Load-Aware Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration Implementation of Crossbar Scheduler
FPGA dynamic partial reconfiguration (DPR) tend to be adopted for its flexibility and fewer resource consumption increasingly in hardware implementation, especially in communication devices. A crossbar scheduling algorithm is used to schedule the crossbar, or decide the order in which cells will be...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 258 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 252 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Shaobin Zhang Tongsen Hu Minghui Wu Tianzhou Chen Zening Qu |
description | FPGA dynamic partial reconfiguration (DPR) tend to be adopted for its flexibility and fewer resource consumption increasingly in hardware implementation, especially in communication devices. A crossbar scheduling algorithm is used to schedule the crossbar, or decide the order in which cells will be served. The is lip and FIRM are two classic crossbar scheduling algorithms, but they do not support DPR. Performance of these two algorithms differs under varying workloads (load: cells' arrival speed). With the development of DPR, implementations of these algorithms will have improvement both in performance and resource usage. DPR reduces 7.249% average delay than iSlip does and 0.013% average delay than FIRM does in 4×4 crossbar. It reduces 17.9% average delay than iSlip does and 0.039% average delay than FIRM does in 8×8 crossbar. In this paper, we compared the DPR implementation and non-DPR implementations (iSlip and FIRM) and found that the former reduces 37.744% LUTs and 47.874% FFs in 4×4 crossbar, and 47.325% LUTs and 49.907% FFs in 8×8 crossbar. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/DASC.2011.62 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6119074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6119074</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6119074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-787b414fded7045bbe85dfc00c994b22e761ca2f5170aa04248bbdfd193125913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8lOwzAURY0QEqhkx45NfiDhPcex42WVMlSKVES7r-z4GYwyVE4q1L9nKKtzz-ZKh7E7hBwR9MNqua1zDoi55Bcs0aoCJXUpJHJx-ecopCoAQBbXLJmmT_jdUoOCG7ZpRuOy5ZeJlK5Og-lDm76aOAfTpW_UjoMP78do5jAO6bo_dNTTMJ919Gkdx2myJqbb9oPcsaN4y6686SZK_rlgu6fHXf2SNZvndb1ssqBhzlSlrEDhHTkForSWqtL5FqDVWljOSUlsDfclKjAGBBeVtc471AXyUmOxYPfn20BE-0MMvYmnvUT8qRLFN1EbT1M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Load-Aware Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration Implementation of Crossbar Scheduler</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Shaobin Zhang ; Tongsen Hu ; Minghui Wu ; Tianzhou Chen ; Zening Qu</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaobin Zhang ; Tongsen Hu ; Minghui Wu ; Tianzhou Chen ; Zening Qu</creatorcontrib><description>FPGA dynamic partial reconfiguration (DPR) tend to be adopted for its flexibility and fewer resource consumption increasingly in hardware implementation, especially in communication devices. A crossbar scheduling algorithm is used to schedule the crossbar, or decide the order in which cells will be served. The is lip and FIRM are two classic crossbar scheduling algorithms, but they do not support DPR. Performance of these two algorithms differs under varying workloads (load: cells' arrival speed). With the development of DPR, implementations of these algorithms will have improvement both in performance and resource usage. DPR reduces 7.249% average delay than iSlip does and 0.013% average delay than FIRM does in 4×4 crossbar. It reduces 17.9% average delay than iSlip does and 0.039% average delay than FIRM does in 8×8 crossbar. In this paper, we compared the DPR implementation and non-DPR implementations (iSlip and FIRM) and found that the former reduces 37.744% LUTs and 47.874% FFs in 4×4 crossbar, and 47.325% LUTs and 49.907% FFs in 8×8 crossbar.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781467300063</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467300063</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9780769546124</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 0769546129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/DASC.2011.62</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithm design and analysis ; crossbar ; Delay ; dynamic partial reconfiguration ; Educational institutions ; FPGA ; Schedules ; Scheduling ; Scheduling algorithm ; Switches</subject><ispartof>2011 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 2011, p.252-258</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6119074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6119074$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaobin Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tongsen Hu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minghui Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tianzhou Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zening Qu</creatorcontrib><title>Load-Aware Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration Implementation of Crossbar Scheduler</title><title>2011 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing</title><addtitle>dasc</addtitle><description>FPGA dynamic partial reconfiguration (DPR) tend to be adopted for its flexibility and fewer resource consumption increasingly in hardware implementation, especially in communication devices. A crossbar scheduling algorithm is used to schedule the crossbar, or decide the order in which cells will be served. The is lip and FIRM are two classic crossbar scheduling algorithms, but they do not support DPR. Performance of these two algorithms differs under varying workloads (load: cells' arrival speed). With the development of DPR, implementations of these algorithms will have improvement both in performance and resource usage. DPR reduces 7.249% average delay than iSlip does and 0.013% average delay than FIRM does in 4×4 crossbar. It reduces 17.9% average delay than iSlip does and 0.039% average delay than FIRM does in 8×8 crossbar. In this paper, we compared the DPR implementation and non-DPR implementations (iSlip and FIRM) and found that the former reduces 37.744% LUTs and 47.874% FFs in 4×4 crossbar, and 47.325% LUTs and 49.907% FFs in 8×8 crossbar.</description><subject>Algorithm design and analysis</subject><subject>crossbar</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>dynamic partial reconfiguration</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>FPGA</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling algorithm</subject><subject>Switches</subject><isbn>9781467300063</isbn><isbn>1467300063</isbn><isbn>9780769546124</isbn><isbn>0769546129</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8lOwzAURY0QEqhkx45NfiDhPcex42WVMlSKVES7r-z4GYwyVE4q1L9nKKtzz-ZKh7E7hBwR9MNqua1zDoi55Bcs0aoCJXUpJHJx-ecopCoAQBbXLJmmT_jdUoOCG7ZpRuOy5ZeJlK5Og-lDm76aOAfTpW_UjoMP78do5jAO6bo_dNTTMJ919Gkdx2myJqbb9oPcsaN4y6686SZK_rlgu6fHXf2SNZvndb1ssqBhzlSlrEDhHTkForSWqtL5FqDVWljOSUlsDfclKjAGBBeVtc471AXyUmOxYPfn20BE-0MMvYmnvUT8qRLFN1EbT1M</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Shaobin Zhang</creator><creator>Tongsen Hu</creator><creator>Minghui Wu</creator><creator>Tianzhou Chen</creator><creator>Zening Qu</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Load-Aware Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration Implementation of Crossbar Scheduler</title><author>Shaobin Zhang ; Tongsen Hu ; Minghui Wu ; Tianzhou Chen ; Zening Qu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-787b414fded7045bbe85dfc00c994b22e761ca2f5170aa04248bbdfd193125913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithm design and analysis</topic><topic>crossbar</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>dynamic partial reconfiguration</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>FPGA</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling algorithm</topic><topic>Switches</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaobin Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tongsen Hu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minghui Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tianzhou Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zening Qu</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaobin Zhang</au><au>Tongsen Hu</au><au>Minghui Wu</au><au>Tianzhou Chen</au><au>Zening Qu</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Load-Aware Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration Implementation of Crossbar Scheduler</atitle><btitle>2011 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing</btitle><stitle>dasc</stitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>252</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>252-258</pages><isbn>9781467300063</isbn><isbn>1467300063</isbn><eisbn>9780769546124</eisbn><eisbn>0769546129</eisbn><abstract>FPGA dynamic partial reconfiguration (DPR) tend to be adopted for its flexibility and fewer resource consumption increasingly in hardware implementation, especially in communication devices. A crossbar scheduling algorithm is used to schedule the crossbar, or decide the order in which cells will be served. The is lip and FIRM are two classic crossbar scheduling algorithms, but they do not support DPR. Performance of these two algorithms differs under varying workloads (load: cells' arrival speed). With the development of DPR, implementations of these algorithms will have improvement both in performance and resource usage. DPR reduces 7.249% average delay than iSlip does and 0.013% average delay than FIRM does in 4×4 crossbar. It reduces 17.9% average delay than iSlip does and 0.039% average delay than FIRM does in 8×8 crossbar. In this paper, we compared the DPR implementation and non-DPR implementations (iSlip and FIRM) and found that the former reduces 37.744% LUTs and 47.874% FFs in 4×4 crossbar, and 47.325% LUTs and 49.907% FFs in 8×8 crossbar.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/DASC.2011.62</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISBN: 9781467300063 |
ispartof | 2011 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 2011, p.252-258 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6119074 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Algorithm design and analysis crossbar Delay dynamic partial reconfiguration Educational institutions FPGA Schedules Scheduling Scheduling algorithm Switches |
title | Load-Aware Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration Implementation of Crossbar Scheduler |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A33%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Load-Aware%20Dynamic%20Partial%20Reconfiguration%20Implementation%20of%20Crossbar%20Scheduler&rft.btitle=2011%20IEEE%20Ninth%20International%20Conference%20on%20Dependable,%20Autonomic%20and%20Secure%20Computing&rft.au=Shaobin%20Zhang&rft.date=2011-12&rft.spage=252&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=252-258&rft.isbn=9781467300063&rft.isbn_list=1467300063&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/DASC.2011.62&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6119074%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9780769546124&rft.eisbn_list=0769546129&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6119074&rfr_iscdi=true |