Wireless Sensor Network simulators relevance compared to a real IEEE 802.15.4 Testbed

The diversity of research topics in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is attracting more and more researchers from different fields. The common point of all proposed solutions and protocols for WSNs is the evaluation usually done with network simulators. In this paper, we focus on the results relevanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lohier, S., Rachedi, A., Livolant, E., Salhi, I.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1352
container_issue
container_start_page 1347
container_title
container_volume
creator Lohier, S.
Rachedi, A.
Livolant, E.
Salhi, I.
description The diversity of research topics in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is attracting more and more researchers from different fields. The common point of all proposed solutions and protocols for WSNs is the evaluation usually done with network simulators. In this paper, we focus on the results relevance of wireless sensor network simulators in different scenarios based on indoor and outdoor environments. We propose a comparative study between 3 usual simulators (NS2, OPNET and QualNet) while using as reference a real testbed based on recent Imote2 sensors. The simulators give different results even in similar environments. NS2 and Qualnet give results close to those of the experimentation in the case of an indoor environment, but in the outdoor environment Opnet gives results closer to the reality. In addition, the impact of different MAC protocols (B-MAC and TKN15.4 MAC) which observe or do not observe the IEEE 802.15.4 standard is illustrated by real experimentations. They show that TKN15.4 protocol gives a better throughput than B-MAC.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/IWCMC.2011.5982734
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5982734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5982734</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5982734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i1344-94ba3800f4001e61429dd0053cd384612362f47a8095c4e3bbaa61aec4b5592a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEFLw0AUhFdUsNb-Ab3sH0h8u_s22T1KiDVQ9WBLj-UleYVg2pTdqPjvrVhPwwwfwzBC3CpIlQJ_X62L5yLVoFRqvdO5wTNxrVAjemucPRczn7t_7_2FmGiTZ0mGXl-JWYxdDQa0cTnqiVitu8A9xyjfeB-HIF94_BrCu4zd7qOncQhR_gKftG9YNsPuQIFbOQ6Sjjn1sirLUjrQqbIpyiXHseb2RlxuqY88O-lUrB7LZfGULF7nVfGwSDplEBOPNRkHsEUAxdlxs29bAGua1jjMlDaZ3mJODrxtkE1dE2WKuMHaWq_JTMXdX2_HzJtD6HYUvjenV8wPuV1Rog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Wireless Sensor Network simulators relevance compared to a real IEEE 802.15.4 Testbed</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Lohier, S. ; Rachedi, A. ; Livolant, E. ; Salhi, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lohier, S. ; Rachedi, A. ; Livolant, E. ; Salhi, I.</creatorcontrib><description>The diversity of research topics in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is attracting more and more researchers from different fields. The common point of all proposed solutions and protocols for WSNs is the evaluation usually done with network simulators. In this paper, we focus on the results relevance of wireless sensor network simulators in different scenarios based on indoor and outdoor environments. We propose a comparative study between 3 usual simulators (NS2, OPNET and QualNet) while using as reference a real testbed based on recent Imote2 sensors. The simulators give different results even in similar environments. NS2 and Qualnet give results close to those of the experimentation in the case of an indoor environment, but in the outdoor environment Opnet gives results closer to the reality. In addition, the impact of different MAC protocols (B-MAC and TKN15.4 MAC) which observe or do not observe the IEEE 802.15.4 standard is illustrated by real experimentations. They show that TKN15.4 protocol gives a better throughput than B-MAC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2376-6492</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424495399</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424495393</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424495385</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424495375</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424495377</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424495382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/IWCMC.2011.5982734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>IEEE 802.15 Standards ; IEEE 802.15.4 ; Indoor environments ; Media Access Protocol ; Network Simulators ; Receivers ; Shadow mapping ; Testbed ; Throughput ; Wireless Sensor Networks</subject><ispartof>2011 7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, 2011, p.1347-1352</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5982734$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5982734$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lohier, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rachedi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livolant, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salhi, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Wireless Sensor Network simulators relevance compared to a real IEEE 802.15.4 Testbed</title><title>2011 7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference</title><addtitle>IWCMC</addtitle><description>The diversity of research topics in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is attracting more and more researchers from different fields. The common point of all proposed solutions and protocols for WSNs is the evaluation usually done with network simulators. In this paper, we focus on the results relevance of wireless sensor network simulators in different scenarios based on indoor and outdoor environments. We propose a comparative study between 3 usual simulators (NS2, OPNET and QualNet) while using as reference a real testbed based on recent Imote2 sensors. The simulators give different results even in similar environments. NS2 and Qualnet give results close to those of the experimentation in the case of an indoor environment, but in the outdoor environment Opnet gives results closer to the reality. In addition, the impact of different MAC protocols (B-MAC and TKN15.4 MAC) which observe or do not observe the IEEE 802.15.4 standard is illustrated by real experimentations. They show that TKN15.4 protocol gives a better throughput than B-MAC.</description><subject>IEEE 802.15 Standards</subject><subject>IEEE 802.15.4</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Media Access Protocol</subject><subject>Network Simulators</subject><subject>Receivers</subject><subject>Shadow mapping</subject><subject>Testbed</subject><subject>Throughput</subject><subject>Wireless Sensor Networks</subject><issn>2376-6492</issn><isbn>9781424495399</isbn><isbn>1424495393</isbn><isbn>1424495385</isbn><isbn>9781424495375</isbn><isbn>1424495377</isbn><isbn>9781424495382</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEFLw0AUhFdUsNb-Ab3sH0h8u_s22T1KiDVQ9WBLj-UleYVg2pTdqPjvrVhPwwwfwzBC3CpIlQJ_X62L5yLVoFRqvdO5wTNxrVAjemucPRczn7t_7_2FmGiTZ0mGXl-JWYxdDQa0cTnqiVitu8A9xyjfeB-HIF94_BrCu4zd7qOncQhR_gKftG9YNsPuQIFbOQ6Sjjn1sirLUjrQqbIpyiXHseb2RlxuqY88O-lUrB7LZfGULF7nVfGwSDplEBOPNRkHsEUAxdlxs29bAGua1jjMlDaZ3mJODrxtkE1dE2WKuMHaWq_JTMXdX2_HzJtD6HYUvjenV8wPuV1Rog</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Lohier, S.</creator><creator>Rachedi, A.</creator><creator>Livolant, E.</creator><creator>Salhi, I.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Wireless Sensor Network simulators relevance compared to a real IEEE 802.15.4 Testbed</title><author>Lohier, S. ; Rachedi, A. ; Livolant, E. ; Salhi, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i1344-94ba3800f4001e61429dd0053cd384612362f47a8095c4e3bbaa61aec4b5592a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>IEEE 802.15 Standards</topic><topic>IEEE 802.15.4</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Media Access Protocol</topic><topic>Network Simulators</topic><topic>Receivers</topic><topic>Shadow mapping</topic><topic>Testbed</topic><topic>Throughput</topic><topic>Wireless Sensor Networks</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lohier, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rachedi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livolant, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salhi, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lohier, S.</au><au>Rachedi, A.</au><au>Livolant, E.</au><au>Salhi, I.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Wireless Sensor Network simulators relevance compared to a real IEEE 802.15.4 Testbed</atitle><btitle>2011 7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference</btitle><stitle>IWCMC</stitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>1347</spage><epage>1352</epage><pages>1347-1352</pages><issn>2376-6492</issn><isbn>9781424495399</isbn><isbn>1424495393</isbn><eisbn>1424495385</eisbn><eisbn>9781424495375</eisbn><eisbn>1424495377</eisbn><eisbn>9781424495382</eisbn><abstract>The diversity of research topics in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is attracting more and more researchers from different fields. The common point of all proposed solutions and protocols for WSNs is the evaluation usually done with network simulators. In this paper, we focus on the results relevance of wireless sensor network simulators in different scenarios based on indoor and outdoor environments. We propose a comparative study between 3 usual simulators (NS2, OPNET and QualNet) while using as reference a real testbed based on recent Imote2 sensors. The simulators give different results even in similar environments. NS2 and Qualnet give results close to those of the experimentation in the case of an indoor environment, but in the outdoor environment Opnet gives results closer to the reality. In addition, the impact of different MAC protocols (B-MAC and TKN15.4 MAC) which observe or do not observe the IEEE 802.15.4 standard is illustrated by real experimentations. They show that TKN15.4 protocol gives a better throughput than B-MAC.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/IWCMC.2011.5982734</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2376-6492
ispartof 2011 7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, 2011, p.1347-1352
issn 2376-6492
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5982734
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects IEEE 802.15 Standards
IEEE 802.15.4
Indoor environments
Media Access Protocol
Network Simulators
Receivers
Shadow mapping
Testbed
Throughput
Wireless Sensor Networks
title Wireless Sensor Network simulators relevance compared to a real IEEE 802.15.4 Testbed
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A43%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Wireless%20Sensor%20Network%20simulators%20relevance%20compared%20to%20a%20real%20IEEE%20802.15.4%20Testbed&rft.btitle=2011%207th%20International%20Wireless%20Communications%20and%20Mobile%20Computing%20Conference&rft.au=Lohier,%20S.&rft.date=2011-07&rft.spage=1347&rft.epage=1352&rft.pages=1347-1352&rft.issn=2376-6492&rft.isbn=9781424495399&rft.isbn_list=1424495393&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/IWCMC.2011.5982734&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5982734%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1424495385&rft.eisbn_list=9781424495375&rft.eisbn_list=1424495377&rft.eisbn_list=9781424495382&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5982734&rfr_iscdi=true