Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations

Acoustic systems may provide suitable underwater communications because sound propagates well in water. However, the maximum data transmission rates of these systems in shallow littoral waters are ~10 kilobits per second (kbps) which may be achieved only at ranges of less than 100 m. Although underw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Giles, J.W., Bankman, I.N.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1705 Vol. 3
container_issue
container_start_page 1700
container_title
container_volume
creator Giles, J.W.
Bankman, I.N.
description Acoustic systems may provide suitable underwater communications because sound propagates well in water. However, the maximum data transmission rates of these systems in shallow littoral waters are ~10 kilobits per second (kbps) which may be achieved only at ranges of less than 100 m. Although underwater (u/w) wireless optical communications systems can have even shorter ranges due to greater attenuation of light propagating through water, they may provide higher bandwidth (up to several hundred kbps) communications as well as covertness. To exploit these potential advantages, we consider the basic design issues for u/w optical communications systems in this paper. In addition to the basic physics of u/w optical communications with environmental noise, we consider system performance with some state-of-the-art commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components, which have promise for placing u/w optical communications systems in a small package with low power consumption and weight. We discuss light sources which show promise for u/w optical transmitters such as laser diodes (LDs) and light emitting diodes (LEDs). Laser diodes with their output frequency shifted into the 500- to 650-nm range can emit more energy per pulse than LEDs but are more expensive. Currently, LEDs emit substantial amounts of light and are typically very inexpensive. Also, COTS photodiodes can be used as detectors which can respond to pulses several nanoseconds wide. Transmitter broadcast angles and detector fields of view (FOVs) with pointing considerations are discussed. If the transmitter broadcast angle and the detector FOV are both narrow, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the received pulse is higher but the pointing accuracy of transmitter and receiver is critical. If, however, the transmitter broadcast angle and/or the detector FOV is wide, pointing is less critical but SNR is lower and some covertness may be lost. The propagation of the transmitted light in various clear oceanic and turbid coastal water types is considered with range estimates for some COTS light sources and detectors. We also consider the effects of environmental noise such as background solar radiation, which typically limits performance of these systems
doi_str_mv 10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1605919
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1605919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1605919</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1605919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-63a12910c2e50dfe75867fbcc6590d812cb68c4a33b32e569017c91ecbdccfe63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtqwzAQRUUf0JD6C7LRD9idkapXdyX0EXCaLpp1kGW5qMR2sFRK_r4qCWUuzMAc7h2GkAVChQjmbr2ql5t1xQBEhRKEQXNBZgyFKJXQ8pIURmnI4iaXvPrfKX1Dihi_AACZlszgjLxth9ZPPzb5iY6HFJzdUzf2_feQxxTGIdJ4jMn3saLvdkqUPdDGxuBo62P4HDI8xJAtTvAtue7sPvri3Odk-_z0sXwt683LavlYlwGVSKXkFnM8OOYFtJ3_u1t1jXNSGGg1MtdI7e4t5w3PiDSAyhn0rmmd67zkc7I4-Qbv_e4whd5Ox935G_wXuyNSpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Giles, J.W. ; Bankman, I.N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giles, J.W. ; Bankman, I.N.</creatorcontrib><description>Acoustic systems may provide suitable underwater communications because sound propagates well in water. However, the maximum data transmission rates of these systems in shallow littoral waters are ~10 kilobits per second (kbps) which may be achieved only at ranges of less than 100 m. Although underwater (u/w) wireless optical communications systems can have even shorter ranges due to greater attenuation of light propagating through water, they may provide higher bandwidth (up to several hundred kbps) communications as well as covertness. To exploit these potential advantages, we consider the basic design issues for u/w optical communications systems in this paper. In addition to the basic physics of u/w optical communications with environmental noise, we consider system performance with some state-of-the-art commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components, which have promise for placing u/w optical communications systems in a small package with low power consumption and weight. We discuss light sources which show promise for u/w optical transmitters such as laser diodes (LDs) and light emitting diodes (LEDs). Laser diodes with their output frequency shifted into the 500- to 650-nm range can emit more energy per pulse than LEDs but are more expensive. Currently, LEDs emit substantial amounts of light and are typically very inexpensive. Also, COTS photodiodes can be used as detectors which can respond to pulses several nanoseconds wide. Transmitter broadcast angles and detector fields of view (FOVs) with pointing considerations are discussed. If the transmitter broadcast angle and the detector FOV are both narrow, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the received pulse is higher but the pointing accuracy of transmitter and receiver is critical. If, however, the transmitter broadcast angle and/or the detector FOV is wide, pointing is less critical but SNR is lower and some covertness may be lost. The propagation of the transmitted light in various clear oceanic and turbid coastal water types is considered with range estimates for some COTS light sources and detectors. We also consider the effects of environmental noise such as background solar radiation, which typically limits performance of these systems</description><identifier>ISSN: 2155-7578</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780393936</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780393937</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-7586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1605919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Broadcasting ; Detectors ; Diode lasers ; Light emitting diodes ; Light sources ; Optical fiber communication ; Optical propagation ; Optical transmitters ; Underwater communication ; Working environment noise</subject><ispartof>MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2005, p.1700-1705 Vol. 3</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1605919$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1605919$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giles, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankman, I.N.</creatorcontrib><title>Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations</title><title>MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference</title><addtitle>MILCOM</addtitle><description>Acoustic systems may provide suitable underwater communications because sound propagates well in water. However, the maximum data transmission rates of these systems in shallow littoral waters are ~10 kilobits per second (kbps) which may be achieved only at ranges of less than 100 m. Although underwater (u/w) wireless optical communications systems can have even shorter ranges due to greater attenuation of light propagating through water, they may provide higher bandwidth (up to several hundred kbps) communications as well as covertness. To exploit these potential advantages, we consider the basic design issues for u/w optical communications systems in this paper. In addition to the basic physics of u/w optical communications with environmental noise, we consider system performance with some state-of-the-art commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components, which have promise for placing u/w optical communications systems in a small package with low power consumption and weight. We discuss light sources which show promise for u/w optical transmitters such as laser diodes (LDs) and light emitting diodes (LEDs). Laser diodes with their output frequency shifted into the 500- to 650-nm range can emit more energy per pulse than LEDs but are more expensive. Currently, LEDs emit substantial amounts of light and are typically very inexpensive. Also, COTS photodiodes can be used as detectors which can respond to pulses several nanoseconds wide. Transmitter broadcast angles and detector fields of view (FOVs) with pointing considerations are discussed. If the transmitter broadcast angle and the detector FOV are both narrow, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the received pulse is higher but the pointing accuracy of transmitter and receiver is critical. If, however, the transmitter broadcast angle and/or the detector FOV is wide, pointing is less critical but SNR is lower and some covertness may be lost. The propagation of the transmitted light in various clear oceanic and turbid coastal water types is considered with range estimates for some COTS light sources and detectors. We also consider the effects of environmental noise such as background solar radiation, which typically limits performance of these systems</description><subject>Broadcasting</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Diode lasers</subject><subject>Light emitting diodes</subject><subject>Light sources</subject><subject>Optical fiber communication</subject><subject>Optical propagation</subject><subject>Optical transmitters</subject><subject>Underwater communication</subject><subject>Working environment noise</subject><issn>2155-7578</issn><issn>2155-7586</issn><isbn>9780780393936</isbn><isbn>0780393937</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtqwzAQRUUf0JD6C7LRD9idkapXdyX0EXCaLpp1kGW5qMR2sFRK_r4qCWUuzMAc7h2GkAVChQjmbr2ql5t1xQBEhRKEQXNBZgyFKJXQ8pIURmnI4iaXvPrfKX1Dihi_AACZlszgjLxth9ZPPzb5iY6HFJzdUzf2_feQxxTGIdJ4jMn3saLvdkqUPdDGxuBo62P4HDI8xJAtTvAtue7sPvri3Odk-_z0sXwt683LavlYlwGVSKXkFnM8OOYFtJ3_u1t1jXNSGGg1MtdI7e4t5w3PiDSAyhn0rmmd67zkc7I4-Qbv_e4whd5Ox935G_wXuyNSpw</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Giles, J.W.</creator><creator>Bankman, I.N.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations</title><author>Giles, J.W. ; Bankman, I.N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-63a12910c2e50dfe75867fbcc6590d812cb68c4a33b32e569017c91ecbdccfe63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Broadcasting</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Diode lasers</topic><topic>Light emitting diodes</topic><topic>Light sources</topic><topic>Optical fiber communication</topic><topic>Optical propagation</topic><topic>Optical transmitters</topic><topic>Underwater communication</topic><topic>Working environment noise</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giles, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankman, I.N.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giles, J.W.</au><au>Bankman, I.N.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations</atitle><btitle>MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference</btitle><stitle>MILCOM</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>1700</spage><epage>1705 Vol. 3</epage><pages>1700-1705 Vol. 3</pages><issn>2155-7578</issn><eissn>2155-7586</eissn><isbn>9780780393936</isbn><isbn>0780393937</isbn><abstract>Acoustic systems may provide suitable underwater communications because sound propagates well in water. However, the maximum data transmission rates of these systems in shallow littoral waters are ~10 kilobits per second (kbps) which may be achieved only at ranges of less than 100 m. Although underwater (u/w) wireless optical communications systems can have even shorter ranges due to greater attenuation of light propagating through water, they may provide higher bandwidth (up to several hundred kbps) communications as well as covertness. To exploit these potential advantages, we consider the basic design issues for u/w optical communications systems in this paper. In addition to the basic physics of u/w optical communications with environmental noise, we consider system performance with some state-of-the-art commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components, which have promise for placing u/w optical communications systems in a small package with low power consumption and weight. We discuss light sources which show promise for u/w optical transmitters such as laser diodes (LDs) and light emitting diodes (LEDs). Laser diodes with their output frequency shifted into the 500- to 650-nm range can emit more energy per pulse than LEDs but are more expensive. Currently, LEDs emit substantial amounts of light and are typically very inexpensive. Also, COTS photodiodes can be used as detectors which can respond to pulses several nanoseconds wide. Transmitter broadcast angles and detector fields of view (FOVs) with pointing considerations are discussed. If the transmitter broadcast angle and the detector FOV are both narrow, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the received pulse is higher but the pointing accuracy of transmitter and receiver is critical. If, however, the transmitter broadcast angle and/or the detector FOV is wide, pointing is less critical but SNR is lower and some covertness may be lost. The propagation of the transmitted light in various clear oceanic and turbid coastal water types is considered with range estimates for some COTS light sources and detectors. We also consider the effects of environmental noise such as background solar radiation, which typically limits performance of these systems</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1605919</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2155-7578
ispartof MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2005, p.1700-1705 Vol. 3
issn 2155-7578
2155-7586
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_1605919
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Broadcasting
Detectors
Diode lasers
Light emitting diodes
Light sources
Optical fiber communication
Optical propagation
Optical transmitters
Underwater communication
Working environment noise
title Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A59%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Underwater%20optical%20communications%20systems.%20Part%202:%20basic%20design%20considerations&rft.btitle=MILCOM%202005%20-%202005%20IEEE%20Military%20Communications%20Conference&rft.au=Giles,%20J.W.&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=1700&rft.epage=1705%20Vol.%203&rft.pages=1700-1705%20Vol.%203&rft.issn=2155-7578&rft.eissn=2155-7586&rft.isbn=9780780393936&rft.isbn_list=0780393937&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1605919&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1605919%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1605919&rfr_iscdi=true