Influence of development parameters on electron resist contrast

A 3D micro/nano structuring is finding more and more applications in different fields of since at last time. One of the 3D micro/nano structuring method is e-beam lithography. Measurement of electron resist characteristics especially contrast is very important for 3D structure fabrication. For this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Knyazev, M.A., Svintsov, A.A., Zaitsev, S.I.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 93
container_issue
container_start_page 92
container_title
container_volume
creator Knyazev, M.A.
Svintsov, A.A.
Zaitsev, S.I.
description A 3D micro/nano structuring is finding more and more applications in different fields of since at last time. One of the 3D micro/nano structuring method is e-beam lithography. Measurement of electron resist characteristics especially contrast is very important for 3D structure fabrication. For this purposes the new express method for contrast determination was developed. This work is devoted to application of the method to investigation of contrast dependence on development conditions. It is based on an expression for resist development velocity: nu = nu 0 (D/D 0 ) gamma where v is development rate of the electron resist exposed with dose D, nu 0 is the development rate of the electron resist exposed with dose D 0 (resist sensitivity), and gamma is a contrast. The main feature of the method is the specially designed 3D test structure "dose wedge" in detail described. Three different profiles can, generally, be revealed after the development of the exposed "dose wedge". As shown, when gamma is higher than the real resist contrast gamma exp the profile is concave, when gamma < gamma exp the profile is convex, and when gamma and gamma exp are equal the profile is plane. Therefore, when gamma = gamma exp the change in the residual resist thickness is linear. The real test structures consist of several dose wedges. The article shows the results of the test structure development of a PMMA 950 K. resist exposed by a JEOL 840 A under NanoMaker hardware/software system control at 25 kV. The exposure data were designed using the software part of the NanoMaker. When the residual resist thickness grows linearly, the distance between neighboring intensity minima or maxima is constant. In the case gamma > gamma exp , the distance decreases with a thickness increment and, vice versa, if gamma < gamma exp the distance between minima or maxima increases with a thickness increment. For the test structure, the value of the resist contrast is 7. The considered method is similar to approach developed for measurements of proximity function parameters. The main advantage of the method in comparison with others is it speed (design, exposure, development and observation take typically 30 minutes). So this method gives possibility to investigate resist contrast as function of different lithography parameters for acceptable time. The results of the investigations can help to find ways for resist contrast manipulating. As example of the method application the contrast of the PMMA 950
doi_str_mv 10.1109/IMNC.2007.4456120
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4456120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4456120</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4456120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b98b8afd17130998bf4b78a7e154eb4568d7d4ebd5feb8d0b460e2dcf9003f8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LxDAYhAMiKGt_gHjJH2h9kyab5CRS_Cjs6kXPS9K8gUq_SKLgvzfgzmVmLsMzhNwyaBgDc98f37qGA6hGCLlnHC5IZZQWxgAXigtzRaqUvqCoNVIyfk0e-iVM37gMSNdAPf7gtG4zLpluNtoZM8ZE14XihEOOJURMY8p0WJccbco35DLYKWF19h35fH766F7rw_tL3z0e6pEpmWtntNM2eKZYC6aUIJzSViGTAl2B1V75krwM6LQHJ_aA3A_BFNSgXbsjd_-7IyKetjjONv6ezjfbP88zSWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Influence of development parameters on electron resist contrast</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Knyazev, M.A. ; Svintsov, A.A. ; Zaitsev, S.I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knyazev, M.A. ; Svintsov, A.A. ; Zaitsev, S.I.</creatorcontrib><description>A 3D micro/nano structuring is finding more and more applications in different fields of since at last time. One of the 3D micro/nano structuring method is e-beam lithography. Measurement of electron resist characteristics especially contrast is very important for 3D structure fabrication. For this purposes the new express method for contrast determination was developed. This work is devoted to application of the method to investigation of contrast dependence on development conditions. It is based on an expression for resist development velocity: nu = nu 0 (D/D 0 ) gamma where v is development rate of the electron resist exposed with dose D, nu 0 is the development rate of the electron resist exposed with dose D 0 (resist sensitivity), and gamma is a contrast. The main feature of the method is the specially designed 3D test structure "dose wedge" in detail described. Three different profiles can, generally, be revealed after the development of the exposed "dose wedge". As shown, when gamma is higher than the real resist contrast gamma exp the profile is concave, when gamma &lt; gamma exp the profile is convex, and when gamma and gamma exp are equal the profile is plane. Therefore, when gamma = gamma exp the change in the residual resist thickness is linear. The real test structures consist of several dose wedges. The article shows the results of the test structure development of a PMMA 950 K. resist exposed by a JEOL 840 A under NanoMaker hardware/software system control at 25 kV. The exposure data were designed using the software part of the NanoMaker. When the residual resist thickness grows linearly, the distance between neighboring intensity minima or maxima is constant. In the case gamma &gt; gamma exp , the distance decreases with a thickness increment and, vice versa, if gamma &lt; gamma exp the distance between minima or maxima increases with a thickness increment. For the test structure, the value of the resist contrast is 7. The considered method is similar to approach developed for measurements of proximity function parameters. The main advantage of the method in comparison with others is it speed (design, exposure, development and observation take typically 30 minutes). So this method gives possibility to investigate resist contrast as function of different lithography parameters for acceptable time. The results of the investigations can help to find ways for resist contrast manipulating. As example of the method application the contrast of the PMMA 950 K. for two development parameters were investigated. First, the method was used for the investigation of the PMMA 950 K. temperature contrast dependence. The test structures were exposed at 25 kV in the PMMA 950 K film and then they were developed in IPA-H 2 O 8:1 for different temperatures. A significant influence of the developer temperature was observed, and as shown in fig 3a, contrast decreases in two times when temperature changes from 21.5degC to 37.5degC. Second, the contrast for four volume ratio of the developer components IPA and H 2 O was found and graphed in fig. 3 b. So developer temperature and the developer staff have material effect on resist contrast value and these factors could be now quantitatively used for development control and optimization.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9784990247249</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 4990247248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/IMNC.2007.4456120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Control systems ; Electrons ; Fabrication ; Hardware ; Lithography ; Resists ; Software systems ; Software testing ; System testing ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>2007 Digest of papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology, 2007, p.92-93</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4456120$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,781,785,790,791,2059,27929,54924</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4456120$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knyazev, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svintsov, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaitsev, S.I.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of development parameters on electron resist contrast</title><title>2007 Digest of papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology</title><addtitle>IMNC</addtitle><description>A 3D micro/nano structuring is finding more and more applications in different fields of since at last time. One of the 3D micro/nano structuring method is e-beam lithography. Measurement of electron resist characteristics especially contrast is very important for 3D structure fabrication. For this purposes the new express method for contrast determination was developed. This work is devoted to application of the method to investigation of contrast dependence on development conditions. It is based on an expression for resist development velocity: nu = nu 0 (D/D 0 ) gamma where v is development rate of the electron resist exposed with dose D, nu 0 is the development rate of the electron resist exposed with dose D 0 (resist sensitivity), and gamma is a contrast. The main feature of the method is the specially designed 3D test structure "dose wedge" in detail described. Three different profiles can, generally, be revealed after the development of the exposed "dose wedge". As shown, when gamma is higher than the real resist contrast gamma exp the profile is concave, when gamma &lt; gamma exp the profile is convex, and when gamma and gamma exp are equal the profile is plane. Therefore, when gamma = gamma exp the change in the residual resist thickness is linear. The real test structures consist of several dose wedges. The article shows the results of the test structure development of a PMMA 950 K. resist exposed by a JEOL 840 A under NanoMaker hardware/software system control at 25 kV. The exposure data were designed using the software part of the NanoMaker. When the residual resist thickness grows linearly, the distance between neighboring intensity minima or maxima is constant. In the case gamma &gt; gamma exp , the distance decreases with a thickness increment and, vice versa, if gamma &lt; gamma exp the distance between minima or maxima increases with a thickness increment. For the test structure, the value of the resist contrast is 7. The considered method is similar to approach developed for measurements of proximity function parameters. The main advantage of the method in comparison with others is it speed (design, exposure, development and observation take typically 30 minutes). So this method gives possibility to investigate resist contrast as function of different lithography parameters for acceptable time. The results of the investigations can help to find ways for resist contrast manipulating. As example of the method application the contrast of the PMMA 950 K. for two development parameters were investigated. First, the method was used for the investigation of the PMMA 950 K. temperature contrast dependence. The test structures were exposed at 25 kV in the PMMA 950 K film and then they were developed in IPA-H 2 O 8:1 for different temperatures. A significant influence of the developer temperature was observed, and as shown in fig 3a, contrast decreases in two times when temperature changes from 21.5degC to 37.5degC. Second, the contrast for four volume ratio of the developer components IPA and H 2 O was found and graphed in fig. 3 b. So developer temperature and the developer staff have material effect on resist contrast value and these factors could be now quantitatively used for development control and optimization.</description><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Fabrication</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Lithography</subject><subject>Resists</subject><subject>Software systems</subject><subject>Software testing</subject><subject>System testing</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><isbn>9784990247249</isbn><isbn>4990247248</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LxDAYhAMiKGt_gHjJH2h9kyab5CRS_Cjs6kXPS9K8gUq_SKLgvzfgzmVmLsMzhNwyaBgDc98f37qGA6hGCLlnHC5IZZQWxgAXigtzRaqUvqCoNVIyfk0e-iVM37gMSNdAPf7gtG4zLpluNtoZM8ZE14XihEOOJURMY8p0WJccbco35DLYKWF19h35fH766F7rw_tL3z0e6pEpmWtntNM2eKZYC6aUIJzSViGTAl2B1V75krwM6LQHJ_aA3A_BFNSgXbsjd_-7IyKetjjONv6ezjfbP88zSWU</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>Knyazev, M.A.</creator><creator>Svintsov, A.A.</creator><creator>Zaitsev, S.I.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Influence of development parameters on electron resist contrast</title><author>Knyazev, M.A. ; Svintsov, A.A. ; Zaitsev, S.I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b98b8afd17130998bf4b78a7e154eb4568d7d4ebd5feb8d0b460e2dcf9003f8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Fabrication</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Lithography</topic><topic>Resists</topic><topic>Software systems</topic><topic>Software testing</topic><topic>System testing</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knyazev, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svintsov, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaitsev, S.I.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knyazev, M.A.</au><au>Svintsov, A.A.</au><au>Zaitsev, S.I.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Influence of development parameters on electron resist contrast</atitle><btitle>2007 Digest of papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology</btitle><stitle>IMNC</stitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>92</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>92-93</pages><isbn>9784990247249</isbn><isbn>4990247248</isbn><abstract>A 3D micro/nano structuring is finding more and more applications in different fields of since at last time. One of the 3D micro/nano structuring method is e-beam lithography. Measurement of electron resist characteristics especially contrast is very important for 3D structure fabrication. For this purposes the new express method for contrast determination was developed. This work is devoted to application of the method to investigation of contrast dependence on development conditions. It is based on an expression for resist development velocity: nu = nu 0 (D/D 0 ) gamma where v is development rate of the electron resist exposed with dose D, nu 0 is the development rate of the electron resist exposed with dose D 0 (resist sensitivity), and gamma is a contrast. The main feature of the method is the specially designed 3D test structure "dose wedge" in detail described. Three different profiles can, generally, be revealed after the development of the exposed "dose wedge". As shown, when gamma is higher than the real resist contrast gamma exp the profile is concave, when gamma &lt; gamma exp the profile is convex, and when gamma and gamma exp are equal the profile is plane. Therefore, when gamma = gamma exp the change in the residual resist thickness is linear. The real test structures consist of several dose wedges. The article shows the results of the test structure development of a PMMA 950 K. resist exposed by a JEOL 840 A under NanoMaker hardware/software system control at 25 kV. The exposure data were designed using the software part of the NanoMaker. When the residual resist thickness grows linearly, the distance between neighboring intensity minima or maxima is constant. In the case gamma &gt; gamma exp , the distance decreases with a thickness increment and, vice versa, if gamma &lt; gamma exp the distance between minima or maxima increases with a thickness increment. For the test structure, the value of the resist contrast is 7. The considered method is similar to approach developed for measurements of proximity function parameters. The main advantage of the method in comparison with others is it speed (design, exposure, development and observation take typically 30 minutes). So this method gives possibility to investigate resist contrast as function of different lithography parameters for acceptable time. The results of the investigations can help to find ways for resist contrast manipulating. As example of the method application the contrast of the PMMA 950 K. for two development parameters were investigated. First, the method was used for the investigation of the PMMA 950 K. temperature contrast dependence. The test structures were exposed at 25 kV in the PMMA 950 K film and then they were developed in IPA-H 2 O 8:1 for different temperatures. A significant influence of the developer temperature was observed, and as shown in fig 3a, contrast decreases in two times when temperature changes from 21.5degC to 37.5degC. Second, the contrast for four volume ratio of the developer components IPA and H 2 O was found and graphed in fig. 3 b. So developer temperature and the developer staff have material effect on resist contrast value and these factors could be now quantitatively used for development control and optimization.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/IMNC.2007.4456120</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9784990247249
ispartof 2007 Digest of papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology, 2007, p.92-93
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_4456120
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Control systems
Electrons
Fabrication
Hardware
Lithography
Resists
Software systems
Software testing
System testing
Temperature
title Influence of development parameters on electron resist contrast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T22%3A44%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20development%20parameters%20on%20electron%20resist%20contrast&rft.btitle=2007%20Digest%20of%20papers%20Microprocesses%20and%20Nanotechnology&rft.au=Knyazev,%20M.A.&rft.date=2007-11&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=92-93&rft.isbn=9784990247249&rft.isbn_list=4990247248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/IMNC.2007.4456120&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4456120%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4456120&rfr_iscdi=true