Issues in benchmarking of ANN training algorithms
There is a need for a consistent and effective method to evaluate algorithms for various aspects of training feedforward networks, such as weight initialization, training data selection, error minimization, and weight decay/pruning. We feel that this should be addressed by the construction and appli...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1216 vol.2 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1213 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | DeAngelis, C.M. Green, R.W. |
description | There is a need for a consistent and effective method to evaluate algorithms for various aspects of training feedforward networks, such as weight initialization, training data selection, error minimization, and weight decay/pruning. We feel that this should be addressed by the construction and application of a benchmark, that is, a comprehensive set of training problems and evaluation criteria. This paper discusses a number of issues which must be addressed in the formation of such a benchmark. Firstly, a taxonomy of learning problems must be derived. This involves issues such as the nature of the mapping, the nature of the training data, and the learning criteria. Secondly, training algorithm performance criteria must be established; these may be dependent upon the class of learning problem. Thirdly, a common software framework for evaluation of training algorithm modules must be designed. Finally, a benchmark set of learning problems must be developed for evaluation of the range of training-related algorithms, as applied to the range of learning problems. Early experiences in benchmarking ANN training algorithms are presented.< > |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ICNN.1994.374357 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_374357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>374357</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>374357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i104t-ebd033c700183c3b9408873b91df750f89ea984bfa6f76aa3fd099f1946c6d5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01Lw0AURQdEUGv34mr-QOJ7vElm3rIEPwIlbhTclUnyph1tU8nEhf_eSHs3h7s53KvUHUKOCPxQV02TI7PJyRoq7IW6AeuAkAE_rtQypU-YYwoEstcK65R-JOk46FaGbnfw41cctvoY9Kpp9DT6OPx3v98exzjtDulWXQa_T7I8c6Henx7fqpds_fpcV6t1FhHMlEnbA1FnAdBRRy0bcM7OxD7YAoJj8exMG3wZbOk9hR6YA7Ipu7IvhBbq_uSNIrL5HuM87XdzOkV_gVlBkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Issues in benchmarking of ANN training algorithms</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>DeAngelis, C.M. ; Green, R.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>DeAngelis, C.M. ; Green, R.W.</creatorcontrib><description>There is a need for a consistent and effective method to evaluate algorithms for various aspects of training feedforward networks, such as weight initialization, training data selection, error minimization, and weight decay/pruning. We feel that this should be addressed by the construction and application of a benchmark, that is, a comprehensive set of training problems and evaluation criteria. This paper discusses a number of issues which must be addressed in the formation of such a benchmark. Firstly, a taxonomy of learning problems must be derived. This involves issues such as the nature of the mapping, the nature of the training data, and the learning criteria. Secondly, training algorithm performance criteria must be established; these may be dependent upon the class of learning problem. Thirdly, a common software framework for evaluation of training algorithm modules must be designed. Finally, a benchmark set of learning problems must be developed for evaluation of the range of training-related algorithms, as applied to the range of learning problems. Early experiences in benchmarking ANN training algorithms are presented.< ></description><identifier>ISBN: 078031901X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780319011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICNN.1994.374357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithm design and analysis ; Artificial neural networks ; Computer networks ; Feedforward neural networks ; Information science ; Military computing ; Minimization methods ; Neural networks ; Taxonomy ; Training data</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94), 1994, Vol.2, p.1213-1216 vol.2</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/374357$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/374357$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeAngelis, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, R.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Issues in benchmarking of ANN training algorithms</title><title>Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94)</title><addtitle>ICNN</addtitle><description>There is a need for a consistent and effective method to evaluate algorithms for various aspects of training feedforward networks, such as weight initialization, training data selection, error minimization, and weight decay/pruning. We feel that this should be addressed by the construction and application of a benchmark, that is, a comprehensive set of training problems and evaluation criteria. This paper discusses a number of issues which must be addressed in the formation of such a benchmark. Firstly, a taxonomy of learning problems must be derived. This involves issues such as the nature of the mapping, the nature of the training data, and the learning criteria. Secondly, training algorithm performance criteria must be established; these may be dependent upon the class of learning problem. Thirdly, a common software framework for evaluation of training algorithm modules must be designed. Finally, a benchmark set of learning problems must be developed for evaluation of the range of training-related algorithms, as applied to the range of learning problems. Early experiences in benchmarking ANN training algorithms are presented.< ></description><subject>Algorithm design and analysis</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Computer networks</subject><subject>Feedforward neural networks</subject><subject>Information science</subject><subject>Military computing</subject><subject>Minimization methods</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Training data</subject><isbn>078031901X</isbn><isbn>9780780319011</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01Lw0AURQdEUGv34mr-QOJ7vElm3rIEPwIlbhTclUnyph1tU8nEhf_eSHs3h7s53KvUHUKOCPxQV02TI7PJyRoq7IW6AeuAkAE_rtQypU-YYwoEstcK65R-JOk46FaGbnfw41cctvoY9Kpp9DT6OPx3v98exzjtDulWXQa_T7I8c6Henx7fqpds_fpcV6t1FhHMlEnbA1FnAdBRRy0bcM7OxD7YAoJj8exMG3wZbOk9hR6YA7Ipu7IvhBbq_uSNIrL5HuM87XdzOkV_gVlBkQ</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>DeAngelis, C.M.</creator><creator>Green, R.W.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Issues in benchmarking of ANN training algorithms</title><author>DeAngelis, C.M. ; Green, R.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i104t-ebd033c700183c3b9408873b91df750f89ea984bfa6f76aa3fd099f1946c6d5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Algorithm design and analysis</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Computer networks</topic><topic>Feedforward neural networks</topic><topic>Information science</topic><topic>Military computing</topic><topic>Minimization methods</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Training data</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeAngelis, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, R.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeAngelis, C.M.</au><au>Green, R.W.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Issues in benchmarking of ANN training algorithms</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94)</btitle><stitle>ICNN</stitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>1213</spage><epage>1216 vol.2</epage><pages>1213-1216 vol.2</pages><isbn>078031901X</isbn><isbn>9780780319011</isbn><abstract>There is a need for a consistent and effective method to evaluate algorithms for various aspects of training feedforward networks, such as weight initialization, training data selection, error minimization, and weight decay/pruning. We feel that this should be addressed by the construction and application of a benchmark, that is, a comprehensive set of training problems and evaluation criteria. This paper discusses a number of issues which must be addressed in the formation of such a benchmark. Firstly, a taxonomy of learning problems must be derived. This involves issues such as the nature of the mapping, the nature of the training data, and the learning criteria. Secondly, training algorithm performance criteria must be established; these may be dependent upon the class of learning problem. Thirdly, a common software framework for evaluation of training algorithm modules must be designed. Finally, a benchmark set of learning problems must be developed for evaluation of the range of training-related algorithms, as applied to the range of learning problems. Early experiences in benchmarking ANN training algorithms are presented.< ></abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICNN.1994.374357</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISBN: 078031901X |
ispartof | Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94), 1994, Vol.2, p.1213-1216 vol.2 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_374357 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Algorithm design and analysis Artificial neural networks Computer networks Feedforward neural networks Information science Military computing Minimization methods Neural networks Taxonomy Training data |
title | Issues in benchmarking of ANN training algorithms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Issues%20in%20benchmarking%20of%20ANN%20training%20algorithms&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%201994%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Neural%20Networks%20(ICNN'94)&rft.au=DeAngelis,%20C.M.&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=1213&rft.epage=1216%20vol.2&rft.pages=1213-1216%20vol.2&rft.isbn=078031901X&rft.isbn_list=9780780319011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICNN.1994.374357&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E374357%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=374357&rfr_iscdi=true |