Exact bias removal for the track-to-track association problem

In the track-to-track association problem, the fundamental quantity to calculate is the probability of an association given the data. Algorithms which are based on such a calculation can make meaningful statements about the probabilities of associations and of related events, and are more accurate a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Ferry, J.P.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1649
container_issue
container_start_page 1642
container_title
container_volume
creator Ferry, J.P.
description In the track-to-track association problem, the fundamental quantity to calculate is the probability of an association given the data. Algorithms which are based on such a calculation can make meaningful statements about the probabilities of associations and of related events, and are more accurate and robust than algorithms which do not. This paper presents the required probability calculation for the case of two or more biased sensors. Two demonstrations are then made of its superiority to currently used approaches for handling bias - in particular to what is currently considered the state-of-the-art approach, which is to remove the most likely bias candidate for each association individually. The first demonstration is a simple, illustrative scenario where commonly used bias removal methods fail drastically because they attempt to compute the wrong quantity. The second is a procedure for validating the probabilities produced by any association algorithm. This procedure demonstrates the correctness of the probability formula, and the degree to which the probabilities produced by other methods are erroneous.
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5203689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5203689</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5203689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-64c755896ebace2d1608f2ae406281c9ffad7c1914034720bc817ddbe3da6a193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzMtKAzEUgOGACEqdJ3CTFxg4uUwuCxdS6gUKbnRdziQnNHXGlCSIvr2grv5v9V-wwVsH3kmtlQN9xYbWTgAgvLHCwTW7231h6HzO2HiltXziwlOpvB-J94rhfexl_AXH1krI2HP54Oda5oXWG3aZcGk0_HfD3h52r9uncf_y-Ly9349Z2KmPRgc7Tc4bmjGQjMKASxJJg5FOBJ8SRhuEFxqUthLm4ISNcSYV0aDwasNu_76ZiA7nmles34dJgjLOqx9nZEHy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Exact bias removal for the track-to-track association problem</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Ferry, J.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferry, J.P.</creatorcontrib><description>In the track-to-track association problem, the fundamental quantity to calculate is the probability of an association given the data. Algorithms which are based on such a calculation can make meaningful statements about the probabilities of associations and of related events, and are more accurate and robust than algorithms which do not. This paper presents the required probability calculation for the case of two or more biased sensors. Two demonstrations are then made of its superiority to currently used approaches for handling bias - in particular to what is currently considered the state-of-the-art approach, which is to remove the most likely bias candidate for each association individually. The first demonstration is a simple, illustrative scenario where commonly used bias removal methods fail drastically because they attempt to compute the wrong quantity. The second is a procedure for validating the probabilities produced by any association algorithm. This procedure demonstrates the correctness of the probability formula, and the degree to which the probabilities produced by other methods are erroneous.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780982443804</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0982443803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Association ; Bayesian ; Bayesian methods ; bias ; bias removal ; Costs ; Covariance matrix ; Gaussian processes ; Kinematics ; Probability ; Robustness ; track correlation ; Track-to-track association</subject><ispartof>2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2009, p.1642-1649</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5203689$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5203689$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferry, J.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Exact bias removal for the track-to-track association problem</title><title>2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion</title><addtitle>ICIF</addtitle><description>In the track-to-track association problem, the fundamental quantity to calculate is the probability of an association given the data. Algorithms which are based on such a calculation can make meaningful statements about the probabilities of associations and of related events, and are more accurate and robust than algorithms which do not. This paper presents the required probability calculation for the case of two or more biased sensors. Two demonstrations are then made of its superiority to currently used approaches for handling bias - in particular to what is currently considered the state-of-the-art approach, which is to remove the most likely bias candidate for each association individually. The first demonstration is a simple, illustrative scenario where commonly used bias removal methods fail drastically because they attempt to compute the wrong quantity. The second is a procedure for validating the probabilities produced by any association algorithm. This procedure demonstrates the correctness of the probability formula, and the degree to which the probabilities produced by other methods are erroneous.</description><subject>Association</subject><subject>Bayesian</subject><subject>Bayesian methods</subject><subject>bias</subject><subject>bias removal</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Covariance matrix</subject><subject>Gaussian processes</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>track correlation</subject><subject>Track-to-track association</subject><isbn>9780982443804</isbn><isbn>0982443803</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotzMtKAzEUgOGACEqdJ3CTFxg4uUwuCxdS6gUKbnRdziQnNHXGlCSIvr2grv5v9V-wwVsH3kmtlQN9xYbWTgAgvLHCwTW7231h6HzO2HiltXziwlOpvB-J94rhfexl_AXH1krI2HP54Oda5oXWG3aZcGk0_HfD3h52r9uncf_y-Ly9349Z2KmPRgc7Tc4bmjGQjMKASxJJg5FOBJ8SRhuEFxqUthLm4ISNcSYV0aDwasNu_76ZiA7nmles34dJgjLOqx9nZEHy</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Ferry, J.P.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>Exact bias removal for the track-to-track association problem</title><author>Ferry, J.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-64c755896ebace2d1608f2ae406281c9ffad7c1914034720bc817ddbe3da6a193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Association</topic><topic>Bayesian</topic><topic>Bayesian methods</topic><topic>bias</topic><topic>bias removal</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Covariance matrix</topic><topic>Gaussian processes</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>track correlation</topic><topic>Track-to-track association</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferry, J.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferry, J.P.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Exact bias removal for the track-to-track association problem</atitle><btitle>2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion</btitle><stitle>ICIF</stitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><spage>1642</spage><epage>1649</epage><pages>1642-1649</pages><isbn>9780982443804</isbn><isbn>0982443803</isbn><abstract>In the track-to-track association problem, the fundamental quantity to calculate is the probability of an association given the data. Algorithms which are based on such a calculation can make meaningful statements about the probabilities of associations and of related events, and are more accurate and robust than algorithms which do not. This paper presents the required probability calculation for the case of two or more biased sensors. Two demonstrations are then made of its superiority to currently used approaches for handling bias - in particular to what is currently considered the state-of-the-art approach, which is to remove the most likely bias candidate for each association individually. The first demonstration is a simple, illustrative scenario where commonly used bias removal methods fail drastically because they attempt to compute the wrong quantity. The second is a procedure for validating the probabilities produced by any association algorithm. This procedure demonstrates the correctness of the probability formula, and the degree to which the probabilities produced by other methods are erroneous.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9780982443804
ispartof 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2009, p.1642-1649
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5203689
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Association
Bayesian
Bayesian methods
bias
bias removal
Costs
Covariance matrix
Gaussian processes
Kinematics
Probability
Robustness
track correlation
Track-to-track association
title Exact bias removal for the track-to-track association problem
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A49%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Exact%20bias%20removal%20for%20the%20track-to-track%20association%20problem&rft.btitle=2009%2012th%20International%20Conference%20on%20Information%20Fusion&rft.au=Ferry,%20J.P.&rft.date=2009-07&rft.spage=1642&rft.epage=1649&rft.pages=1642-1649&rft.isbn=9780982443804&rft.isbn_list=0982443803&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5203689%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5203689&rfr_iscdi=true