Comparison of absorbing boundary conditions for numerical analysis of periodic structures

Periodic structures like gratings or frequency selective surfaces are widely met in antenna design and applications. Some problems require calculating reflectivity in a wide frequency band. Time domain methods like FDTD are beneficial in such problems since they provide the whole spectrum in a singl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Butrym, A. Yu, Legenkiy, M. N.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 242
container_issue
container_start_page 239
container_title
container_volume
creator Butrym, A. Yu
Legenkiy, M. N.
description Periodic structures like gratings or frequency selective surfaces are widely met in antenna design and applications. Some problems require calculating reflectivity in a wide frequency band. Time domain methods like FDTD are beneficial in such problems since they provide the whole spectrum in a single simulation. A periodic structure is modeled as a Floquet waveguide. In FDTD the simulation region needs to be bound with absorbing boundary condition that imitates a semi-infinite waveguide. We tested several such conditions, which are widely used, and reveal that none of these performs well near cutoff frequencies. The problem is demonstrated on a simple illustrative diffraction problem. Some possible ways of improving ABC to overcome the difficulty are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICATT.2007.4425170
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4425170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4425170</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4425170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b692ee9899164f813f70f8d4cf654a632662bd3740c4cc323a59f27c4ff0eb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81KxDAcxAMiqOu-gF7yAl3z8U_SHKX4BQteevG0JGkikTYpSXvYt7fizmVgYIbfIPRAyYFSop8-uue-PzBC1AGACarIFbqjwACoaEHcoH2tP2QT11wScYu-ujzNpsSaE84BG1tzsTF9Y5vXNJhyxi6nIS4xp4pDLjitky_RmRGbZMZzjfWvN29ZHqLDdSmrW9bi6z26Dmasfn_xHepfX_ruvTl-vm2YxyZSJZbGSs28163WVEJoKQ-KhHYAF6QAIzmTktmBKyAOnOOMG6EDUw5CIN4yvkOP_7PRe3-aS5w26NPlPP8FVh9R2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of absorbing boundary conditions for numerical analysis of periodic structures</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Butrym, A. Yu ; Legenkiy, M. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Butrym, A. Yu ; Legenkiy, M. N.</creatorcontrib><description>Periodic structures like gratings or frequency selective surfaces are widely met in antenna design and applications. Some problems require calculating reflectivity in a wide frequency band. Time domain methods like FDTD are beneficial in such problems since they provide the whole spectrum in a single simulation. A periodic structure is modeled as a Floquet waveguide. In FDTD the simulation region needs to be bound with absorbing boundary condition that imitates a semi-infinite waveguide. We tested several such conditions, which are widely used, and reveal that none of these performs well near cutoff frequencies. The problem is demonstrated on a simple illustrative diffraction problem. Some possible ways of improving ABC to overcome the difficulty are discussed.</description><identifier>ISBN: 1424415845</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424415847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICATT.2007.4425170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Absorbing Boundary Condition ; Boundary conditions ; Finite difference methods ; Floquet waveguide ; Frequency selective surfaces ; Gratings ; Klein-Gordon equation ; Mode Basis Method ; Numerical analysis ; Perfectly Matched Layer ; Performance evaluation ; Periodic structures ; Reflectivity ; Testing ; Time domain analysis</subject><ispartof>2007 6th International Conference on Antenna Theory and Techniques, 2007, p.239-242</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4425170$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2051,27904,54898</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4425170$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butrym, A. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legenkiy, M. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of absorbing boundary conditions for numerical analysis of periodic structures</title><title>2007 6th International Conference on Antenna Theory and Techniques</title><addtitle>ICATT</addtitle><description>Periodic structures like gratings or frequency selective surfaces are widely met in antenna design and applications. Some problems require calculating reflectivity in a wide frequency band. Time domain methods like FDTD are beneficial in such problems since they provide the whole spectrum in a single simulation. A periodic structure is modeled as a Floquet waveguide. In FDTD the simulation region needs to be bound with absorbing boundary condition that imitates a semi-infinite waveguide. We tested several such conditions, which are widely used, and reveal that none of these performs well near cutoff frequencies. The problem is demonstrated on a simple illustrative diffraction problem. Some possible ways of improving ABC to overcome the difficulty are discussed.</description><subject>Absorbing Boundary Condition</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Finite difference methods</subject><subject>Floquet waveguide</subject><subject>Frequency selective surfaces</subject><subject>Gratings</subject><subject>Klein-Gordon equation</subject><subject>Mode Basis Method</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Perfectly Matched Layer</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Periodic structures</subject><subject>Reflectivity</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Time domain analysis</subject><isbn>1424415845</isbn><isbn>9781424415847</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj81KxDAcxAMiqOu-gF7yAl3z8U_SHKX4BQteevG0JGkikTYpSXvYt7fizmVgYIbfIPRAyYFSop8-uue-PzBC1AGACarIFbqjwACoaEHcoH2tP2QT11wScYu-ujzNpsSaE84BG1tzsTF9Y5vXNJhyxi6nIS4xp4pDLjitky_RmRGbZMZzjfWvN29ZHqLDdSmrW9bi6z26Dmasfn_xHepfX_ruvTl-vm2YxyZSJZbGSs28163WVEJoKQ-KhHYAF6QAIzmTktmBKyAOnOOMG6EDUw5CIN4yvkOP_7PRe3-aS5w26NPlPP8FVh9R2A</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Butrym, A. Yu</creator><creator>Legenkiy, M. N.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>Comparison of absorbing boundary conditions for numerical analysis of periodic structures</title><author>Butrym, A. Yu ; Legenkiy, M. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b692ee9899164f813f70f8d4cf654a632662bd3740c4cc323a59f27c4ff0eb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Absorbing Boundary Condition</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Finite difference methods</topic><topic>Floquet waveguide</topic><topic>Frequency selective surfaces</topic><topic>Gratings</topic><topic>Klein-Gordon equation</topic><topic>Mode Basis Method</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Perfectly Matched Layer</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Periodic structures</topic><topic>Reflectivity</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Time domain analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butrym, A. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legenkiy, M. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butrym, A. Yu</au><au>Legenkiy, M. N.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of absorbing boundary conditions for numerical analysis of periodic structures</atitle><btitle>2007 6th International Conference on Antenna Theory and Techniques</btitle><stitle>ICATT</stitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>239</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>239-242</pages><isbn>1424415845</isbn><isbn>9781424415847</isbn><abstract>Periodic structures like gratings or frequency selective surfaces are widely met in antenna design and applications. Some problems require calculating reflectivity in a wide frequency band. Time domain methods like FDTD are beneficial in such problems since they provide the whole spectrum in a single simulation. A periodic structure is modeled as a Floquet waveguide. In FDTD the simulation region needs to be bound with absorbing boundary condition that imitates a semi-infinite waveguide. We tested several such conditions, which are widely used, and reveal that none of these performs well near cutoff frequencies. The problem is demonstrated on a simple illustrative diffraction problem. Some possible ways of improving ABC to overcome the difficulty are discussed.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICATT.2007.4425170</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 1424415845
ispartof 2007 6th International Conference on Antenna Theory and Techniques, 2007, p.239-242
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_4425170
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Absorbing Boundary Condition
Boundary conditions
Finite difference methods
Floquet waveguide
Frequency selective surfaces
Gratings
Klein-Gordon equation
Mode Basis Method
Numerical analysis
Perfectly Matched Layer
Performance evaluation
Periodic structures
Reflectivity
Testing
Time domain analysis
title Comparison of absorbing boundary conditions for numerical analysis of periodic structures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A31%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20absorbing%20boundary%20conditions%20for%20numerical%20analysis%20of%20periodic%20structures&rft.btitle=2007%206th%20International%20Conference%20on%20Antenna%20Theory%20and%20Techniques&rft.au=Butrym,%20A.%20Yu&rft.date=2007-09&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=239-242&rft.isbn=1424415845&rft.isbn_list=9781424415847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICATT.2007.4425170&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4425170%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4425170&rfr_iscdi=true