Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction

In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zacharias, F, Howard, I S, Hulin, T, Hirzinger, G
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3122
container_issue
container_start_page 3117
container_title
container_volume
creator Zacharias, F
Howard, I S
Hulin, T
Hirzinger, G
description In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are analyzed for a recently introduced haptic device that is based on two DLR-KUKA light weight robots: the standard configuration, where the device is opposite the human operator, and the ergonomic configuration, where the haptic device is mounted behind the human operator. The human operator directly controls the robotic arms using handles. The analysis is performed using a representation of the robot arm workspace. The merits of restricting the comparisons to the most significant regions of the human workspace are discussed. Using this method, a greater workspace correspondence for the ergonomic configuration was shown.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649207
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5649207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5649207</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5649207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i218t-b71738fe33efb89b3d8440a61c37564d91ec3adb61df60a121248666112bcd573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNtKxDAYhOMJXNY-gHjTF-iaP0lzuJTFQ2FhwQNeLkmaaNQ2JWkvfHu7uAheDTMfDMwgdAl4BYDVdfO4fVoRPNuaM0WwOEKFEhIYYYxzwdkxWhCoaYUl5yf_GMOnf6yW56jI-QPjuUooqfgCNa8xfeZBW1fa2A06hRz7XEZfZjdOwxz2PrxNSY9hn_uYyvep032VooljGfrRJW338AKdef2VXXHQJXq5u31eP1Sb7X2zvtlUgYAcKyNAUOkdpc4bqQxtJWNYc7BUzOtaBc5S3RoOredYAwHC5lUcgBjb1oIu0dVvb3DO7YYUOp2-d4dj6A_exFLp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Zacharias, F ; Howard, I S ; Hulin, T ; Hirzinger, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Zacharias, F ; Howard, I S ; Hulin, T ; Hirzinger, G</creatorcontrib><description>In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are analyzed for a recently introduced haptic device that is based on two DLR-KUKA light weight robots: the standard configuration, where the device is opposite the human operator, and the ergonomic configuration, where the haptic device is mounted behind the human operator. The human operator directly controls the robotic arms using handles. The analysis is performed using a representation of the robot arm workspace. The merits of restricting the comparisons to the most significant regions of the human workspace are discussed. Using this method, a greater workspace correspondence for the ergonomic configuration was shown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2153-0858</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424466740</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424466741</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-0866</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424466764</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424466768</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 142446675X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424466757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Collision avoidance ; Haptic interfaces ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Manipulators ; Robot kinematics</subject><ispartof>2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2010, p.3117-3122</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5649207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5649207$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zacharias, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, I S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulin, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirzinger, G</creatorcontrib><title>Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction</title><title>2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems</title><addtitle>IROS</addtitle><description>In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are analyzed for a recently introduced haptic device that is based on two DLR-KUKA light weight robots: the standard configuration, where the device is opposite the human operator, and the ergonomic configuration, where the haptic device is mounted behind the human operator. The human operator directly controls the robotic arms using handles. The analysis is performed using a representation of the robot arm workspace. The merits of restricting the comparisons to the most significant regions of the human workspace are discussed. Using this method, a greater workspace correspondence for the ergonomic configuration was shown.</description><subject>Collision avoidance</subject><subject>Haptic interfaces</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Manipulators</subject><subject>Robot kinematics</subject><issn>2153-0858</issn><issn>2153-0866</issn><isbn>9781424466740</isbn><isbn>1424466741</isbn><isbn>9781424466764</isbn><isbn>1424466768</isbn><isbn>142446675X</isbn><isbn>9781424466757</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkNtKxDAYhOMJXNY-gHjTF-iaP0lzuJTFQ2FhwQNeLkmaaNQ2JWkvfHu7uAheDTMfDMwgdAl4BYDVdfO4fVoRPNuaM0WwOEKFEhIYYYxzwdkxWhCoaYUl5yf_GMOnf6yW56jI-QPjuUooqfgCNa8xfeZBW1fa2A06hRz7XEZfZjdOwxz2PrxNSY9hn_uYyvep032VooljGfrRJW338AKdef2VXXHQJXq5u31eP1Sb7X2zvtlUgYAcKyNAUOkdpc4bqQxtJWNYc7BUzOtaBc5S3RoOredYAwHC5lUcgBjb1oIu0dVvb3DO7YYUOp2-d4dj6A_exFLp</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Zacharias, F</creator><creator>Howard, I S</creator><creator>Hulin, T</creator><creator>Hirzinger, G</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction</title><author>Zacharias, F ; Howard, I S ; Hulin, T ; Hirzinger, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i218t-b71738fe33efb89b3d8440a61c37564d91ec3adb61df60a121248666112bcd573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Collision avoidance</topic><topic>Haptic interfaces</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Manipulators</topic><topic>Robot kinematics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zacharias, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, I S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulin, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirzinger, G</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zacharias, F</au><au>Howard, I S</au><au>Hulin, T</au><au>Hirzinger, G</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction</atitle><btitle>2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems</btitle><stitle>IROS</stitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><spage>3117</spage><epage>3122</epage><pages>3117-3122</pages><issn>2153-0858</issn><eissn>2153-0866</eissn><isbn>9781424466740</isbn><isbn>1424466741</isbn><eisbn>9781424466764</eisbn><eisbn>1424466768</eisbn><eisbn>142446675X</eisbn><eisbn>9781424466757</eisbn><abstract>In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are analyzed for a recently introduced haptic device that is based on two DLR-KUKA light weight robots: the standard configuration, where the device is opposite the human operator, and the ergonomic configuration, where the haptic device is mounted behind the human operator. The human operator directly controls the robotic arms using handles. The analysis is performed using a representation of the robot arm workspace. The merits of restricting the comparisons to the most significant regions of the human workspace are discussed. Using this method, a greater workspace correspondence for the ergonomic configuration was shown.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/IROS.2010.5649207</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2153-0858
ispartof 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2010, p.3117-3122
issn 2153-0858
2153-0866
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5649207
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Collision avoidance
Haptic interfaces
Humans
Kinematics
Manipulators
Robot kinematics
title Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A35%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Workspace%20comparisons%20of%20setup%20configurations%20for%20human-robot%20interaction&rft.btitle=2010%20IEEE/RSJ%20International%20Conference%20on%20Intelligent%20Robots%20and%20Systems&rft.au=Zacharias,%20F&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.spage=3117&rft.epage=3122&rft.pages=3117-3122&rft.issn=2153-0858&rft.eissn=2153-0866&rft.isbn=9781424466740&rft.isbn_list=1424466741&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/IROS.2010.5649207&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5649207%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781424466764&rft.eisbn_list=1424466768&rft.eisbn_list=142446675X&rft.eisbn_list=9781424466757&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5649207&rfr_iscdi=true