Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting

Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on image processing 2011-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1313-1326
Hauptverfasser: Eid, A H, Ahmed, M N, Cooper, B E, Rippetoe, E E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1326
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1313
container_title IEEE transactions on image processing
container_volume 20
creator Eid, A H
Ahmed, M N
Cooper, B E
Rippetoe, E E
description Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TIP.2010.2092511
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5635331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5635331</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>875052968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9f0d42f9e7f86c499e24660b64b69d77bd727a926adb7550cc626d3f09b62a533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EglLYkZBQxMJC4Oz4I2aDCgqoEh0Ka-Q4TmvUxsV2B_j1GLV0YGG6O_t5Tzo9CJ1guMIY5PXkaXxFIE0EJGEY76AelhTnAJTsph6YyAWm8gAdhvAOgCnDfB8dEAyiZAJ66G0wU17paLz9UtG6LnNtdj83Onq3nLnopl4tZ1ZnY2-7mN36aNuEh5vsTnWN7aaX2bONKX6ZpTkbzlyI6fUI7bVqHszxpvbR68P9ZPCYj16GT4PbUa4LIWIuW2goaaURbck1ldIQyjnUnNZcNkLUjSBCScJVUwvGQGtOeFO0IGtOFCuKPrpY711697EyIVYLG7SZz1Vn3CpUpWDAiOTl_yQvKClpAYk8_0O-u5Xv0hkJIqLkjJEEwRrS3oXgTVstvV0o_1lhqH7cVMlN9eOm2rhJkbPN3lW9MM028CsjAadrwBpjtt-MF-lQXHwDbhSRHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>862786552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting</title><source>IEEE Xplore</source><creator>Eid, A H ; Ahmed, M N ; Cooper, B E ; Rippetoe, E E</creator><creatorcontrib>Eid, A H ; Ahmed, M N ; Cooper, B E ; Rippetoe, E E</creatorcontrib><description>Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-7149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2092511</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21078570</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IIPRE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Banding ; Calibration ; defect ; Defects ; Discrete Fourier transforms ; electrophotographic ; Filtering ; Ghosting ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Jitter ; Position (location) ; print quality ; Printers ; Prints ; Spectral analysis ; Studies ; template matching ; Wavelet transforms ; wavelets</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on image processing, 2011-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1313-1326</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) May 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9f0d42f9e7f86c499e24660b64b69d77bd727a926adb7550cc626d3f09b62a533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9f0d42f9e7f86c499e24660b64b69d77bd727a926adb7550cc626d3f09b62a533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5635331$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5635331$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21078570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eid, A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, M N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippetoe, E E</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting</title><title>IEEE transactions on image processing</title><addtitle>TIP</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Image Process</addtitle><description>Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Banding</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>defect</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Discrete Fourier transforms</subject><subject>electrophotographic</subject><subject>Filtering</subject><subject>Ghosting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Jitter</subject><subject>Position (location)</subject><subject>print quality</subject><subject>Printers</subject><subject>Prints</subject><subject>Spectral analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>template matching</subject><subject>Wavelet transforms</subject><subject>wavelets</subject><issn>1057-7149</issn><issn>1941-0042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EglLYkZBQxMJC4Oz4I2aDCgqoEh0Ka-Q4TmvUxsV2B_j1GLV0YGG6O_t5Tzo9CJ1guMIY5PXkaXxFIE0EJGEY76AelhTnAJTsph6YyAWm8gAdhvAOgCnDfB8dEAyiZAJ66G0wU17paLz9UtG6LnNtdj83Onq3nLnopl4tZ1ZnY2-7mN36aNuEh5vsTnWN7aaX2bONKX6ZpTkbzlyI6fUI7bVqHszxpvbR68P9ZPCYj16GT4PbUa4LIWIuW2goaaURbck1ldIQyjnUnNZcNkLUjSBCScJVUwvGQGtOeFO0IGtOFCuKPrpY711697EyIVYLG7SZz1Vn3CpUpWDAiOTl_yQvKClpAYk8_0O-u5Xv0hkJIqLkjJEEwRrS3oXgTVstvV0o_1lhqH7cVMlN9eOm2rhJkbPN3lW9MM028CsjAadrwBpjtt-MF-lQXHwDbhSRHg</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Eid, A H</creator><creator>Ahmed, M N</creator><creator>Cooper, B E</creator><creator>Rippetoe, E E</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting</title><author>Eid, A H ; Ahmed, M N ; Cooper, B E ; Rippetoe, E E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9f0d42f9e7f86c499e24660b64b69d77bd727a926adb7550cc626d3f09b62a533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Banding</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>defect</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Discrete Fourier transforms</topic><topic>electrophotographic</topic><topic>Filtering</topic><topic>Ghosting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Jitter</topic><topic>Position (location)</topic><topic>print quality</topic><topic>Printers</topic><topic>Prints</topic><topic>Spectral analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>template matching</topic><topic>Wavelet transforms</topic><topic>wavelets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eid, A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, M N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippetoe, E E</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) Online</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on image processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eid, A H</au><au>Ahmed, M N</au><au>Cooper, B E</au><au>Rippetoe, E E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on image processing</jtitle><stitle>TIP</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Image Process</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1313</spage><epage>1326</epage><pages>1313-1326</pages><issn>1057-7149</issn><eissn>1941-0042</eissn><coden>IIPRE4</coden><abstract>Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>21078570</pmid><doi>10.1109/TIP.2010.2092511</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1057-7149
ispartof IEEE transactions on image processing, 2011-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1313-1326
issn 1057-7149
1941-0042
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5635331
source IEEE Xplore
subjects Algorithms
Banding
Calibration
defect
Defects
Discrete Fourier transforms
electrophotographic
Filtering
Ghosting
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Jitter
Position (location)
print quality
Printers
Prints
Spectral analysis
Studies
template matching
Wavelet transforms
wavelets
title Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T17%3A34%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20Electrophotographic%20Print%20Artifacts:%20Banding,%20Jitter,%20and%20Ghosting&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20image%20processing&rft.au=Eid,%20A%20H&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1313&rft.epage=1326&rft.pages=1313-1326&rft.issn=1057-7149&rft.eissn=1941-0042&rft.coden=IIPRE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIP.2010.2092511&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E875052968%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=862786552&rft_id=info:pmid/21078570&rft_ieee_id=5635331&rfr_iscdi=true