Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling
Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management f...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 86 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 75 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Blake, G Dreslinski, R G Mudge, T |
description | Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management focused on heuristic managers that reacted to conflicts between transactions by picking the most appropriate transaction to abort. Reactive methods allow conflicts to happen repeatedly as they do not try to prevent future conflicts from happening. These shortcomings of reactive contention managers have led to proposals that approach contention management as a scheduling problem - proactive managers. Proactive techniques range from throttling execution in predicted periods of high contention to preventing groups of transactions running concurrently that are predicted likely to conflict. We propose a novel transaction scheduling scheme called "Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling" (BFGTS), that uses a combination of simple hardware and Bloom filter heuristics to guide scheduling decisions and provide enhanced performance in high contention situations. We compare to two state-of-the-art transaction schedulers, "Adaptive Transaction Scheduling" and "Proactive Transaction Scheduling" and show that BFGTS attains up to a 4.6× and 1.7× improvement on high contention benchmarks respectively. Across all benchmarks it shows a 35% and 25% average performance improvement respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749718 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5749718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5749718</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5749718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-2482e30c03551eecd1a1c77ab2a2f6d5e33a8ce86f57c727262781f5a54325ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj01Lw0AURccvsNb-AHGTtZA47828mcmyBtsKBQUrdFemkxcdSRNJ0kX_vQUL3s1dHLicK8QdyAxA5o-Lt2KaoQTIyOrcgjsTN6BR61wrbc7FCJV1KUq1vvgHuL4UIyAlU-lyey0mff8tjzEmB8KReHiq23aXzGI9cJfM97HkMll1vul9GGLbJO_hi8t9HZvPW3FV-brnyanH4mP2vCoW6fJ1_lJMl2kES0OK2iErGaQiAuZQgodgrd-ix8qUxEp5F9iZimywaNGgdVCRp6Mt-a0ai_u_3cjMm58u7nx32Jw-q1_GZ0UD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Blake, G ; Dreslinski, R G ; Mudge, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Blake, G ; Dreslinski, R G ; Mudge, T</creatorcontrib><description>Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management focused on heuristic managers that reacted to conflicts between transactions by picking the most appropriate transaction to abort. Reactive methods allow conflicts to happen repeatedly as they do not try to prevent future conflicts from happening. These shortcomings of reactive contention managers have led to proposals that approach contention management as a scheduling problem - proactive managers. Proactive techniques range from throttling execution in predicted periods of high contention to preventing groups of transactions running concurrently that are predicted likely to conflict. We propose a novel transaction scheduling scheme called "Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling" (BFGTS), that uses a combination of simple hardware and Bloom filter heuristics to guide scheduling decisions and provide enhanced performance in high contention situations. We compare to two state-of-the-art transaction schedulers, "Adaptive Transaction Scheduling" and "Proactive Transaction Scheduling" and show that BFGTS attains up to a 4.6× and 1.7× improvement on high contention benchmarks respectively. Across all benchmarks it shows a 35% and 25% average performance improvement respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-0897</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 142449432X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424494323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2378-203X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424494346</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424494354</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424494354</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424494347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Benchmark testing ; Data structures ; Hardware ; Memory management ; Registers ; Runtime ; Software</subject><ispartof>2011 IEEE 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, 2011, p.75-86</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5749718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,781,785,790,791,2059,27929,54924</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5749718$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blake, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreslinski, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudge, T</creatorcontrib><title>Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling</title><title>2011 IEEE 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture</title><addtitle>HPCA</addtitle><description>Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management focused on heuristic managers that reacted to conflicts between transactions by picking the most appropriate transaction to abort. Reactive methods allow conflicts to happen repeatedly as they do not try to prevent future conflicts from happening. These shortcomings of reactive contention managers have led to proposals that approach contention management as a scheduling problem - proactive managers. Proactive techniques range from throttling execution in predicted periods of high contention to preventing groups of transactions running concurrently that are predicted likely to conflict. We propose a novel transaction scheduling scheme called "Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling" (BFGTS), that uses a combination of simple hardware and Bloom filter heuristics to guide scheduling decisions and provide enhanced performance in high contention situations. We compare to two state-of-the-art transaction schedulers, "Adaptive Transaction Scheduling" and "Proactive Transaction Scheduling" and show that BFGTS attains up to a 4.6× and 1.7× improvement on high contention benchmarks respectively. Across all benchmarks it shows a 35% and 25% average performance improvement respectively.</description><subject>Benchmark testing</subject><subject>Data structures</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Memory management</subject><subject>Registers</subject><subject>Runtime</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1530-0897</issn><issn>2378-203X</issn><isbn>142449432X</isbn><isbn>9781424494323</isbn><isbn>1424494346</isbn><isbn>1424494354</isbn><isbn>9781424494354</isbn><isbn>9781424494347</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFj01Lw0AURccvsNb-AHGTtZA47828mcmyBtsKBQUrdFemkxcdSRNJ0kX_vQUL3s1dHLicK8QdyAxA5o-Lt2KaoQTIyOrcgjsTN6BR61wrbc7FCJV1KUq1vvgHuL4UIyAlU-lyey0mff8tjzEmB8KReHiq23aXzGI9cJfM97HkMll1vul9GGLbJO_hi8t9HZvPW3FV-brnyanH4mP2vCoW6fJ1_lJMl2kES0OK2iErGaQiAuZQgodgrd-ix8qUxEp5F9iZimywaNGgdVCRp6Mt-a0ai_u_3cjMm58u7nx32Jw-q1_GZ0UD</recordid><startdate>201102</startdate><enddate>201102</enddate><creator>Blake, G</creator><creator>Dreslinski, R G</creator><creator>Mudge, T</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201102</creationdate><title>Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling</title><author>Blake, G ; Dreslinski, R G ; Mudge, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-2482e30c03551eecd1a1c77ab2a2f6d5e33a8ce86f57c727262781f5a54325ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Benchmark testing</topic><topic>Data structures</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Memory management</topic><topic>Registers</topic><topic>Runtime</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blake, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreslinski, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudge, T</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blake, G</au><au>Dreslinski, R G</au><au>Mudge, T</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling</atitle><btitle>2011 IEEE 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture</btitle><stitle>HPCA</stitle><date>2011-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>75</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>75-86</pages><issn>1530-0897</issn><eissn>2378-203X</eissn><isbn>142449432X</isbn><isbn>9781424494323</isbn><eisbn>1424494346</eisbn><eisbn>1424494354</eisbn><eisbn>9781424494354</eisbn><eisbn>9781424494347</eisbn><abstract>Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management focused on heuristic managers that reacted to conflicts between transactions by picking the most appropriate transaction to abort. Reactive methods allow conflicts to happen repeatedly as they do not try to prevent future conflicts from happening. These shortcomings of reactive contention managers have led to proposals that approach contention management as a scheduling problem - proactive managers. Proactive techniques range from throttling execution in predicted periods of high contention to preventing groups of transactions running concurrently that are predicted likely to conflict. We propose a novel transaction scheduling scheme called "Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling" (BFGTS), that uses a combination of simple hardware and Bloom filter heuristics to guide scheduling decisions and provide enhanced performance in high contention situations. We compare to two state-of-the-art transaction schedulers, "Adaptive Transaction Scheduling" and "Proactive Transaction Scheduling" and show that BFGTS attains up to a 4.6× and 1.7× improvement on high contention benchmarks respectively. Across all benchmarks it shows a 35% and 25% average performance improvement respectively.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749718</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1530-0897 |
ispartof | 2011 IEEE 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, 2011, p.75-86 |
issn | 1530-0897 2378-203X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_5749718 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Benchmark testing Data structures Hardware Memory management Registers Runtime Software |
title | Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T15%3A24%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Bloom%20Filter%20Guided%20Transaction%20Scheduling&rft.btitle=2011%20IEEE%2017th%20International%20Symposium%20on%20High%20Performance%20Computer%20Architecture&rft.au=Blake,%20G&rft.date=2011-02&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=75-86&rft.issn=1530-0897&rft.eissn=2378-203X&rft.isbn=142449432X&rft.isbn_list=9781424494323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749718&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5749718%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1424494346&rft.eisbn_list=1424494354&rft.eisbn_list=9781424494354&rft.eisbn_list=9781424494347&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5749718&rfr_iscdi=true |