Evaluation of several variable FIR fractional-sample delay filters
Four main FIR filter types are examined for applicability to the task of fractional-sample delay filtering. Since a balance is sought between the small magnitude of the complex approximation error and rapid re-design for employment in variable-delay situations, techniques with closed-form design for...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | III/624 vol.3 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | III/621 |
container_title | |
container_volume | iii |
creator | Cain, G.D. Murphy, N.P. Tarczynski, A. |
description | Four main FIR filter types are examined for applicability to the task of fractional-sample delay filtering. Since a balance is sought between the small magnitude of the complex approximation error and rapid re-design for employment in variable-delay situations, techniques with closed-form design formulae have been favoured. Size of fractional delay and oddness or evenness of the filter exhibit simple, but fundamentally important interplay, and an irreducible error at the Nyquist frequency always prevails. Guidelines for choosing between these closed-form candidate filters are suggested. The popular sinc delayer is shown to be a particularly poor performer.< > |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ICASSP.1994.389950 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_389950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>389950</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>389950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i89t-33eca7e6563c7924a249fe055f88b3b154cb971973042ead056b352a0ac310333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj91Kw0AUhBd_wFj7Ar3KC2w8m7ObzbnU0mqhoNheeFdO0rMQ2dqSxEDf3kidm4HhY5hRamYgMwbocTV_2mzeM0NkMyyJHFypJEdP2hB8Xqt78CWg8d7BjUqMy0EXxtKdmnbdF4yyzlljE_W8GDj-cN8cv9NjSDsZpOWYDtw2XEVJl6uPNLRc_wEcdceH05juJfI5DU3spe0e1G3g2Mn03ydqu1xs5696_fYy7lzrpqReI0rNXgpXYO0pt5xbCgLOhbKssDLO1hV5Qx7B5sJ7cEWFLmfgGg0g4kTNLrWNiOxObXPg9ry7nMdfc0ZLbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Evaluation of several variable FIR fractional-sample delay filters</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Cain, G.D. ; Murphy, N.P. ; Tarczynski, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cain, G.D. ; Murphy, N.P. ; Tarczynski, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Four main FIR filter types are examined for applicability to the task of fractional-sample delay filtering. Since a balance is sought between the small magnitude of the complex approximation error and rapid re-design for employment in variable-delay situations, techniques with closed-form design formulae have been favoured. Size of fractional delay and oddness or evenness of the filter exhibit simple, but fundamentally important interplay, and an irreducible error at the Nyquist frequency always prevails. Guidelines for choosing between these closed-form candidate filters are suggested. The popular sinc delayer is shown to be a particularly poor performer.< ></description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6149</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780317750</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780317758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2379-190X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.1994.389950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Adaptive control ; Delay systems ; Digital signal processing ; Electronic mail ; Finite impulse response filter ; Frequency ; Manufacturing systems ; Programmable control ; Systems engineering and theory ; Transfer functions</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of ICASSP '94. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1994, Vol.iii, p.III/621-III/624 vol.3</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/389950$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,782,786,791,792,2060,4052,4053,27932,54927</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/389950$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cain, G.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarczynski, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of several variable FIR fractional-sample delay filters</title><title>Proceedings of ICASSP '94. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing</title><addtitle>ICASSP</addtitle><description>Four main FIR filter types are examined for applicability to the task of fractional-sample delay filtering. Since a balance is sought between the small magnitude of the complex approximation error and rapid re-design for employment in variable-delay situations, techniques with closed-form design formulae have been favoured. Size of fractional delay and oddness or evenness of the filter exhibit simple, but fundamentally important interplay, and an irreducible error at the Nyquist frequency always prevails. Guidelines for choosing between these closed-form candidate filters are suggested. The popular sinc delayer is shown to be a particularly poor performer.< ></description><subject>Adaptive control</subject><subject>Delay systems</subject><subject>Digital signal processing</subject><subject>Electronic mail</subject><subject>Finite impulse response filter</subject><subject>Frequency</subject><subject>Manufacturing systems</subject><subject>Programmable control</subject><subject>Systems engineering and theory</subject><subject>Transfer functions</subject><issn>1520-6149</issn><issn>2379-190X</issn><isbn>0780317750</isbn><isbn>9780780317758</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj91Kw0AUhBd_wFj7Ar3KC2w8m7ObzbnU0mqhoNheeFdO0rMQ2dqSxEDf3kidm4HhY5hRamYgMwbocTV_2mzeM0NkMyyJHFypJEdP2hB8Xqt78CWg8d7BjUqMy0EXxtKdmnbdF4yyzlljE_W8GDj-cN8cv9NjSDsZpOWYDtw2XEVJl6uPNLRc_wEcdceH05juJfI5DU3spe0e1G3g2Mn03ydqu1xs5696_fYy7lzrpqReI0rNXgpXYO0pt5xbCgLOhbKssDLO1hV5Qx7B5sJ7cEWFLmfgGg0g4kTNLrWNiOxObXPg9ry7nMdfc0ZLbg</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Cain, G.D.</creator><creator>Murphy, N.P.</creator><creator>Tarczynski, A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Evaluation of several variable FIR fractional-sample delay filters</title><author>Cain, G.D. ; Murphy, N.P. ; Tarczynski, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i89t-33eca7e6563c7924a249fe055f88b3b154cb971973042ead056b352a0ac310333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adaptive control</topic><topic>Delay systems</topic><topic>Digital signal processing</topic><topic>Electronic mail</topic><topic>Finite impulse response filter</topic><topic>Frequency</topic><topic>Manufacturing systems</topic><topic>Programmable control</topic><topic>Systems engineering and theory</topic><topic>Transfer functions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cain, G.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarczynski, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cain, G.D.</au><au>Murphy, N.P.</au><au>Tarczynski, A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of several variable FIR fractional-sample delay filters</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of ICASSP '94. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing</btitle><stitle>ICASSP</stitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>iii</volume><spage>III/621</spage><epage>III/624 vol.3</epage><pages>III/621-III/624 vol.3</pages><issn>1520-6149</issn><eissn>2379-190X</eissn><isbn>0780317750</isbn><isbn>9780780317758</isbn><abstract>Four main FIR filter types are examined for applicability to the task of fractional-sample delay filtering. Since a balance is sought between the small magnitude of the complex approximation error and rapid re-design for employment in variable-delay situations, techniques with closed-form design formulae have been favoured. Size of fractional delay and oddness or evenness of the filter exhibit simple, but fundamentally important interplay, and an irreducible error at the Nyquist frequency always prevails. Guidelines for choosing between these closed-form candidate filters are suggested. The popular sinc delayer is shown to be a particularly poor performer.< ></abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICASSP.1994.389950</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1520-6149 |
ispartof | Proceedings of ICASSP '94. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1994, Vol.iii, p.III/621-III/624 vol.3 |
issn | 1520-6149 2379-190X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_389950 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Adaptive control Delay systems Digital signal processing Electronic mail Finite impulse response filter Frequency Manufacturing systems Programmable control Systems engineering and theory Transfer functions |
title | Evaluation of several variable FIR fractional-sample delay filters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T00%3A28%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20several%20variable%20FIR%20fractional-sample%20delay%20filters&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20ICASSP%20'94.%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Acoustics,%20Speech%20and%20Signal%20Processing&rft.au=Cain,%20G.D.&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=iii&rft.spage=III/621&rft.epage=III/624%20vol.3&rft.pages=III/621-III/624%20vol.3&rft.issn=1520-6149&rft.eissn=2379-190X&rft.isbn=0780317750&rft.isbn_list=9780780317758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICASSP.1994.389950&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E389950%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=389950&rfr_iscdi=true |