On the Energy Efficiency of Content Delivery Architectures
We examine the energy consumption of content delivery architectures, with a focus on the benefit of content centric networking (CCN) and dynamic optical bypass. For each case, we build energy models based on the energy consumption of current network equipment and devices. We further analyze the ener...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Guan, K. Atkinson, G. Kilper, D. C. Gulsen, E. |
description | We examine the energy consumption of content delivery architectures, with a focus on the benefit of content centric networking (CCN) and dynamic optical bypass. For each case, we build energy models based on the energy consumption of current network equipment and devices. We further analyze the energy tradeoff among key networking resources. By optimizing the placement of content according to its popularity, CCNs achieve good scalability in energy consumption, i.e., the per-bit energy decreases as the download rate increases. The relative energy benefit from CCNs depends on numerous factors such as content popularity, equipment energy efficiency, and network topology. As such, we provide initial assessments of the operational regimes in which CCNs are advantageous. The comparison between CCN and dynamic optical bypass suggests that CCN is more energy efficient in delivering popular content while dynamic optical bypass is more energy efficient in serving less popular content. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/iccw.2011.5963557 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5963557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5963557</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5963557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-606aab2b13b612af08a33a51ff551d02cd74b9fff924184597b70db8bea4036d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j8tOwzAURI0AiVLyAYiNfyDF16_Y7KoQHlKlbmBd2c41NSopcgwof08lymxGZzM6Q8g1sAUAs7cphJ8FZwALZbVQqjkhl6CBG2mVUqekso35Z6nPyIyDlnXDhLkg1Ti-s0O0NlaoGblbD7RskXYD5reJdjGmkHAIE91H2u6HgkOh97hL35gnusxhmwqG8pVxvCLn0e1GrI49J68P3Uv7VK_Wj8_tclUHzmSpNdPOee5B-IOTi8w4IZyCGJWCnvHQN9LbGKPlEoxUtvEN673x6CQTuhdzcvO3mxBx85nTh8vT5nhd_AIRjEpR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>On the Energy Efficiency of Content Delivery Architectures</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Guan, K. ; Atkinson, G. ; Kilper, D. C. ; Gulsen, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guan, K. ; Atkinson, G. ; Kilper, D. C. ; Gulsen, E.</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the energy consumption of content delivery architectures, with a focus on the benefit of content centric networking (CCN) and dynamic optical bypass. For each case, we build energy models based on the energy consumption of current network equipment and devices. We further analyze the energy tradeoff among key networking resources. By optimizing the placement of content according to its popularity, CCNs achieve good scalability in energy consumption, i.e., the per-bit energy decreases as the download rate increases. The relative energy benefit from CCNs depends on numerous factors such as content popularity, equipment energy efficiency, and network topology. As such, we provide initial assessments of the operational regimes in which CCNs are advantageous. The comparison between CCN and dynamic optical bypass suggests that CCN is more energy efficient in delivering popular content while dynamic optical bypass is more energy efficient in serving less popular content.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-7038</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781612849546</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1612849547</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1612849555</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781612849553</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1612849539</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781612849539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/iccw.2011.5963557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Energy consumption ; Network topology ; Optical fiber networks ; Servers ; Topology ; Wavelength division multiplexing</subject><ispartof>2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC), 2011, p.1-6</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-606aab2b13b612af08a33a51ff551d02cd74b9fff924184597b70db8bea4036d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5963557$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5963557$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guan, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilper, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulsen, E.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Energy Efficiency of Content Delivery Architectures</title><title>2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC)</title><addtitle>iccw</addtitle><description>We examine the energy consumption of content delivery architectures, with a focus on the benefit of content centric networking (CCN) and dynamic optical bypass. For each case, we build energy models based on the energy consumption of current network equipment and devices. We further analyze the energy tradeoff among key networking resources. By optimizing the placement of content according to its popularity, CCNs achieve good scalability in energy consumption, i.e., the per-bit energy decreases as the download rate increases. The relative energy benefit from CCNs depends on numerous factors such as content popularity, equipment energy efficiency, and network topology. As such, we provide initial assessments of the operational regimes in which CCNs are advantageous. The comparison between CCN and dynamic optical bypass suggests that CCN is more energy efficient in delivering popular content while dynamic optical bypass is more energy efficient in serving less popular content.</description><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Network topology</subject><subject>Optical fiber networks</subject><subject>Servers</subject><subject>Topology</subject><subject>Wavelength division multiplexing</subject><issn>2164-7038</issn><isbn>9781612849546</isbn><isbn>1612849547</isbn><isbn>1612849555</isbn><isbn>9781612849553</isbn><isbn>1612849539</isbn><isbn>9781612849539</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j8tOwzAURI0AiVLyAYiNfyDF16_Y7KoQHlKlbmBd2c41NSopcgwof08lymxGZzM6Q8g1sAUAs7cphJ8FZwALZbVQqjkhl6CBG2mVUqekso35Z6nPyIyDlnXDhLkg1Ti-s0O0NlaoGblbD7RskXYD5reJdjGmkHAIE91H2u6HgkOh97hL35gnusxhmwqG8pVxvCLn0e1GrI49J68P3Uv7VK_Wj8_tclUHzmSpNdPOee5B-IOTi8w4IZyCGJWCnvHQN9LbGKPlEoxUtvEN673x6CQTuhdzcvO3mxBx85nTh8vT5nhd_AIRjEpR</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Guan, K.</creator><creator>Atkinson, G.</creator><creator>Kilper, D. C.</creator><creator>Gulsen, E.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>On the Energy Efficiency of Content Delivery Architectures</title><author>Guan, K. ; Atkinson, G. ; Kilper, D. C. ; Gulsen, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-606aab2b13b612af08a33a51ff551d02cd74b9fff924184597b70db8bea4036d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Network topology</topic><topic>Optical fiber networks</topic><topic>Servers</topic><topic>Topology</topic><topic>Wavelength division multiplexing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guan, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilper, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulsen, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guan, K.</au><au>Atkinson, G.</au><au>Kilper, D. C.</au><au>Gulsen, E.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>On the Energy Efficiency of Content Delivery Architectures</atitle><btitle>2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC)</btitle><stitle>iccw</stitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>2164-7038</issn><isbn>9781612849546</isbn><isbn>1612849547</isbn><eisbn>1612849555</eisbn><eisbn>9781612849553</eisbn><eisbn>1612849539</eisbn><eisbn>9781612849539</eisbn><abstract>We examine the energy consumption of content delivery architectures, with a focus on the benefit of content centric networking (CCN) and dynamic optical bypass. For each case, we build energy models based on the energy consumption of current network equipment and devices. We further analyze the energy tradeoff among key networking resources. By optimizing the placement of content according to its popularity, CCNs achieve good scalability in energy consumption, i.e., the per-bit energy decreases as the download rate increases. The relative energy benefit from CCNs depends on numerous factors such as content popularity, equipment energy efficiency, and network topology. As such, we provide initial assessments of the operational regimes in which CCNs are advantageous. The comparison between CCN and dynamic optical bypass suggests that CCN is more energy efficient in delivering popular content while dynamic optical bypass is more energy efficient in serving less popular content.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/iccw.2011.5963557</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2164-7038 |
ispartof | 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC), 2011, p.1-6 |
issn | 2164-7038 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_5963557 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Energy consumption Network topology Optical fiber networks Servers Topology Wavelength division multiplexing |
title | On the Energy Efficiency of Content Delivery Architectures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A14%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Energy%20Efficiency%20of%20Content%20Delivery%20Architectures&rft.btitle=2011%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Communications%20Workshops%20(ICC)&rft.au=Guan,%20K.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=2164-7038&rft.isbn=9781612849546&rft.isbn_list=1612849547&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/iccw.2011.5963557&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5963557%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1612849555&rft.eisbn_list=9781612849553&rft.eisbn_list=1612849539&rft.eisbn_list=9781612849539&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5963557&rfr_iscdi=true |