Development and testing of a reliability performance index for modular robotic systems

One issue pertaining to modular robotic systems is the integration of modules into a fully functional robot system. Two criteria for modules integration not previously investigated are the reliability and accuracy of the system. This paper presents the results of the development of a framework for a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Schneider, D.L., Tesar, D., Barnes, J.W.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue
container_start_page 263
container_title
container_volume
creator Schneider, D.L.
Tesar, D.
Barnes, J.W.
description One issue pertaining to modular robotic systems is the integration of modules into a fully functional robot system. Two criteria for modules integration not previously investigated are the reliability and accuracy of the system. This paper presents the results of the development of a framework for a "criterion" embodying these two modular robot characteristics. Using a probabilistic representation of manipulator kinematics and a reliability block diagram model of the manipulator system, a reliability performance index (RPI) representing the probability of no hardware or software failure and the manipulator achieving a specified position and orientation is developed. The RPI is tested with a case study consisting of a three degree-of-freedom planar manipulator assembled from a choice of six joint modules of varying reliability and precision and a choice of six link module combinations of varying lengths and machining tolerances. A straight-line, square trajectory is specified and the RPI is calculated for each combination of joint modules and links, a total of 1296 different combinations. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) is performed on the results using the different joint locations and link options as factors and the different joint modules and link options as factor levels. The different factors are tested for significance and the Tukey Studentized Range Test is performed to determine significance of the different joint modules and link options. Using this statistical testing, a 70% reduction in the module design space is achieved using the RPI. Optimization using other appropriate manipulator criteria can then be performed to generate the final configuration. Additional extensive case studies are needed to fully develop the RPI to a stage necessary for implementation into a computer-aided design system for modular robot configuration design. The RPI may also be useful in the quantification of the overall system reliability and performance of any system based upon measured error, such as control systems.< >
doi_str_mv 10.1109/RAMS.1994.291118
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_291118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>291118</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>291118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ieee_primary_2911183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jrsKwkAURBdEUDS9WN0fMOZqNNlSfGBjo2IbVnMjK_sIu6uYvzegtcPAYTjNMDbCJEZM-PS4Opxi5DyNZxwR8w6LeJYnbeeY5cu0xyLvH0mbxSLPUuyzy4ZepGytyQQQpoRAPkhzB1uBAEdKiqtUMjRQk6us08LcCKQp6Q3tBG3LpxIOnL3aIG_gGx9I-yHrVkJ5in4csPFue17vJ5KIitpJLVxTfE_O_8oPxLNBzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Development and testing of a reliability performance index for modular robotic systems</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Schneider, D.L. ; Tesar, D. ; Barnes, J.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, D.L. ; Tesar, D. ; Barnes, J.W.</creatorcontrib><description>One issue pertaining to modular robotic systems is the integration of modules into a fully functional robot system. Two criteria for modules integration not previously investigated are the reliability and accuracy of the system. This paper presents the results of the development of a framework for a "criterion" embodying these two modular robot characteristics. Using a probabilistic representation of manipulator kinematics and a reliability block diagram model of the manipulator system, a reliability performance index (RPI) representing the probability of no hardware or software failure and the manipulator achieving a specified position and orientation is developed. The RPI is tested with a case study consisting of a three degree-of-freedom planar manipulator assembled from a choice of six joint modules of varying reliability and precision and a choice of six link module combinations of varying lengths and machining tolerances. A straight-line, square trajectory is specified and the RPI is calculated for each combination of joint modules and links, a total of 1296 different combinations. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) is performed on the results using the different joint locations and link options as factors and the different joint modules and link options as factor levels. The different factors are tested for significance and the Tukey Studentized Range Test is performed to determine significance of the different joint modules and link options. Using this statistical testing, a 70% reduction in the module design space is achieved using the RPI. Optimization using other appropriate manipulator criteria can then be performed to generate the final configuration. Additional extensive case studies are needed to fully develop the RPI to a stage necessary for implementation into a computer-aided design system for modular robot configuration design. The RPI may also be useful in the quantification of the overall system reliability and performance of any system based upon measured error, such as control systems.&lt; &gt;</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780780317864</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780317866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/RAMS.1994.291118</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Analysis of variance ; Assembly ; Economic indicators ; Hardware ; Kinematics ; Manipulators ; Performance analysis ; Robots ; Software performance ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 1994, p.263-271</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/291118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/291118$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, J.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Development and testing of a reliability performance index for modular robotic systems</title><title>Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)</title><addtitle>RAMS</addtitle><description>One issue pertaining to modular robotic systems is the integration of modules into a fully functional robot system. Two criteria for modules integration not previously investigated are the reliability and accuracy of the system. This paper presents the results of the development of a framework for a "criterion" embodying these two modular robot characteristics. Using a probabilistic representation of manipulator kinematics and a reliability block diagram model of the manipulator system, a reliability performance index (RPI) representing the probability of no hardware or software failure and the manipulator achieving a specified position and orientation is developed. The RPI is tested with a case study consisting of a three degree-of-freedom planar manipulator assembled from a choice of six joint modules of varying reliability and precision and a choice of six link module combinations of varying lengths and machining tolerances. A straight-line, square trajectory is specified and the RPI is calculated for each combination of joint modules and links, a total of 1296 different combinations. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) is performed on the results using the different joint locations and link options as factors and the different joint modules and link options as factor levels. The different factors are tested for significance and the Tukey Studentized Range Test is performed to determine significance of the different joint modules and link options. Using this statistical testing, a 70% reduction in the module design space is achieved using the RPI. Optimization using other appropriate manipulator criteria can then be performed to generate the final configuration. Additional extensive case studies are needed to fully develop the RPI to a stage necessary for implementation into a computer-aided design system for modular robot configuration design. The RPI may also be useful in the quantification of the overall system reliability and performance of any system based upon measured error, such as control systems.&lt; &gt;</description><subject>Analysis of variance</subject><subject>Assembly</subject><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Manipulators</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Software performance</subject><subject>Testing</subject><isbn>9780780317864</isbn><isbn>0780317866</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp9jrsKwkAURBdEUDS9WN0fMOZqNNlSfGBjo2IbVnMjK_sIu6uYvzegtcPAYTjNMDbCJEZM-PS4Opxi5DyNZxwR8w6LeJYnbeeY5cu0xyLvH0mbxSLPUuyzy4ZepGytyQQQpoRAPkhzB1uBAEdKiqtUMjRQk6us08LcCKQp6Q3tBG3LpxIOnL3aIG_gGx9I-yHrVkJ5in4csPFue17vJ5KIitpJLVxTfE_O_8oPxLNBzg</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Schneider, D.L.</creator><creator>Tesar, D.</creator><creator>Barnes, J.W.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Development and testing of a reliability performance index for modular robotic systems</title><author>Schneider, D.L. ; Tesar, D. ; Barnes, J.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ieee_primary_2911183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Analysis of variance</topic><topic>Assembly</topic><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Manipulators</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Software performance</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, J.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, D.L.</au><au>Tesar, D.</au><au>Barnes, J.W.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Development and testing of a reliability performance index for modular robotic systems</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)</btitle><stitle>RAMS</stitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><spage>263</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>263-271</pages><isbn>9780780317864</isbn><isbn>0780317866</isbn><abstract>One issue pertaining to modular robotic systems is the integration of modules into a fully functional robot system. Two criteria for modules integration not previously investigated are the reliability and accuracy of the system. This paper presents the results of the development of a framework for a "criterion" embodying these two modular robot characteristics. Using a probabilistic representation of manipulator kinematics and a reliability block diagram model of the manipulator system, a reliability performance index (RPI) representing the probability of no hardware or software failure and the manipulator achieving a specified position and orientation is developed. The RPI is tested with a case study consisting of a three degree-of-freedom planar manipulator assembled from a choice of six joint modules of varying reliability and precision and a choice of six link module combinations of varying lengths and machining tolerances. A straight-line, square trajectory is specified and the RPI is calculated for each combination of joint modules and links, a total of 1296 different combinations. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) is performed on the results using the different joint locations and link options as factors and the different joint modules and link options as factor levels. The different factors are tested for significance and the Tukey Studentized Range Test is performed to determine significance of the different joint modules and link options. Using this statistical testing, a 70% reduction in the module design space is achieved using the RPI. Optimization using other appropriate manipulator criteria can then be performed to generate the final configuration. Additional extensive case studies are needed to fully develop the RPI to a stage necessary for implementation into a computer-aided design system for modular robot configuration design. The RPI may also be useful in the quantification of the overall system reliability and performance of any system based upon measured error, such as control systems.&lt; &gt;</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/RAMS.1994.291118</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9780780317864
ispartof Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 1994, p.263-271
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_291118
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Analysis of variance
Assembly
Economic indicators
Hardware
Kinematics
Manipulators
Performance analysis
Robots
Software performance
Testing
title Development and testing of a reliability performance index for modular robotic systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A05%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20testing%20of%20a%20reliability%20performance%20index%20for%20modular%20robotic%20systems&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20Annual%20Reliability%20and%20Maintainability%20Symposium%20(RAMS)&rft.au=Schneider,%20D.L.&rft.date=1994&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=263-271&rft.isbn=9780780317864&rft.isbn_list=0780317866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/RAMS.1994.291118&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E291118%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=291118&rfr_iscdi=true