Using ASCAT Scatterometer Winds to Evaluate Relative Biases in the QuikSCAT-Derived Wind Vorticity

Relative wind vorticity ω (hereafter vorticity) is a crucial parameter to understand the spatial features of the wind field. In the Mediterranean Sea, which is the area where this study is focused, these are particularly interesting because they are often the effects of the interaction between the a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2012-07, Vol.50 (7), p.2518-2524
Hauptverfasser: Zecchetto, S., Accadia, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2524
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2518
container_title IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing
container_volume 50
creator Zecchetto, S.
Accadia, C.
description Relative wind vorticity ω (hereafter vorticity) is a crucial parameter to understand the spatial features of the wind field. In the Mediterranean Sea, which is the area where this study is focused, these are particularly interesting because they are often the effects of the interaction between the airflow and the orography. Wind vorticity has been derived from both Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT) and Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) 12.5-km scatterometer data downloaded from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center data archive, and compared in the period from March to November 2009. The monthly mean fields of the vorticity ω̅ show discrepancies which need to be understood. This paper thus aims to understand the nature of these differences, to make the two vorticity data sets compatible and usable as a common data set. Results have been provided in terms of the relative bias in vorticity 〈Δ̅ω̅〉, which is the mean difference between the ASCAT ω̅ A and QuikSCAT ω̅ Q monthly mean vorticities averaged over the entire Mediterranean Basin and the entire study period. This difference 〈Δ̅ω̅〉 = 0.093 ·10 -5 ±0.05 ·10 -5 s -1 ) is mainly due to a relative vorticity bias in the cyclonic component of ω̅, rather than in the anticyclonic component, whose bias is four times smaller. This bias does not depend significantly on the variable accuracy of the wind speed and direction across the QuikSCAT swath. This study led us to define and analyze the so-called vorticity noise, which is present particularly in the QuikSCAT-derived vorticity, to understand if, and how, it can contribute to the relative bias in vorticity. The contribution of this kind of noise on ω̅ has been found relevant only for the cyclonic vorticity of ω̅ Q . By applying a cyclonic denoising to each swath of QuikSCAT, 〈Δ̅ω̅〉 = -0.016 ·10 -5 ±0.05 ·10 -5 s -1 is obtained, drastically reduced with respect to the initial value. This may be considered the typical bias over the Mediterranean Sea between ω̅ A and (ω̅ Q derived from the 12.5-km data, after applying the cyclonic denoising to QuikSCAT vorticity fields.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184125
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6161635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6161635</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TGRS_2012_2184125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-207a077db7bdf9e2029ce6ce83889cbd1d53bcf3ae70ddb9ceef837c4411eaf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAYiNfyDFY8exsyylLUiVEH3AMnLsCRjaBsVupf49Ca3QSDOLe88sDiG3wAYALL9fTueLAWfABxx0ClyekR5IqROWpek56THIs4TrnF-SqxC-GINUguqRchX89oMOF6Phki6siRGbeoPtpu9-6wKNNR3vzXpnItI5rk30e6QP3gQM1G9p_ET6uvPfHZ88YtOm7o-kb3UTvfXxcE0uKrMOeHO6fbKajJejp2T2Mn0eDWeJ5ZmMCWfKMKVcqUpX5cgZzy1mFrXQOrelAydFaSthUDHnyjbESgtl0xQATZWJPoHjX9vUITRYFT-N35jmUAArOklFJ6noJBUnSS1zd2Q8Iv73M2hHSPELl9dkhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using ASCAT Scatterometer Winds to Evaluate Relative Biases in the QuikSCAT-Derived Wind Vorticity</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Zecchetto, S. ; Accadia, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zecchetto, S. ; Accadia, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Relative wind vorticity ω (hereafter vorticity) is a crucial parameter to understand the spatial features of the wind field. In the Mediterranean Sea, which is the area where this study is focused, these are particularly interesting because they are often the effects of the interaction between the airflow and the orography. Wind vorticity has been derived from both Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT) and Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) 12.5-km scatterometer data downloaded from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center data archive, and compared in the period from March to November 2009. The monthly mean fields of the vorticity ω̅ show discrepancies which need to be understood. This paper thus aims to understand the nature of these differences, to make the two vorticity data sets compatible and usable as a common data set. Results have been provided in terms of the relative bias in vorticity 〈Δ̅ω̅〉, which is the mean difference between the ASCAT ω̅ A and QuikSCAT ω̅ Q monthly mean vorticities averaged over the entire Mediterranean Basin and the entire study period. This difference 〈Δ̅ω̅〉 = 0.093 ·10 -5 ±0.05 ·10 -5 s -1 ) is mainly due to a relative vorticity bias in the cyclonic component of ω̅, rather than in the anticyclonic component, whose bias is four times smaller. This bias does not depend significantly on the variable accuracy of the wind speed and direction across the QuikSCAT swath. This study led us to define and analyze the so-called vorticity noise, which is present particularly in the QuikSCAT-derived vorticity, to understand if, and how, it can contribute to the relative bias in vorticity. The contribution of this kind of noise on ω̅ has been found relevant only for the cyclonic vorticity of ω̅ Q . By applying a cyclonic denoising to each swath of QuikSCAT, 〈Δ̅ω̅〉 = -0.016 ·10 -5 ±0.05 ·10 -5 s -1 is obtained, drastically reduced with respect to the initial value. This may be considered the typical bias over the Mediterranean Sea between ω̅ A and (ω̅ Q derived from the 12.5-km data, after applying the cyclonic denoising to QuikSCAT vorticity fields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-2892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184125</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IGRSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Geophysical signal processing ; meteorology ; Noise ; oceans ; Radar measurements ; Rain ; Satellites ; Spaceborne radar ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2012-07, Vol.50 (7), p.2518-2524</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-207a077db7bdf9e2029ce6ce83889cbd1d53bcf3ae70ddb9ceef837c4411eaf63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-207a077db7bdf9e2029ce6ce83889cbd1d53bcf3ae70ddb9ceef837c4411eaf63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6161635$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6161635$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zecchetto, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accadia, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Using ASCAT Scatterometer Winds to Evaluate Relative Biases in the QuikSCAT-Derived Wind Vorticity</title><title>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</title><addtitle>TGRS</addtitle><description>Relative wind vorticity ω (hereafter vorticity) is a crucial parameter to understand the spatial features of the wind field. In the Mediterranean Sea, which is the area where this study is focused, these are particularly interesting because they are often the effects of the interaction between the airflow and the orography. Wind vorticity has been derived from both Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT) and Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) 12.5-km scatterometer data downloaded from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center data archive, and compared in the period from March to November 2009. The monthly mean fields of the vorticity ω̅ show discrepancies which need to be understood. This paper thus aims to understand the nature of these differences, to make the two vorticity data sets compatible and usable as a common data set. Results have been provided in terms of the relative bias in vorticity 〈Δ̅ω̅〉, which is the mean difference between the ASCAT ω̅ A and QuikSCAT ω̅ Q monthly mean vorticities averaged over the entire Mediterranean Basin and the entire study period. This difference 〈Δ̅ω̅〉 = 0.093 ·10 -5 ±0.05 ·10 -5 s -1 ) is mainly due to a relative vorticity bias in the cyclonic component of ω̅, rather than in the anticyclonic component, whose bias is four times smaller. This bias does not depend significantly on the variable accuracy of the wind speed and direction across the QuikSCAT swath. This study led us to define and analyze the so-called vorticity noise, which is present particularly in the QuikSCAT-derived vorticity, to understand if, and how, it can contribute to the relative bias in vorticity. The contribution of this kind of noise on ω̅ has been found relevant only for the cyclonic vorticity of ω̅ Q . By applying a cyclonic denoising to each swath of QuikSCAT, 〈Δ̅ω̅〉 = -0.016 ·10 -5 ±0.05 ·10 -5 s -1 is obtained, drastically reduced with respect to the initial value. This may be considered the typical bias over the Mediterranean Sea between ω̅ A and (ω̅ Q derived from the 12.5-km data, after applying the cyclonic denoising to QuikSCAT vorticity fields.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Geophysical signal processing</subject><subject>meteorology</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>oceans</subject><subject>Radar measurements</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spaceborne radar</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0196-2892</issn><issn>1558-0644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAYiNfyDFY8exsyylLUiVEH3AMnLsCRjaBsVupf49Ca3QSDOLe88sDiG3wAYALL9fTueLAWfABxx0ClyekR5IqROWpek56THIs4TrnF-SqxC-GINUguqRchX89oMOF6Phki6siRGbeoPtpu9-6wKNNR3vzXpnItI5rk30e6QP3gQM1G9p_ET6uvPfHZ88YtOm7o-kb3UTvfXxcE0uKrMOeHO6fbKajJejp2T2Mn0eDWeJ5ZmMCWfKMKVcqUpX5cgZzy1mFrXQOrelAydFaSthUDHnyjbESgtl0xQATZWJPoHjX9vUITRYFT-N35jmUAArOklFJ6noJBUnSS1zd2Q8Iv73M2hHSPELl9dkhw</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Zecchetto, S.</creator><creator>Accadia, C.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Using ASCAT Scatterometer Winds to Evaluate Relative Biases in the QuikSCAT-Derived Wind Vorticity</title><author>Zecchetto, S. ; Accadia, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-207a077db7bdf9e2029ce6ce83889cbd1d53bcf3ae70ddb9ceef837c4411eaf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Geophysical signal processing</topic><topic>meteorology</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>oceans</topic><topic>Radar measurements</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spaceborne radar</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zecchetto, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accadia, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zecchetto, S.</au><au>Accadia, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using ASCAT Scatterometer Winds to Evaluate Relative Biases in the QuikSCAT-Derived Wind Vorticity</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle><stitle>TGRS</stitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2518</spage><epage>2524</epage><pages>2518-2524</pages><issn>0196-2892</issn><eissn>1558-0644</eissn><coden>IGRSD2</coden><abstract>Relative wind vorticity ω (hereafter vorticity) is a crucial parameter to understand the spatial features of the wind field. In the Mediterranean Sea, which is the area where this study is focused, these are particularly interesting because they are often the effects of the interaction between the airflow and the orography. Wind vorticity has been derived from both Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT) and Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) 12.5-km scatterometer data downloaded from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center data archive, and compared in the period from March to November 2009. The monthly mean fields of the vorticity ω̅ show discrepancies which need to be understood. This paper thus aims to understand the nature of these differences, to make the two vorticity data sets compatible and usable as a common data set. Results have been provided in terms of the relative bias in vorticity 〈Δ̅ω̅〉, which is the mean difference between the ASCAT ω̅ A and QuikSCAT ω̅ Q monthly mean vorticities averaged over the entire Mediterranean Basin and the entire study period. This difference 〈Δ̅ω̅〉 = 0.093 ·10 -5 ±0.05 ·10 -5 s -1 ) is mainly due to a relative vorticity bias in the cyclonic component of ω̅, rather than in the anticyclonic component, whose bias is four times smaller. This bias does not depend significantly on the variable accuracy of the wind speed and direction across the QuikSCAT swath. This study led us to define and analyze the so-called vorticity noise, which is present particularly in the QuikSCAT-derived vorticity, to understand if, and how, it can contribute to the relative bias in vorticity. The contribution of this kind of noise on ω̅ has been found relevant only for the cyclonic vorticity of ω̅ Q . By applying a cyclonic denoising to each swath of QuikSCAT, 〈Δ̅ω̅〉 = -0.016 ·10 -5 ±0.05 ·10 -5 s -1 is obtained, drastically reduced with respect to the initial value. This may be considered the typical bias over the Mediterranean Sea between ω̅ A and (ω̅ Q derived from the 12.5-km data, after applying the cyclonic denoising to QuikSCAT vorticity fields.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184125</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0196-2892
ispartof IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2012-07, Vol.50 (7), p.2518-2524
issn 0196-2892
1558-0644
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6161635
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Accuracy
Geophysical signal processing
meteorology
Noise
oceans
Radar measurements
Rain
Satellites
Spaceborne radar
Wind speed
title Using ASCAT Scatterometer Winds to Evaluate Relative Biases in the QuikSCAT-Derived Wind Vorticity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A29%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20ASCAT%20Scatterometer%20Winds%20to%20Evaluate%20Relative%20Biases%20in%20the%20QuikSCAT-Derived%20Wind%20Vorticity&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20geoscience%20and%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=Zecchetto,%20S.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2518&rft.epage=2524&rft.pages=2518-2524&rft.issn=0196-2892&rft.eissn=1558-0644&rft.coden=IGRSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184125&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_TGRS_2012_2184125%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6161635&rfr_iscdi=true