Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions

This paper examines the potential effectiveness of the following three precollision system (PCS) algorithms: 1) forward collision warning only; 2) forward collision warning and precrash brake assist; and 3) forward collision warning, precrash brake assist, and autonomous precrash brake. Real-world r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 2012-12, Vol.13 (4), p.1546-1555
Hauptverfasser: Kusano, K. D., Gabler, H. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1555
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1546
container_title IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems
container_volume 13
creator Kusano, K. D.
Gabler, H. C.
description This paper examines the potential effectiveness of the following three precollision system (PCS) algorithms: 1) forward collision warning only; 2) forward collision warning and precrash brake assist; and 3) forward collision warning, precrash brake assist, and autonomous precrash brake. Real-world rear-end crashes were extracted from a nationally representative sample of collisions in the United States. A sample of 1396 collisions, corresponding to 1.1 million crashes, were computationally simulated as if they occurred, with the driver operating a precollision-system-equipped vehicle. A probability-based framework was developed to account for the variable driver reaction to the warning system. As more components were added to the algorithms, greater benefits were realized. The results indicate that the exemplar PCS investigated in this paper could reduce the severity (i.e., ΔV) of the collision between 14% and 34%. The number of moderately to fatally injured drivers who wore their seat belts could have been reduced by 29% to 50%. These collision-mitigating algorithms could have prevented 3.2% to 7.7% of rear-end collisions. This paper shows the dramatic reductions in serious and fatal injuries that a PCS, which is one of the first intelligent vehicle technologies to be deployed in production cars, can bring to highway safety when available throughout the fleet. This paper also presents the framework of an innovative safety benefits methodology that, when adapted to other emerging active safety technologies, can be employed to estimate potential reductions in the frequency and severity of highway crashes.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TITS.2012.2191542
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6180219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6180219</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TITS_2012_2191542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-39aa348ec56bb8e40c731a1df5a0d6d5692fc5a714e26587e97ee19985faca313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKw0AQhhdRsFYfQLzsAzRxJ8km2WNbWi0UBFvxGKbJrKy2u7qbIn17E1vE0wwz__8dPsZuQcQAQt2vF-tVnAhI4gQUyCw5YwOQsoyEgPy835MsUkKKS3YVwnt3zSTAgH2tUFN74BOypE0buNN87vw3-oZP3XZrgnGWv6K3xr6N-MTjB_FxCCa0I4624eN966zbuX34fXYpvjqElnaBG8ufCX00s_9Y4ZpdaNwGujnNIXuZz9bTx2j59LCYjpdRnULaRqlCTLOSaplvNiVloi5SQGi0RNHkjcxVomuJBWSU5LIsSBVEoFQpNdbYIYYMjtzauxA86erTmx36QwWi6p1VvbOqd1adnHWdu2PHENFfPodSdIn0B4sJaVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Kusano, K. D. ; Gabler, H. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kusano, K. D. ; Gabler, H. C.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the potential effectiveness of the following three precollision system (PCS) algorithms: 1) forward collision warning only; 2) forward collision warning and precrash brake assist; and 3) forward collision warning, precrash brake assist, and autonomous precrash brake. Real-world rear-end crashes were extracted from a nationally representative sample of collisions in the United States. A sample of 1396 collisions, corresponding to 1.1 million crashes, were computationally simulated as if they occurred, with the driver operating a precollision-system-equipped vehicle. A probability-based framework was developed to account for the variable driver reaction to the warning system. As more components were added to the algorithms, greater benefits were realized. The results indicate that the exemplar PCS investigated in this paper could reduce the severity (i.e., ΔV) of the collision between 14% and 34%. The number of moderately to fatally injured drivers who wore their seat belts could have been reduced by 29% to 50%. These collision-mitigating algorithms could have prevented 3.2% to 7.7% of rear-end collisions. This paper shows the dramatic reductions in serious and fatal injuries that a PCS, which is one of the first intelligent vehicle technologies to be deployed in production cars, can bring to highway safety when available throughout the fleet. This paper also presents the framework of an innovative safety benefits methodology that, when adapted to other emerging active safety technologies, can be employed to estimate potential reductions in the frequency and severity of highway crashes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-9050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2012.2191542</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITISFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithm design and analysis ; Collision avoidance ; Crash-imminent braking ; intelligent transportation systems (ITSs) ; precollision system (PCS) ; rear-end collisions ; safety systems ; Vehicle crash testing ; Vehicle safety</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2012-12, Vol.13 (4), p.1546-1555</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-39aa348ec56bb8e40c731a1df5a0d6d5692fc5a714e26587e97ee19985faca313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-39aa348ec56bb8e40c731a1df5a0d6d5692fc5a714e26587e97ee19985faca313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6180219$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,793,27905,27906,54739</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6180219$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kusano, K. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabler, H. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions</title><title>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</title><addtitle>TITS</addtitle><description>This paper examines the potential effectiveness of the following three precollision system (PCS) algorithms: 1) forward collision warning only; 2) forward collision warning and precrash brake assist; and 3) forward collision warning, precrash brake assist, and autonomous precrash brake. Real-world rear-end crashes were extracted from a nationally representative sample of collisions in the United States. A sample of 1396 collisions, corresponding to 1.1 million crashes, were computationally simulated as if they occurred, with the driver operating a precollision-system-equipped vehicle. A probability-based framework was developed to account for the variable driver reaction to the warning system. As more components were added to the algorithms, greater benefits were realized. The results indicate that the exemplar PCS investigated in this paper could reduce the severity (i.e., ΔV) of the collision between 14% and 34%. The number of moderately to fatally injured drivers who wore their seat belts could have been reduced by 29% to 50%. These collision-mitigating algorithms could have prevented 3.2% to 7.7% of rear-end collisions. This paper shows the dramatic reductions in serious and fatal injuries that a PCS, which is one of the first intelligent vehicle technologies to be deployed in production cars, can bring to highway safety when available throughout the fleet. This paper also presents the framework of an innovative safety benefits methodology that, when adapted to other emerging active safety technologies, can be employed to estimate potential reductions in the frequency and severity of highway crashes.</description><subject>Algorithm design and analysis</subject><subject>Collision avoidance</subject><subject>Crash-imminent braking</subject><subject>intelligent transportation systems (ITSs)</subject><subject>precollision system (PCS)</subject><subject>rear-end collisions</subject><subject>safety systems</subject><subject>Vehicle crash testing</subject><subject>Vehicle safety</subject><issn>1524-9050</issn><issn>1558-0016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKw0AQhhdRsFYfQLzsAzRxJ8km2WNbWi0UBFvxGKbJrKy2u7qbIn17E1vE0wwz__8dPsZuQcQAQt2vF-tVnAhI4gQUyCw5YwOQsoyEgPy835MsUkKKS3YVwnt3zSTAgH2tUFN74BOypE0buNN87vw3-oZP3XZrgnGWv6K3xr6N-MTjB_FxCCa0I4624eN966zbuX34fXYpvjqElnaBG8ufCX00s_9Y4ZpdaNwGujnNIXuZz9bTx2j59LCYjpdRnULaRqlCTLOSaplvNiVloi5SQGi0RNHkjcxVomuJBWSU5LIsSBVEoFQpNdbYIYYMjtzauxA86erTmx36QwWi6p1VvbOqd1adnHWdu2PHENFfPodSdIn0B4sJaVc</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Kusano, K. D.</creator><creator>Gabler, H. C.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions</title><author>Kusano, K. D. ; Gabler, H. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-39aa348ec56bb8e40c731a1df5a0d6d5692fc5a714e26587e97ee19985faca313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Algorithm design and analysis</topic><topic>Collision avoidance</topic><topic>Crash-imminent braking</topic><topic>intelligent transportation systems (ITSs)</topic><topic>precollision system (PCS)</topic><topic>rear-end collisions</topic><topic>safety systems</topic><topic>Vehicle crash testing</topic><topic>Vehicle safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kusano, K. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabler, H. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kusano, K. D.</au><au>Gabler, H. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</jtitle><stitle>TITS</stitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1546</spage><epage>1555</epage><pages>1546-1555</pages><issn>1524-9050</issn><eissn>1558-0016</eissn><coden>ITISFG</coden><abstract>This paper examines the potential effectiveness of the following three precollision system (PCS) algorithms: 1) forward collision warning only; 2) forward collision warning and precrash brake assist; and 3) forward collision warning, precrash brake assist, and autonomous precrash brake. Real-world rear-end crashes were extracted from a nationally representative sample of collisions in the United States. A sample of 1396 collisions, corresponding to 1.1 million crashes, were computationally simulated as if they occurred, with the driver operating a precollision-system-equipped vehicle. A probability-based framework was developed to account for the variable driver reaction to the warning system. As more components were added to the algorithms, greater benefits were realized. The results indicate that the exemplar PCS investigated in this paper could reduce the severity (i.e., ΔV) of the collision between 14% and 34%. The number of moderately to fatally injured drivers who wore their seat belts could have been reduced by 29% to 50%. These collision-mitigating algorithms could have prevented 3.2% to 7.7% of rear-end collisions. This paper shows the dramatic reductions in serious and fatal injuries that a PCS, which is one of the first intelligent vehicle technologies to be deployed in production cars, can bring to highway safety when available throughout the fleet. This paper also presents the framework of an innovative safety benefits methodology that, when adapted to other emerging active safety technologies, can be employed to estimate potential reductions in the frequency and severity of highway crashes.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TITS.2012.2191542</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1524-9050
ispartof IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2012-12, Vol.13 (4), p.1546-1555
issn 1524-9050
1558-0016
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6180219
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Algorithm design and analysis
Collision avoidance
Crash-imminent braking
intelligent transportation systems (ITSs)
precollision system (PCS)
rear-end collisions
safety systems
Vehicle crash testing
Vehicle safety
title Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A17%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20Benefits%20of%20Forward%20Collision%20Warning,%20Brake%20Assist,%20and%20Autonomous%20Braking%20Systems%20in%20Rear-End%20Collisions&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20intelligent%20transportation%20systems&rft.au=Kusano,%20K.%20D.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1546&rft.epage=1555&rft.pages=1546-1555&rft.issn=1524-9050&rft.eissn=1558-0016&rft.coden=ITISFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TITS.2012.2191542&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_TITS_2012_2191542%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6180219&rfr_iscdi=true