A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent
Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have pro...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1073 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1068 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Stais, C. Xylomenos, G. Archodovassilis, A. |
description | Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have proposed modifications to the well known BitTorrent protocol in order to adapt it to the needs of such applications. In this paper we present findings from our experiments with three proposals for the integration of multimedia streaming into BitTorrent: the fixed-size window approach, the high-priority set approach and the stretching window approach. We evaluate these proposals under identical circumstances using our detailed packet-level BitTorrent simulator, showing that while all approaches are reasonably capable of supporting multimedia streaming, their different design choices have a pronounced effect on their streaming performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ISCC.2011.5983984 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5983984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5983984</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5983984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i284t-b41eff7a7b1e01d5b6e3fa0d7382f4b392b5f5c38a26c2c3bf04c1cf1de264393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j8tKAzEYRuMNnNY-gLiZF5gxf-5Z1sFLoeDCui5JJpGIMylJFvr2Fqyrs_jg8B2EbgH3AFjfb96GoScYoOdaUa3YGVoA41JioYCdo4YIRjpJlb5AKy3V_4bFJWqAU9wBZeIaLUr5xBgrTmSDyLp1aTqYHEua2xTaUrM3U5w_Wv9d_VximktbU_sQ6y7l7Od6g66C-Sp-deISvT897oaXbvv6vBnW2y4SxWpnGfgQpJEWPIaRW-FpMHg8HiSBWaqJ5YE7qgwRjjhqA2YOXIDRH0Oopkt09-eN3vv9IcfJ5J_9qZ3-AtbESTk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Stais, C. ; Xylomenos, G. ; Archodovassilis, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stais, C. ; Xylomenos, G. ; Archodovassilis, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have proposed modifications to the well known BitTorrent protocol in order to adapt it to the needs of such applications. In this paper we present findings from our experiments with three proposals for the integration of multimedia streaming into BitTorrent: the fixed-size window approach, the high-priority set approach and the stretching window approach. We evaluate these proposals under identical circumstances using our detailed packet-level BitTorrent simulator, showing that while all approaches are reasonably capable of supporting multimedia streaming, their different design choices have a pronounced effect on their streaming performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-1346</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781457706806</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1457706806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2642-7389</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457706814</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457706784</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457706783</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457706813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ISCC.2011.5983984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>BitTorrent ; Downlink ; IP networks ; Measurement ; Multimedia communication ; Peer-to-peer ; Prefetching ; Protocols ; Simulation ; Streaming ; Streaming media</subject><ispartof>2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 2011, p.1068-1073</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5983984$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5983984$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stais, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xylomenos, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archodovassilis, A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent</title><title>2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC)</title><addtitle>ISCC</addtitle><description>Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have proposed modifications to the well known BitTorrent protocol in order to adapt it to the needs of such applications. In this paper we present findings from our experiments with three proposals for the integration of multimedia streaming into BitTorrent: the fixed-size window approach, the high-priority set approach and the stretching window approach. We evaluate these proposals under identical circumstances using our detailed packet-level BitTorrent simulator, showing that while all approaches are reasonably capable of supporting multimedia streaming, their different design choices have a pronounced effect on their streaming performance.</description><subject>BitTorrent</subject><subject>Downlink</subject><subject>IP networks</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Multimedia communication</subject><subject>Peer-to-peer</subject><subject>Prefetching</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Streaming</subject><subject>Streaming media</subject><issn>1530-1346</issn><issn>2642-7389</issn><isbn>9781457706806</isbn><isbn>1457706806</isbn><isbn>1457706814</isbn><isbn>1457706784</isbn><isbn>9781457706783</isbn><isbn>9781457706813</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j8tKAzEYRuMNnNY-gLiZF5gxf-5Z1sFLoeDCui5JJpGIMylJFvr2Fqyrs_jg8B2EbgH3AFjfb96GoScYoOdaUa3YGVoA41JioYCdo4YIRjpJlb5AKy3V_4bFJWqAU9wBZeIaLUr5xBgrTmSDyLp1aTqYHEua2xTaUrM3U5w_Wv9d_VximktbU_sQ6y7l7Od6g66C-Sp-deISvT897oaXbvv6vBnW2y4SxWpnGfgQpJEWPIaRW-FpMHg8HiSBWaqJ5YE7qgwRjjhqA2YOXIDRH0Oopkt09-eN3vv9IcfJ5J_9qZ3-AtbESTk</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Stais, C.</creator><creator>Xylomenos, G.</creator><creator>Archodovassilis, A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent</title><author>Stais, C. ; Xylomenos, G. ; Archodovassilis, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i284t-b41eff7a7b1e01d5b6e3fa0d7382f4b392b5f5c38a26c2c3bf04c1cf1de264393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>BitTorrent</topic><topic>Downlink</topic><topic>IP networks</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Multimedia communication</topic><topic>Peer-to-peer</topic><topic>Prefetching</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Streaming</topic><topic>Streaming media</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stais, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xylomenos, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archodovassilis, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stais, C.</au><au>Xylomenos, G.</au><au>Archodovassilis, A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent</atitle><btitle>2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC)</btitle><stitle>ISCC</stitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>1068</spage><epage>1073</epage><pages>1068-1073</pages><issn>1530-1346</issn><eissn>2642-7389</eissn><isbn>9781457706806</isbn><isbn>1457706806</isbn><eisbn>1457706814</eisbn><eisbn>1457706784</eisbn><eisbn>9781457706783</eisbn><eisbn>9781457706813</eisbn><abstract>Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have proposed modifications to the well known BitTorrent protocol in order to adapt it to the needs of such applications. In this paper we present findings from our experiments with three proposals for the integration of multimedia streaming into BitTorrent: the fixed-size window approach, the high-priority set approach and the stretching window approach. We evaluate these proposals under identical circumstances using our detailed packet-level BitTorrent simulator, showing that while all approaches are reasonably capable of supporting multimedia streaming, their different design choices have a pronounced effect on their streaming performance.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ISCC.2011.5983984</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1530-1346 |
ispartof | 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 2011, p.1068-1073 |
issn | 1530-1346 2642-7389 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_5983984 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | BitTorrent Downlink IP networks Measurement Multimedia communication Peer-to-peer Prefetching Protocols Simulation Streaming Streaming media |
title | A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A04%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20streaming%20extensions%20to%20BitTorrent&rft.btitle=2011%20IEEE%20Symposium%20on%20Computers%20and%20Communications%20(ISCC)&rft.au=Stais,%20C.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.spage=1068&rft.epage=1073&rft.pages=1068-1073&rft.issn=1530-1346&rft.eissn=2642-7389&rft.isbn=9781457706806&rft.isbn_list=1457706806&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ISCC.2011.5983984&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5983984%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1457706814&rft.eisbn_list=1457706784&rft.eisbn_list=9781457706783&rft.eisbn_list=9781457706813&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5983984&rfr_iscdi=true |