Developing instruments to assess first-year calculus and physics mechanics skills needed for a sophomore statics and dynamics course

Anecdotally, engineering faculty members complain students taking sophomore engineering science courses are not prepared with respect to mathematics and mechanics-based physics. However, evidence has rarely been systematically collected and analyzed to determine the veracity of these assertions. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Shryock, K. J., Srinivasa, A. R., Froyd, J. E.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page F1J-6
container_issue
container_start_page F1J-1
container_title
container_volume
creator Shryock, K. J.
Srinivasa, A. R.
Froyd, J. E.
description Anecdotally, engineering faculty members complain students taking sophomore engineering science courses are not prepared with respect to mathematics and mechanics-based physics. However, evidence has rarely been systematically collected and analyzed to determine the veracity of these assertions. Therefore, the paper intends to address two questions: 1) With respect to first-year mathematics and first-year physics mechanics knowledge, what do engineering faculty members expect students to know and be able to do when they begin a sophomore statics and dynamics course? 2) To what extent do students satisfy these expectations? To address these questions, the following steps were taken. First, engineering faculty members who taught a sophomore statics and dynamics course at Texas A&M University were asked for problems involving first-year mathematics and physics mechanics they thought students should be able to solve entering the course. Learning outcomes were abstracted, and two instruments were developed and administered near the beginning of the statics and dynamics course. After administering the instruments and analyzing results, faculty members have a better idea of the background of their students. Furthermore, there is evidence to examine the extent to which students are prepared in first-year mathematics and physics mechanics to begin a core engineering science course.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142722
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6142722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6142722</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6142722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-4332300a33ac6222d83cde675fdfcd6d2860880fb1d1db3ba432b98508f404083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UMlOwzAUNJtEW3pH4uIfSPEW2zmi0kKlSlxA4lY59gsNZJNfgpQ7H44iymlmNMthCLnlbMU5y-63u81KMM5XmithhDgjy8xYrrmwSmnDz8lMSGMSLdX7BZn_Gza9JDPGM5akVtlrMkf8ZIxJq82M_DzCN1RtVzYftGywj0MNTY-0b6lDBERalBH7ZAQXqXeVH6oBqWsC7Y4jlh5pDf7omonhV1lVSBuAAIEWbaSOYtsd27qNQLF3_ZSaumFsXD0J3w4R4YZcFa5CWJ5wQd62m9f1c7J_edqtH_ZJyU3aJ0pKIRlzUjqvhRDBSh9Am7QIhQ86CKuZtazIeeAhl7lTUuSZTZktFFPMygW5-9stAeDQxbJ2cTyc3pS_hFRnPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Developing instruments to assess first-year calculus and physics mechanics skills needed for a sophomore statics and dynamics course</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Shryock, K. J. ; Srinivasa, A. R. ; Froyd, J. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shryock, K. J. ; Srinivasa, A. R. ; Froyd, J. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Anecdotally, engineering faculty members complain students taking sophomore engineering science courses are not prepared with respect to mathematics and mechanics-based physics. However, evidence has rarely been systematically collected and analyzed to determine the veracity of these assertions. Therefore, the paper intends to address two questions: 1) With respect to first-year mathematics and first-year physics mechanics knowledge, what do engineering faculty members expect students to know and be able to do when they begin a sophomore statics and dynamics course? 2) To what extent do students satisfy these expectations? To address these questions, the following steps were taken. First, engineering faculty members who taught a sophomore statics and dynamics course at Texas A&amp;M University were asked for problems involving first-year mathematics and physics mechanics they thought students should be able to solve entering the course. Learning outcomes were abstracted, and two instruments were developed and administered near the beginning of the statics and dynamics course. After administering the instruments and analyzing results, faculty members have a better idea of the background of their students. Furthermore, there is evidence to examine the extent to which students are prepared in first-year mathematics and physics mechanics to begin a core engineering science course.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-5848</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1612844685</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781612844688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2377-634X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781612844671</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781612844695</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1612844693</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1612844677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Educational institutions ; Equations ; Instruments ; Knowledge engineering ; mathematics and physics instruments ; Physics ; statics and dynamics ; Vectors</subject><ispartof>2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, p.F1J-1-F1J-6</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6142722$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2056,27923,54918</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6142722$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shryock, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasa, A. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froyd, J. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Developing instruments to assess first-year calculus and physics mechanics skills needed for a sophomore statics and dynamics course</title><title>2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)</title><addtitle>FIE</addtitle><description>Anecdotally, engineering faculty members complain students taking sophomore engineering science courses are not prepared with respect to mathematics and mechanics-based physics. However, evidence has rarely been systematically collected and analyzed to determine the veracity of these assertions. Therefore, the paper intends to address two questions: 1) With respect to first-year mathematics and first-year physics mechanics knowledge, what do engineering faculty members expect students to know and be able to do when they begin a sophomore statics and dynamics course? 2) To what extent do students satisfy these expectations? To address these questions, the following steps were taken. First, engineering faculty members who taught a sophomore statics and dynamics course at Texas A&amp;M University were asked for problems involving first-year mathematics and physics mechanics they thought students should be able to solve entering the course. Learning outcomes were abstracted, and two instruments were developed and administered near the beginning of the statics and dynamics course. After administering the instruments and analyzing results, faculty members have a better idea of the background of their students. Furthermore, there is evidence to examine the extent to which students are prepared in first-year mathematics and physics mechanics to begin a core engineering science course.</description><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Equations</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>Knowledge engineering</subject><subject>mathematics and physics instruments</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>statics and dynamics</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><issn>0190-5848</issn><issn>2377-634X</issn><isbn>1612844685</isbn><isbn>9781612844688</isbn><isbn>9781612844671</isbn><isbn>9781612844695</isbn><isbn>1612844693</isbn><isbn>1612844677</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UMlOwzAUNJtEW3pH4uIfSPEW2zmi0kKlSlxA4lY59gsNZJNfgpQ7H44iymlmNMthCLnlbMU5y-63u81KMM5XmithhDgjy8xYrrmwSmnDz8lMSGMSLdX7BZn_Gza9JDPGM5akVtlrMkf8ZIxJq82M_DzCN1RtVzYftGywj0MNTY-0b6lDBERalBH7ZAQXqXeVH6oBqWsC7Y4jlh5pDf7omonhV1lVSBuAAIEWbaSOYtsd27qNQLF3_ZSaumFsXD0J3w4R4YZcFa5CWJ5wQd62m9f1c7J_edqtH_ZJyU3aJ0pKIRlzUjqvhRDBSh9Am7QIhQ86CKuZtazIeeAhl7lTUuSZTZktFFPMygW5-9stAeDQxbJ2cTyc3pS_hFRnPg</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Shryock, K. J.</creator><creator>Srinivasa, A. R.</creator><creator>Froyd, J. E.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>Developing instruments to assess first-year calculus and physics mechanics skills needed for a sophomore statics and dynamics course</title><author>Shryock, K. J. ; Srinivasa, A. R. ; Froyd, J. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-4332300a33ac6222d83cde675fdfcd6d2860880fb1d1db3ba432b98508f404083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Equations</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>Knowledge engineering</topic><topic>mathematics and physics instruments</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>statics and dynamics</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shryock, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasa, A. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froyd, J. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shryock, K. J.</au><au>Srinivasa, A. R.</au><au>Froyd, J. E.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Developing instruments to assess first-year calculus and physics mechanics skills needed for a sophomore statics and dynamics course</atitle><btitle>2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)</btitle><stitle>FIE</stitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>F1J-1</spage><epage>F1J-6</epage><pages>F1J-1-F1J-6</pages><issn>0190-5848</issn><eissn>2377-634X</eissn><isbn>1612844685</isbn><isbn>9781612844688</isbn><eisbn>9781612844671</eisbn><eisbn>9781612844695</eisbn><eisbn>1612844693</eisbn><eisbn>1612844677</eisbn><abstract>Anecdotally, engineering faculty members complain students taking sophomore engineering science courses are not prepared with respect to mathematics and mechanics-based physics. However, evidence has rarely been systematically collected and analyzed to determine the veracity of these assertions. Therefore, the paper intends to address two questions: 1) With respect to first-year mathematics and first-year physics mechanics knowledge, what do engineering faculty members expect students to know and be able to do when they begin a sophomore statics and dynamics course? 2) To what extent do students satisfy these expectations? To address these questions, the following steps were taken. First, engineering faculty members who taught a sophomore statics and dynamics course at Texas A&amp;M University were asked for problems involving first-year mathematics and physics mechanics they thought students should be able to solve entering the course. Learning outcomes were abstracted, and two instruments were developed and administered near the beginning of the statics and dynamics course. After administering the instruments and analyzing results, faculty members have a better idea of the background of their students. Furthermore, there is evidence to examine the extent to which students are prepared in first-year mathematics and physics mechanics to begin a core engineering science course.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/FIE.2011.6142722</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0190-5848
ispartof 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, p.F1J-1-F1J-6
issn 0190-5848
2377-634X
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6142722
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Educational institutions
Equations
Instruments
Knowledge engineering
mathematics and physics instruments
Physics
statics and dynamics
Vectors
title Developing instruments to assess first-year calculus and physics mechanics skills needed for a sophomore statics and dynamics course
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A06%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Developing%20instruments%20to%20assess%20first-year%20calculus%20and%20physics%20mechanics%20skills%20needed%20for%20a%20sophomore%20statics%20and%20dynamics%20course&rft.btitle=2011%20Frontiers%20in%20Education%20Conference%20(FIE)&rft.au=Shryock,%20K.%20J.&rft.date=2011-10&rft.spage=F1J-1&rft.epage=F1J-6&rft.pages=F1J-1-F1J-6&rft.issn=0190-5848&rft.eissn=2377-634X&rft.isbn=1612844685&rft.isbn_list=9781612844688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/FIE.2011.6142722&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6142722%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781612844671&rft.eisbn_list=9781612844695&rft.eisbn_list=1612844693&rft.eisbn_list=1612844677&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6142722&rfr_iscdi=true