Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling

Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Blake, G, Dreslinski, R G, Mudge, T
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue
container_start_page 75
container_title
container_volume
creator Blake, G
Dreslinski, R G
Mudge, T
description Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management focused on heuristic managers that reacted to conflicts between transactions by picking the most appropriate transaction to abort. Reactive methods allow conflicts to happen repeatedly as they do not try to prevent future conflicts from happening. These shortcomings of reactive contention managers have led to proposals that approach contention management as a scheduling problem - proactive managers. Proactive techniques range from throttling execution in predicted periods of high contention to preventing groups of transactions running concurrently that are predicted likely to conflict. We propose a novel transaction scheduling scheme called "Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling" (BFGTS), that uses a combination of simple hardware and Bloom filter heuristics to guide scheduling decisions and provide enhanced performance in high contention situations. We compare to two state-of-the-art transaction schedulers, "Adaptive Transaction Scheduling" and "Proactive Transaction Scheduling" and show that BFGTS attains up to a 4.6× and 1.7× improvement on high contention benchmarks respectively. Across all benchmarks it shows a 35% and 25% average performance improvement respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749718
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5749718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5749718</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5749718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-2482e30c03551eecd1a1c77ab2a2f6d5e33a8ce86f57c727262781f5a54325ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj01Lw0AURccvsNb-AHGTtZA47828mcmyBtsKBQUrdFemkxcdSRNJ0kX_vQUL3s1dHLicK8QdyAxA5o-Lt2KaoQTIyOrcgjsTN6BR61wrbc7FCJV1KUq1vvgHuL4UIyAlU-lyey0mff8tjzEmB8KReHiq23aXzGI9cJfM97HkMll1vul9GGLbJO_hi8t9HZvPW3FV-brnyanH4mP2vCoW6fJ1_lJMl2kES0OK2iErGaQiAuZQgodgrd-ix8qUxEp5F9iZimywaNGgdVCRp6Mt-a0ai_u_3cjMm58u7nx32Jw-q1_GZ0UD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Blake, G ; Dreslinski, R G ; Mudge, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Blake, G ; Dreslinski, R G ; Mudge, T</creatorcontrib><description>Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management focused on heuristic managers that reacted to conflicts between transactions by picking the most appropriate transaction to abort. Reactive methods allow conflicts to happen repeatedly as they do not try to prevent future conflicts from happening. These shortcomings of reactive contention managers have led to proposals that approach contention management as a scheduling problem - proactive managers. Proactive techniques range from throttling execution in predicted periods of high contention to preventing groups of transactions running concurrently that are predicted likely to conflict. We propose a novel transaction scheduling scheme called "Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling" (BFGTS), that uses a combination of simple hardware and Bloom filter heuristics to guide scheduling decisions and provide enhanced performance in high contention situations. We compare to two state-of-the-art transaction schedulers, "Adaptive Transaction Scheduling" and "Proactive Transaction Scheduling" and show that BFGTS attains up to a 4.6× and 1.7× improvement on high contention benchmarks respectively. Across all benchmarks it shows a 35% and 25% average performance improvement respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-0897</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 142449432X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424494323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2378-203X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424494346</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424494354</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424494354</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424494347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Benchmark testing ; Data structures ; Hardware ; Memory management ; Registers ; Runtime ; Software</subject><ispartof>2011 IEEE 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, 2011, p.75-86</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5749718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,781,785,790,791,2059,27929,54924</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5749718$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blake, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreslinski, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudge, T</creatorcontrib><title>Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling</title><title>2011 IEEE 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture</title><addtitle>HPCA</addtitle><description>Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management focused on heuristic managers that reacted to conflicts between transactions by picking the most appropriate transaction to abort. Reactive methods allow conflicts to happen repeatedly as they do not try to prevent future conflicts from happening. These shortcomings of reactive contention managers have led to proposals that approach contention management as a scheduling problem - proactive managers. Proactive techniques range from throttling execution in predicted periods of high contention to preventing groups of transactions running concurrently that are predicted likely to conflict. We propose a novel transaction scheduling scheme called "Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling" (BFGTS), that uses a combination of simple hardware and Bloom filter heuristics to guide scheduling decisions and provide enhanced performance in high contention situations. We compare to two state-of-the-art transaction schedulers, "Adaptive Transaction Scheduling" and "Proactive Transaction Scheduling" and show that BFGTS attains up to a 4.6× and 1.7× improvement on high contention benchmarks respectively. Across all benchmarks it shows a 35% and 25% average performance improvement respectively.</description><subject>Benchmark testing</subject><subject>Data structures</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Memory management</subject><subject>Registers</subject><subject>Runtime</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1530-0897</issn><issn>2378-203X</issn><isbn>142449432X</isbn><isbn>9781424494323</isbn><isbn>1424494346</isbn><isbn>1424494354</isbn><isbn>9781424494354</isbn><isbn>9781424494347</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFj01Lw0AURccvsNb-AHGTtZA47828mcmyBtsKBQUrdFemkxcdSRNJ0kX_vQUL3s1dHLicK8QdyAxA5o-Lt2KaoQTIyOrcgjsTN6BR61wrbc7FCJV1KUq1vvgHuL4UIyAlU-lyey0mff8tjzEmB8KReHiq23aXzGI9cJfM97HkMll1vul9GGLbJO_hi8t9HZvPW3FV-brnyanH4mP2vCoW6fJ1_lJMl2kES0OK2iErGaQiAuZQgodgrd-ix8qUxEp5F9iZimywaNGgdVCRp6Mt-a0ai_u_3cjMm58u7nx32Jw-q1_GZ0UD</recordid><startdate>201102</startdate><enddate>201102</enddate><creator>Blake, G</creator><creator>Dreslinski, R G</creator><creator>Mudge, T</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201102</creationdate><title>Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling</title><author>Blake, G ; Dreslinski, R G ; Mudge, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-2482e30c03551eecd1a1c77ab2a2f6d5e33a8ce86f57c727262781f5a54325ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Benchmark testing</topic><topic>Data structures</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Memory management</topic><topic>Registers</topic><topic>Runtime</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blake, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreslinski, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudge, T</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blake, G</au><au>Dreslinski, R G</au><au>Mudge, T</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling</atitle><btitle>2011 IEEE 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture</btitle><stitle>HPCA</stitle><date>2011-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>75</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>75-86</pages><issn>1530-0897</issn><eissn>2378-203X</eissn><isbn>142449432X</isbn><isbn>9781424494323</isbn><eisbn>1424494346</eisbn><eisbn>1424494354</eisbn><eisbn>9781424494354</eisbn><eisbn>9781424494347</eisbn><abstract>Contention management is an important design component to a transactional memory system. Without effective contention management to ensure forward progress, a transactional memory system can experience live-lock, which is difficult to debug in parallel programs. Early work in contention management focused on heuristic managers that reacted to conflicts between transactions by picking the most appropriate transaction to abort. Reactive methods allow conflicts to happen repeatedly as they do not try to prevent future conflicts from happening. These shortcomings of reactive contention managers have led to proposals that approach contention management as a scheduling problem - proactive managers. Proactive techniques range from throttling execution in predicted periods of high contention to preventing groups of transactions running concurrently that are predicted likely to conflict. We propose a novel transaction scheduling scheme called "Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling" (BFGTS), that uses a combination of simple hardware and Bloom filter heuristics to guide scheduling decisions and provide enhanced performance in high contention situations. We compare to two state-of-the-art transaction schedulers, "Adaptive Transaction Scheduling" and "Proactive Transaction Scheduling" and show that BFGTS attains up to a 4.6× and 1.7× improvement on high contention benchmarks respectively. Across all benchmarks it shows a 35% and 25% average performance improvement respectively.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749718</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1530-0897
ispartof 2011 IEEE 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, 2011, p.75-86
issn 1530-0897
2378-203X
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5749718
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Benchmark testing
Data structures
Hardware
Memory management
Registers
Runtime
Software
title Bloom Filter Guided Transaction Scheduling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T15%3A24%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Bloom%20Filter%20Guided%20Transaction%20Scheduling&rft.btitle=2011%20IEEE%2017th%20International%20Symposium%20on%20High%20Performance%20Computer%20Architecture&rft.au=Blake,%20G&rft.date=2011-02&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=75-86&rft.issn=1530-0897&rft.eissn=2378-203X&rft.isbn=142449432X&rft.isbn_list=9781424494323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749718&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5749718%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1424494346&rft.eisbn_list=1424494354&rft.eisbn_list=9781424494354&rft.eisbn_list=9781424494347&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5749718&rfr_iscdi=true