Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning
Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 280 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 271 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Denger, C. Elberzhager, F. |
description | Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer Reviews and simple Desk Checks. What is missing today is a systematic approach on how to select and apply the most appropriate technique under the consideration of the given development constraints and quality goals a company wants to achieve. This paper presents the first step towards a comprehensive planning framework for static quality assurance activities, i.e., the definition of a generic process that explicitly models the commonalities and variabilities of different techniques. The paper describes how such a process is defined by using concepts of product line engineering and how the generic process and a related decision model supports the selection of a technique. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/EUROMICRO.2007.59 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4301089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4301089</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4301089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-118d021486eda6c823ef100a822ea3b4d7a1ab850f7424b9c20218b30a2e77cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj11rwjAYhcM-YM75A8Zu8gfq3iRt01xKUSc4dDqv3dv4dmTTtiSR4b-fsp2bA4eHBw5jjwKGQoB5Hm9Wi9dZuVoMJYAeZuaK9aTSeWIyyK7ZPejcZNJoLW5YT0BhkjwDdccGIXzBOcrkQkKPfWwaV59c88lnTejIRtc2fOlbSyFQ4LHlpSeMxJFPPB7op_Xfl3V97LrWR76OGJ3lb0fcu3jioxCOHhtLfLnHpjl7H9htjftAg__us81k_F6-JPPFdFaO5okTOouJEMUOpEiLnHaY20IqqgUAFlISqirdaRRYFRnUOpVpZaw800WlACVpba3qs6c_ryOibefdAf1pmyq4nFe_Yc9Xhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Denger, C. ; Elberzhager, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Denger, C. ; Elberzhager, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer Reviews and simple Desk Checks. What is missing today is a systematic approach on how to select and apply the most appropriate technique under the consideration of the given development constraints and quality goals a company wants to achieve. This paper presents the first step towards a comprehensive planning framework for static quality assurance activities, i.e., the definition of a generic process that explicitly models the commonalities and variabilities of different techniques. The paper describes how such a process is defined by using concepts of product line engineering and how the generic process and a related decision model supports the selection of a technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-6503</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769529771</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769529776</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EUROMICRO.2007.59</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Application software ; Costs ; Inspection ; Process planning ; Programming ; Quality assurance ; Software engineering ; Software performance ; Software quality ; Testing</subject><ispartof>33rd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2007), 2007, p.271-280</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4301089$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4301089$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elberzhager, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning</title><title>33rd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2007)</title><addtitle>EUROMICRO</addtitle><description>Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer Reviews and simple Desk Checks. What is missing today is a systematic approach on how to select and apply the most appropriate technique under the consideration of the given development constraints and quality goals a company wants to achieve. This paper presents the first step towards a comprehensive planning framework for static quality assurance activities, i.e., the definition of a generic process that explicitly models the commonalities and variabilities of different techniques. The paper describes how such a process is defined by using concepts of product line engineering and how the generic process and a related decision model supports the selection of a technique.</description><subject>Application software</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Process planning</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Software performance</subject><subject>Software quality</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1089-6503</issn><issn>2376-9505</issn><isbn>0769529771</isbn><isbn>9780769529776</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj11rwjAYhcM-YM75A8Zu8gfq3iRt01xKUSc4dDqv3dv4dmTTtiSR4b-fsp2bA4eHBw5jjwKGQoB5Hm9Wi9dZuVoMJYAeZuaK9aTSeWIyyK7ZPejcZNJoLW5YT0BhkjwDdccGIXzBOcrkQkKPfWwaV59c88lnTejIRtc2fOlbSyFQ4LHlpSeMxJFPPB7op_Xfl3V97LrWR76OGJ3lb0fcu3jioxCOHhtLfLnHpjl7H9htjftAg__us81k_F6-JPPFdFaO5okTOouJEMUOpEiLnHaY20IqqgUAFlISqirdaRRYFRnUOpVpZaw800WlACVpba3qs6c_ryOibefdAf1pmyq4nFe_Yc9Xhg</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>Denger, C.</creator><creator>Elberzhager, F.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning</title><author>Denger, C. ; Elberzhager, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-118d021486eda6c823ef100a822ea3b4d7a1ab850f7424b9c20218b30a2e77cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Application software</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Process planning</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Software performance</topic><topic>Software quality</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elberzhager, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denger, C.</au><au>Elberzhager, F.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning</atitle><btitle>33rd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2007)</btitle><stitle>EUROMICRO</stitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>271</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>271-280</pages><issn>1089-6503</issn><eissn>2376-9505</eissn><isbn>0769529771</isbn><isbn>9780769529776</isbn><abstract>Inspections, Reviews and walkthroughs are highly effective and efficient means for static software quality assurance. During the last three decades different variations and facets evolved on how to perform and apply such techniques, ranging from Fagan inspection over structured walkthroughs to Peer Reviews and simple Desk Checks. What is missing today is a systematic approach on how to select and apply the most appropriate technique under the consideration of the given development constraints and quality goals a company wants to achieve. This paper presents the first step towards a comprehensive planning framework for static quality assurance activities, i.e., the definition of a generic process that explicitly models the commonalities and variabilities of different techniques. The paper describes how such a process is defined by using concepts of product line engineering and how the generic process and a related decision model supports the selection of a technique.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/EUROMICRO.2007.59</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1089-6503 |
ispartof | 33rd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2007), 2007, p.271-280 |
issn | 1089-6503 2376-9505 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_4301089 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Application software Costs Inspection Process planning Programming Quality assurance Software engineering Software performance Software quality Testing |
title | Unifying Inspection Processes to Create a Framework to Support Static Quality Assurance Planning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A52%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Unifying%20Inspection%20Processes%20to%20Create%20a%20Framework%20to%20Support%20Static%20Quality%20Assurance%20Planning&rft.btitle=33rd%20EUROMICRO%20Conference%20on%20Software%20Engineering%20and%20Advanced%20Applications%20(EUROMICRO%202007)&rft.au=Denger,%20C.&rft.date=2007-08&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=271-280&rft.issn=1089-6503&rft.eissn=2376-9505&rft.isbn=0769529771&rft.isbn_list=9780769529776&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EUROMICRO.2007.59&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4301089%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4301089&rfr_iscdi=true |