Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods
Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 436 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 432 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Mei Yen Cheong Aschbacher, E. Brunmayr, P. Rupp, M. Laakso, T. |
description | Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate two PDs of different design approaches. The first PD is modeled using a simplicial canonical piecewise linear (SCPWL) function while the second one is modeled using a polynomial function. The former exploits the properties of the SCPWL function to develop a reduced complexity PD identification method. The latter utilizes the secant method to iteratively search for the signal at the PD output, thus parameter identification is avoided. The implementation complexity and effectiveness of the PDs are compared. The limitations of the measurement system for predistorter design is also discussed briefly |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ACSSC.2005.1599784 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1599784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1599784</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1599784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b448fc796c26311a25d5c96d583a911f924c8c0b4a4cbb2a824a2d701019ab1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUFtLwzAUDl7AMfsH9KV_oDUntyaPo84pVBQ2fRJGmqYa6ZrSFLb9e6Pu6RzOd-F8H0I3gHMArO4W5Xpd5gRjngNXqpDsDM0IL0RGKKbnKIknYIQxDBTYBZoB5jITVNErlITwjTEGJWTUzdBH6XeDHl3wfar7Jl0eBju6ne0n3aXvcW2d0ZOLqG_Tzd6nld9nJmo6e3DTMb13n-6X-jraxoXJj3_cZzt9-SZco8tWd8EmpzlHbw_LTfmYVS-rp3JRZQ4KPmU1Y7I1hRKGCAqgCW-4UaLhkmoF0CrCjDS4ZpqZuiZaEqZJU2CIMXQNls7R7b-vs9Zuh_i_Ho_bUzf0B6ghVxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Mei Yen Cheong ; Aschbacher, E. ; Brunmayr, P. ; Rupp, M. ; Laakso, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mei Yen Cheong ; Aschbacher, E. ; Brunmayr, P. ; Rupp, M. ; Laakso, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate two PDs of different design approaches. The first PD is modeled using a simplicial canonical piecewise linear (SCPWL) function while the second one is modeled using a polynomial function. The former exploits the properties of the SCPWL function to develop a reduced complexity PD identification method. The latter utilizes the secant method to iteratively search for the signal at the PD output, thus parameter identification is avoided. The implementation complexity and effectiveness of the PDs are compared. The limitations of the measurement system for predistorter design is also discussed briefly</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-6393</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424401314</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424401313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2576-2303</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACSSC.2005.1599784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Laboratories ; Linearization techniques ; Mobile communication ; OFDM ; Paper technology ; Peak to average power ratio ; Predistortion ; Signal processing ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005, 2005, p.432-436</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1599784$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1599784$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mei Yen Cheong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschbacher, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunmayr, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rupp, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laakso, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods</title><title>Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005</title><addtitle>ACSSC</addtitle><description>Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate two PDs of different design approaches. The first PD is modeled using a simplicial canonical piecewise linear (SCPWL) function while the second one is modeled using a polynomial function. The former exploits the properties of the SCPWL function to develop a reduced complexity PD identification method. The latter utilizes the secant method to iteratively search for the signal at the PD output, thus parameter identification is avoided. The implementation complexity and effectiveness of the PDs are compared. The limitations of the measurement system for predistorter design is also discussed briefly</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Linearization techniques</subject><subject>Mobile communication</subject><subject>OFDM</subject><subject>Paper technology</subject><subject>Peak to average power ratio</subject><subject>Predistortion</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1058-6393</issn><issn>2576-2303</issn><isbn>9781424401314</isbn><isbn>1424401313</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotUFtLwzAUDl7AMfsH9KV_oDUntyaPo84pVBQ2fRJGmqYa6ZrSFLb9e6Pu6RzOd-F8H0I3gHMArO4W5Xpd5gRjngNXqpDsDM0IL0RGKKbnKIknYIQxDBTYBZoB5jITVNErlITwjTEGJWTUzdBH6XeDHl3wfar7Jl0eBju6ne0n3aXvcW2d0ZOLqG_Tzd6nld9nJmo6e3DTMb13n-6X-jraxoXJj3_cZzt9-SZco8tWd8EmpzlHbw_LTfmYVS-rp3JRZQ4KPmU1Y7I1hRKGCAqgCW-4UaLhkmoF0CrCjDS4ZpqZuiZaEqZJU2CIMXQNls7R7b-vs9Zuh_i_Ho_bUzf0B6ghVxs</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Mei Yen Cheong</creator><creator>Aschbacher, E.</creator><creator>Brunmayr, P.</creator><creator>Rupp, M.</creator><creator>Laakso, T.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods</title><author>Mei Yen Cheong ; Aschbacher, E. ; Brunmayr, P. ; Rupp, M. ; Laakso, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b448fc796c26311a25d5c96d583a911f924c8c0b4a4cbb2a824a2d701019ab1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Linearization techniques</topic><topic>Mobile communication</topic><topic>OFDM</topic><topic>Paper technology</topic><topic>Peak to average power ratio</topic><topic>Predistortion</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mei Yen Cheong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschbacher, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunmayr, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rupp, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laakso, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mei Yen Cheong</au><au>Aschbacher, E.</au><au>Brunmayr, P.</au><au>Rupp, M.</au><au>Laakso, T.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods</atitle><btitle>Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005</btitle><stitle>ACSSC</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>432</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>432-436</pages><issn>1058-6393</issn><eissn>2576-2303</eissn><isbn>9781424401314</isbn><isbn>1424401313</isbn><abstract>Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate two PDs of different design approaches. The first PD is modeled using a simplicial canonical piecewise linear (SCPWL) function while the second one is modeled using a polynomial function. The former exploits the properties of the SCPWL function to develop a reduced complexity PD identification method. The latter utilizes the secant method to iteratively search for the signal at the PD output, thus parameter identification is avoided. The implementation complexity and effectiveness of the PDs are compared. The limitations of the measurement system for predistorter design is also discussed briefly</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACSSC.2005.1599784</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-6393 |
ispartof | Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005, 2005, p.432-436 |
issn | 1058-6393 2576-2303 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1599784 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Computer simulation Laboratories Linearization techniques Mobile communication OFDM Paper technology Peak to average power ratio Predistortion Signal processing Testing |
title | Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20and%20Experimental%20Verification%20of%20Two%20Low-complexity%20Digital%20Predistortion%20Methods&rft.btitle=Conference%20Record%20of%20the%20Thirty-Ninth%20Asilomar%20Conference%20onSignals,%20Systems%20and%20Computers,%202005&rft.au=Mei%20Yen%20Cheong&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=432&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=432-436&rft.issn=1058-6393&rft.eissn=2576-2303&rft.isbn=9781424401314&rft.isbn_list=1424401313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACSSC.2005.1599784&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1599784%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1599784&rfr_iscdi=true |