FDA perspective on ultrasound contrast agents safety and development

Regulatory actions through 2007-2008 demonstrate FDA's response to multiple reports of sudden death and severe cardiopulmonary reactions temporally related to the administration of Ultrasound Contrast Agents (UCA). Certain animal data showed similar adverse effects at a clinically relevant dose...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Krefting, I.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 754
container_issue
container_start_page 754
container_title
container_volume
creator Krefting, I.
description Regulatory actions through 2007-2008 demonstrate FDA's response to multiple reports of sudden death and severe cardiopulmonary reactions temporally related to the administration of Ultrasound Contrast Agents (UCA). Certain animal data showed similar adverse effects at a clinically relevant dose. The products labels were changed to include the boxed warning encouraging healthcare providers to assess patients for contraindications and to monitor patients with pulmonary hypertension or unstable cardiac conditions. To further characterize risks, the manufacturers agreed to perform postmarketing studies in the outpatient setting, a retrospective study in the critically ill and a pulmonary hemodynamic study. Over 2008 FDA held two Advisory Committees to discuss UCA. The first in June, 2008, dealt with the issues of safety particularly relating to the rare cardiovascular reactions which had lead to the boxed warnings and the interpretation of pre-clinical data from various species. The Advisory Committee discussed the difficulty of characterizing safety in a study of a single arm design (all patients receiving the test UCA), particularly in patients with serious co-morbidities. The Advisory Committee emphasized the need for premarket prospective randomized studies in high risk populations who are likely to receive the product and also for large sample size post-marketing observational studies. Additionally the Advisory Committee re-confirmed the importance of pre-clinical data when obtained from a relevant species. The second Advisory Committee held in December, 2008 evaluated the possible approval of AI-700, a new UCA, with the proposed indication being the detection of coronary artery disease based on the assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion. The targeted population was patients with stable chest pain being evaluated for inducible ischemia. The Advisory Committee's finding of an unacceptable risk:benefit profile was based on the safety data as well as variations in diagnostic performance in the registration studies and failure to demonstrate the added value of AI-700 to non-contrast echocardiography. The major safety concerns related to the occurrence of hypotension following administration of the product. The process for UCA development from conception, pre-clinical studies, and early safety trials through registration trials leading to licensure should be evident to all stakeholders. The FDA website contains relevant recommendations from our Gui
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193158
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5193158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5193158</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5193158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-908d0b523069dfcc5d35d94021478027a1f8e7315db8a8964e3d7b7b89e843b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkN1Kw0AQhdc_sNY-gHizL5A4-9fduayt1UDBC_W6bLITibRJyKaFvn0jBjw3ZzgfHJjD2IOAVAjAp-zjOUslAKZGoBLGXbA7oaXWCpXESzYRqE3itJFX_0DA9QgsSnfLZjH-wCA7UNATtlqvFrylLrZU9NWReFPzw67vfGwOdeBFU__ePfffVPeRR19Sf-J-QIGOtGva_ZDfs5vS7yLNRp-yr_XL5_It2by_ZsvFJqmENX2C4ALkRiqYYyiLwgRlAmqQQlsH0npROrLDZyF33uFckwo2t7lDclrlUk3Z419vRUTbtqv2vjttxzXUGb6RTqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>FDA perspective on ultrasound contrast agents safety and development</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Krefting, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Krefting, I.</creatorcontrib><description>Regulatory actions through 2007-2008 demonstrate FDA's response to multiple reports of sudden death and severe cardiopulmonary reactions temporally related to the administration of Ultrasound Contrast Agents (UCA). Certain animal data showed similar adverse effects at a clinically relevant dose. The products labels were changed to include the boxed warning encouraging healthcare providers to assess patients for contraindications and to monitor patients with pulmonary hypertension or unstable cardiac conditions. To further characterize risks, the manufacturers agreed to perform postmarketing studies in the outpatient setting, a retrospective study in the critically ill and a pulmonary hemodynamic study. Over 2008 FDA held two Advisory Committees to discuss UCA. The first in June, 2008, dealt with the issues of safety particularly relating to the rare cardiovascular reactions which had lead to the boxed warnings and the interpretation of pre-clinical data from various species. The Advisory Committee discussed the difficulty of characterizing safety in a study of a single arm design (all patients receiving the test UCA), particularly in patients with serious co-morbidities. The Advisory Committee emphasized the need for premarket prospective randomized studies in high risk populations who are likely to receive the product and also for large sample size post-marketing observational studies. Additionally the Advisory Committee re-confirmed the importance of pre-clinical data when obtained from a relevant species. The second Advisory Committee held in December, 2008 evaluated the possible approval of AI-700, a new UCA, with the proposed indication being the detection of coronary artery disease based on the assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion. The targeted population was patients with stable chest pain being evaluated for inducible ischemia. The Advisory Committee's finding of an unacceptable risk:benefit profile was based on the safety data as well as variations in diagnostic performance in the registration studies and failure to demonstrate the added value of AI-700 to non-contrast echocardiography. The major safety concerns related to the occurrence of hypotension following administration of the product. The process for UCA development from conception, pre-clinical studies, and early safety trials through registration trials leading to licensure should be evident to all stakeholders. The FDA website contains relevant recommendations from our Guidances and recent Advisory Committee meetings: Pre-market patients should be typical of the patients likely to receive the UCA in practice; a clinical benefit should be apparent; diagnostic efficacy should be self evident or derived from a sensitivity and specificity analysis compared to an existing standard, and safety where possible should be demonstrated through clinical trials. Through the new FDAAA legislation, FDA can now require post marketing studies for newly identified safety signals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1945-7928</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424439310</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424439317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-8452</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424439329</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424439324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cardiology ; Condition monitoring ; Hemodynamics ; Hypertension ; Manufacturing ; Medical services ; Patient monitoring ; Safety ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009, p.754-754</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5193158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5193158$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krefting, I.</creatorcontrib><title>FDA perspective on ultrasound contrast agents safety and development</title><title>2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro</title><addtitle>ISBI</addtitle><description>Regulatory actions through 2007-2008 demonstrate FDA's response to multiple reports of sudden death and severe cardiopulmonary reactions temporally related to the administration of Ultrasound Contrast Agents (UCA). Certain animal data showed similar adverse effects at a clinically relevant dose. The products labels were changed to include the boxed warning encouraging healthcare providers to assess patients for contraindications and to monitor patients with pulmonary hypertension or unstable cardiac conditions. To further characterize risks, the manufacturers agreed to perform postmarketing studies in the outpatient setting, a retrospective study in the critically ill and a pulmonary hemodynamic study. Over 2008 FDA held two Advisory Committees to discuss UCA. The first in June, 2008, dealt with the issues of safety particularly relating to the rare cardiovascular reactions which had lead to the boxed warnings and the interpretation of pre-clinical data from various species. The Advisory Committee discussed the difficulty of characterizing safety in a study of a single arm design (all patients receiving the test UCA), particularly in patients with serious co-morbidities. The Advisory Committee emphasized the need for premarket prospective randomized studies in high risk populations who are likely to receive the product and also for large sample size post-marketing observational studies. Additionally the Advisory Committee re-confirmed the importance of pre-clinical data when obtained from a relevant species. The second Advisory Committee held in December, 2008 evaluated the possible approval of AI-700, a new UCA, with the proposed indication being the detection of coronary artery disease based on the assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion. The targeted population was patients with stable chest pain being evaluated for inducible ischemia. The Advisory Committee's finding of an unacceptable risk:benefit profile was based on the safety data as well as variations in diagnostic performance in the registration studies and failure to demonstrate the added value of AI-700 to non-contrast echocardiography. The major safety concerns related to the occurrence of hypotension following administration of the product. The process for UCA development from conception, pre-clinical studies, and early safety trials through registration trials leading to licensure should be evident to all stakeholders. The FDA website contains relevant recommendations from our Guidances and recent Advisory Committee meetings: Pre-market patients should be typical of the patients likely to receive the UCA in practice; a clinical benefit should be apparent; diagnostic efficacy should be self evident or derived from a sensitivity and specificity analysis compared to an existing standard, and safety where possible should be demonstrated through clinical trials. Through the new FDAAA legislation, FDA can now require post marketing studies for newly identified safety signals.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Condition monitoring</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Medical services</subject><subject>Patient monitoring</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>1945-7928</issn><issn>1945-8452</issn><isbn>1424439310</isbn><isbn>9781424439317</isbn><isbn>1424439329</isbn><isbn>9781424439324</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkN1Kw0AQhdc_sNY-gHizL5A4-9fduayt1UDBC_W6bLITibRJyKaFvn0jBjw3ZzgfHJjD2IOAVAjAp-zjOUslAKZGoBLGXbA7oaXWCpXESzYRqE3itJFX_0DA9QgsSnfLZjH-wCA7UNATtlqvFrylLrZU9NWReFPzw67vfGwOdeBFU__ePfffVPeRR19Sf-J-QIGOtGva_ZDfs5vS7yLNRp-yr_XL5_It2by_ZsvFJqmENX2C4ALkRiqYYyiLwgRlAmqQQlsH0npROrLDZyF33uFckwo2t7lDclrlUk3Z419vRUTbtqv2vjttxzXUGb6RTqY</recordid><startdate>200906</startdate><enddate>200906</enddate><creator>Krefting, I.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200906</creationdate><title>FDA perspective on ultrasound contrast agents safety and development</title><author>Krefting, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-908d0b523069dfcc5d35d94021478027a1f8e7315db8a8964e3d7b7b89e843b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Condition monitoring</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Medical services</topic><topic>Patient monitoring</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krefting, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krefting, I.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>FDA perspective on ultrasound contrast agents safety and development</atitle><btitle>2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro</btitle><stitle>ISBI</stitle><date>2009-06</date><risdate>2009</risdate><spage>754</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>754-754</pages><issn>1945-7928</issn><eissn>1945-8452</eissn><isbn>1424439310</isbn><isbn>9781424439317</isbn><eisbn>1424439329</eisbn><eisbn>9781424439324</eisbn><abstract>Regulatory actions through 2007-2008 demonstrate FDA's response to multiple reports of sudden death and severe cardiopulmonary reactions temporally related to the administration of Ultrasound Contrast Agents (UCA). Certain animal data showed similar adverse effects at a clinically relevant dose. The products labels were changed to include the boxed warning encouraging healthcare providers to assess patients for contraindications and to monitor patients with pulmonary hypertension or unstable cardiac conditions. To further characterize risks, the manufacturers agreed to perform postmarketing studies in the outpatient setting, a retrospective study in the critically ill and a pulmonary hemodynamic study. Over 2008 FDA held two Advisory Committees to discuss UCA. The first in June, 2008, dealt with the issues of safety particularly relating to the rare cardiovascular reactions which had lead to the boxed warnings and the interpretation of pre-clinical data from various species. The Advisory Committee discussed the difficulty of characterizing safety in a study of a single arm design (all patients receiving the test UCA), particularly in patients with serious co-morbidities. The Advisory Committee emphasized the need for premarket prospective randomized studies in high risk populations who are likely to receive the product and also for large sample size post-marketing observational studies. Additionally the Advisory Committee re-confirmed the importance of pre-clinical data when obtained from a relevant species. The second Advisory Committee held in December, 2008 evaluated the possible approval of AI-700, a new UCA, with the proposed indication being the detection of coronary artery disease based on the assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion. The targeted population was patients with stable chest pain being evaluated for inducible ischemia. The Advisory Committee's finding of an unacceptable risk:benefit profile was based on the safety data as well as variations in diagnostic performance in the registration studies and failure to demonstrate the added value of AI-700 to non-contrast echocardiography. The major safety concerns related to the occurrence of hypotension following administration of the product. The process for UCA development from conception, pre-clinical studies, and early safety trials through registration trials leading to licensure should be evident to all stakeholders. The FDA website contains relevant recommendations from our Guidances and recent Advisory Committee meetings: Pre-market patients should be typical of the patients likely to receive the UCA in practice; a clinical benefit should be apparent; diagnostic efficacy should be self evident or derived from a sensitivity and specificity analysis compared to an existing standard, and safety where possible should be demonstrated through clinical trials. Through the new FDAAA legislation, FDA can now require post marketing studies for newly identified safety signals.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193158</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1945-7928
ispartof 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009, p.754-754
issn 1945-7928
1945-8452
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5193158
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Animals
Cardiology
Condition monitoring
Hemodynamics
Hypertension
Manufacturing
Medical services
Patient monitoring
Safety
Ultrasonic imaging
title FDA perspective on ultrasound contrast agents safety and development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A18%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=FDA%20perspective%20on%20ultrasound%20contrast%20agents%20safety%20and%20development&rft.btitle=2009%20IEEE%20International%20Symposium%20on%20Biomedical%20Imaging:%20From%20Nano%20to%20Macro&rft.au=Krefting,%20I.&rft.date=2009-06&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=754-754&rft.issn=1945-7928&rft.eissn=1945-8452&rft.isbn=1424439310&rft.isbn_list=9781424439317&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193158&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5193158%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1424439329&rft.eisbn_list=9781424439324&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5193158&rfr_iscdi=true