Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods

Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Mei Yen Cheong, Aschbacher, E., Brunmayr, P., Rupp, M., Laakso, T.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 436
container_issue
container_start_page 432
container_title
container_volume
creator Mei Yen Cheong
Aschbacher, E.
Brunmayr, P.
Rupp, M.
Laakso, T.
description Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate two PDs of different design approaches. The first PD is modeled using a simplicial canonical piecewise linear (SCPWL) function while the second one is modeled using a polynomial function. The former exploits the properties of the SCPWL function to develop a reduced complexity PD identification method. The latter utilizes the secant method to iteratively search for the signal at the PD output, thus parameter identification is avoided. The implementation complexity and effectiveness of the PDs are compared. The limitations of the measurement system for predistorter design is also discussed briefly
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACSSC.2005.1599784
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1599784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1599784</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1599784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b448fc796c26311a25d5c96d583a911f924c8c0b4a4cbb2a824a2d701019ab1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUFtLwzAUDl7AMfsH9KV_oDUntyaPo84pVBQ2fRJGmqYa6ZrSFLb9e6Pu6RzOd-F8H0I3gHMArO4W5Xpd5gRjngNXqpDsDM0IL0RGKKbnKIknYIQxDBTYBZoB5jITVNErlITwjTEGJWTUzdBH6XeDHl3wfar7Jl0eBju6ne0n3aXvcW2d0ZOLqG_Tzd6nld9nJmo6e3DTMb13n-6X-jraxoXJj3_cZzt9-SZco8tWd8EmpzlHbw_LTfmYVS-rp3JRZQ4KPmU1Y7I1hRKGCAqgCW-4UaLhkmoF0CrCjDS4ZpqZuiZaEqZJU2CIMXQNls7R7b-vs9Zuh_i_Ho_bUzf0B6ghVxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Mei Yen Cheong ; Aschbacher, E. ; Brunmayr, P. ; Rupp, M. ; Laakso, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mei Yen Cheong ; Aschbacher, E. ; Brunmayr, P. ; Rupp, M. ; Laakso, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate two PDs of different design approaches. The first PD is modeled using a simplicial canonical piecewise linear (SCPWL) function while the second one is modeled using a polynomial function. The former exploits the properties of the SCPWL function to develop a reduced complexity PD identification method. The latter utilizes the secant method to iteratively search for the signal at the PD output, thus parameter identification is avoided. The implementation complexity and effectiveness of the PDs are compared. The limitations of the measurement system for predistorter design is also discussed briefly</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-6393</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424401314</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424401313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2576-2303</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACSSC.2005.1599784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Laboratories ; Linearization techniques ; Mobile communication ; OFDM ; Paper technology ; Peak to average power ratio ; Predistortion ; Signal processing ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005, 2005, p.432-436</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1599784$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1599784$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mei Yen Cheong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschbacher, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunmayr, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rupp, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laakso, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods</title><title>Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005</title><addtitle>ACSSC</addtitle><description>Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate two PDs of different design approaches. The first PD is modeled using a simplicial canonical piecewise linear (SCPWL) function while the second one is modeled using a polynomial function. The former exploits the properties of the SCPWL function to develop a reduced complexity PD identification method. The latter utilizes the secant method to iteratively search for the signal at the PD output, thus parameter identification is avoided. The implementation complexity and effectiveness of the PDs are compared. The limitations of the measurement system for predistorter design is also discussed briefly</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Linearization techniques</subject><subject>Mobile communication</subject><subject>OFDM</subject><subject>Paper technology</subject><subject>Peak to average power ratio</subject><subject>Predistortion</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1058-6393</issn><issn>2576-2303</issn><isbn>9781424401314</isbn><isbn>1424401313</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotUFtLwzAUDl7AMfsH9KV_oDUntyaPo84pVBQ2fRJGmqYa6ZrSFLb9e6Pu6RzOd-F8H0I3gHMArO4W5Xpd5gRjngNXqpDsDM0IL0RGKKbnKIknYIQxDBTYBZoB5jITVNErlITwjTEGJWTUzdBH6XeDHl3wfar7Jl0eBju6ne0n3aXvcW2d0ZOLqG_Tzd6nld9nJmo6e3DTMb13n-6X-jraxoXJj3_cZzt9-SZco8tWd8EmpzlHbw_LTfmYVS-rp3JRZQ4KPmU1Y7I1hRKGCAqgCW-4UaLhkmoF0CrCjDS4ZpqZuiZaEqZJU2CIMXQNls7R7b-vs9Zuh_i_Ho_bUzf0B6ghVxs</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Mei Yen Cheong</creator><creator>Aschbacher, E.</creator><creator>Brunmayr, P.</creator><creator>Rupp, M.</creator><creator>Laakso, T.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods</title><author>Mei Yen Cheong ; Aschbacher, E. ; Brunmayr, P. ; Rupp, M. ; Laakso, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b448fc796c26311a25d5c96d583a911f924c8c0b4a4cbb2a824a2d701019ab1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Linearization techniques</topic><topic>Mobile communication</topic><topic>OFDM</topic><topic>Paper technology</topic><topic>Peak to average power ratio</topic><topic>Predistortion</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mei Yen Cheong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschbacher, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunmayr, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rupp, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laakso, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mei Yen Cheong</au><au>Aschbacher, E.</au><au>Brunmayr, P.</au><au>Rupp, M.</au><au>Laakso, T.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods</atitle><btitle>Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005</btitle><stitle>ACSSC</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>432</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>432-436</pages><issn>1058-6393</issn><eissn>2576-2303</eissn><isbn>9781424401314</isbn><isbn>1424401313</isbn><abstract>Recently, many papers have been published on the designs of predistortion systems for power amplifiers (PA). Most of these studies are based on computer simulations. In this work, we examine our predistorter (PD) designs on a practical microwave PA in a laboratory setup. The objective is to validate two PDs of different design approaches. The first PD is modeled using a simplicial canonical piecewise linear (SCPWL) function while the second one is modeled using a polynomial function. The former exploits the properties of the SCPWL function to develop a reduced complexity PD identification method. The latter utilizes the secant method to iteratively search for the signal at the PD output, thus parameter identification is avoided. The implementation complexity and effectiveness of the PDs are compared. The limitations of the measurement system for predistorter design is also discussed briefly</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACSSC.2005.1599784</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1058-6393
ispartof Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005, 2005, p.432-436
issn 1058-6393
2576-2303
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_1599784
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Computer simulation
Laboratories
Linearization techniques
Mobile communication
OFDM
Paper technology
Peak to average power ratio
Predistortion
Signal processing
Testing
title Comparison and Experimental Verification of Two Low-complexity Digital Predistortion Methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20and%20Experimental%20Verification%20of%20Two%20Low-complexity%20Digital%20Predistortion%20Methods&rft.btitle=Conference%20Record%20of%20the%20Thirty-Ninth%20Asilomar%20Conference%20onSignals,%20Systems%20and%20Computers,%202005&rft.au=Mei%20Yen%20Cheong&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=432&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=432-436&rft.issn=1058-6393&rft.eissn=2576-2303&rft.isbn=9781424401314&rft.isbn_list=1424401313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACSSC.2005.1599784&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1599784%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1599784&rfr_iscdi=true