Is High Quality Sensing Really Necessary for Opportunistic Spectrum Usage?
The major requirement for Cognitive Radio (CR) based opportunistic spectrum re-usage is reliable protection of the primary communication. This calls for a reliable detection of the presence of the Primary Users (PUs) as well as for an immediate reconfiguration of the secondary communication: Each ti...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Dombrowski, C Willkomm, D Wolisz, A |
description | The major requirement for Cognitive Radio (CR) based opportunistic spectrum re-usage is reliable protection of the primary communication. This calls for a reliable detection of the presence of the Primary Users (PUs) as well as for an immediate reconfiguration of the secondary communication: Each time the PU has been detected, the Secondary Users (SUs) have to vacate the respective part of the spectrum and continue their communication elsewhere. Unfortunately enough, also false positives in the sensing process trigger the same type of reconfiguration, leading to more reconfigurations than actually necessary. Therefore, the efficiency of this reconfiguration process is of high interest. For a frequently postulated OFDM based spectrum pooling SU system two basic questions are considered: (1) How should the parameters of the secondary communication link be selected in order to achieve a stable Quality of Service (QoS) in spite of reconfigurations, and (2) how strongly is the QoS of the SU influenced by reconfigurations caused by a non ideal sensing process, i. e. by an excessive number of false positives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683599 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5683599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5683599</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5683599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-6e451a8f6544b482b97053acb1a7ce159bd4f9ba29e8900cc5043bd57730e2203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtqwkAYhac3qNo-gZt5gdi5_TOZVSnSqiVtaK3gTibjn3RKjCETF759hQpdHTgfHD4OIWPOJpwz-zDL8mn-NhHsVIBOJVh7QYZcCaVAS8MvyUCA0YnRan31D7S8JgNuJUtA2PUtGcb4wxioFPiAvC4inYfqm34cXB36I11iE0NT0U90dX2k7-gxRtcdabnvaN62-64_NCH2wdNli77vDju6iq7CxztyU7o64v05R2T18vw1nSdZPltMn7IkcAN9olEBd2mpQalCpaKwhoF0vuDOeORgi60qbeGExdQy5j0wJYstGCMZCsHkiIz_dgMibtou7E56m_Mh8hfqnVDc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Is High Quality Sensing Really Necessary for Opportunistic Spectrum Usage?</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Dombrowski, C ; Willkomm, D ; Wolisz, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Dombrowski, C ; Willkomm, D ; Wolisz, A</creatorcontrib><description>The major requirement for Cognitive Radio (CR) based opportunistic spectrum re-usage is reliable protection of the primary communication. This calls for a reliable detection of the presence of the Primary Users (PUs) as well as for an immediate reconfiguration of the secondary communication: Each time the PU has been detected, the Secondary Users (SUs) have to vacate the respective part of the spectrum and continue their communication elsewhere. Unfortunately enough, also false positives in the sensing process trigger the same type of reconfiguration, leading to more reconfigurations than actually necessary. Therefore, the efficiency of this reconfiguration process is of high interest. For a frequently postulated OFDM based spectrum pooling SU system two basic questions are considered: (1) How should the parameters of the secondary communication link be selected in order to achieve a stable Quality of Service (QoS) in spite of reconfigurations, and (2) how strongly is the QoS of the SU influenced by reconfigurations caused by a non ideal sensing process, i. e. by an excessive number of false positives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-529X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424456363</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424456369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2576-764X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424456371</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424456383</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424456376</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 142445638X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Bandwidth ; Data communication ; OFDM ; Quality of service ; Sensors ; Telephony</subject><ispartof>2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010, 2010, p.1-6</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5683599$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2051,27904,54899</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5683599$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dombrowski, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willkomm, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolisz, A</creatorcontrib><title>Is High Quality Sensing Really Necessary for Opportunistic Spectrum Usage?</title><title>2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010</title><addtitle>GLOCOM</addtitle><description>The major requirement for Cognitive Radio (CR) based opportunistic spectrum re-usage is reliable protection of the primary communication. This calls for a reliable detection of the presence of the Primary Users (PUs) as well as for an immediate reconfiguration of the secondary communication: Each time the PU has been detected, the Secondary Users (SUs) have to vacate the respective part of the spectrum and continue their communication elsewhere. Unfortunately enough, also false positives in the sensing process trigger the same type of reconfiguration, leading to more reconfigurations than actually necessary. Therefore, the efficiency of this reconfiguration process is of high interest. For a frequently postulated OFDM based spectrum pooling SU system two basic questions are considered: (1) How should the parameters of the secondary communication link be selected in order to achieve a stable Quality of Service (QoS) in spite of reconfigurations, and (2) how strongly is the QoS of the SU influenced by reconfigurations caused by a non ideal sensing process, i. e. by an excessive number of false positives.</description><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Data communication</subject><subject>OFDM</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Telephony</subject><issn>1930-529X</issn><issn>2576-764X</issn><isbn>1424456363</isbn><isbn>9781424456369</isbn><isbn>1424456371</isbn><isbn>9781424456383</isbn><isbn>9781424456376</isbn><isbn>142445638X</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtqwkAYhac3qNo-gZt5gdi5_TOZVSnSqiVtaK3gTibjn3RKjCETF759hQpdHTgfHD4OIWPOJpwz-zDL8mn-NhHsVIBOJVh7QYZcCaVAS8MvyUCA0YnRan31D7S8JgNuJUtA2PUtGcb4wxioFPiAvC4inYfqm34cXB36I11iE0NT0U90dX2k7-gxRtcdabnvaN62-64_NCH2wdNli77vDju6iq7CxztyU7o64v05R2T18vw1nSdZPltMn7IkcAN9olEBd2mpQalCpaKwhoF0vuDOeORgi60qbeGExdQy5j0wJYstGCMZCsHkiIz_dgMibtou7E56m_Mh8hfqnVDc</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Dombrowski, C</creator><creator>Willkomm, D</creator><creator>Wolisz, A</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Is High Quality Sensing Really Necessary for Opportunistic Spectrum Usage?</title><author>Dombrowski, C ; Willkomm, D ; Wolisz, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-6e451a8f6544b482b97053acb1a7ce159bd4f9ba29e8900cc5043bd57730e2203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Data communication</topic><topic>OFDM</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Telephony</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dombrowski, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willkomm, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolisz, A</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dombrowski, C</au><au>Willkomm, D</au><au>Wolisz, A</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Is High Quality Sensing Really Necessary for Opportunistic Spectrum Usage?</atitle><btitle>2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010</btitle><stitle>GLOCOM</stitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>1930-529X</issn><eissn>2576-764X</eissn><isbn>1424456363</isbn><isbn>9781424456369</isbn><eisbn>1424456371</eisbn><eisbn>9781424456383</eisbn><eisbn>9781424456376</eisbn><eisbn>142445638X</eisbn><abstract>The major requirement for Cognitive Radio (CR) based opportunistic spectrum re-usage is reliable protection of the primary communication. This calls for a reliable detection of the presence of the Primary Users (PUs) as well as for an immediate reconfiguration of the secondary communication: Each time the PU has been detected, the Secondary Users (SUs) have to vacate the respective part of the spectrum and continue their communication elsewhere. Unfortunately enough, also false positives in the sensing process trigger the same type of reconfiguration, leading to more reconfigurations than actually necessary. Therefore, the efficiency of this reconfiguration process is of high interest. For a frequently postulated OFDM based spectrum pooling SU system two basic questions are considered: (1) How should the parameters of the secondary communication link be selected in order to achieve a stable Quality of Service (QoS) in spite of reconfigurations, and (2) how strongly is the QoS of the SU influenced by reconfigurations caused by a non ideal sensing process, i. e. by an excessive number of false positives.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683599</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1930-529X |
ispartof | 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010, 2010, p.1-6 |
issn | 1930-529X 2576-764X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_5683599 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Bandwidth Data communication OFDM Quality of service Sensors Telephony |
title | Is High Quality Sensing Really Necessary for Opportunistic Spectrum Usage? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T15%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Is%20High%20Quality%20Sensing%20Really%20Necessary%20for%20Opportunistic%20Spectrum%20Usage?&rft.btitle=2010%20IEEE%20Global%20Telecommunications%20Conference%20GLOBECOM%202010&rft.au=Dombrowski,%20C&rft.date=2010-12&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=1930-529X&rft.eissn=2576-764X&rft.isbn=1424456363&rft.isbn_list=9781424456369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683599&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5683599%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1424456371&rft.eisbn_list=9781424456383&rft.eisbn_list=9781424456376&rft.eisbn_list=142445638X&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5683599&rfr_iscdi=true |