Task-based specifications through conceptual graphs

Conceptual modeling is an important step toward the construction of user requirements. Requirements engineering is knowledge intensive and cannot be dealt with using only a few general principles. Therefore, a conceptual model is domain oriented and should represent the richer semantics of the probl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE expert 1996-08, Vol.11 (4), p.60-70
Hauptverfasser: Lee, J., Lai, L.F., Haung, W.T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue 4
container_start_page 60
container_title IEEE expert
container_volume 11
creator Lee, J.
Lai, L.F.
Haung, W.T.
description Conceptual modeling is an important step toward the construction of user requirements. Requirements engineering is knowledge intensive and cannot be dealt with using only a few general principles. Therefore, a conceptual model is domain oriented and should represent the richer semantics of the problem domain. The conceptual model also helps designers communicate among themselves and with users. To capture and represent a conceptual model for the problem domain, we need: mechanisms to structure the knowledge of the problem domain at the conceptual level, which has the underlying principles of abstraction and encapsulation; and formalisms to represent the semantics of the problem domain and to provide a reasoning capability for verification and validation. We propose the task based specification methodology as the mechanism to structure the knowledge captured in conceptual models. TBSM offers four main benefits for constructing conceptual models, which are outlined. We propose conceptual graphs as the formalism to express task based specifications where the task structure of problem solving knowledge drives the specification, the pieces of the specification can be iteratively refined, and verification can be performed for a single layer or between layers. We chose conceptual graphs for their expressive power to represent both declarative and procedural knowledge, and for their assimilation capability-that is, their ability to be combined.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/64.511868
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_511868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>511868</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>57381589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b57d1c2d7e3c39d8c551e2c6e11c38a8c40a49e0d7f434a29367f27c7677088b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90L1PwzAQBXALgUQpDKxMmZAYUuz44-wRVRSQKrGU2XIulzaQNsFOBv57ilIxveH9dDo9xm4FXwjB3aNRCy2ENfaMzQoJKneKwzmbcWt17jjnl-wqpU_OhVJgZkxuQvrKy5CoylJP2NQNhqHpDikbdrEbt7sMuwNSP4yhzbYx9Lt0zS7q0Ca6OeWcfayeN8vXfP3-8rZ8WudYAAx5qaESWFRAEqWrLGotqEBDQqC0waLiQTniFdRKqlA4aaAuAMEAHN8t5ZzdT3f72H2PlAa_bxJS24YDdWPyGqQV2rojfJggxi6lSLXvY7MP8ccL7v9m8Ub5aZajvZtsQ0T_7lT-AoINXEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57381589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Task-based specifications through conceptual graphs</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Lee, J. ; Lai, L.F. ; Haung, W.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, J. ; Lai, L.F. ; Haung, W.T.</creatorcontrib><description>Conceptual modeling is an important step toward the construction of user requirements. Requirements engineering is knowledge intensive and cannot be dealt with using only a few general principles. Therefore, a conceptual model is domain oriented and should represent the richer semantics of the problem domain. The conceptual model also helps designers communicate among themselves and with users. To capture and represent a conceptual model for the problem domain, we need: mechanisms to structure the knowledge of the problem domain at the conceptual level, which has the underlying principles of abstraction and encapsulation; and formalisms to represent the semantics of the problem domain and to provide a reasoning capability for verification and validation. We propose the task based specification methodology as the mechanism to structure the knowledge captured in conceptual models. TBSM offers four main benefits for constructing conceptual models, which are outlined. We propose conceptual graphs as the formalism to express task based specifications where the task structure of problem solving knowledge drives the specification, the pieces of the specification can be iteratively refined, and verification can be performed for a single layer or between layers. We chose conceptual graphs for their expressive power to represent both declarative and procedural knowledge, and for their assimilation capability-that is, their ability to be combined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-9000</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2374-9407</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/64.511868</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEXE7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Conceptual graphs ; Control systems ; Encapsulation ; Expert systems ; Organizing ; Power system modeling ; Problem-solving ; Protection ; Task based specifications</subject><ispartof>IEEE expert, 1996-08, Vol.11 (4), p.60-70</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b57d1c2d7e3c39d8c551e2c6e11c38a8c40a49e0d7f434a29367f27c7677088b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b57d1c2d7e3c39d8c551e2c6e11c38a8c40a49e0d7f434a29367f27c7677088b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/511868$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27923,27924,54757</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/511868$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haung, W.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Task-based specifications through conceptual graphs</title><title>IEEE expert</title><addtitle>EX-M</addtitle><description>Conceptual modeling is an important step toward the construction of user requirements. Requirements engineering is knowledge intensive and cannot be dealt with using only a few general principles. Therefore, a conceptual model is domain oriented and should represent the richer semantics of the problem domain. The conceptual model also helps designers communicate among themselves and with users. To capture and represent a conceptual model for the problem domain, we need: mechanisms to structure the knowledge of the problem domain at the conceptual level, which has the underlying principles of abstraction and encapsulation; and formalisms to represent the semantics of the problem domain and to provide a reasoning capability for verification and validation. We propose the task based specification methodology as the mechanism to structure the knowledge captured in conceptual models. TBSM offers four main benefits for constructing conceptual models, which are outlined. We propose conceptual graphs as the formalism to express task based specifications where the task structure of problem solving knowledge drives the specification, the pieces of the specification can be iteratively refined, and verification can be performed for a single layer or between layers. We chose conceptual graphs for their expressive power to represent both declarative and procedural knowledge, and for their assimilation capability-that is, their ability to be combined.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Conceptual graphs</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Encapsulation</subject><subject>Expert systems</subject><subject>Organizing</subject><subject>Power system modeling</subject><subject>Problem-solving</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Task based specifications</subject><issn>0885-9000</issn><issn>2374-9407</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90L1PwzAQBXALgUQpDKxMmZAYUuz44-wRVRSQKrGU2XIulzaQNsFOBv57ilIxveH9dDo9xm4FXwjB3aNRCy2ENfaMzQoJKneKwzmbcWt17jjnl-wqpU_OhVJgZkxuQvrKy5CoylJP2NQNhqHpDikbdrEbt7sMuwNSP4yhzbYx9Lt0zS7q0Ca6OeWcfayeN8vXfP3-8rZ8WudYAAx5qaESWFRAEqWrLGotqEBDQqC0waLiQTniFdRKqlA4aaAuAMEAHN8t5ZzdT3f72H2PlAa_bxJS24YDdWPyGqQV2rojfJggxi6lSLXvY7MP8ccL7v9m8Ub5aZajvZtsQ0T_7lT-AoINXEw</recordid><startdate>199608</startdate><enddate>199608</enddate><creator>Lee, J.</creator><creator>Lai, L.F.</creator><creator>Haung, W.T.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199608</creationdate><title>Task-based specifications through conceptual graphs</title><author>Lee, J. ; Lai, L.F. ; Haung, W.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b57d1c2d7e3c39d8c551e2c6e11c38a8c40a49e0d7f434a29367f27c7677088b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Conceptual graphs</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Encapsulation</topic><topic>Expert systems</topic><topic>Organizing</topic><topic>Power system modeling</topic><topic>Problem-solving</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Task based specifications</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haung, W.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>IEEE expert</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, J.</au><au>Lai, L.F.</au><au>Haung, W.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Task-based specifications through conceptual graphs</atitle><jtitle>IEEE expert</jtitle><stitle>EX-M</stitle><date>1996-08</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>60-70</pages><issn>0885-9000</issn><eissn>2374-9407</eissn><coden>IEEXE7</coden><abstract>Conceptual modeling is an important step toward the construction of user requirements. Requirements engineering is knowledge intensive and cannot be dealt with using only a few general principles. Therefore, a conceptual model is domain oriented and should represent the richer semantics of the problem domain. The conceptual model also helps designers communicate among themselves and with users. To capture and represent a conceptual model for the problem domain, we need: mechanisms to structure the knowledge of the problem domain at the conceptual level, which has the underlying principles of abstraction and encapsulation; and formalisms to represent the semantics of the problem domain and to provide a reasoning capability for verification and validation. We propose the task based specification methodology as the mechanism to structure the knowledge captured in conceptual models. TBSM offers four main benefits for constructing conceptual models, which are outlined. We propose conceptual graphs as the formalism to express task based specifications where the task structure of problem solving knowledge drives the specification, the pieces of the specification can be iteratively refined, and verification can be performed for a single layer or between layers. We chose conceptual graphs for their expressive power to represent both declarative and procedural knowledge, and for their assimilation capability-that is, their ability to be combined.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/64.511868</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0885-9000
ispartof IEEE expert, 1996-08, Vol.11 (4), p.60-70
issn 0885-9000
2374-9407
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_511868
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Artificial intelligence
Conceptual graphs
Control systems
Encapsulation
Expert systems
Organizing
Power system modeling
Problem-solving
Protection
Task based specifications
title Task-based specifications through conceptual graphs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A30%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Task-based%20specifications%20through%20conceptual%20graphs&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20expert&rft.au=Lee,%20J.&rft.date=1996-08&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=60-70&rft.issn=0885-9000&rft.eissn=2374-9407&rft.coden=IEEXE7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/64.511868&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E57381589%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57381589&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=511868&rfr_iscdi=true