Further Results on the Impact of Quality of Wireless Sensor Links on Decentralized Detection Performance
In this paper we consider the impact of quality of wireless sensor links on the overall detection performance of a large sensor network system. Independent and identical sensors gather observations regarding the presence or the absence of a phenomenon of interest and then transmit their binary decis...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 49 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Kanchumarthy, V.R. Viswanathan, R. |
description | In this paper we consider the impact of quality of wireless sensor links on the overall detection performance of a large sensor network system. Independent and identical sensors gather observations regarding the presence or the absence of a phenomenon of interest and then transmit their binary decisions to a fusion center over parallel, non-interfering but slow Rayleigh fading, wireless links. We derive asymptotic error exponents of the probability of false alarm and the probability of miss at the fusion center for the following cases: (a) BPSK modulation and (i) maximal ratio combining (ii) equal gain combining (iii) decision fusion (b) BFSK modulation and (i) square law combining (ii) decision fusion. In the case of BPSK, the EGC performs the best for low and moderate SNR, with the DF achieving the next best performance. The DF scheme performs the best for large SNR values, whereas the MRC performs the best for very low SNR values. Similar relative performance results were obtained by others for the case of a finite number of sensors. In the case of BFSK, square law combining outperforms DF, except for large SNR values. Finally, we show how the false alarm and the detection probabilities of the decision of a sensor, as seen at the fusion center, are altered by changes to the threshold of the matched filter receiver. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/CISS.2006.286428 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4067774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4067774</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4067774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-d5fec5f83269f589bef1015adc663f239814f2a05f624a87226a5bc9f8b60dcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj0tLAzEUhSMiKHX2gpv8gda8J1lKtVoo-BjFZclkbmh0HiXJLOqvd3wsvJt7v8M9Bw5CF5QsKCXmarmuqgUjRC2YVoLpI1SYUlPBhCBcEnP8n4Xhp6hI6Z1Mw42kmp6h3WqMeQcRP0Ma25zw0OOJ8brbW5fx4PHTaNuQD9_nW4jQQkq4gj4NEW9C__HjuAEHfY7T4yc0E2VwOUz6I0Q_xM72Ds7RibdtguJvz9Dr6vZleT_fPNytl9ebeaClzPNGenDSa86U8VKbGjwlVNrGKcU942Zq45kl0ismrC4ZU1bWznhdK9K4ms_Q5W9uAIDtPobOxsNWEFWWpeBfEDBZvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Further Results on the Impact of Quality of Wireless Sensor Links on Decentralized Detection Performance</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Kanchumarthy, V.R. ; Viswanathan, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanchumarthy, V.R. ; Viswanathan, R.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we consider the impact of quality of wireless sensor links on the overall detection performance of a large sensor network system. Independent and identical sensors gather observations regarding the presence or the absence of a phenomenon of interest and then transmit their binary decisions to a fusion center over parallel, non-interfering but slow Rayleigh fading, wireless links. We derive asymptotic error exponents of the probability of false alarm and the probability of miss at the fusion center for the following cases: (a) BPSK modulation and (i) maximal ratio combining (ii) equal gain combining (iii) decision fusion (b) BFSK modulation and (i) square law combining (ii) decision fusion. In the case of BPSK, the EGC performs the best for low and moderate SNR, with the DF achieving the next best performance. The DF scheme performs the best for large SNR values, whereas the MRC performs the best for very low SNR values. Similar relative performance results were obtained by others for the case of a finite number of sensors. In the case of BFSK, square law combining outperforms DF, except for large SNR values. Finally, we show how the false alarm and the detection probabilities of the decision of a sensor, as seen at the fusion center, are altered by changes to the threshold of the matched filter receiver.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781424403493</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424403499</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424403509</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424403502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/CISS.2006.286428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Binary phase shift keying ; Diversity reception ; Fading ; Frequency shift keying ; Matched filters ; Sensor fusion ; Sensor phenomena and characterization ; Sensor systems ; Statistics ; Wireless sensor networks</subject><ispartof>2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, 2006, p.44-49</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4067774$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4067774$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanchumarthy, V.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Further Results on the Impact of Quality of Wireless Sensor Links on Decentralized Detection Performance</title><title>2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems</title><addtitle>CISS</addtitle><description>In this paper we consider the impact of quality of wireless sensor links on the overall detection performance of a large sensor network system. Independent and identical sensors gather observations regarding the presence or the absence of a phenomenon of interest and then transmit their binary decisions to a fusion center over parallel, non-interfering but slow Rayleigh fading, wireless links. We derive asymptotic error exponents of the probability of false alarm and the probability of miss at the fusion center for the following cases: (a) BPSK modulation and (i) maximal ratio combining (ii) equal gain combining (iii) decision fusion (b) BFSK modulation and (i) square law combining (ii) decision fusion. In the case of BPSK, the EGC performs the best for low and moderate SNR, with the DF achieving the next best performance. The DF scheme performs the best for large SNR values, whereas the MRC performs the best for very low SNR values. Similar relative performance results were obtained by others for the case of a finite number of sensors. In the case of BFSK, square law combining outperforms DF, except for large SNR values. Finally, we show how the false alarm and the detection probabilities of the decision of a sensor, as seen at the fusion center, are altered by changes to the threshold of the matched filter receiver.</description><subject>Binary phase shift keying</subject><subject>Diversity reception</subject><subject>Fading</subject><subject>Frequency shift keying</subject><subject>Matched filters</subject><subject>Sensor fusion</subject><subject>Sensor phenomena and characterization</subject><subject>Sensor systems</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Wireless sensor networks</subject><isbn>9781424403493</isbn><isbn>1424403499</isbn><isbn>9781424403509</isbn><isbn>1424403502</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj0tLAzEUhSMiKHX2gpv8gda8J1lKtVoo-BjFZclkbmh0HiXJLOqvd3wsvJt7v8M9Bw5CF5QsKCXmarmuqgUjRC2YVoLpI1SYUlPBhCBcEnP8n4Xhp6hI6Z1Mw42kmp6h3WqMeQcRP0Ma25zw0OOJ8brbW5fx4PHTaNuQD9_nW4jQQkq4gj4NEW9C__HjuAEHfY7T4yc0E2VwOUz6I0Q_xM72Ds7RibdtguJvz9Dr6vZleT_fPNytl9ebeaClzPNGenDSa86U8VKbGjwlVNrGKcU942Zq45kl0ismrC4ZU1bWznhdK9K4ms_Q5W9uAIDtPobOxsNWEFWWpeBfEDBZvw</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Kanchumarthy, V.R.</creator><creator>Viswanathan, R.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Further Results on the Impact of Quality of Wireless Sensor Links on Decentralized Detection Performance</title><author>Kanchumarthy, V.R. ; Viswanathan, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-d5fec5f83269f589bef1015adc663f239814f2a05f624a87226a5bc9f8b60dcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Binary phase shift keying</topic><topic>Diversity reception</topic><topic>Fading</topic><topic>Frequency shift keying</topic><topic>Matched filters</topic><topic>Sensor fusion</topic><topic>Sensor phenomena and characterization</topic><topic>Sensor systems</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Wireless sensor networks</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanchumarthy, V.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanchumarthy, V.R.</au><au>Viswanathan, R.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Further Results on the Impact of Quality of Wireless Sensor Links on Decentralized Detection Performance</atitle><btitle>2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems</btitle><stitle>CISS</stitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><spage>44</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>44-49</pages><isbn>9781424403493</isbn><isbn>1424403499</isbn><eisbn>9781424403509</eisbn><eisbn>1424403502</eisbn><abstract>In this paper we consider the impact of quality of wireless sensor links on the overall detection performance of a large sensor network system. Independent and identical sensors gather observations regarding the presence or the absence of a phenomenon of interest and then transmit their binary decisions to a fusion center over parallel, non-interfering but slow Rayleigh fading, wireless links. We derive asymptotic error exponents of the probability of false alarm and the probability of miss at the fusion center for the following cases: (a) BPSK modulation and (i) maximal ratio combining (ii) equal gain combining (iii) decision fusion (b) BFSK modulation and (i) square law combining (ii) decision fusion. In the case of BPSK, the EGC performs the best for low and moderate SNR, with the DF achieving the next best performance. The DF scheme performs the best for large SNR values, whereas the MRC performs the best for very low SNR values. Similar relative performance results were obtained by others for the case of a finite number of sensors. In the case of BFSK, square law combining outperforms DF, except for large SNR values. Finally, we show how the false alarm and the detection probabilities of the decision of a sensor, as seen at the fusion center, are altered by changes to the threshold of the matched filter receiver.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/CISS.2006.286428</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISBN: 9781424403493 |
ispartof | 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, 2006, p.44-49 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_4067774 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Binary phase shift keying Diversity reception Fading Frequency shift keying Matched filters Sensor fusion Sensor phenomena and characterization Sensor systems Statistics Wireless sensor networks |
title | Further Results on the Impact of Quality of Wireless Sensor Links on Decentralized Detection Performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Further%20Results%20on%20the%20Impact%20of%20Quality%20of%20Wireless%20Sensor%20Links%20on%20Decentralized%20Detection%20Performance&rft.btitle=2006%2040th%20Annual%20Conference%20on%20Information%20Sciences%20and%20Systems&rft.au=Kanchumarthy,%20V.R.&rft.date=2006-03&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=44-49&rft.isbn=9781424403493&rft.isbn_list=1424403499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/CISS.2006.286428&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4067774%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781424403509&rft.eisbn_list=1424403502&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4067774&rfr_iscdi=true |