Characterization of scientific workflows
Researchers working on the planning, scheduling and execution of scientific workflows need access to a wide variety of scientific workflows to evaluate the performance of their implementations. We describe basic workflow structures that are composed into complex workflows by scientific communities....
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 10 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Bharathi, S. Chervenak, A. Deelman, E. Mehta, G. Mei-Hui Su Vahi, K. |
| description | Researchers working on the planning, scheduling and execution of scientific workflows need access to a wide variety of scientific workflows to evaluate the performance of their implementations. We describe basic workflow structures that are composed into complex workflows by scientific communities. We provide a characterization of workflows from five diverse scientific applications, describing their composition and data and computational requirements. We also describe the effect of the size of the input datasets on the structure and execution profiles of these workflows. Finally, we describe a workflow generator that produces synthetic, parameterizable workflows that closely resemble the workflows that we characterize. We make these workflows available to the community to be used as benchmarks for evaluating various workflow systems and scheduling algorithms. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/WORKS.2008.4723958 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4723958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4723958</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4723958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c139t-a1bb0fc433076bb9aedb51ab41c32f2f5d7aba9f400360cc07c3bdc5b4575f343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8tKxDAUQIMPcBj7A7rp0k3rvbk3TbKU4gsHBmYUl0OSJhgdp9IWBv16Fw6uzuLAgSPEBUKNCPb6dbl6WtcSwNSsJVlljsRMosIKyeCxKKw2yJJZGqn55N9pOhPFOL4DAErTSMMzcdW-ucGFKQ75x02535V9KseQ427KKYdy3w8fadvvx3Nxmtx2jMWBc_Fyd_vcPlSL5f1je7OoApKdKofeQwpMBLrx3rrYeYXOMwaSSSbVaeedTQxADYQAOpDvgvKstErENBeXf90cY9x8DfnTDd-bwyf9ApTnRMs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Characterization of scientific workflows</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Bharathi, S. ; Chervenak, A. ; Deelman, E. ; Mehta, G. ; Mei-Hui Su ; Vahi, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bharathi, S. ; Chervenak, A. ; Deelman, E. ; Mehta, G. ; Mei-Hui Su ; Vahi, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers working on the planning, scheduling and execution of scientific workflows need access to a wide variety of scientific workflows to evaluate the performance of their implementations. We describe basic workflow structures that are composed into complex workflows by scientific communities. We provide a characterization of workflows from five diverse scientific applications, describing their composition and data and computational requirements. We also describe the effect of the size of the input datasets on the structure and execution profiles of these workflows. Finally, we describe a workflow generator that produces synthetic, parameterizable workflows that closely resemble the workflows that we characterize. We make these workflows available to the community to be used as benchmarks for evaluating various workflow systems and scheduling algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-1373</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424428274</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424428270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-1381</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/WORKS.2008.4723958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; Biology ; Character generation ; Earthquakes ; Geometry ; Libraries ; Performance analysis ; Physics ; Scheduling algorithm ; Workflow management software</subject><ispartof>2008 Third Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, 2008, p.1-10</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c139t-a1bb0fc433076bb9aedb51ab41c32f2f5d7aba9f400360cc07c3bdc5b4575f343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4723958$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4723958$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bharathi, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chervenak, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deelman, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei-Hui Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahi, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of scientific workflows</title><title>2008 Third Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science</title><addtitle>WORKS</addtitle><description>Researchers working on the planning, scheduling and execution of scientific workflows need access to a wide variety of scientific workflows to evaluate the performance of their implementations. We describe basic workflow structures that are composed into complex workflows by scientific communities. We provide a characterization of workflows from five diverse scientific applications, describing their composition and data and computational requirements. We also describe the effect of the size of the input datasets on the structure and execution profiles of these workflows. Finally, we describe a workflow generator that produces synthetic, parameterizable workflows that closely resemble the workflows that we characterize. We make these workflows available to the community to be used as benchmarks for evaluating various workflow systems and scheduling algorithms.</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Character generation</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Scheduling algorithm</subject><subject>Workflow management software</subject><issn>2151-1373</issn><issn>2151-1381</issn><isbn>9781424428274</isbn><isbn>1424428270</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j8tKxDAUQIMPcBj7A7rp0k3rvbk3TbKU4gsHBmYUl0OSJhgdp9IWBv16Fw6uzuLAgSPEBUKNCPb6dbl6WtcSwNSsJVlljsRMosIKyeCxKKw2yJJZGqn55N9pOhPFOL4DAErTSMMzcdW-ucGFKQ75x02535V9KseQ427KKYdy3w8fadvvx3Nxmtx2jMWBc_Fyd_vcPlSL5f1je7OoApKdKofeQwpMBLrx3rrYeYXOMwaSSSbVaeedTQxADYQAOpDvgvKstErENBeXf90cY9x8DfnTDd-bwyf9ApTnRMs</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Bharathi, S.</creator><creator>Chervenak, A.</creator><creator>Deelman, E.</creator><creator>Mehta, G.</creator><creator>Mei-Hui Su</creator><creator>Vahi, K.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>Characterization of scientific workflows</title><author>Bharathi, S. ; Chervenak, A. ; Deelman, E. ; Mehta, G. ; Mei-Hui Su ; Vahi, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c139t-a1bb0fc433076bb9aedb51ab41c32f2f5d7aba9f400360cc07c3bdc5b4575f343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Character generation</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Scheduling algorithm</topic><topic>Workflow management software</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bharathi, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chervenak, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deelman, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei-Hui Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahi, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bharathi, S.</au><au>Chervenak, A.</au><au>Deelman, E.</au><au>Mehta, G.</au><au>Mei-Hui Su</au><au>Vahi, K.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Characterization of scientific workflows</atitle><btitle>2008 Third Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science</btitle><stitle>WORKS</stitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>2151-1373</issn><eissn>2151-1381</eissn><isbn>9781424428274</isbn><isbn>1424428270</isbn><abstract>Researchers working on the planning, scheduling and execution of scientific workflows need access to a wide variety of scientific workflows to evaluate the performance of their implementations. We describe basic workflow structures that are composed into complex workflows by scientific communities. We provide a characterization of workflows from five diverse scientific applications, describing their composition and data and computational requirements. We also describe the effect of the size of the input datasets on the structure and execution profiles of these workflows. Finally, we describe a workflow generator that produces synthetic, parameterizable workflows that closely resemble the workflows that we characterize. We make these workflows available to the community to be used as benchmarks for evaluating various workflow systems and scheduling algorithms.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/WORKS.2008.4723958</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 2151-1373 |
| ispartof | 2008 Third Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, 2008, p.1-10 |
| issn | 2151-1373 2151-1381 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_4723958 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | Astronomy Biology Character generation Earthquakes Geometry Libraries Performance analysis Physics Scheduling algorithm Workflow management software |
| title | Characterization of scientific workflows |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T13%3A24%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20scientific%20workflows&rft.btitle=2008%20Third%20Workshop%20on%20Workflows%20in%20Support%20of%20Large-Scale%20Science&rft.au=Bharathi,%20S.&rft.date=2008-11&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=2151-1373&rft.eissn=2151-1381&rft.isbn=9781424428274&rft.isbn_list=1424428270&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/WORKS.2008.4723958&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4723958%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4723958&rfr_iscdi=true |