Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction
In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are a...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3122 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 3117 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Zacharias, F Howard, I S Hulin, T Hirzinger, G |
description | In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are analyzed for a recently introduced haptic device that is based on two DLR-KUKA light weight robots: the standard configuration, where the device is opposite the human operator, and the ergonomic configuration, where the haptic device is mounted behind the human operator. The human operator directly controls the robotic arms using handles. The analysis is performed using a representation of the robot arm workspace. The merits of restricting the comparisons to the most significant regions of the human workspace are discussed. Using this method, a greater workspace correspondence for the ergonomic configuration was shown. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649207 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5649207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5649207</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5649207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i218t-b71738fe33efb89b3d8440a61c37564d91ec3adb61df60a121248666112bcd573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNtKxDAYhOMJXNY-gHjTF-iaP0lzuJTFQ2FhwQNeLkmaaNQ2JWkvfHu7uAheDTMfDMwgdAl4BYDVdfO4fVoRPNuaM0WwOEKFEhIYYYxzwdkxWhCoaYUl5yf_GMOnf6yW56jI-QPjuUooqfgCNa8xfeZBW1fa2A06hRz7XEZfZjdOwxz2PrxNSY9hn_uYyvep032VooljGfrRJW338AKdef2VXXHQJXq5u31eP1Sb7X2zvtlUgYAcKyNAUOkdpc4bqQxtJWNYc7BUzOtaBc5S3RoOredYAwHC5lUcgBjb1oIu0dVvb3DO7YYUOp2-d4dj6A_exFLp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Zacharias, F ; Howard, I S ; Hulin, T ; Hirzinger, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Zacharias, F ; Howard, I S ; Hulin, T ; Hirzinger, G</creatorcontrib><description>In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are analyzed for a recently introduced haptic device that is based on two DLR-KUKA light weight robots: the standard configuration, where the device is opposite the human operator, and the ergonomic configuration, where the haptic device is mounted behind the human operator. The human operator directly controls the robotic arms using handles. The analysis is performed using a representation of the robot arm workspace. The merits of restricting the comparisons to the most significant regions of the human workspace are discussed. Using this method, a greater workspace correspondence for the ergonomic configuration was shown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2153-0858</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424466740</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424466741</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-0866</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424466764</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424466768</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 142446675X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424466757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Collision avoidance ; Haptic interfaces ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Manipulators ; Robot kinematics</subject><ispartof>2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2010, p.3117-3122</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5649207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5649207$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zacharias, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, I S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulin, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirzinger, G</creatorcontrib><title>Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction</title><title>2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems</title><addtitle>IROS</addtitle><description>In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are analyzed for a recently introduced haptic device that is based on two DLR-KUKA light weight robots: the standard configuration, where the device is opposite the human operator, and the ergonomic configuration, where the haptic device is mounted behind the human operator. The human operator directly controls the robotic arms using handles. The analysis is performed using a representation of the robot arm workspace. The merits of restricting the comparisons to the most significant regions of the human workspace are discussed. Using this method, a greater workspace correspondence for the ergonomic configuration was shown.</description><subject>Collision avoidance</subject><subject>Haptic interfaces</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Manipulators</subject><subject>Robot kinematics</subject><issn>2153-0858</issn><issn>2153-0866</issn><isbn>9781424466740</isbn><isbn>1424466741</isbn><isbn>9781424466764</isbn><isbn>1424466768</isbn><isbn>142446675X</isbn><isbn>9781424466757</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkNtKxDAYhOMJXNY-gHjTF-iaP0lzuJTFQ2FhwQNeLkmaaNQ2JWkvfHu7uAheDTMfDMwgdAl4BYDVdfO4fVoRPNuaM0WwOEKFEhIYYYxzwdkxWhCoaYUl5yf_GMOnf6yW56jI-QPjuUooqfgCNa8xfeZBW1fa2A06hRz7XEZfZjdOwxz2PrxNSY9hn_uYyvep032VooljGfrRJW338AKdef2VXXHQJXq5u31eP1Sb7X2zvtlUgYAcKyNAUOkdpc4bqQxtJWNYc7BUzOtaBc5S3RoOredYAwHC5lUcgBjb1oIu0dVvb3DO7YYUOp2-d4dj6A_exFLp</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Zacharias, F</creator><creator>Howard, I S</creator><creator>Hulin, T</creator><creator>Hirzinger, G</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction</title><author>Zacharias, F ; Howard, I S ; Hulin, T ; Hirzinger, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i218t-b71738fe33efb89b3d8440a61c37564d91ec3adb61df60a121248666112bcd573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Collision avoidance</topic><topic>Haptic interfaces</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Manipulators</topic><topic>Robot kinematics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zacharias, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, I S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulin, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirzinger, G</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zacharias, F</au><au>Howard, I S</au><au>Hulin, T</au><au>Hirzinger, G</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction</atitle><btitle>2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems</btitle><stitle>IROS</stitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><spage>3117</spage><epage>3122</epage><pages>3117-3122</pages><issn>2153-0858</issn><eissn>2153-0866</eissn><isbn>9781424466740</isbn><isbn>1424466741</isbn><eisbn>9781424466764</eisbn><eisbn>1424466768</eisbn><eisbn>142446675X</eisbn><eisbn>9781424466757</eisbn><abstract>In virtual assembly verification or remote maintenance tasks, bimanual haptic interfaces play a crucial role in successful task completion. This paper proposes a method for objectively comparing how well a haptic interface covers the reachable workspace of human arms. Two system configurations are analyzed for a recently introduced haptic device that is based on two DLR-KUKA light weight robots: the standard configuration, where the device is opposite the human operator, and the ergonomic configuration, where the haptic device is mounted behind the human operator. The human operator directly controls the robotic arms using handles. The analysis is performed using a representation of the robot arm workspace. The merits of restricting the comparisons to the most significant regions of the human workspace are discussed. Using this method, a greater workspace correspondence for the ergonomic configuration was shown.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/IROS.2010.5649207</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2153-0858 |
ispartof | 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2010, p.3117-3122 |
issn | 2153-0858 2153-0866 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_5649207 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Collision avoidance Haptic interfaces Humans Kinematics Manipulators Robot kinematics |
title | Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A35%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Workspace%20comparisons%20of%20setup%20configurations%20for%20human-robot%20interaction&rft.btitle=2010%20IEEE/RSJ%20International%20Conference%20on%20Intelligent%20Robots%20and%20Systems&rft.au=Zacharias,%20F&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.spage=3117&rft.epage=3122&rft.pages=3117-3122&rft.issn=2153-0858&rft.eissn=2153-0866&rft.isbn=9781424466740&rft.isbn_list=1424466741&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/IROS.2010.5649207&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5649207%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781424466764&rft.eisbn_list=1424466768&rft.eisbn_list=142446675X&rft.eisbn_list=9781424466757&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5649207&rfr_iscdi=true |