A Comparison of Multi-Transducer Arrays and Single-Transducer Arrays for the Determination of Multi-Vapor Mixtures

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of multi-transducer (MT) array performance, illustrating quantitatively the advantages of such arrays over their single-transducer (ST) counterparts. Calibrations were performed for 11 vapors with five cantilevers, five capacitive, and five calorimetric s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Chunguang Jin, Zellers, E.T., Kurzawski, P., Hierlemann, A.
Format:	Tagungsbericht
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Calibration Capacitive sensors Capacitors Coatings Microsensors Pattern recognition Performance analysis Resonance Sensor arrays Transducers
Online-Zugang:	Volltext bestellen
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	1220
container_issue
container_start_page	1217
container_title
container_volume
creator	Chunguang Jin Zellers, E.T. Kurzawski, P. Hierlemann, A.
description	This study provides a comprehensive analysis of multi-transducer (MT) array performance, illustrating quantitatively the advantages of such arrays over their single-transducer (ST) counterparts. Calibrations were performed for 11 vapors with five cantilevers, five capacitive, and five calorimetric sensors coated with five different polymers. Using these data in Monte Carlo simulations coupled with a disjoint principal component regression pattern recognition algorithm we examine the predicted rates of recognition achievable for analyses of individual vapors and their binary and ternary mixtures. Optimal MT arrays consistently outperform optimal ST arrays of similar dimension, and a number of ternary mixtures could be reliably analyzed with MT arrays that could not be analyzed with any ST arrays. Recognition rates did not increase significantly by including > 5 or 6 sensors in the array.
doi_str_mv	10.1109/ICSENS.2007.4388628
format	Conference Proceeding
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4388628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4388628</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4388628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-c2f72a3ec1e2d7f229797d418c9a04245af36f517a62dee0b79d104770b7e5f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1OwzAUhM2fRFp6gm58gRT72YntZRUKVGphkcK2MskzGDVJZacSvT2RKBILVjPSjEb6hpApZzPOmbldFuXiqZwBY2omhdY56DMyMUpzCVJyyEGekwR4rlMDYC7I6Dfg6pIk3AiWMmGyazKK8ZMxYBnohIQ5Lbpmb4OPXUs7R9eHXe_TTbBtrA8VBjoPwR4jtW1NS9--7_Cf0HWB9h9I77DH0PjW9v7v2qvdD4W1_-oPAeMNuXJ2F3Fy0jF5uV9sisd09fywLOar1HOV9WkFToEVWHGEWrmBSRlVS64rY9mAllkncpdxZXOoEdmbMjVnUqnBYea0GJPpz65HxO0--MaG4_b0nfgGckFgQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A Comparison of Multi-Transducer Arrays and Single-Transducer Arrays for the Determination of Multi-Vapor Mixtures</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Chunguang Jin ; Zellers, E.T. ; Kurzawski, P. ; Hierlemann, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chunguang Jin ; Zellers, E.T. ; Kurzawski, P. ; Hierlemann, A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study provides a comprehensive analysis of multi-transducer (MT) array performance, illustrating quantitatively the advantages of such arrays over their single-transducer (ST) counterparts. Calibrations were performed for 11 vapors with five cantilevers, five capacitive, and five calorimetric sensors coated with five different polymers. Using these data in Monte Carlo simulations coupled with a disjoint principal component regression pattern recognition algorithm we examine the predicted rates of recognition achievable for analyses of individual vapors and their binary and ternary mixtures. Optimal MT arrays consistently outperform optimal ST arrays of similar dimension, and a number of ternary mixtures could be reliably analyzed with MT arrays that could not be analyzed with any ST arrays. Recognition rates did not increase significantly by including > 5 or 6 sensors in the array.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-0395</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424412617</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424412617</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-9229</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424412624</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424412625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICSENS.2007.4388628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Capacitive sensors ; Capacitors ; Coatings ; Microsensors ; Pattern recognition ; Performance analysis ; Resonance ; Sensor arrays ; Transducers</subject><ispartof>2007 IEEE Sensors, 2007, p.1217-1220</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4388628$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,778,782,787,788,2054,27908,54903</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4388628$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chunguang Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zellers, E.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurzawski, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hierlemann, A.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Multi-Transducer Arrays and Single-Transducer Arrays for the Determination of Multi-Vapor Mixtures</title><title>2007 IEEE Sensors</title><addtitle>ICSENS</addtitle><description>This study provides a comprehensive analysis of multi-transducer (MT) array performance, illustrating quantitatively the advantages of such arrays over their single-transducer (ST) counterparts. Calibrations were performed for 11 vapors with five cantilevers, five capacitive, and five calorimetric sensors coated with five different polymers. Using these data in Monte Carlo simulations coupled with a disjoint principal component regression pattern recognition algorithm we examine the predicted rates of recognition achievable for analyses of individual vapors and their binary and ternary mixtures. Optimal MT arrays consistently outperform optimal ST arrays of similar dimension, and a number of ternary mixtures could be reliably analyzed with MT arrays that could not be analyzed with any ST arrays. Recognition rates did not increase significantly by including > 5 or 6 sensors in the array.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Capacitive sensors</subject><subject>Capacitors</subject><subject>Coatings</subject><subject>Microsensors</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Resonance</subject><subject>Sensor arrays</subject><subject>Transducers</subject><issn>1930-0395</issn><issn>2168-9229</issn><isbn>1424412617</isbn><isbn>9781424412617</isbn><isbn>9781424412624</isbn><isbn>1424412625</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1OwzAUhM2fRFp6gm58gRT72YntZRUKVGphkcK2MskzGDVJZacSvT2RKBILVjPSjEb6hpApZzPOmbldFuXiqZwBY2omhdY56DMyMUpzCVJyyEGekwR4rlMDYC7I6Dfg6pIk3AiWMmGyazKK8ZMxYBnohIQ5Lbpmb4OPXUs7R9eHXe_TTbBtrA8VBjoPwR4jtW1NS9--7_Cf0HWB9h9I77DH0PjW9v7v2qvdD4W1_-oPAeMNuXJ2F3Fy0jF5uV9sisd09fywLOar1HOV9WkFToEVWHGEWrmBSRlVS64rY9mAllkncpdxZXOoEdmbMjVnUqnBYea0GJPpz65HxO0--MaG4_b0nfgGckFgQw</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>Chunguang Jin</creator><creator>Zellers, E.T.</creator><creator>Kurzawski, P.</creator><creator>Hierlemann, A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Multi-Transducer Arrays and Single-Transducer Arrays for the Determination of Multi-Vapor Mixtures</title><author>Chunguang Jin ; Zellers, E.T. ; Kurzawski, P. ; Hierlemann, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-c2f72a3ec1e2d7f229797d418c9a04245af36f517a62dee0b79d104770b7e5f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Capacitive sensors</topic><topic>Capacitors</topic><topic>Coatings</topic><topic>Microsensors</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Resonance</topic><topic>Sensor arrays</topic><topic>Transducers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chunguang Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zellers, E.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurzawski, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hierlemann, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chunguang Jin</au><au>Zellers, E.T.</au><au>Kurzawski, P.</au><au>Hierlemann, A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Multi-Transducer Arrays and Single-Transducer Arrays for the Determination of Multi-Vapor Mixtures</atitle><btitle>2007 IEEE Sensors</btitle><stitle>ICSENS</stitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>1217</spage><epage>1220</epage><pages>1217-1220</pages><issn>1930-0395</issn><eissn>2168-9229</eissn><isbn>1424412617</isbn><isbn>9781424412617</isbn><eisbn>9781424412624</eisbn><eisbn>1424412625</eisbn><abstract>This study provides a comprehensive analysis of multi-transducer (MT) array performance, illustrating quantitatively the advantages of such arrays over their single-transducer (ST) counterparts. Calibrations were performed for 11 vapors with five cantilevers, five capacitive, and five calorimetric sensors coated with five different polymers. Using these data in Monte Carlo simulations coupled with a disjoint principal component regression pattern recognition algorithm we examine the predicted rates of recognition achievable for analyses of individual vapors and their binary and ternary mixtures. Optimal MT arrays consistently outperform optimal ST arrays of similar dimension, and a number of ternary mixtures could be reliably analyzed with MT arrays that could not be analyzed with any ST arrays. Recognition rates did not increase significantly by including > 5 or 6 sensors in the array.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICSENS.2007.4388628</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier	ISSN: 1930-0395
ispartof	2007 IEEE Sensors, 2007, p.1217-1220
issn	1930-0395 2168-9229
language	eng
recordid	cdi_ieee_primary_4388628
source	IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects	Calibration Capacitive sensors Capacitors Coatings Microsensors Pattern recognition Performance analysis Resonance Sensor arrays Transducers
title	A Comparison of Multi-Transducer Arrays and Single-Transducer Arrays for the Determination of Multi-Vapor Mixtures
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A03%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Multi-Transducer%20Arrays%20and%20Single-Transducer%20Arrays%20for%20the%20Determination%20of%20Multi-Vapor%20Mixtures&rft.btitle=2007%20IEEE%20Sensors&rft.au=Chunguang%20Jin&rft.date=2007-10&rft.spage=1217&rft.epage=1220&rft.pages=1217-1220&rft.issn=1930-0395&rft.eissn=2168-9229&rft.isbn=1424412617&rft.isbn_list=9781424412617&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICSENS.2007.4388628&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4388628%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781424412624&rft.eisbn_list=1424412625&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4388628&rfr_iscdi=true