A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent

Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Stais, C., Xylomenos, G., Archodovassilis, A.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1073
container_issue
container_start_page 1068
container_title
container_volume
creator Stais, C.
Xylomenos, G.
Archodovassilis, A.
description Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have proposed modifications to the well known BitTorrent protocol in order to adapt it to the needs of such applications. In this paper we present findings from our experiments with three proposals for the integration of multimedia streaming into BitTorrent: the fixed-size window approach, the high-priority set approach and the stretching window approach. We evaluate these proposals under identical circumstances using our detailed packet-level BitTorrent simulator, showing that while all approaches are reasonably capable of supporting multimedia streaming, their different design choices have a pronounced effect on their streaming performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ISCC.2011.5983984
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5983984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5983984</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5983984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i284t-b41eff7a7b1e01d5b6e3fa0d7382f4b392b5f5c38a26c2c3bf04c1cf1de264393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j8tKAzEYRuMNnNY-gLiZF5gxf-5Z1sFLoeDCui5JJpGIMylJFvr2Fqyrs_jg8B2EbgH3AFjfb96GoScYoOdaUa3YGVoA41JioYCdo4YIRjpJlb5AKy3V_4bFJWqAU9wBZeIaLUr5xBgrTmSDyLp1aTqYHEua2xTaUrM3U5w_Wv9d_VximktbU_sQ6y7l7Od6g66C-Sp-deISvT897oaXbvv6vBnW2y4SxWpnGfgQpJEWPIaRW-FpMHg8HiSBWaqJ5YE7qgwRjjhqA2YOXIDRH0Oopkt09-eN3vv9IcfJ5J_9qZ3-AtbESTk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Stais, C. ; Xylomenos, G. ; Archodovassilis, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stais, C. ; Xylomenos, G. ; Archodovassilis, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have proposed modifications to the well known BitTorrent protocol in order to adapt it to the needs of such applications. In this paper we present findings from our experiments with three proposals for the integration of multimedia streaming into BitTorrent: the fixed-size window approach, the high-priority set approach and the stretching window approach. We evaluate these proposals under identical circumstances using our detailed packet-level BitTorrent simulator, showing that while all approaches are reasonably capable of supporting multimedia streaming, their different design choices have a pronounced effect on their streaming performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-1346</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781457706806</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1457706806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2642-7389</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457706814</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1457706784</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457706783</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781457706813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ISCC.2011.5983984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>BitTorrent ; Downlink ; IP networks ; Measurement ; Multimedia communication ; Peer-to-peer ; Prefetching ; Protocols ; Simulation ; Streaming ; Streaming media</subject><ispartof>2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 2011, p.1068-1073</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5983984$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5983984$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stais, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xylomenos, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archodovassilis, A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent</title><title>2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC)</title><addtitle>ISCC</addtitle><description>Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have proposed modifications to the well known BitTorrent protocol in order to adapt it to the needs of such applications. In this paper we present findings from our experiments with three proposals for the integration of multimedia streaming into BitTorrent: the fixed-size window approach, the high-priority set approach and the stretching window approach. We evaluate these proposals under identical circumstances using our detailed packet-level BitTorrent simulator, showing that while all approaches are reasonably capable of supporting multimedia streaming, their different design choices have a pronounced effect on their streaming performance.</description><subject>BitTorrent</subject><subject>Downlink</subject><subject>IP networks</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Multimedia communication</subject><subject>Peer-to-peer</subject><subject>Prefetching</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Streaming</subject><subject>Streaming media</subject><issn>1530-1346</issn><issn>2642-7389</issn><isbn>9781457706806</isbn><isbn>1457706806</isbn><isbn>1457706814</isbn><isbn>1457706784</isbn><isbn>9781457706783</isbn><isbn>9781457706813</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j8tKAzEYRuMNnNY-gLiZF5gxf-5Z1sFLoeDCui5JJpGIMylJFvr2Fqyrs_jg8B2EbgH3AFjfb96GoScYoOdaUa3YGVoA41JioYCdo4YIRjpJlb5AKy3V_4bFJWqAU9wBZeIaLUr5xBgrTmSDyLp1aTqYHEua2xTaUrM3U5w_Wv9d_VximktbU_sQ6y7l7Od6g66C-Sp-deISvT897oaXbvv6vBnW2y4SxWpnGfgQpJEWPIaRW-FpMHg8HiSBWaqJ5YE7qgwRjjhqA2YOXIDRH0Oopkt09-eN3vv9IcfJ5J_9qZ3-AtbESTk</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Stais, C.</creator><creator>Xylomenos, G.</creator><creator>Archodovassilis, A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent</title><author>Stais, C. ; Xylomenos, G. ; Archodovassilis, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i284t-b41eff7a7b1e01d5b6e3fa0d7382f4b392b5f5c38a26c2c3bf04c1cf1de264393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>BitTorrent</topic><topic>Downlink</topic><topic>IP networks</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Multimedia communication</topic><topic>Peer-to-peer</topic><topic>Prefetching</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Streaming</topic><topic>Streaming media</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stais, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xylomenos, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archodovassilis, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stais, C.</au><au>Xylomenos, G.</au><au>Archodovassilis, A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent</atitle><btitle>2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC)</btitle><stitle>ISCC</stitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>1068</spage><epage>1073</epage><pages>1068-1073</pages><issn>1530-1346</issn><eissn>2642-7389</eissn><isbn>9781457706806</isbn><isbn>1457706806</isbn><eisbn>1457706814</eisbn><eisbn>1457706784</eisbn><eisbn>9781457706783</eisbn><eisbn>9781457706813</eisbn><abstract>Peer-to-peer (P2P) protocols have been widely accepted by users and operators alike as efficient mechanisms for non real-time content distribution. It is therefore reasonable to extend these protocols to also handle more demanding applications, such as multimedia streaming. Many researchers have proposed modifications to the well known BitTorrent protocol in order to adapt it to the needs of such applications. In this paper we present findings from our experiments with three proposals for the integration of multimedia streaming into BitTorrent: the fixed-size window approach, the high-priority set approach and the stretching window approach. We evaluate these proposals under identical circumstances using our detailed packet-level BitTorrent simulator, showing that while all approaches are reasonably capable of supporting multimedia streaming, their different design choices have a pronounced effect on their streaming performance.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ISCC.2011.5983984</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1530-1346
ispartof 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 2011, p.1068-1073
issn 1530-1346
2642-7389
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5983984
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects BitTorrent
Downlink
IP networks
Measurement
Multimedia communication
Peer-to-peer
Prefetching
Protocols
Simulation
Streaming
Streaming media
title A comparison of streaming extensions to BitTorrent
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A04%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20streaming%20extensions%20to%20BitTorrent&rft.btitle=2011%20IEEE%20Symposium%20on%20Computers%20and%20Communications%20(ISCC)&rft.au=Stais,%20C.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.spage=1068&rft.epage=1073&rft.pages=1068-1073&rft.issn=1530-1346&rft.eissn=2642-7389&rft.isbn=9781457706806&rft.isbn_list=1457706806&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ISCC.2011.5983984&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5983984%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1457706814&rft.eisbn_list=1457706784&rft.eisbn_list=9781457706783&rft.eisbn_list=9781457706813&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5983984&rfr_iscdi=true