RDP Technique: Take a Different Look at XP for Adoption

Although software projects can benefit from XP practices, all projects can't directly adopt it. Characteristics of some projects make it difficult to use XP directly, therefore, we need to tailor XP to the local conditions, contexts and the size of these projects. In this article we will descri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Mirakhorli, M., Rad, A.K., Aliee, F.S., Mirakhorli, A., Pazoki, M.
Format:	Tagungsbericht
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Australia Concrete Costs Customizing Extreme Programming Feedback Large-scale systems Mathematics Process Tailoring Productivity Programming RDP Software engineering Software testing
Online-Zugang:	Volltext bestellen
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	662
container_issue
container_start_page	656
container_title
container_volume
creator	Mirakhorli, M. Rad, A.K. Aliee, F.S. Mirakhorli, A. Pazoki, M.
description	Although software projects can benefit from XP practices, all projects can't directly adopt it. Characteristics of some projects make it difficult to use XP directly, therefore, we need to tailor XP to the local conditions, contexts and the size of these projects. In this article we will describe why defining XP by its practices has problems and with the belief that XP's values make it agile, XP's practices do not define XP and XP is defined by its rules, we introduce a practical technique for tailoring XP. Proposed technique benefits from RDP (rule-description-practice) cards for identifying a set of suitable practices for a specific project: organizing "YourXP" software development process.
doi_str_mv	10.1109/ASWEC.2008.4483259
format	Conference Proceeding
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4483259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4483259</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4483259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-f5b2c48afb77b52baaf31b9b42abfa153292261bad3918402c1a9abe3f197f5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tOwzAUAC0-EqX0ArDxBRKen-3YZhel5SNFooJIsKueU1uYQlKSsOD2INHV7EYzjF0KyIUAd10-v6yqHAFsrpSVqN0Rm6E0JtMK7DFbOGPBFE5LAWBO2ExoCRlYkGfsfBzfARAUFDNmnpZr3oT2rUtf3-GGN7QLnPgyxRiG0E287vsdp4m_rnnsB15u-_2U-u6CnUb6GMPiwDlrbldNdZ_Vj3cPVVlnycGURe2xVZaiN8Zr9ERRCu-8QvKR_prQIRbC01Y6YRVgK8iRDzIKZ6Ju5Zxd_WtTCGGzH9InDT-bw7L8BfA5RvI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>RDP Technique: Take a Different Look at XP for Adoption</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Mirakhorli, M. ; Rad, A.K. ; Aliee, F.S. ; Mirakhorli, A. ; Pazoki, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirakhorli, M. ; Rad, A.K. ; Aliee, F.S. ; Mirakhorli, A. ; Pazoki, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Although software projects can benefit from XP practices, all projects can't directly adopt it. Characteristics of some projects make it difficult to use XP directly, therefore, we need to tailor XP to the local conditions, contexts and the size of these projects. In this article we will describe why defining XP by its practices has problems and with the belief that XP's values make it agile, XP's practices do not define XP and XP is defined by its rules, we introduce a practical technique for tailoring XP. Proposed technique benefits from RDP (rule-description-practice) cards for identifying a set of suitable practices for a specific project: organizing "YourXP" software development process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-0803</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769531007</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769531008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2377-5408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ASWEC.2008.4483259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Australia ; Concrete ; Costs ; Customizing ; Extreme Programming ; Feedback ; Large-scale systems ; Mathematics ; Process Tailoring ; Productivity ; Programming ; RDP ; Software engineering ; Software testing</subject><ispartof>19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008), 2008, p.656-662</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4483259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,778,782,787,788,2054,27912,54907</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4483259$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirakhorli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rad, A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aliee, F.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirakhorli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazoki, M.</creatorcontrib><title>RDP Technique: Take a Different Look at XP for Adoption</title><title>19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)</title><addtitle>ASWEC</addtitle><description>Although software projects can benefit from XP practices, all projects can't directly adopt it. Characteristics of some projects make it difficult to use XP directly, therefore, we need to tailor XP to the local conditions, contexts and the size of these projects. In this article we will describe why defining XP by its practices has problems and with the belief that XP's values make it agile, XP's practices do not define XP and XP is defined by its rules, we introduce a practical technique for tailoring XP. Proposed technique benefits from RDP (rule-description-practice) cards for identifying a set of suitable practices for a specific project: organizing "YourXP" software development process.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Customizing</subject><subject>Extreme Programming</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Large-scale systems</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Process Tailoring</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>RDP</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Software testing</subject><issn>1530-0803</issn><issn>2377-5408</issn><isbn>9780769531007</isbn><isbn>0769531008</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0tOwzAUAC0-EqX0ArDxBRKen-3YZhel5SNFooJIsKueU1uYQlKSsOD2INHV7EYzjF0KyIUAd10-v6yqHAFsrpSVqN0Rm6E0JtMK7DFbOGPBFE5LAWBO2ExoCRlYkGfsfBzfARAUFDNmnpZr3oT2rUtf3-GGN7QLnPgyxRiG0E287vsdp4m_rnnsB15u-_2U-u6CnUb6GMPiwDlrbldNdZ_Vj3cPVVlnycGURe2xVZaiN8Zr9ERRCu-8QvKR_prQIRbC01Y6YRVgK8iRDzIKZ6Ju5Zxd_WtTCGGzH9InDT-bw7L8BfA5RvI</recordid><startdate>200803</startdate><enddate>200803</enddate><creator>Mirakhorli, M.</creator><creator>Rad, A.K.</creator><creator>Aliee, F.S.</creator><creator>Mirakhorli, A.</creator><creator>Pazoki, M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200803</creationdate><title>RDP Technique: Take a Different Look at XP for Adoption</title><author>Mirakhorli, M. ; Rad, A.K. ; Aliee, F.S. ; Mirakhorli, A. ; Pazoki, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-f5b2c48afb77b52baaf31b9b42abfa153292261bad3918402c1a9abe3f197f5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Customizing</topic><topic>Extreme Programming</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Large-scale systems</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Process Tailoring</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>RDP</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Software testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirakhorli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rad, A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aliee, F.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirakhorli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazoki, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirakhorli, M.</au><au>Rad, A.K.</au><au>Aliee, F.S.</au><au>Mirakhorli, A.</au><au>Pazoki, M.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>RDP Technique: Take a Different Look at XP for Adoption</atitle><btitle>19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)</btitle><stitle>ASWEC</stitle><date>2008-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><spage>656</spage><epage>662</epage><pages>656-662</pages><issn>1530-0803</issn><eissn>2377-5408</eissn><isbn>9780769531007</isbn><isbn>0769531008</isbn><abstract>Although software projects can benefit from XP practices, all projects can't directly adopt it. Characteristics of some projects make it difficult to use XP directly, therefore, we need to tailor XP to the local conditions, contexts and the size of these projects. In this article we will describe why defining XP by its practices has problems and with the belief that XP's values make it agile, XP's practices do not define XP and XP is defined by its rules, we introduce a practical technique for tailoring XP. Proposed technique benefits from RDP (rule-description-practice) cards for identifying a set of suitable practices for a specific project: organizing "YourXP" software development process.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ASWEC.2008.4483259</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier	ISSN: 1530-0803
ispartof	19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008), 2008, p.656-662
issn	1530-0803 2377-5408
language	eng
recordid	cdi_ieee_primary_4483259
source	IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects	Australia Concrete Costs Customizing Extreme Programming Feedback Large-scale systems Mathematics Process Tailoring Productivity Programming RDP Software engineering Software testing
title	RDP Technique: Take a Different Look at XP for Adoption
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A51%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=RDP%20Technique:%20Take%20a%20Different%20Look%20at%20XP%20for%20Adoption&rft.btitle=19th%20Australian%20Conference%20on%20Software%20Engineering%20(aswec%202008)&rft.au=Mirakhorli,%20M.&rft.date=2008-03&rft.spage=656&rft.epage=662&rft.pages=656-662&rft.issn=1530-0803&rft.eissn=2377-5408&rft.isbn=9780769531007&rft.isbn_list=0769531008&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ASWEC.2008.4483259&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4483259%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4483259&rfr_iscdi=true