Speckle detection in ultrasonic images using unsupervised clustering techniques
In ultrasonic images, identification of speckled regions helps to estimate probe movement as well as improve performance of algorithms for adaptive speckle suppression and the elevational separation of B-scans by speckle decorrelation. By tracking FDS patch displacements over time we can calculate s...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8101 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 8098 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 2011 |
creator | Azar, A. A. Rivaz, H. Boctor, E. |
description | In ultrasonic images, identification of speckled regions helps to estimate probe movement as well as improve performance of algorithms for adaptive speckle suppression and the elevational separation of B-scans by speckle decorrelation. By tracking FDS patch displacements over time we can calculate strain and detect tumor location. Previous studies for speckle detection were based on classification techniques which estimated parameters of the statistical distribution which were based on observation data and ultrasound echo envelope signal. However, in this study, we proposed a new combination of statistical features which were extracted from the ultrasound images and explored their properties for the speckle detection. These features were used as inputs to the unsupervised clustering algorithms for the speckle classification. We used five different types of unsupervised techniques and compared their performance by feeding different combinations of the statistical features. In order to quantitatively compare statistical features and classification methods, as ground truth, we used simulations of cyst and fetus ultrasound images which were generated using Field II ultrasound simulation program[1]. Initial results showed that by combining two statistical models (K and Rayleigh distributions) we can get best speck detection signatures to feed unsupervised classifiers and maximize speckle detection performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091997 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6091997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6091997</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>22256221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i300t-bbda0ba539017b23507032232a9486cbf65f4f365e41a496b2f3ddf2ca7a39053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN1OwkAQhde_CGJfQBPTFyjuzP60e6kElQTDBZp4R7btFFdLqd3WxLe3BnBuJpnvnMmZYewK-BiAm9vZ9Pl-OUYOMNbcgDHxEbsAiVJKQNTHbAhKJZHUoE5YYOLkwABOe8aNjHQSvw1Y4P0H70trIwSeswEiKo0IQ7ZY1pR9lhTm1FLWum0Vuirsyraxflu5LHQbuyYfdt5V67CrfFdT8-085WFWdr6l5m_eW98r99WRv2RnhS09Bfs-Yq8P05fJUzRfPM4md_PICc7bKE1zy1OrhOEQpygUj7lAFGiNTHSWFloVshBakQQrjU6xEHleYGZj23uUGLGb3d66SzeUr-qmD9r8rA6X9YLrncAR0T_e_1H8ArGCYHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Speckle detection in ultrasonic images using unsupervised clustering techniques</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Azar, A. A. ; Rivaz, H. ; Boctor, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Azar, A. A. ; Rivaz, H. ; Boctor, E.</creatorcontrib><description>In ultrasonic images, identification of speckled regions helps to estimate probe movement as well as improve performance of algorithms for adaptive speckle suppression and the elevational separation of B-scans by speckle decorrelation. By tracking FDS patch displacements over time we can calculate strain and detect tumor location. Previous studies for speckle detection were based on classification techniques which estimated parameters of the statistical distribution which were based on observation data and ultrasound echo envelope signal. However, in this study, we proposed a new combination of statistical features which were extracted from the ultrasound images and explored their properties for the speckle detection. These features were used as inputs to the unsupervised clustering algorithms for the speckle classification. We used five different types of unsupervised techniques and compared their performance by feeding different combinations of the statistical features. In order to quantitatively compare statistical features and classification methods, as ground truth, we used simulations of cyst and fetus ultrasound images which were generated using Field II ultrasound simulation program[1]. Initial results showed that by combining two statistical models (K and Rayleigh distributions) we can get best speck detection signatures to feed unsupervised classifiers and maximize speckle detection performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-687X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-170X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424441211</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424441218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4615</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424441226</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457715899</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457715891</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424441228</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091997</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22256221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Algorithms ; Biomedical imaging ; Cluster Analysis ; Computer Simulation ; Feature extraction ; Humans ; Image segmentation ; pattern classification ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radio Waves ; segmentation ; Speckle ; Speckle detection ; speckle tracking ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography - methods ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal ; Ultrasound ; unsupervised clustering</subject><ispartof>2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2011, Vol.2011, p.8098-8101</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6091997$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6091997$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22256221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azar, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivaz, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boctor, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Speckle detection in ultrasonic images using unsupervised clustering techniques</title><title>2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</title><addtitle>IEMBS</addtitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><description>In ultrasonic images, identification of speckled regions helps to estimate probe movement as well as improve performance of algorithms for adaptive speckle suppression and the elevational separation of B-scans by speckle decorrelation. By tracking FDS patch displacements over time we can calculate strain and detect tumor location. Previous studies for speckle detection were based on classification techniques which estimated parameters of the statistical distribution which were based on observation data and ultrasound echo envelope signal. However, in this study, we proposed a new combination of statistical features which were extracted from the ultrasound images and explored their properties for the speckle detection. These features were used as inputs to the unsupervised clustering algorithms for the speckle classification. We used five different types of unsupervised techniques and compared their performance by feeding different combinations of the statistical features. In order to quantitatively compare statistical features and classification methods, as ground truth, we used simulations of cyst and fetus ultrasound images which were generated using Field II ultrasound simulation program[1]. Initial results showed that by combining two statistical models (K and Rayleigh distributions) we can get best speck detection signatures to feed unsupervised classifiers and maximize speckle detection performance.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomedical imaging</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>pattern classification</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radio Waves</subject><subject>segmentation</subject><subject>Speckle</subject><subject>Speckle detection</subject><subject>speckle tracking</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>unsupervised clustering</subject><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><issn>1558-4615</issn><isbn>9781424441211</isbn><isbn>1424441218</isbn><isbn>1424441226</isbn><isbn>1457715899</isbn><isbn>9781457715891</isbn><isbn>9781424441228</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN1OwkAQhde_CGJfQBPTFyjuzP60e6kElQTDBZp4R7btFFdLqd3WxLe3BnBuJpnvnMmZYewK-BiAm9vZ9Pl-OUYOMNbcgDHxEbsAiVJKQNTHbAhKJZHUoE5YYOLkwABOe8aNjHQSvw1Y4P0H70trIwSeswEiKo0IQ7ZY1pR9lhTm1FLWum0Vuirsyraxflu5LHQbuyYfdt5V67CrfFdT8-085WFWdr6l5m_eW98r99WRv2RnhS09Bfs-Yq8P05fJUzRfPM4md_PICc7bKE1zy1OrhOEQpygUj7lAFGiNTHSWFloVshBakQQrjU6xEHleYGZj23uUGLGb3d66SzeUr-qmD9r8rA6X9YLrncAR0T_e_1H8ArGCYHc</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Azar, A. A.</creator><creator>Rivaz, H.</creator><creator>Boctor, E.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Speckle detection in ultrasonic images using unsupervised clustering techniques</title><author>Azar, A. A. ; Rivaz, H. ; Boctor, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i300t-bbda0ba539017b23507032232a9486cbf65f4f365e41a496b2f3ddf2ca7a39053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomedical imaging</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>pattern classification</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radio Waves</topic><topic>segmentation</topic><topic>Speckle</topic><topic>Speckle detection</topic><topic>speckle tracking</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>unsupervised clustering</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azar, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivaz, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boctor, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azar, A. A.</au><au>Rivaz, H.</au><au>Boctor, E.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Speckle detection in ultrasonic images using unsupervised clustering techniques</atitle><btitle>2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</btitle><stitle>IEMBS</stitle><addtitle>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><spage>8098</spage><epage>8101</epage><pages>8098-8101</pages><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>1557-170X</issn><eissn>1558-4615</eissn><isbn>9781424441211</isbn><isbn>1424441218</isbn><eisbn>1424441226</eisbn><eisbn>1457715899</eisbn><eisbn>9781457715891</eisbn><eisbn>9781424441228</eisbn><abstract>In ultrasonic images, identification of speckled regions helps to estimate probe movement as well as improve performance of algorithms for adaptive speckle suppression and the elevational separation of B-scans by speckle decorrelation. By tracking FDS patch displacements over time we can calculate strain and detect tumor location. Previous studies for speckle detection were based on classification techniques which estimated parameters of the statistical distribution which were based on observation data and ultrasound echo envelope signal. However, in this study, we proposed a new combination of statistical features which were extracted from the ultrasound images and explored their properties for the speckle detection. These features were used as inputs to the unsupervised clustering algorithms for the speckle classification. We used five different types of unsupervised techniques and compared their performance by feeding different combinations of the statistical features. In order to quantitatively compare statistical features and classification methods, as ground truth, we used simulations of cyst and fetus ultrasound images which were generated using Field II ultrasound simulation program[1]. Initial results showed that by combining two statistical models (K and Rayleigh distributions) we can get best speck detection signatures to feed unsupervised classifiers and maximize speckle detection performance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>22256221</pmid><doi>10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091997</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1094-687X |
ispartof | 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2011, Vol.2011, p.8098-8101 |
issn | 1094-687X 1557-170X 1558-4615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6091997 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Acoustics Algorithms Biomedical imaging Cluster Analysis Computer Simulation Feature extraction Humans Image segmentation pattern classification Phantoms, Imaging Radio Waves segmentation Speckle Speckle detection speckle tracking Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography - methods Ultrasonography, Prenatal Ultrasound unsupervised clustering |
title | Speckle detection in ultrasonic images using unsupervised clustering techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A14%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Speckle%20detection%20in%20ultrasonic%20images%20using%20unsupervised%20clustering%20techniques&rft.btitle=2011%20Annual%20International%20Conference%20of%20the%20IEEE%20Engineering%20in%20Medicine%20and%20Biology%20Society&rft.au=Azar,%20A.%20A.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=2011&rft.spage=8098&rft.epage=8101&rft.pages=8098-8101&rft.issn=1094-687X&rft.eissn=1558-4615&rft.isbn=9781424441211&rft.isbn_list=1424441218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091997&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_6IE%3E22256221%3C/pubmed_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1424441226&rft.eisbn_list=1457715899&rft.eisbn_list=9781457715891&rft.eisbn_list=9781424441228&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/22256221&rft_ieee_id=6091997&rfr_iscdi=true |