Dynamic Planning & Execution

In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, comman...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Aitken, A., Humiston, T., Patel, J.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 406
container_issue
container_start_page 401
container_title
container_volume
creator Aitken, A.
Humiston, T.
Patel, J.
description In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, commander's intent and inbuilt flexibility in plans. However, some recent operational experiences indicate that the dynamism of the battlespace has outstripped current ability to respond effectively. The challenge is how to plan and execute continuously in the face of a rapidly changing situation. The technical cooperation program (TTCP) action group 1 (AG1) has been investigating both the theory and practical application of dynamic planning and execution (DP&E). Having examined the problem in a defence context, the findings suggest that representation of plans and coordination are two of the key technical enablers in realising DP&E. This paper is a summation of AG1's work on DP&E to date, and will present the findings from studies and explain the rationale and nature of technical challenges.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/KIMAS.2007.369843
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4227582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4227582</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4227582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-1ca7898852e3a220a8269d0257bcc66703f13af789527bd88f95c66dd4e937853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjEFLAzEUhCMiqLU_QPSwp952TV7eS16OpVZbWmlBPZc0m5VIG6Vbof33LlhwGBi-YRghbpWslJLuYTZ9Gb5WIKWttHGM-kxcKwRE6ZDw_B_QXIp-237KTtpR5ytx_3jMfptCsdz4nFP-KAbF-BDDzz595Rtx0fhNG_un7In3p_HbaFLOF8_T0XBeJmVpX6rgLTtmgqg9gPQMxtUSyK5DMMZK3Sjtm25DYNc1c-Oo6-sao9OWSffE3d9vijGuvndp63fHFQJYYtC_ST47CQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Dynamic Planning &amp; Execution</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Aitken, A. ; Humiston, T. ; Patel, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aitken, A. ; Humiston, T. ; Patel, J.</creatorcontrib><description>In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, commander's intent and inbuilt flexibility in plans. However, some recent operational experiences indicate that the dynamism of the battlespace has outstripped current ability to respond effectively. The challenge is how to plan and execute continuously in the face of a rapidly changing situation. The technical cooperation program (TTCP) action group 1 (AG1) has been investigating both the theory and practical application of dynamic planning and execution (DP&amp;E). Having examined the problem in a defence context, the findings suggest that representation of plans and coordination are two of the key technical enablers in realising DP&amp;E. This paper is a summation of AG1's work on DP&amp;E to date, and will present the findings from studies and explain the rationale and nature of technical challenges.</description><identifier>ISBN: 1424409446</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424409440</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424409454</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424409457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/KIMAS.2007.369843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Dictionaries ; Laboratories ; Process planning ; Technology planning ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, 2007, p.401-406</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4227582$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4227582$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aitken, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humiston, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Planning &amp; Execution</title><title>2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems</title><addtitle>KIMAS</addtitle><description>In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, commander's intent and inbuilt flexibility in plans. However, some recent operational experiences indicate that the dynamism of the battlespace has outstripped current ability to respond effectively. The challenge is how to plan and execute continuously in the face of a rapidly changing situation. The technical cooperation program (TTCP) action group 1 (AG1) has been investigating both the theory and practical application of dynamic planning and execution (DP&amp;E). Having examined the problem in a defence context, the findings suggest that representation of plans and coordination are two of the key technical enablers in realising DP&amp;E. This paper is a summation of AG1's work on DP&amp;E to date, and will present the findings from studies and explain the rationale and nature of technical challenges.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Dictionaries</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Process planning</subject><subject>Technology planning</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><isbn>1424409446</isbn><isbn>9781424409440</isbn><isbn>1424409454</isbn><isbn>9781424409457</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFjEFLAzEUhCMiqLU_QPSwp952TV7eS16OpVZbWmlBPZc0m5VIG6Vbof33LlhwGBi-YRghbpWslJLuYTZ9Gb5WIKWttHGM-kxcKwRE6ZDw_B_QXIp-237KTtpR5ytx_3jMfptCsdz4nFP-KAbF-BDDzz595Rtx0fhNG_un7In3p_HbaFLOF8_T0XBeJmVpX6rgLTtmgqg9gPQMxtUSyK5DMMZK3Sjtm25DYNc1c-Oo6-sao9OWSffE3d9vijGuvndp63fHFQJYYtC_ST47CQ</recordid><startdate>200704</startdate><enddate>200704</enddate><creator>Aitken, A.</creator><creator>Humiston, T.</creator><creator>Patel, J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200704</creationdate><title>Dynamic Planning &amp; Execution</title><author>Aitken, A. ; Humiston, T. ; Patel, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-1ca7898852e3a220a8269d0257bcc66703f13af789527bd88f95c66dd4e937853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Dictionaries</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Process planning</topic><topic>Technology planning</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aitken, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humiston, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aitken, A.</au><au>Humiston, T.</au><au>Patel, J.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Planning &amp; Execution</atitle><btitle>2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems</btitle><stitle>KIMAS</stitle><date>2007-04</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>401</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>401-406</pages><isbn>1424409446</isbn><isbn>9781424409440</isbn><eisbn>1424409454</eisbn><eisbn>9781424409457</eisbn><abstract>In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, commander's intent and inbuilt flexibility in plans. However, some recent operational experiences indicate that the dynamism of the battlespace has outstripped current ability to respond effectively. The challenge is how to plan and execute continuously in the face of a rapidly changing situation. The technical cooperation program (TTCP) action group 1 (AG1) has been investigating both the theory and practical application of dynamic planning and execution (DP&amp;E). Having examined the problem in a defence context, the findings suggest that representation of plans and coordination are two of the key technical enablers in realising DP&amp;E. This paper is a summation of AG1's work on DP&amp;E to date, and will present the findings from studies and explain the rationale and nature of technical challenges.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/KIMAS.2007.369843</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 1424409446
ispartof 2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, 2007, p.401-406
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_4227582
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Collaboration
Dictionaries
Laboratories
Process planning
Technology planning
Uncertainty
title Dynamic Planning & Execution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A27%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Planning%20&%20Execution&rft.btitle=2007%20International%20Conference%20on%20Integration%20of%20Knowledge%20Intensive%20Multi-Agent%20Systems&rft.au=Aitken,%20A.&rft.date=2007-04&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=401-406&rft.isbn=1424409446&rft.isbn_list=9781424409440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/KIMAS.2007.369843&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4227582%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1424409454&rft.eisbn_list=9781424409457&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4227582&rfr_iscdi=true