh networks, with the standard Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) metric (i.e. hop count), traffic is routed on the shortest path without considering factors such as traffic distribution and link capacities. Consequently, some nodes may get overloaded from the uneven utilization of network resources. OLSR can be modified to use other link cost metrics, with route selection based on lowest cost path. With delay as the metric, OLSR reduces average round trip time but the load-aware routes may cause wide variance in delay and packet reordering due to route oscillations. We describe a new hybrid routing approach that combines the strength of a) link state routing (e.g. fast convergence), b) load-aware routing (e.g., avoiding congested paths) and c) cognitive routing (e.g. learning to avoid path oscillations). In particular, we investigate the use of Q-learning with OLSR to increase network capacity and reduce congestion delay. We present simulation results for a 36 node dynamic mobile ad hoc network, with standard OLSR, a non-cognitive load-aware OLSR (OLSR-D) and our new hybrid cognitive load-aware OLSR (OLSR-Q). We show that OLSR-Q &gt;; OLSR-D &gt;; OLSR in terms of reducing delay and increasing network capacity. Furthermore, we show that, unlike conventional cognitive Q-routing protocols, our hybrid approach does not reduce performance at low load. Although OLSR-Q can significantly reduce delay and improve capacity, the learning time can reduce connectivity and the distribution of more link state information can reduce raw link capacity. We show how adding OLSR, OLSR-D and OLSR-Q as routing options into the Cognitive Network Engineering Design Analytic Toolset (C-NEDAT), we can select the best routing protocol and parameters (e.g., learning rate) for a given network and its mission. We verify simulation performance improvements by implementing the OLSR-Q in on a 9 node wireless testbed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-3511</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467304368</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467304360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2612</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467304352</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467304351</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467304375</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467304379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/WCNC.2012.6214275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Delay ; Load modeling ; Logic gates ; Routing ; Routing protocols ; Wireless communication</subject><ispartof>2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2012, p.2786-2791</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6214275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2056,27916,54911</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6214275$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAuley, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinkar, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kant, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graff, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Tuning of reinforcement learning parameters applied to OLSR using a cognitive network design tool</title><title>2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)</title><addtitle>WCNC</addtitle><description>In wireless mesh networks, with the standard Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) metric (i.e. hop count), traffic is routed on the shortest path without considering factors such as traffic distribution and link capacities. Consequently, some nodes may get overloaded from the uneven utilization of network resources. OLSR can be modified to use other link cost metrics, with route selection based on lowest cost path. With delay as the metric, OLSR reduces average round trip time but the load-aware routes may cause wide variance in delay and packet reordering due to route oscillations. We describe a new hybrid routing approach that combines the strength of a) link state routing (e.g. fast convergence), b) load-aware routing (e.g., avoiding congested paths) and c) cognitive routing (e.g. learning to avoid path oscillations). In particular, we investigate the use of Q-learning with OLSR to increase network capacity and reduce congestion delay. We present simulation results for a 36 node dynamic mobile ad hoc network, with standard OLSR, a non-cognitive load-aware OLSR (OLSR-D) and our new hybrid cognitive load-aware OLSR (OLSR-Q). We show that OLSR-Q &gt;; OLSR-D &gt;; OLSR in terms of reducing delay and increasing network capacity. Furthermore, we show that, unlike conventional cognitive Q-routing protocols, our hybrid approach does not reduce performance at low load. Although OLSR-Q can significantly reduce delay and improve capacity, the learning time can reduce connectivity and the distribution of more link state information can reduce raw link capacity. We show how adding OLSR, OLSR-D and OLSR-Q as routing options into the Cognitive Network Engineering Design Analytic Toolset (C-NEDAT), we can select the best routing protocol and parameters (e.g., learning rate) for a given network and its mission. We verify simulation performance improvements by implementing the OLSR-Q in on a 9 node wireless testbed.</description><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Load modeling</subject><subject>Logic gates</subject><subject>Routing</subject><subject>Routing protocols</subject><subject>Wireless communication</subject><issn>1525-3511</issn><issn>1558-2612</issn><isbn>9781467304368</isbn><isbn>1467304360</isbn><isbn>1467304352</isbn><isbn>9781467304351</isbn><isbn>9781467304375</isbn><isbn>1467304379</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMlOwzAURc0k0ZZ-AGLjH0ixn-clipikikpQxLJynefKkCaRk4L4eyjD6i7O0VlcQs45m3HO3OVL-VDOgHGYaeASjDogYy61EUwKBYdkxJWyBWgOR2TqjP1n2h7vGahCKM5PybjvXxkDpqQcEb_cNanZ0DbSjKmJbQ64xWagNfr8Qzqf_RYHzD31XVcnrOjQ0sX86ZHu-r3gaWg3TRrSO9IGh482v9EK-7RpvsW2PiMn0dc9Tv92Qp5vrpflXTFf3N6XV_MicaOGIjgnjQ5Owlo4poOK1mP0zAIPa-kNRAc2yGAqHytvtTJr5NF4MDI6LayYkIvfbkLEVZfT1ufP1d9V4gsEC1op</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>McAuley, A.</creator><creator>Sinkar, K.</creator><creator>Kant, L.</creator><creator>Graff, C.</creator><creator>Patel, M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Tuning of reinforcement learning parameters applied to OLSR using a cognitive network design tool</title><author>McAuley, A. ; Sinkar, K. ; Kant, L. ; Graff, C. ; Patel, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-c99476c942b3906c5f8aefa0821cb4a72f928c4c7dafda8657be1f7a274f96383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Load modeling</topic><topic>Logic gates</topic><topic>Routing</topic><topic>Routing protocols</topic><topic>Wireless communication</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAuley, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinkar, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kant, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graff, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAuley, A.</au><au>Sinkar, K.</au><au>Kant, L.</au><au>Graff, C.</au><au>Patel, M.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Tuning of reinforcement learning parameters applied to OLSR using a cognitive network design tool</atitle><btitle>2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)</btitle><stitle>WCNC</stitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>2786</spage><epage>2791</epage><pages>2786-2791</pages><issn>1525-3511</issn><eissn>1558-2612</eissn><isbn>9781467304368</isbn><isbn>1467304360</isbn><eisbn>1467304352</eisbn><eisbn>9781467304351</eisbn><eisbn>9781467304375</eisbn><eisbn>1467304379</eisbn><abstract>In wireless mesh networks, with the standard Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) metric (i.e. hop count), traffic is routed on the shortest path without considering factors such as traffic distribution and link capacities. Consequently, some nodes may get overloaded from the uneven utilization of network resources. OLSR can be modified to use other link cost metrics, with route selection based on lowest cost path. With delay as the metric, OLSR reduces average round trip time but the load-aware routes may cause wide variance in delay and packet reordering due to route oscillations. We describe a new hybrid routing approach that combines the strength of a) link state routing (e.g. fast convergence), b) load-aware routing (e.g., avoiding congested paths) and c) cognitive routing (e.g. learning to avoid path oscillations). In particular, we investigate the use of Q-learning with OLSR to increase network capacity and reduce congestion delay. We present simulation results for a 36 node dynamic mobile ad hoc network, with standard OLSR, a non-cognitive load-aware OLSR (OLSR-D) and our new hybrid cognitive load-aware OLSR (OLSR-Q). We show that OLSR-Q &gt;; OLSR-D &gt;; OLSR in terms of reducing delay and increasing network capacity. Furthermore, we show that, unlike conventional cognitive Q-routing protocols, our hybrid approach does not reduce performance at low load. Although OLSR-Q can significantly reduce delay and improve capacity, the learning time can reduce connectivity and the distribution of more link state information can reduce raw link capacity. We show how adding OLSR, OLSR-D and OLSR-Q as routing options into the Cognitive Network Engineering Design Analytic Toolset (C-NEDAT), we can select the best routing protocol and parameters (e.g., learning rate) for a given network and its mission. We verify simulation performance improvements by implementing the OLSR-Q in on a 9 node wireless testbed.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/WCNC.2012.6214275</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1525-3511
ispartof 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2012, p.2786-2791
issn 1525-3511
1558-2612
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6214275
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Delay
Load modeling
Logic gates
Routing
Routing protocols
Wireless communication
title Tuning of reinforcement learning parameters applied to OLSR using a cognitive network design tool
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A54%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Tuning%20of%20reinforcement%20learning%20parameters%20applied%20to%20OLSR%20using%20a%20cognitive%20network%20design%20tool&rft.btitle=2012%20IEEE%20Wireless%20Communications%20and%20Networking%20Conference%20(WCNC)&rft.au=McAuley,%20A.&rft.date=2012-04&rft.spage=2786&rft.epage=2791&rft.pages=2786-2791&rft.issn=1525-3511&rft.eissn=1558-2612&rft.isbn=9781467304368&rft.isbn_list=1467304360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/WCNC.2012.6214275&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6214275%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1467304352&rft.eisbn_list=9781467304351&rft.eisbn_list=9781467304375&rft.eisbn_list=1467304379&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6214275&rfr_iscdi=true