Underwater detection and surveillance technology for commercial port and vessel security. Who is going to pay for it?
Regulatory requirements for surface and subsurface surveillance and detection as a part of requisite Port, Facility and Vessel Security Plans -set forth following the implementation of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) "International Ship and Port Facility Security Code" (ISPS)...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 940 Vol. 1 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 935 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Smookler, M.S. Clark, B.G. Ostrander, J.M. |
description | Regulatory requirements for surface and subsurface surveillance and detection as a part of requisite Port, Facility and Vessel Security Plans -set forth following the implementation of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) "International Ship and Port Facility Security Code" (ISPS), and its U.S. equivalent - "The Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002" (MTSA) - are generic and vague in terms of specific goals and objectives Neither MTSA nor ISPS make specific mention of technology requirements or capabilities, or which entities are specifically charged with deployment, operation, and maintenance of such systems installed in any given geographic region. Nevertheless, both the ISPS Code and the MTSA 2002 REQUIRE implementation of provisions for monitoring and surveillance tied to approved facility and vessel security plans. These requirements leave undefined any specific provisions that a port, facility or vessel owner/operator must apply to ensure that all security goals are met. As a result, the means and methods of identifying and mitigating potential waterside threats are being unevenly applied throughout the maritime community, with some port authorities and individual facilities purchasing and installing expensive and sophisticated surveillance and detection systems, while others are doing nothing more than traditional "watch standing". Such disparate interpretation of need and requirement, abetted by regulatory "approval" of security plans that incorporate and validate this diversity of capability and response, has created an environment of uncertainty and complacency where uneven standards of operational maritime security prevail. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/OCEANS.2005.1639875 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1639875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1639875</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1639875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-a1f9191367316e8cfcf7c864e9e0057e8faba9c42df4e53d2b5b32cbac5783333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUM1qAjEYDLSFWusTePleYLfJZrNJTkXE_oDUQys9Sjb7RQPrRpJo8e0rrXOZw_zADCFTRkvGqH5azRezj8-yolSUrOFaSXFDHqjmXAvJa35LRpRpWUiuxD2ZpORbylhDGVd6RI7rocP4YzJG6DCjzT4MYIYO0jGe0Pe9GSzCRdgNoQ_bM7gQwYb9HqP1podDiPnPf8KUsIeE9hh9PpfwvQvgE2yDH7aQAxzMf9jn50dy50yfcHLlMVm_LL7mb8Vy9fo-ny0Lz6TIhWFOM814IzlrUFlnnbSqqVHjZa1E5UxrtK2rztUoeFe1ouWVbY0VUvELxmT63-sRcXOIfm_ieXN9if8CZVNepA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Underwater detection and surveillance technology for commercial port and vessel security. Who is going to pay for it?</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Smookler, M.S. ; Clark, B.G. ; Ostrander, J.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smookler, M.S. ; Clark, B.G. ; Ostrander, J.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Regulatory requirements for surface and subsurface surveillance and detection as a part of requisite Port, Facility and Vessel Security Plans -set forth following the implementation of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) "International Ship and Port Facility Security Code" (ISPS), and its U.S. equivalent - "The Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002" (MTSA) - are generic and vague in terms of specific goals and objectives Neither MTSA nor ISPS make specific mention of technology requirements or capabilities, or which entities are specifically charged with deployment, operation, and maintenance of such systems installed in any given geographic region. Nevertheless, both the ISPS Code and the MTSA 2002 REQUIRE implementation of provisions for monitoring and surveillance tied to approved facility and vessel security plans. These requirements leave undefined any specific provisions that a port, facility or vessel owner/operator must apply to ensure that all security goals are met. As a result, the means and methods of identifying and mitigating potential waterside threats are being unevenly applied throughout the maritime community, with some port authorities and individual facilities purchasing and installing expensive and sophisticated surveillance and detection systems, while others are doing nothing more than traditional "watch standing". Such disparate interpretation of need and requirement, abetted by regulatory "approval" of security plans that incorporate and validate this diversity of capability and response, has created an environment of uncertainty and complacency where uneven standards of operational maritime security prevail.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-7385</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0933957343</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780933957343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/OCEANS.2005.1639875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Costs ; Information security ; Marine vehicles ; Monitoring ; Radar detection ; Remotely operated vehicles ; Sonar detection ; Surveillance ; Underwater tracking ; Vehicle detection</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE, 2005, p.935-940 Vol. 1</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1639875$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,777,781,786,787,2052,4036,4037,27906,54901</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1639875$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smookler, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, B.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostrander, J.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Underwater detection and surveillance technology for commercial port and vessel security. Who is going to pay for it?</title><title>Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE</title><addtitle>OCEANS</addtitle><description>Regulatory requirements for surface and subsurface surveillance and detection as a part of requisite Port, Facility and Vessel Security Plans -set forth following the implementation of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) "International Ship and Port Facility Security Code" (ISPS), and its U.S. equivalent - "The Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002" (MTSA) - are generic and vague in terms of specific goals and objectives Neither MTSA nor ISPS make specific mention of technology requirements or capabilities, or which entities are specifically charged with deployment, operation, and maintenance of such systems installed in any given geographic region. Nevertheless, both the ISPS Code and the MTSA 2002 REQUIRE implementation of provisions for monitoring and surveillance tied to approved facility and vessel security plans. These requirements leave undefined any specific provisions that a port, facility or vessel owner/operator must apply to ensure that all security goals are met. As a result, the means and methods of identifying and mitigating potential waterside threats are being unevenly applied throughout the maritime community, with some port authorities and individual facilities purchasing and installing expensive and sophisticated surveillance and detection systems, while others are doing nothing more than traditional "watch standing". Such disparate interpretation of need and requirement, abetted by regulatory "approval" of security plans that incorporate and validate this diversity of capability and response, has created an environment of uncertainty and complacency where uneven standards of operational maritime security prevail.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Information security</subject><subject>Marine vehicles</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Radar detection</subject><subject>Remotely operated vehicles</subject><subject>Sonar detection</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Underwater tracking</subject><subject>Vehicle detection</subject><issn>0197-7385</issn><isbn>0933957343</isbn><isbn>9780933957343</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotUM1qAjEYDLSFWusTePleYLfJZrNJTkXE_oDUQys9Sjb7RQPrRpJo8e0rrXOZw_zADCFTRkvGqH5azRezj8-yolSUrOFaSXFDHqjmXAvJa35LRpRpWUiuxD2ZpORbylhDGVd6RI7rocP4YzJG6DCjzT4MYIYO0jGe0Pe9GSzCRdgNoQ_bM7gQwYb9HqP1podDiPnPf8KUsIeE9hh9PpfwvQvgE2yDH7aQAxzMf9jn50dy50yfcHLlMVm_LL7mb8Vy9fo-ny0Lz6TIhWFOM814IzlrUFlnnbSqqVHjZa1E5UxrtK2rztUoeFe1ouWVbY0VUvELxmT63-sRcXOIfm_ieXN9if8CZVNepA</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Smookler, M.S.</creator><creator>Clark, B.G.</creator><creator>Ostrander, J.M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Underwater detection and surveillance technology for commercial port and vessel security. Who is going to pay for it?</title><author>Smookler, M.S. ; Clark, B.G. ; Ostrander, J.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-a1f9191367316e8cfcf7c864e9e0057e8faba9c42df4e53d2b5b32cbac5783333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Information security</topic><topic>Marine vehicles</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Radar detection</topic><topic>Remotely operated vehicles</topic><topic>Sonar detection</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Underwater tracking</topic><topic>Vehicle detection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smookler, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, B.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostrander, J.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smookler, M.S.</au><au>Clark, B.G.</au><au>Ostrander, J.M.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Underwater detection and surveillance technology for commercial port and vessel security. Who is going to pay for it?</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE</btitle><stitle>OCEANS</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>935</spage><epage>940 Vol. 1</epage><pages>935-940 Vol. 1</pages><issn>0197-7385</issn><isbn>0933957343</isbn><isbn>9780933957343</isbn><abstract>Regulatory requirements for surface and subsurface surveillance and detection as a part of requisite Port, Facility and Vessel Security Plans -set forth following the implementation of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) "International Ship and Port Facility Security Code" (ISPS), and its U.S. equivalent - "The Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002" (MTSA) - are generic and vague in terms of specific goals and objectives Neither MTSA nor ISPS make specific mention of technology requirements or capabilities, or which entities are specifically charged with deployment, operation, and maintenance of such systems installed in any given geographic region. Nevertheless, both the ISPS Code and the MTSA 2002 REQUIRE implementation of provisions for monitoring and surveillance tied to approved facility and vessel security plans. These requirements leave undefined any specific provisions that a port, facility or vessel owner/operator must apply to ensure that all security goals are met. As a result, the means and methods of identifying and mitigating potential waterside threats are being unevenly applied throughout the maritime community, with some port authorities and individual facilities purchasing and installing expensive and sophisticated surveillance and detection systems, while others are doing nothing more than traditional "watch standing". Such disparate interpretation of need and requirement, abetted by regulatory "approval" of security plans that incorporate and validate this diversity of capability and response, has created an environment of uncertainty and complacency where uneven standards of operational maritime security prevail.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/OCEANS.2005.1639875</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-7385 |
ispartof | Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE, 2005, p.935-940 Vol. 1 |
issn | 0197-7385 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1639875 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Costs Information security Marine vehicles Monitoring Radar detection Remotely operated vehicles Sonar detection Surveillance Underwater tracking Vehicle detection |
title | Underwater detection and surveillance technology for commercial port and vessel security. Who is going to pay for it? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T08%3A50%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Underwater%20detection%20and%20surveillance%20technology%20for%20commercial%20port%20and%20vessel%20security.%20Who%20is%20going%20to%20pay%20for%20it?&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20OCEANS%202005%20MTS/IEEE&rft.au=Smookler,%20M.S.&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=935&rft.epage=940%20Vol.%201&rft.pages=935-940%20Vol.%201&rft.issn=0197-7385&rft.isbn=0933957343&rft.isbn_list=9780933957343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/OCEANS.2005.1639875&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1639875%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1639875&rfr_iscdi=true |