Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning

Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Denger, C., Elberzhager, F.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 280
container_issue
container_start_page 271
container_title
container_volume
creator Denger, C.
Elberzhager, F.
description Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer Reviews and simple Desk Checks. What is missing today is a systematic approach on how to select and apply the most appropriate technique under the consideration of the given development constraints and quality goals a company wants to achieve. This paper presents the first step towards a comprehensive planning framework for static quality assurance activities, i.e., the definition of a generic process that explicitly models the commonalities and variabilities of different techniques. The paper describes how such a process is defined by using concepts of product line engineering and how the generic process and a related decision model supports the selection of a technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/EUROMICRO.2007.59
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4301089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4301089</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4301089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-118d021486eda6c823ef100a822ea3b4d7a1ab850f7424b9c20218b30a2e77cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj11rwjAYhcM-YM75A8Zu8gfq3iRt01xKUSc4dDqv3dv4dmTTtiSR4b-fsp2bA4eHBw5jjwKGQoB5Hm9Wi9dZuVoMJYAeZuaK9aTSeWIyyK7ZPejcZNJoLW5YT0BhkjwDdccGIXzBOcrkQkKPfWwaV59c88lnTejIRtc2fOlbSyFQ4LHlpSeMxJFPPB7op_Xfl3V97LrWR76OGJ3lb0fcu3jioxCOHhtLfLnHpjl7H9htjftAg__us81k_F6-JPPFdFaO5okTOouJEMUOpEiLnHaY20IqqgUAFlISqirdaRRYFRnUOpVpZaw800WlACVpba3qs6c_ryOibefdAf1pmyq4nFe_Yc9Xhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Denger, C. ; Elberzhager, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Denger, C. ; Elberzhager, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer Reviews and simple Desk Checks. What is missing today is a systematic approach on how to select and apply the most appropriate technique under the consideration of the given development constraints and quality goals a company wants to achieve. This paper presents the first step towards a comprehensive planning framework for static quality assurance activities, i.e., the definition of a generic process that explicitly models the commonalities and variabilities of different techniques. The paper describes how such a process is defined by using concepts of product line engineering and how the generic process and a related decision model supports the selection of a technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-6503</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769529771</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769529776</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EUROMICRO.2007.59</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Application software ; Costs ; Inspection ; Process planning ; Programming ; Quality assurance ; Software engineering ; Software performance ; Software quality ; Testing</subject><ispartof>33rd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2007), 2007, p.271-280</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4301089$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4301089$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elberzhager, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning</title><title>33rd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2007)</title><addtitle>EUROMICRO</addtitle><description>Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer Reviews and simple Desk Checks. What is missing today is a systematic approach on how to select and apply the most appropriate technique under the consideration of the given development constraints and quality goals a company wants to achieve. This paper presents the first step towards a comprehensive planning framework for static quality assurance activities, i.e., the definition of a generic process that explicitly models the commonalities and variabilities of different techniques. The paper describes how such a process is defined by using concepts of product line engineering and how the generic process and a related decision model supports the selection of a technique.</description><subject>Application software</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Process planning</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Software performance</subject><subject>Software quality</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1089-6503</issn><issn>2376-9505</issn><isbn>0769529771</isbn><isbn>9780769529776</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj11rwjAYhcM-YM75A8Zu8gfq3iRt01xKUSc4dDqv3dv4dmTTtiSR4b-fsp2bA4eHBw5jjwKGQoB5Hm9Wi9dZuVoMJYAeZuaK9aTSeWIyyK7ZPejcZNJoLW5YT0BhkjwDdccGIXzBOcrkQkKPfWwaV59c88lnTejIRtc2fOlbSyFQ4LHlpSeMxJFPPB7op_Xfl3V97LrWR76OGJ3lb0fcu3jioxCOHhtLfLnHpjl7H9htjftAg__us81k_F6-JPPFdFaO5okTOouJEMUOpEiLnHaY20IqqgUAFlISqirdaRRYFRnUOpVpZaw800WlACVpba3qs6c_ryOibefdAf1pmyq4nFe_Yc9Xhg</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>Denger, C.</creator><creator>Elberzhager, F.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning</title><author>Denger, C. ; Elberzhager, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-118d021486eda6c823ef100a822ea3b4d7a1ab850f7424b9c20218b30a2e77cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Application software</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Process planning</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Software performance</topic><topic>Software quality</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elberzhager, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denger, C.</au><au>Elberzhager, F.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning</atitle><btitle>33rd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2007)</btitle><stitle>EUROMICRO</stitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>271</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>271-280</pages><issn>1089-6503</issn><eissn>2376-9505</eissn><isbn>0769529771</isbn><isbn>9780769529776</isbn><abstract>Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer Reviews and simple Desk Checks. What is missing today is a systematic approach on how to select and apply the most appropriate technique under the consideration of the given development constraints and quality goals a company wants to achieve. This paper presents the first step towards a comprehensive planning framework for static quality assurance activities, i.e., the definition of a generic process that explicitly models the commonalities and variabilities of different techniques. The paper describes how such a process is defined by using concepts of product line engineering and how the generic process and a related decision model supports the selection of a technique.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/EUROMICRO.2007.59</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1089-6503
ispartof 33rd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2007), 2007, p.271-280
issn 1089-6503
2376-9505
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_4301089
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Application software
Costs
Inspection
Process planning
Programming
Quality assurance
Software engineering
Software performance
Software quality
Testing
title Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A52%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Unifying%20Inspection%20Processes%20to%20Create%20a%20Framework%20to%20Support%20Static%20Quality%20Assurance%20Planning&rft.btitle=33rd%20EUROMICRO%20Conference%20on%20Software%20Engineering%20and%20Advanced%20Applications%20(EUROMICRO%202007)&rft.au=Denger,%20C.&rft.date=2007-08&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=271-280&rft.issn=1089-6503&rft.eissn=2376-9505&rft.isbn=0769529771&rft.isbn_list=9780769529776&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EUROMICRO.2007.59&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4301089%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4301089&rfr_iscdi=true