Formalizing Informal Stakeholder Decisions--A Hybrid Method Approach
Decisions are hard to make when available information is incomplete, inconsistent, and ambiguous. Moreover, good-sufficiently complete, consistent, traceable, and testable-requirements are a prerequisite for successful projects. Without understanding what the stakeholders really want and need and wr...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 283c |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 283c |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Kitapci, H. Boehm, B.W. |
| description | Decisions are hard to make when available information is incomplete, inconsistent, and ambiguous. Moreover, good-sufficiently complete, consistent, traceable, and testable-requirements are a prerequisite for successful projects. Without understanding what the stakeholders really want and need and writing these requirements in a concise, understandable and testable manner, projects will not develop what the stakeholders wanted leading to either major late rework or project termination. During the development of the WinWin negotiation model and the EasyWinWin requirements negotiation method, we have gained considerable experience in capturing decisions made by stakeholders in over 100 projects. However, the transition from informal decisions to requirements specification is still a challenging problem. Based on our analysis of the projects to date, we have developed an integrated set of gap-bridging methods as a hybrid method to support stakeholders making better decisions in order to eliminate requirements related problems and ease the process of formality transition |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/HICSS.2007.233 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4076956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4076956</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4076956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-c5b326409db6f8e169c1b98ad57f16107f297ddd500075841a726673b8e6db653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj71OwzAYRQ0SEm1hZWHxCzh8tuO_MUopiVTEkO6VEzvEkCaRk6U8PVVhOrrDudJB6IlCQimYl6LMqyphACphnN-gNShpBFNC6Fu0YkIxIrVk92g9z18ADFIqV2i7G-PJ9uEnDJ-4HNrrwtViv3039s5HvPVNmMM4zIRkuDjXMTj87pdudDibpjjapntAd63tZ__4zw067F4PeUH2H29lnu1JMLCQRtScyRSMq2WrPZWmobXR1gnVUklBtcwo55yAS4PQKbWKSal4rb28KIJv0PPfbfDeH6cYTjaej-m1U_Jfb4RIkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Formalizing Informal Stakeholder Decisions--A Hybrid Method Approach</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Kitapci, H. ; Boehm, B.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitapci, H. ; Boehm, B.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Decisions are hard to make when available information is incomplete, inconsistent, and ambiguous. Moreover, good-sufficiently complete, consistent, traceable, and testable-requirements are a prerequisite for successful projects. Without understanding what the stakeholders really want and need and writing these requirements in a concise, understandable and testable manner, projects will not develop what the stakeholders wanted leading to either major late rework or project termination. During the development of the WinWin negotiation model and the EasyWinWin requirements negotiation method, we have gained considerable experience in capturing decisions made by stakeholders in over 100 projects. However, the transition from informal decisions to requirements specification is still a challenging problem. Based on our analysis of the projects to date, we have developed an integrated set of gap-bridging methods as a hybrid method to support stakeholders making better decisions in order to eliminate requirements related problems and ease the process of formality transition</description><identifier>EISSN: 2572-6862</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 0769527558</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9780769527550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2007.233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Communication system software ; Computer science ; Costs ; Decision making ; Documentation ; Productivity ; Programming ; Software engineering ; Testing ; Writing</subject><ispartof>2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07), 2007, p.283c-283c</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4076956$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2056,27924,54919</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4076956$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitapci, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, B.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Formalizing Informal Stakeholder Decisions--A Hybrid Method Approach</title><title>2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)</title><addtitle>HICSS</addtitle><description>Decisions are hard to make when available information is incomplete, inconsistent, and ambiguous. Moreover, good-sufficiently complete, consistent, traceable, and testable-requirements are a prerequisite for successful projects. Without understanding what the stakeholders really want and need and writing these requirements in a concise, understandable and testable manner, projects will not develop what the stakeholders wanted leading to either major late rework or project termination. During the development of the WinWin negotiation model and the EasyWinWin requirements negotiation method, we have gained considerable experience in capturing decisions made by stakeholders in over 100 projects. However, the transition from informal decisions to requirements specification is still a challenging problem. Based on our analysis of the projects to date, we have developed an integrated set of gap-bridging methods as a hybrid method to support stakeholders making better decisions in order to eliminate requirements related problems and ease the process of formality transition</description><subject>Communication system software</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>2572-6862</issn><isbn>0769527558</isbn><isbn>9780769527550</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj71OwzAYRQ0SEm1hZWHxCzh8tuO_MUopiVTEkO6VEzvEkCaRk6U8PVVhOrrDudJB6IlCQimYl6LMqyphACphnN-gNShpBFNC6Fu0YkIxIrVk92g9z18ADFIqV2i7G-PJ9uEnDJ-4HNrrwtViv3039s5HvPVNmMM4zIRkuDjXMTj87pdudDibpjjapntAd63tZ__4zw067F4PeUH2H29lnu1JMLCQRtScyRSMq2WrPZWmobXR1gnVUklBtcwo55yAS4PQKbWKSal4rb28KIJv0PPfbfDeH6cYTjaej-m1U_Jfb4RIkQ</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Kitapci, H.</creator><creator>Boehm, B.W.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Formalizing Informal Stakeholder Decisions--A Hybrid Method Approach</title><author>Kitapci, H. ; Boehm, B.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-c5b326409db6f8e169c1b98ad57f16107f297ddd500075841a726673b8e6db653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Communication system software</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitapci, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, B.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitapci, H.</au><au>Boehm, B.W.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Formalizing Informal Stakeholder Decisions--A Hybrid Method Approach</atitle><btitle>2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)</btitle><stitle>HICSS</stitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>283c</spage><epage>283c</epage><pages>283c-283c</pages><eissn>2572-6862</eissn><eisbn>0769527558</eisbn><eisbn>9780769527550</eisbn><abstract>Decisions are hard to make when available information is incomplete, inconsistent, and ambiguous. Moreover, good-sufficiently complete, consistent, traceable, and testable-requirements are a prerequisite for successful projects. Without understanding what the stakeholders really want and need and writing these requirements in a concise, understandable and testable manner, projects will not develop what the stakeholders wanted leading to either major late rework or project termination. During the development of the WinWin negotiation model and the EasyWinWin requirements negotiation method, we have gained considerable experience in capturing decisions made by stakeholders in over 100 projects. However, the transition from informal decisions to requirements specification is still a challenging problem. Based on our analysis of the projects to date, we have developed an integrated set of gap-bridging methods as a hybrid method to support stakeholders making better decisions in order to eliminate requirements related problems and ease the process of formality transition</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/HICSS.2007.233</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | EISSN: 2572-6862 |
| ispartof | 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07), 2007, p.283c-283c |
| issn | 2572-6862 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_4076956 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | Communication system software Computer science Costs Decision making Documentation Productivity Programming Software engineering Testing Writing |
| title | Formalizing Informal Stakeholder Decisions--A Hybrid Method Approach |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A44%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Formalizing%20Informal%20Stakeholder%20Decisions--A%20Hybrid%20Method%20Approach&rft.btitle=2007%2040th%20Annual%20Hawaii%20International%20Conference%20on%20System%20Sciences%20(HICSS'07)&rft.au=Kitapci,%20H.&rft.date=2007-01&rft.spage=283c&rft.epage=283c&rft.pages=283c-283c&rft.eissn=2572-6862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/HICSS.2007.233&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4076956%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=0769527558&rft.eisbn_list=9780769527550&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4076956&rfr_iscdi=true |