Online 3D Terrain Visualization: A Comparison of Three Different GIS Software
In recent times, the online 3D terrain visualization has created much interest in many applications such as land information system, military, environmental, tourism and mapping science. Many systems such as CityGML, Terraserver, Google Earth and Spaceye3D have successfully adopted this technology i...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 487 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 483 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Mat, R.C. Shariff, A.R.M. Mahmud, A.R. |
| description | In recent times, the online 3D terrain visualization has created much interest in many applications such as land information system, military, environmental, tourism and mapping science. Many systems such as CityGML, Terraserver, Google Earth and Spaceye3D have successfully adopted this technology in their system for different applications. The aim of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of developing online 3D terrain visualization by using three popular GIS software; R2V, Arc View 3.2 and Arc GIS 9.2. In this paper, we implement the system based on the digital elevation model (DEM) and triangulated irregular network (TIN) for the terrain data and then overlay with satellite image. Finally, the effectiveness of online 3D terrain rendering in terms of terrain visualization quality, file size, and loading time are made to compare the quality of the systems. The results help the developers on finding the right software to be used for their online 3D terrain visualization. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ICIME.2009.57 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5077081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5077081</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5077081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-9a72eb37ce3946b4fe01ab1f3ee44c4d6c0ddb906887a08a5c6ebffea25d29503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjUFLwzAYhgMyUGePnrzkD7R-aZIm8Ta6OQsbO6x6HWn7BSNdOtKK6K-3oO_lOTzwvITcM8gYA_NYldV-k-UAJpPqiiRGaVCFkVwayRbkdjbaMGa0vCbJOH7APCEkF-yG7A-h9wEpX9MaY7Q-0Dc_ftre_9jJD-GJrmg5nC82-nEIdHC0fo-IdO2dw4hhotvqSI-Dm75sxDuycLYfMfnnkrw-b-ryJd0dtlW52qWeKTmlxqocG65a5EYUjXAIzDbMcUQhWtEVLXRdY6DQWlnQVrYFNvOfzWWXGwl8SR7-uh4RT5fozzZ-nyQoBZrxX98DThM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Online 3D Terrain Visualization: A Comparison of Three Different GIS Software</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Mat, R.C. ; Shariff, A.R.M. ; Mahmud, A.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mat, R.C. ; Shariff, A.R.M. ; Mahmud, A.R.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent times, the online 3D terrain visualization has created much interest in many applications such as land information system, military, environmental, tourism and mapping science. Many systems such as CityGML, Terraserver, Google Earth and Spaceye3D have successfully adopted this technology in their system for different applications. The aim of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of developing online 3D terrain visualization by using three popular GIS software; R2V, Arc View 3.2 and Arc GIS 9.2. In this paper, we implement the system based on the digital elevation model (DEM) and triangulated irregular network (TIN) for the terrain data and then overlay with satellite image. Finally, the effectiveness of online 3D terrain rendering in terms of terrain visualization quality, file size, and loading time are made to compare the quality of the systems. The results help the developers on finding the right software to be used for their online 3D terrain visualization.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780769535951</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 076953595X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICIME.2009.57</identifier><identifier>LCCN: 2008911985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>3D terrain visualization ; Application software ; Arc GIS ; Arc View ; Data visualization ; Digital elevation models ; Earth ; effectiveness ; Geographic Information Systems ; GIS software ; Information systems ; online system ; R2V ; Satellites ; Space technology ; Terrain mapping ; Tin</subject><ispartof>2009 International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, 2009, p.483-487</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5077081$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5077081$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mat, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shariff, A.R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmud, A.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Online 3D Terrain Visualization: A Comparison of Three Different GIS Software</title><title>2009 International Conference on Information Management and Engineering</title><addtitle>ICIME</addtitle><description>In recent times, the online 3D terrain visualization has created much interest in many applications such as land information system, military, environmental, tourism and mapping science. Many systems such as CityGML, Terraserver, Google Earth and Spaceye3D have successfully adopted this technology in their system for different applications. The aim of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of developing online 3D terrain visualization by using three popular GIS software; R2V, Arc View 3.2 and Arc GIS 9.2. In this paper, we implement the system based on the digital elevation model (DEM) and triangulated irregular network (TIN) for the terrain data and then overlay with satellite image. Finally, the effectiveness of online 3D terrain rendering in terms of terrain visualization quality, file size, and loading time are made to compare the quality of the systems. The results help the developers on finding the right software to be used for their online 3D terrain visualization.</description><subject>3D terrain visualization</subject><subject>Application software</subject><subject>Arc GIS</subject><subject>Arc View</subject><subject>Data visualization</subject><subject>Digital elevation models</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>effectiveness</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>GIS software</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>online system</subject><subject>R2V</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Space technology</subject><subject>Terrain mapping</subject><subject>Tin</subject><isbn>9780769535951</isbn><isbn>076953595X</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotjUFLwzAYhgMyUGePnrzkD7R-aZIm8Ta6OQsbO6x6HWn7BSNdOtKK6K-3oO_lOTzwvITcM8gYA_NYldV-k-UAJpPqiiRGaVCFkVwayRbkdjbaMGa0vCbJOH7APCEkF-yG7A-h9wEpX9MaY7Q-0Dc_ftre_9jJD-GJrmg5nC82-nEIdHC0fo-IdO2dw4hhotvqSI-Dm75sxDuycLYfMfnnkrw-b-ryJd0dtlW52qWeKTmlxqocG65a5EYUjXAIzDbMcUQhWtEVLXRdY6DQWlnQVrYFNvOfzWWXGwl8SR7-uh4RT5fozzZ-nyQoBZrxX98DThM</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>Mat, R.C.</creator><creator>Shariff, A.R.M.</creator><creator>Mahmud, A.R.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Online 3D Terrain Visualization: A Comparison of Three Different GIS Software</title><author>Mat, R.C. ; Shariff, A.R.M. ; Mahmud, A.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-9a72eb37ce3946b4fe01ab1f3ee44c4d6c0ddb906887a08a5c6ebffea25d29503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>3D terrain visualization</topic><topic>Application software</topic><topic>Arc GIS</topic><topic>Arc View</topic><topic>Data visualization</topic><topic>Digital elevation models</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>effectiveness</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>GIS software</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>online system</topic><topic>R2V</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Space technology</topic><topic>Terrain mapping</topic><topic>Tin</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mat, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shariff, A.R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmud, A.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mat, R.C.</au><au>Shariff, A.R.M.</au><au>Mahmud, A.R.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Online 3D Terrain Visualization: A Comparison of Three Different GIS Software</atitle><btitle>2009 International Conference on Information Management and Engineering</btitle><stitle>ICIME</stitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><spage>483</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>483-487</pages><isbn>9780769535951</isbn><isbn>076953595X</isbn><abstract>In recent times, the online 3D terrain visualization has created much interest in many applications such as land information system, military, environmental, tourism and mapping science. Many systems such as CityGML, Terraserver, Google Earth and Spaceye3D have successfully adopted this technology in their system for different applications. The aim of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of developing online 3D terrain visualization by using three popular GIS software; R2V, Arc View 3.2 and Arc GIS 9.2. In this paper, we implement the system based on the digital elevation model (DEM) and triangulated irregular network (TIN) for the terrain data and then overlay with satellite image. Finally, the effectiveness of online 3D terrain rendering in terms of terrain visualization quality, file size, and loading time are made to compare the quality of the systems. The results help the developers on finding the right software to be used for their online 3D terrain visualization.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICIME.2009.57</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISBN: 9780769535951 |
| ispartof | 2009 International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, 2009, p.483-487 |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_5077081 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | 3D terrain visualization Application software Arc GIS Arc View Data visualization Digital elevation models Earth effectiveness Geographic Information Systems GIS software Information systems online system R2V Satellites Space technology Terrain mapping Tin |
| title | Online 3D Terrain Visualization: A Comparison of Three Different GIS Software |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A49%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Online%203D%20Terrain%20Visualization:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Three%20Different%20GIS%20Software&rft.btitle=2009%20International%20Conference%20on%20Information%20Management%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Mat,%20R.C.&rft.date=2009-04&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=483-487&rft.isbn=9780769535951&rft.isbn_list=076953595X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICIME.2009.57&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5077081%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5077081&rfr_iscdi=true |