Dynamic Planning & Execution
In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, comman...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 406 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 401 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Aitken, A. Humiston, T. Patel, J. |
description | In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, commander's intent and inbuilt flexibility in plans. However, some recent operational experiences indicate that the dynamism of the battlespace has outstripped current ability to respond effectively. The challenge is how to plan and execute continuously in the face of a rapidly changing situation. The technical cooperation program (TTCP) action group 1 (AG1) has been investigating both the theory and practical application of dynamic planning and execution (DP&E). Having examined the problem in a defence context, the findings suggest that representation of plans and coordination are two of the key technical enablers in realising DP&E. This paper is a summation of AG1's work on DP&E to date, and will present the findings from studies and explain the rationale and nature of technical challenges. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/KIMAS.2007.369843 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4227582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4227582</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4227582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-1ca7898852e3a220a8269d0257bcc66703f13af789527bd88f95c66dd4e937853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjEFLAzEUhCMiqLU_QPSwp952TV7eS16OpVZbWmlBPZc0m5VIG6Vbof33LlhwGBi-YRghbpWslJLuYTZ9Gb5WIKWttHGM-kxcKwRE6ZDw_B_QXIp-237KTtpR5ytx_3jMfptCsdz4nFP-KAbF-BDDzz595Rtx0fhNG_un7In3p_HbaFLOF8_T0XBeJmVpX6rgLTtmgqg9gPQMxtUSyK5DMMZK3Sjtm25DYNc1c-Oo6-sao9OWSffE3d9vijGuvndp63fHFQJYYtC_ST47CQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Dynamic Planning & Execution</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Aitken, A. ; Humiston, T. ; Patel, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aitken, A. ; Humiston, T. ; Patel, J.</creatorcontrib><description>In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, commander's intent and inbuilt flexibility in plans. However, some recent operational experiences indicate that the dynamism of the battlespace has outstripped current ability to respond effectively. The challenge is how to plan and execute continuously in the face of a rapidly changing situation. The technical cooperation program (TTCP) action group 1 (AG1) has been investigating both the theory and practical application of dynamic planning and execution (DP&E). Having examined the problem in a defence context, the findings suggest that representation of plans and coordination are two of the key technical enablers in realising DP&E. This paper is a summation of AG1's work on DP&E to date, and will present the findings from studies and explain the rationale and nature of technical challenges.</description><identifier>ISBN: 1424409446</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424409440</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424409454</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424409457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/KIMAS.2007.369843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Dictionaries ; Laboratories ; Process planning ; Technology planning ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, 2007, p.401-406</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4227582$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4227582$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aitken, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humiston, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Planning & Execution</title><title>2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems</title><addtitle>KIMAS</addtitle><description>In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, commander's intent and inbuilt flexibility in plans. However, some recent operational experiences indicate that the dynamism of the battlespace has outstripped current ability to respond effectively. The challenge is how to plan and execute continuously in the face of a rapidly changing situation. The technical cooperation program (TTCP) action group 1 (AG1) has been investigating both the theory and practical application of dynamic planning and execution (DP&E). Having examined the problem in a defence context, the findings suggest that representation of plans and coordination are two of the key technical enablers in realising DP&E. This paper is a summation of AG1's work on DP&E to date, and will present the findings from studies and explain the rationale and nature of technical challenges.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Dictionaries</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Process planning</subject><subject>Technology planning</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><isbn>1424409446</isbn><isbn>9781424409440</isbn><isbn>1424409454</isbn><isbn>9781424409457</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFjEFLAzEUhCMiqLU_QPSwp952TV7eS16OpVZbWmlBPZc0m5VIG6Vbof33LlhwGBi-YRghbpWslJLuYTZ9Gb5WIKWttHGM-kxcKwRE6ZDw_B_QXIp-237KTtpR5ytx_3jMfptCsdz4nFP-KAbF-BDDzz595Rtx0fhNG_un7In3p_HbaFLOF8_T0XBeJmVpX6rgLTtmgqg9gPQMxtUSyK5DMMZK3Sjtm25DYNc1c-Oo6-sao9OWSffE3d9vijGuvndp63fHFQJYYtC_ST47CQ</recordid><startdate>200704</startdate><enddate>200704</enddate><creator>Aitken, A.</creator><creator>Humiston, T.</creator><creator>Patel, J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200704</creationdate><title>Dynamic Planning & Execution</title><author>Aitken, A. ; Humiston, T. ; Patel, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-1ca7898852e3a220a8269d0257bcc66703f13af789527bd88f95c66dd4e937853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Dictionaries</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Process planning</topic><topic>Technology planning</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aitken, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humiston, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aitken, A.</au><au>Humiston, T.</au><au>Patel, J.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Planning & Execution</atitle><btitle>2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems</btitle><stitle>KIMAS</stitle><date>2007-04</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>401</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>401-406</pages><isbn>1424409446</isbn><isbn>9781424409440</isbn><eisbn>1424409454</eisbn><eisbn>9781424409457</eisbn><abstract>In order to gain tactical and operational advantage, the military must deliver effects by conducting activities at optimum tempo; thus staying inside an adversary's decision-action cycle. To date, planners have used various methods to deal with changes in situation: contingency planning, commander's intent and inbuilt flexibility in plans. However, some recent operational experiences indicate that the dynamism of the battlespace has outstripped current ability to respond effectively. The challenge is how to plan and execute continuously in the face of a rapidly changing situation. The technical cooperation program (TTCP) action group 1 (AG1) has been investigating both the theory and practical application of dynamic planning and execution (DP&E). Having examined the problem in a defence context, the findings suggest that representation of plans and coordination are two of the key technical enablers in realising DP&E. This paper is a summation of AG1's work on DP&E to date, and will present the findings from studies and explain the rationale and nature of technical challenges.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/KIMAS.2007.369843</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISBN: 1424409446 |
ispartof | 2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, 2007, p.401-406 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_4227582 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Collaboration Dictionaries Laboratories Process planning Technology planning Uncertainty |
title | Dynamic Planning & Execution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A27%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Planning%20&%20Execution&rft.btitle=2007%20International%20Conference%20on%20Integration%20of%20Knowledge%20Intensive%20Multi-Agent%20Systems&rft.au=Aitken,%20A.&rft.date=2007-04&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=401-406&rft.isbn=1424409446&rft.isbn_list=9781424409440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/KIMAS.2007.369843&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4227582%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1424409454&rft.eisbn_list=9781424409457&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4227582&rfr_iscdi=true |