On the use of adaptive beam forming techniques for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise

We provide an explanation for the poor performance of the minimum-variance distortionless-response (MVDR) beam former when applied to one particular technique for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise. Previous studies have shown that using the Bartlett beam former one can estimate the refle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Muzi, L, Siderius, M, Gebbie, J, Paddock, J
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title
container_volume
creator Muzi, L
Siderius, M
Gebbie, J
Paddock, J
description We provide an explanation for the poor performance of the minimum-variance distortionless-response (MVDR) beam former when applied to one particular technique for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise. Previous studies have shown that using the Bartlett beam former one can estimate the reflection loss (RL) as a function of frequency and grazing angle, and use it to estimate the seabed geoacoustic parameters. Despite its superior performance in direction-of-arrival estimation, the MVDR beam former's results for RL estimation are less reliable than those yielded by the Bartlett beam former. One important difference between the two beam formers lies in the fact that the MVDR beam patterns for the two look directions ±φ can be markedly different, whereas the Bartlett beam patterns are always symmetric with respect to the broadside look direction. By estimating the RL from simulated acoustic fields we first present a method of quantifying and visualizing the asymmetry, and then show that it is responsible for the anomalies in the MVDR-based RL estimate.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664300
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5664300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5664300</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5664300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-df887a9f44d7bd7270862279d1296170de23cd76e7425741a21a3a1cd6771fce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEFPAjEUhGuUREB-AZf-gcW-ttu3PRKCYkLkoJ6xu30LTdwubhcS_70Q8TSZL5nJZBibgpgBCPu4WSznr28zKc4gN0YrIW7YCLTUWiul9C2bWCz-vYQ7NhRgMUNV5AM2kkJYK6Sy5p5NUgqlADACVGGH7HMTeb8nfkzE25o77w59OBEvyTW8brsmxB3vqdrH8H2kdEF8R62r2mPqQ8VDPFGXQhsv6cZ1IRJ3TRko9jy2IdEDG9TuK9HkqmP28bR8X6yy9eb5ZTFfZwEw7zNfFwU6W2vtsfQoURRGSrQepDWAwpNUlUdDqGWOGpwEpxxU3iBCXZEas-lfbyCi7aEL5zE_2-tb6hco7Vp3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>On the use of adaptive beam forming techniques for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Muzi, L ; Siderius, M ; Gebbie, J ; Paddock, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Muzi, L ; Siderius, M ; Gebbie, J ; Paddock, J</creatorcontrib><description>We provide an explanation for the poor performance of the minimum-variance distortionless-response (MVDR) beam former when applied to one particular technique for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise. Previous studies have shown that using the Bartlett beam former one can estimate the reflection loss (RL) as a function of frequency and grazing angle, and use it to estimate the seabed geoacoustic parameters. Despite its superior performance in direction-of-arrival estimation, the MVDR beam former's results for RL estimation are less reliable than those yielded by the Bartlett beam former. One important difference between the two beam formers lies in the fact that the MVDR beam patterns for the two look directions ±φ can be markedly different, whereas the Bartlett beam patterns are always symmetric with respect to the broadside look direction. By estimating the RL from simulated acoustic fields we first present a method of quantifying and visualizing the asymmetry, and then show that it is responsible for the anomalies in the MVDR-based RL estimate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-7385</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424443321</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424443326</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424443334</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424443338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664300</identifier><identifier>LCCN: 2009902396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Acoustic beams ; Arrays ; Estimation ; Frequency estimation ; Geoacoustic inversion ; Noise ; Reflection</subject><ispartof>OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE, 2010, p.1-6</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5664300$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5664300$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muzi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siderius, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebbie, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paddock, J</creatorcontrib><title>On the use of adaptive beam forming techniques for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise</title><title>OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE</title><addtitle>OCEANS</addtitle><description>We provide an explanation for the poor performance of the minimum-variance distortionless-response (MVDR) beam former when applied to one particular technique for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise. Previous studies have shown that using the Bartlett beam former one can estimate the reflection loss (RL) as a function of frequency and grazing angle, and use it to estimate the seabed geoacoustic parameters. Despite its superior performance in direction-of-arrival estimation, the MVDR beam former's results for RL estimation are less reliable than those yielded by the Bartlett beam former. One important difference between the two beam formers lies in the fact that the MVDR beam patterns for the two look directions ±φ can be markedly different, whereas the Bartlett beam patterns are always symmetric with respect to the broadside look direction. By estimating the RL from simulated acoustic fields we first present a method of quantifying and visualizing the asymmetry, and then show that it is responsible for the anomalies in the MVDR-based RL estimate.</description><subject>Acoustic beams</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Frequency estimation</subject><subject>Geoacoustic inversion</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><issn>0197-7385</issn><isbn>9781424443321</isbn><isbn>1424443326</isbn><isbn>1424443334</isbn><isbn>9781424443338</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEFPAjEUhGuUREB-AZf-gcW-ttu3PRKCYkLkoJ6xu30LTdwubhcS_70Q8TSZL5nJZBibgpgBCPu4WSznr28zKc4gN0YrIW7YCLTUWiul9C2bWCz-vYQ7NhRgMUNV5AM2kkJYK6Sy5p5NUgqlADACVGGH7HMTeb8nfkzE25o77w59OBEvyTW8brsmxB3vqdrH8H2kdEF8R62r2mPqQ8VDPFGXQhsv6cZ1IRJ3TRko9jy2IdEDG9TuK9HkqmP28bR8X6yy9eb5ZTFfZwEw7zNfFwU6W2vtsfQoURRGSrQepDWAwpNUlUdDqGWOGpwEpxxU3iBCXZEas-lfbyCi7aEL5zE_2-tb6hco7Vp3</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Muzi, L</creator><creator>Siderius, M</creator><creator>Gebbie, J</creator><creator>Paddock, J</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>On the use of adaptive beam forming techniques for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise</title><author>Muzi, L ; Siderius, M ; Gebbie, J ; Paddock, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-df887a9f44d7bd7270862279d1296170de23cd76e7425741a21a3a1cd6771fce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Acoustic beams</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Frequency estimation</topic><topic>Geoacoustic inversion</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muzi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siderius, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebbie, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paddock, J</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muzi, L</au><au>Siderius, M</au><au>Gebbie, J</au><au>Paddock, J</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>On the use of adaptive beam forming techniques for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise</atitle><btitle>OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE</btitle><stitle>OCEANS</stitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0197-7385</issn><isbn>9781424443321</isbn><isbn>1424443326</isbn><eisbn>1424443334</eisbn><eisbn>9781424443338</eisbn><abstract>We provide an explanation for the poor performance of the minimum-variance distortionless-response (MVDR) beam former when applied to one particular technique for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise. Previous studies have shown that using the Bartlett beam former one can estimate the reflection loss (RL) as a function of frequency and grazing angle, and use it to estimate the seabed geoacoustic parameters. Despite its superior performance in direction-of-arrival estimation, the MVDR beam former's results for RL estimation are less reliable than those yielded by the Bartlett beam former. One important difference between the two beam formers lies in the fact that the MVDR beam patterns for the two look directions ±φ can be markedly different, whereas the Bartlett beam patterns are always symmetric with respect to the broadside look direction. By estimating the RL from simulated acoustic fields we first present a method of quantifying and visualizing the asymmetry, and then show that it is responsible for the anomalies in the MVDR-based RL estimate.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664300</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0197-7385
ispartof OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE, 2010, p.1-6
issn 0197-7385
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5664300
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Acoustic beams
Arrays
Estimation
Frequency estimation
Geoacoustic inversion
Noise
Reflection
title On the use of adaptive beam forming techniques for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A39%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=On%20the%20use%20of%20adaptive%20beam%20forming%20techniques%20for%20geoacoustic%20inversion%20of%20marine%20ambient%20noise&rft.btitle=OCEANS%202010%20MTS/IEEE%20SEATTLE&rft.au=Muzi,%20L&rft.date=2010-09&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0197-7385&rft.isbn=9781424443321&rft.isbn_list=1424443326&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664300&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5664300%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1424443334&rft.eisbn_list=9781424443338&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5664300&rfr_iscdi=true