Thermal and Thermoelectric Properties of Nanostructured versus Crystalline SiGe

Nearly 60% of the world's energy is wasted as heat. Thermoelectric materials can play an important role in green energy harvesting with their ability to convert waste heat into electricity. In this report, thermal and thermoelectric properties of p- type nanostructured silicon germanium (SiGe)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Tayebi, L., Zamanipour, Z., Mozafari, M., Norouzzadeh, P., Krasinski, J. S., Ede, K. F., Vashaee, D.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title
container_volume
creator Tayebi, L.
Zamanipour, Z.
Mozafari, M.
Norouzzadeh, P.
Krasinski, J. S.
Ede, K. F.
Vashaee, D.
description Nearly 60% of the world's energy is wasted as heat. Thermoelectric materials can play an important role in green energy harvesting with their ability to convert waste heat into electricity. In this report, thermal and thermoelectric properties of p- type nanostructured silicon germanium (SiGe) as an important high temperature thermoelectric material was studied and compared with those of crystalline SiGe. The materials were synthesized via mechanical alloying and sintering approach. The different synthesis procedures resulted in two different conformation of SiGe. The first one was in nanostructure configuration and the other was in crystalline configuration containing large grains. Thermal and thermoelectric properties of both configurations were investigated in this manuscript. Although, differential thermal analysis (DTA) did not show significant differences between the thermal characteristics of nanostructured and crystalline SiGe, there were major changes in their thermoelectric properties. The nanostructured SiGe had lower electrical conductivity owing to the large scattering rate of electron at the grain boundaries. However, the lower mobility was accompanied by small thermal conductivity in nanostructured SiGe. The Seeback coefficient was grown in nanostructured SiGe as a result of lower carrier concentration. Considering the influence of all these factors, the nanostructured SiGe was thermoelectrically preferred as the figure-of-merit was increased specially at high temperatures.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/GREEN.2012.6200959
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6200959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6200959</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6200959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-6f68c36edd446f7aa810dc10ccae4612796ebe14466bbfd4c5af2f7000ca33073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkN9KwzAYxeM_cM69gN7kBVqTNP3SXMrYqjA20V54N9L0C0a6diSdsLe36NBzcw784HA4hNxxlnLO9EP5ulisU8G4SEEwpnN9Rm64BJUxDUqck4ngAEkuVXHxDwp2-Qfg_ZrMYvxko5TSUvAJ2VQfGHampaZr6E_usUU7BG_pS-j3GAaPkfaOrk3XxyEc7HAI2NAvDPEQ6Twc42Da1ndI33yJt-TKmTbi7ORTUi0X1fwpWW3K5_njKvGaDQk4KGwG2DRSglPGFJw1ljNrDUrgQmnAGvkIoa5dI21unHBq3G1NljGVTcn9b61HxO0--J0Jx-3pl-wbj9JUXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Thermal and Thermoelectric Properties of Nanostructured versus Crystalline SiGe</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Tayebi, L. ; Zamanipour, Z. ; Mozafari, M. ; Norouzzadeh, P. ; Krasinski, J. S. ; Ede, K. F. ; Vashaee, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tayebi, L. ; Zamanipour, Z. ; Mozafari, M. ; Norouzzadeh, P. ; Krasinski, J. S. ; Ede, K. F. ; Vashaee, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Nearly 60% of the world's energy is wasted as heat. Thermoelectric materials can play an important role in green energy harvesting with their ability to convert waste heat into electricity. In this report, thermal and thermoelectric properties of p- type nanostructured silicon germanium (SiGe) as an important high temperature thermoelectric material was studied and compared with those of crystalline SiGe. The materials were synthesized via mechanical alloying and sintering approach. The different synthesis procedures resulted in two different conformation of SiGe. The first one was in nanostructure configuration and the other was in crystalline configuration containing large grains. Thermal and thermoelectric properties of both configurations were investigated in this manuscript. Although, differential thermal analysis (DTA) did not show significant differences between the thermal characteristics of nanostructured and crystalline SiGe, there were major changes in their thermoelectric properties. The nanostructured SiGe had lower electrical conductivity owing to the large scattering rate of electron at the grain boundaries. However, the lower mobility was accompanied by small thermal conductivity in nanostructured SiGe. The Seeback coefficient was grown in nanostructured SiGe as a result of lower carrier concentration. Considering the influence of all these factors, the nanostructured SiGe was thermoelectrically preferred as the figure-of-merit was increased specially at high temperatures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2166-546X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467309680</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467309684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2166-5478</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467309672</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467309660</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467309664</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467309677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/GREEN.2012.6200959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Conductivity ; Powders ; Silicon germanium ; Temperature ; Thermal conductivity ; Thermal stability</subject><ispartof>2012 IEEE Green Technologies Conference, 2012, p.1-4</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6200959$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6200959$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tayebi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamanipour, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozafari, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norouzzadeh, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krasinski, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ede, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vashaee, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Thermal and Thermoelectric Properties of Nanostructured versus Crystalline SiGe</title><title>2012 IEEE Green Technologies Conference</title><addtitle>GREEN</addtitle><description>Nearly 60% of the world's energy is wasted as heat. Thermoelectric materials can play an important role in green energy harvesting with their ability to convert waste heat into electricity. In this report, thermal and thermoelectric properties of p- type nanostructured silicon germanium (SiGe) as an important high temperature thermoelectric material was studied and compared with those of crystalline SiGe. The materials were synthesized via mechanical alloying and sintering approach. The different synthesis procedures resulted in two different conformation of SiGe. The first one was in nanostructure configuration and the other was in crystalline configuration containing large grains. Thermal and thermoelectric properties of both configurations were investigated in this manuscript. Although, differential thermal analysis (DTA) did not show significant differences between the thermal characteristics of nanostructured and crystalline SiGe, there were major changes in their thermoelectric properties. The nanostructured SiGe had lower electrical conductivity owing to the large scattering rate of electron at the grain boundaries. However, the lower mobility was accompanied by small thermal conductivity in nanostructured SiGe. The Seeback coefficient was grown in nanostructured SiGe as a result of lower carrier concentration. Considering the influence of all these factors, the nanostructured SiGe was thermoelectrically preferred as the figure-of-merit was increased specially at high temperatures.</description><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Powders</subject><subject>Silicon germanium</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thermal conductivity</subject><subject>Thermal stability</subject><issn>2166-546X</issn><issn>2166-5478</issn><isbn>1467309680</isbn><isbn>9781467309684</isbn><isbn>1467309672</isbn><isbn>9781467309660</isbn><isbn>1467309664</isbn><isbn>9781467309677</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkN9KwzAYxeM_cM69gN7kBVqTNP3SXMrYqjA20V54N9L0C0a6diSdsLe36NBzcw784HA4hNxxlnLO9EP5ulisU8G4SEEwpnN9Rm64BJUxDUqck4ngAEkuVXHxDwp2-Qfg_ZrMYvxko5TSUvAJ2VQfGHampaZr6E_usUU7BG_pS-j3GAaPkfaOrk3XxyEc7HAI2NAvDPEQ6Twc42Da1ndI33yJt-TKmTbi7ORTUi0X1fwpWW3K5_njKvGaDQk4KGwG2DRSglPGFJw1ljNrDUrgQmnAGvkIoa5dI21unHBq3G1NljGVTcn9b61HxO0--J0Jx-3pl-wbj9JUXw</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Tayebi, L.</creator><creator>Zamanipour, Z.</creator><creator>Mozafari, M.</creator><creator>Norouzzadeh, P.</creator><creator>Krasinski, J. S.</creator><creator>Ede, K. F.</creator><creator>Vashaee, D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Thermal and Thermoelectric Properties of Nanostructured versus Crystalline SiGe</title><author>Tayebi, L. ; Zamanipour, Z. ; Mozafari, M. ; Norouzzadeh, P. ; Krasinski, J. S. ; Ede, K. F. ; Vashaee, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-6f68c36edd446f7aa810dc10ccae4612796ebe14466bbfd4c5af2f7000ca33073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Powders</topic><topic>Silicon germanium</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thermal conductivity</topic><topic>Thermal stability</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tayebi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamanipour, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozafari, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norouzzadeh, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krasinski, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ede, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vashaee, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tayebi, L.</au><au>Zamanipour, Z.</au><au>Mozafari, M.</au><au>Norouzzadeh, P.</au><au>Krasinski, J. S.</au><au>Ede, K. F.</au><au>Vashaee, D.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Thermal and Thermoelectric Properties of Nanostructured versus Crystalline SiGe</atitle><btitle>2012 IEEE Green Technologies Conference</btitle><stitle>GREEN</stitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><issn>2166-546X</issn><eissn>2166-5478</eissn><isbn>1467309680</isbn><isbn>9781467309684</isbn><eisbn>1467309672</eisbn><eisbn>9781467309660</eisbn><eisbn>1467309664</eisbn><eisbn>9781467309677</eisbn><abstract>Nearly 60% of the world's energy is wasted as heat. Thermoelectric materials can play an important role in green energy harvesting with their ability to convert waste heat into electricity. In this report, thermal and thermoelectric properties of p- type nanostructured silicon germanium (SiGe) as an important high temperature thermoelectric material was studied and compared with those of crystalline SiGe. The materials were synthesized via mechanical alloying and sintering approach. The different synthesis procedures resulted in two different conformation of SiGe. The first one was in nanostructure configuration and the other was in crystalline configuration containing large grains. Thermal and thermoelectric properties of both configurations were investigated in this manuscript. Although, differential thermal analysis (DTA) did not show significant differences between the thermal characteristics of nanostructured and crystalline SiGe, there were major changes in their thermoelectric properties. The nanostructured SiGe had lower electrical conductivity owing to the large scattering rate of electron at the grain boundaries. However, the lower mobility was accompanied by small thermal conductivity in nanostructured SiGe. The Seeback coefficient was grown in nanostructured SiGe as a result of lower carrier concentration. Considering the influence of all these factors, the nanostructured SiGe was thermoelectrically preferred as the figure-of-merit was increased specially at high temperatures.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/GREEN.2012.6200959</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2166-546X
ispartof 2012 IEEE Green Technologies Conference, 2012, p.1-4
issn 2166-546X
2166-5478
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6200959
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Conductivity
Powders
Silicon germanium
Temperature
Thermal conductivity
Thermal stability
title Thermal and Thermoelectric Properties of Nanostructured versus Crystalline SiGe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A51%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Thermal%20and%20Thermoelectric%20Properties%20of%20Nanostructured%20versus%20Crystalline%20SiGe&rft.btitle=2012%20IEEE%20Green%20Technologies%20Conference&rft.au=Tayebi,%20L.&rft.date=2012-04&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.issn=2166-546X&rft.eissn=2166-5478&rft.isbn=1467309680&rft.isbn_list=9781467309684&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/GREEN.2012.6200959&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6200959%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1467309672&rft.eisbn_list=9781467309660&rft.eisbn_list=1467309664&rft.eisbn_list=9781467309677&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6200959&rfr_iscdi=true