Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting
Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on image processing 2011-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1313-1326 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1326 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1313 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on image processing |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Eid, A H Ahmed, M N Cooper, B E Rippetoe, E E |
description | Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TIP.2010.2092511 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5635331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5635331</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>875052968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9f0d42f9e7f86c499e24660b64b69d77bd727a926adb7550cc626d3f09b62a533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EglLYkZBQxMJC4Oz4I2aDCgqoEh0Ka-Q4TmvUxsV2B_j1GLV0YGG6O_t5Tzo9CJ1guMIY5PXkaXxFIE0EJGEY76AelhTnAJTsph6YyAWm8gAdhvAOgCnDfB8dEAyiZAJ66G0wU17paLz9UtG6LnNtdj83Onq3nLnopl4tZ1ZnY2-7mN36aNuEh5vsTnWN7aaX2bONKX6ZpTkbzlyI6fUI7bVqHszxpvbR68P9ZPCYj16GT4PbUa4LIWIuW2goaaURbck1ldIQyjnUnNZcNkLUjSBCScJVUwvGQGtOeFO0IGtOFCuKPrpY711697EyIVYLG7SZz1Vn3CpUpWDAiOTl_yQvKClpAYk8_0O-u5Xv0hkJIqLkjJEEwRrS3oXgTVstvV0o_1lhqH7cVMlN9eOm2rhJkbPN3lW9MM028CsjAadrwBpjtt-MF-lQXHwDbhSRHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>862786552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting</title><source>IEEE Xplore</source><creator>Eid, A H ; Ahmed, M N ; Cooper, B E ; Rippetoe, E E</creator><creatorcontrib>Eid, A H ; Ahmed, M N ; Cooper, B E ; Rippetoe, E E</creatorcontrib><description>Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-7149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2092511</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21078570</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IIPRE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Banding ; Calibration ; defect ; Defects ; Discrete Fourier transforms ; electrophotographic ; Filtering ; Ghosting ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Jitter ; Position (location) ; print quality ; Printers ; Prints ; Spectral analysis ; Studies ; template matching ; Wavelet transforms ; wavelets</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on image processing, 2011-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1313-1326</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) May 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9f0d42f9e7f86c499e24660b64b69d77bd727a926adb7550cc626d3f09b62a533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9f0d42f9e7f86c499e24660b64b69d77bd727a926adb7550cc626d3f09b62a533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5635331$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5635331$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21078570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eid, A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, M N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippetoe, E E</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting</title><title>IEEE transactions on image processing</title><addtitle>TIP</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Image Process</addtitle><description>Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Banding</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>defect</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Discrete Fourier transforms</subject><subject>electrophotographic</subject><subject>Filtering</subject><subject>Ghosting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Jitter</subject><subject>Position (location)</subject><subject>print quality</subject><subject>Printers</subject><subject>Prints</subject><subject>Spectral analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>template matching</subject><subject>Wavelet transforms</subject><subject>wavelets</subject><issn>1057-7149</issn><issn>1941-0042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EglLYkZBQxMJC4Oz4I2aDCgqoEh0Ka-Q4TmvUxsV2B_j1GLV0YGG6O_t5Tzo9CJ1guMIY5PXkaXxFIE0EJGEY76AelhTnAJTsph6YyAWm8gAdhvAOgCnDfB8dEAyiZAJ66G0wU17paLz9UtG6LnNtdj83Onq3nLnopl4tZ1ZnY2-7mN36aNuEh5vsTnWN7aaX2bONKX6ZpTkbzlyI6fUI7bVqHszxpvbR68P9ZPCYj16GT4PbUa4LIWIuW2goaaURbck1ldIQyjnUnNZcNkLUjSBCScJVUwvGQGtOeFO0IGtOFCuKPrpY711697EyIVYLG7SZz1Vn3CpUpWDAiOTl_yQvKClpAYk8_0O-u5Xv0hkJIqLkjJEEwRrS3oXgTVstvV0o_1lhqH7cVMlN9eOm2rhJkbPN3lW9MM028CsjAadrwBpjtt-MF-lQXHwDbhSRHg</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Eid, A H</creator><creator>Ahmed, M N</creator><creator>Cooper, B E</creator><creator>Rippetoe, E E</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting</title><author>Eid, A H ; Ahmed, M N ; Cooper, B E ; Rippetoe, E E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9f0d42f9e7f86c499e24660b64b69d77bd727a926adb7550cc626d3f09b62a533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Banding</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>defect</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Discrete Fourier transforms</topic><topic>electrophotographic</topic><topic>Filtering</topic><topic>Ghosting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Jitter</topic><topic>Position (location)</topic><topic>print quality</topic><topic>Printers</topic><topic>Prints</topic><topic>Spectral analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>template matching</topic><topic>Wavelet transforms</topic><topic>wavelets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eid, A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, M N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippetoe, E E</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) Online</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on image processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eid, A H</au><au>Ahmed, M N</au><au>Cooper, B E</au><au>Rippetoe, E E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on image processing</jtitle><stitle>TIP</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Image Process</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1313</spage><epage>1326</epage><pages>1313-1326</pages><issn>1057-7149</issn><eissn>1941-0042</eissn><coden>IIPRE4</coden><abstract>Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>21078570</pmid><doi>10.1109/TIP.2010.2092511</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-7149 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on image processing, 2011-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1313-1326 |
issn | 1057-7149 1941-0042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_5635331 |
source | IEEE Xplore |
subjects | Algorithms Banding Calibration defect Defects Discrete Fourier transforms electrophotographic Filtering Ghosting Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Jitter Position (location) print quality Printers Prints Spectral analysis Studies template matching Wavelet transforms wavelets |
title | Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T17%3A34%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20Electrophotographic%20Print%20Artifacts:%20Banding,%20Jitter,%20and%20Ghosting&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20image%20processing&rft.au=Eid,%20A%20H&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1313&rft.epage=1326&rft.pages=1313-1326&rft.issn=1057-7149&rft.eissn=1941-0042&rft.coden=IIPRE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIP.2010.2092511&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E875052968%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=862786552&rft_id=info:pmid/21078570&rft_ieee_id=5635331&rfr_iscdi=true |