Towards a Process for Developing Maintenance Tools in Academia
Building of tools-from simple prototypes to industrial-strength applications-is a pervasive activity in academic research. When proposing a new technique for software maintenance, effective tool support is typically required to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the approach. However,...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 246 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Kienle, H.M. Muller, H.A. |
description | Building of tools-from simple prototypes to industrial-strength applications-is a pervasive activity in academic research. When proposing a new technique for software maintenance, effective tool support is typically required to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the approach. However, even though tool building is both pervasive and requiring significant time and effort, it is still pursued in an ad hoc manner. In fact, little research has addressed the question how to make tool building in academia more disciplined, predictable and efficient. In this paper, we address these issues by proposing a dedicated development process for tool building that takes the unique characteristics of an academic research environment into account. We first identify process requirements based on a review of the literature and our extensive tool building experience in the domain of maintenance tools. We then outline a process framework based on work products that accommodates the requirements while providing needed flexibility for tailoring the process to account for specific tool building approaches and project constraints. The work products are concrete milestones of the process, tracking progress, rationalizing (design) decisions, and documenting the current state of the tool building project. Thus, the work products provide important input for strategic project decisions and rapid initiation of new team members. Leveraging a dedicated tool building process promises tools that are designed, build, and maintained in a more disciplined, predictable and efficient manner. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/WCRE.2008.46 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4656415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4656415</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4656415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-98732489625284ed677e864f7ceb9c3d5b5ccf273cddd7defa4ef21343852a9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzMtKAzEUgOHgBRxrd-7c5AVmTHJy3QhlrBeoKDLisqTJGYlMJ2VSlL69gq7-zcdPyCVnDefMXb-3r8tGMGYbqY9IJcCoWoF2x2TujGVGOwVSOHdCql-uag6KnZHzUj4ZEwwcq8hNl7_9FAv19GXKAUuhfZ7oLX7hkHdp_KBPPo17HP0YkHY5D4WmkS6Cj7hN_oKc9n4oOP_vjLzdLbv2oV493z-2i1WduFH72lkDQlqnhRJWYtTGoNWyNwE3LkBUGxVCLwyEGKOJ2HuJveAgwSrhXYQZufr7JkRc76a09dNhLbXSkiv4AdmzSXc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Towards a Process for Developing Maintenance Tools in Academia</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Kienle, H.M. ; Muller, H.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kienle, H.M. ; Muller, H.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Building of tools-from simple prototypes to industrial-strength applications-is a pervasive activity in academic research. When proposing a new technique for software maintenance, effective tool support is typically required to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the approach. However, even though tool building is both pervasive and requiring significant time and effort, it is still pursued in an ad hoc manner. In fact, little research has addressed the question how to make tool building in academia more disciplined, predictable and efficient. In this paper, we address these issues by proposing a dedicated development process for tool building that takes the unique characteristics of an academic research environment into account. We first identify process requirements based on a review of the literature and our extensive tool building experience in the domain of maintenance tools. We then outline a process framework based on work products that accommodates the requirements while providing needed flexibility for tailoring the process to account for specific tool building approaches and project constraints. The work products are concrete milestones of the process, tracking progress, rationalizing (design) decisions, and documenting the current state of the tool building project. Thus, the work products provide important input for strategic project decisions and rapid initiation of new team members. Leveraging a dedicated tool building process promises tools that are designed, build, and maintained in a more disciplined, predictable and efficient manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-1350</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769534299</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769534295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2375-5369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/WCRE.2008.46</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Buildings ; Construction industry ; Maintenance engineering ; Programming ; Prototypes ; Reverse engineering ; Software</subject><ispartof>2008 15th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, 2008, p.237-246</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4656415$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27904,54898</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4656415$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kienle, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, H.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a Process for Developing Maintenance Tools in Academia</title><title>2008 15th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering</title><addtitle>WCRE</addtitle><description>Building of tools-from simple prototypes to industrial-strength applications-is a pervasive activity in academic research. When proposing a new technique for software maintenance, effective tool support is typically required to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the approach. However, even though tool building is both pervasive and requiring significant time and effort, it is still pursued in an ad hoc manner. In fact, little research has addressed the question how to make tool building in academia more disciplined, predictable and efficient. In this paper, we address these issues by proposing a dedicated development process for tool building that takes the unique characteristics of an academic research environment into account. We first identify process requirements based on a review of the literature and our extensive tool building experience in the domain of maintenance tools. We then outline a process framework based on work products that accommodates the requirements while providing needed flexibility for tailoring the process to account for specific tool building approaches and project constraints. The work products are concrete milestones of the process, tracking progress, rationalizing (design) decisions, and documenting the current state of the tool building project. Thus, the work products provide important input for strategic project decisions and rapid initiation of new team members. Leveraging a dedicated tool building process promises tools that are designed, build, and maintained in a more disciplined, predictable and efficient manner.</description><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Maintenance engineering</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Prototypes</subject><subject>Reverse engineering</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1095-1350</issn><issn>2375-5369</issn><isbn>9780769534299</isbn><isbn>0769534295</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotzMtKAzEUgOHgBRxrd-7c5AVmTHJy3QhlrBeoKDLisqTJGYlMJ2VSlL69gq7-zcdPyCVnDefMXb-3r8tGMGYbqY9IJcCoWoF2x2TujGVGOwVSOHdCql-uag6KnZHzUj4ZEwwcq8hNl7_9FAv19GXKAUuhfZ7oLX7hkHdp_KBPPo17HP0YkHY5D4WmkS6Cj7hN_oKc9n4oOP_vjLzdLbv2oV493z-2i1WduFH72lkDQlqnhRJWYtTGoNWyNwE3LkBUGxVCLwyEGKOJ2HuJveAgwSrhXYQZufr7JkRc76a09dNhLbXSkiv4AdmzSXc</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Kienle, H.M.</creator><creator>Muller, H.A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>Towards a Process for Developing Maintenance Tools in Academia</title><author>Kienle, H.M. ; Muller, H.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-98732489625284ed677e864f7ceb9c3d5b5ccf273cddd7defa4ef21343852a9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Maintenance engineering</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Prototypes</topic><topic>Reverse engineering</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kienle, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, H.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kienle, H.M.</au><au>Muller, H.A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Towards a Process for Developing Maintenance Tools in Academia</atitle><btitle>2008 15th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering</btitle><stitle>WCRE</stitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><spage>237</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>237-246</pages><issn>1095-1350</issn><eissn>2375-5369</eissn><isbn>9780769534299</isbn><isbn>0769534295</isbn><abstract>Building of tools-from simple prototypes to industrial-strength applications-is a pervasive activity in academic research. When proposing a new technique for software maintenance, effective tool support is typically required to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the approach. However, even though tool building is both pervasive and requiring significant time and effort, it is still pursued in an ad hoc manner. In fact, little research has addressed the question how to make tool building in academia more disciplined, predictable and efficient. In this paper, we address these issues by proposing a dedicated development process for tool building that takes the unique characteristics of an academic research environment into account. We first identify process requirements based on a review of the literature and our extensive tool building experience in the domain of maintenance tools. We then outline a process framework based on work products that accommodates the requirements while providing needed flexibility for tailoring the process to account for specific tool building approaches and project constraints. The work products are concrete milestones of the process, tracking progress, rationalizing (design) decisions, and documenting the current state of the tool building project. Thus, the work products provide important input for strategic project decisions and rapid initiation of new team members. Leveraging a dedicated tool building process promises tools that are designed, build, and maintained in a more disciplined, predictable and efficient manner.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/WCRE.2008.46</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1095-1350 |
ispartof | 2008 15th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, 2008, p.237-246 |
issn | 1095-1350 2375-5369 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_4656415 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Buildings Construction industry Maintenance engineering Programming Prototypes Reverse engineering Software |
title | Towards a Process for Developing Maintenance Tools in Academia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A06%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20Process%20for%20Developing%20Maintenance%20Tools%20in%20Academia&rft.btitle=2008%2015th%20Working%20Conference%20on%20Reverse%20Engineering&rft.au=Kienle,%20H.M.&rft.date=2008-10&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=237-246&rft.issn=1095-1350&rft.eissn=2375-5369&rft.isbn=9780769534299&rft.isbn_list=0769534295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/WCRE.2008.46&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4656415%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4656415&rfr_iscdi=true |