Comparison of two metaheuristics with mathematical programming methods for the solution of OPF
This paper presents a comparison of different optimization methods developed for the solution of the nonlinear OPF problem with both continuous and discrete variables. Two mathematical programming methods are compared with two metaheuristics, a particle swarm optimization implementation and an enhan...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 6 pp. |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Biskas, P.N. Ziogos, N.P. Tellidou, A. Zoumas, C.E. Bakirtzis, A.G. Petridis, V. Tsakoumis, A. |
| description | This paper presents a comparison of different optimization methods developed for the solution of the nonlinear OPF problem with both continuous and discrete variables. Two mathematical programming methods are compared with two metaheuristics, a particle swarm optimization implementation and an enhanced genetic algorithm. Test results from the application of the methods to several IEEE systems are presented and compared. Useful conclusions are drawn concerning the execution times and the "optimum" costs provided by all four tested methods |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ISAP.2005.1599316 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1599316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1599316</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1599316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-760eb14ed5a75ba62c7acfc7fe895ecd6e588aa9bccaf5705af2d71c1f8229ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFFrwyAcxIUx2OjyAcZe_ALJNIkaH0tYt0KhhfV55R-jjSPWoJayb7-U9uWOO37cwyH0SklBKZHv6-_lrigJYQVlUlaUP6BMiuYaBKOiJk8oi_GXEEIll4TXz-in9W6CYKM_YW9wunjsdIJBn-cuWRXxxaYBO0iDnsUqGPEU_DGAc_Z0vMKD7yM2PuAZwdGP52RvY9vd6gU9Ghijzu6-QPvVx779yjfbz3W73ORWkpQLTnRHa90zEKwDXioByihhdCOZVj3XrGkAZKcUGCYIA1P2gipqmrKUCqoFervNWq31YQrWQfg73E-o_gH6MlVy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of two metaheuristics with mathematical programming methods for the solution of OPF</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Biskas, P.N. ; Ziogos, N.P. ; Tellidou, A. ; Zoumas, C.E. ; Bakirtzis, A.G. ; Petridis, V. ; Tsakoumis, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Biskas, P.N. ; Ziogos, N.P. ; Tellidou, A. ; Zoumas, C.E. ; Bakirtzis, A.G. ; Petridis, V. ; Tsakoumis, A.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a comparison of different optimization methods developed for the solution of the nonlinear OPF problem with both continuous and discrete variables. Two mathematical programming methods are compared with two metaheuristics, a particle swarm optimization implementation and an enhanced genetic algorithm. Test results from the application of the methods to several IEEE systems are presented and compared. Useful conclusions are drawn concerning the execution times and the "optimum" costs provided by all four tested methods</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781599751740</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1599751747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ISAP.2005.1599316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Admittance ; Costs ; Genetic algorithms ; Genetic programming ; Load flow ; Mathematical programming ; Optimization methods ; Particle swarm optimization ; Programming profession ; System testing</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on, Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems, 2005, p.6 pp.</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1599316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2051,4035,4036,27904,54898</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1599316$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biskas, P.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziogos, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tellidou, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoumas, C.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakirtzis, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petridis, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsakoumis, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two metaheuristics with mathematical programming methods for the solution of OPF</title><title>Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on, Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems</title><addtitle>ISAP</addtitle><description>This paper presents a comparison of different optimization methods developed for the solution of the nonlinear OPF problem with both continuous and discrete variables. Two mathematical programming methods are compared with two metaheuristics, a particle swarm optimization implementation and an enhanced genetic algorithm. Test results from the application of the methods to several IEEE systems are presented and compared. Useful conclusions are drawn concerning the execution times and the "optimum" costs provided by all four tested methods</description><subject>Admittance</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Genetic programming</subject><subject>Load flow</subject><subject>Mathematical programming</subject><subject>Optimization methods</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Programming profession</subject><subject>System testing</subject><isbn>9781599751740</isbn><isbn>1599751747</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFFrwyAcxIUx2OjyAcZe_ALJNIkaH0tYt0KhhfV55R-jjSPWoJayb7-U9uWOO37cwyH0SklBKZHv6-_lrigJYQVlUlaUP6BMiuYaBKOiJk8oi_GXEEIll4TXz-in9W6CYKM_YW9wunjsdIJBn-cuWRXxxaYBO0iDnsUqGPEU_DGAc_Z0vMKD7yM2PuAZwdGP52RvY9vd6gU9Ghijzu6-QPvVx779yjfbz3W73ORWkpQLTnRHa90zEKwDXioByihhdCOZVj3XrGkAZKcUGCYIA1P2gipqmrKUCqoFervNWq31YQrWQfg73E-o_gH6MlVy</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Biskas, P.N.</creator><creator>Ziogos, N.P.</creator><creator>Tellidou, A.</creator><creator>Zoumas, C.E.</creator><creator>Bakirtzis, A.G.</creator><creator>Petridis, V.</creator><creator>Tsakoumis, A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Comparison of two metaheuristics with mathematical programming methods for the solution of OPF</title><author>Biskas, P.N. ; Ziogos, N.P. ; Tellidou, A. ; Zoumas, C.E. ; Bakirtzis, A.G. ; Petridis, V. ; Tsakoumis, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-760eb14ed5a75ba62c7acfc7fe895ecd6e588aa9bccaf5705af2d71c1f8229ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Admittance</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Genetic programming</topic><topic>Load flow</topic><topic>Mathematical programming</topic><topic>Optimization methods</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Programming profession</topic><topic>System testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biskas, P.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziogos, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tellidou, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoumas, C.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakirtzis, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petridis, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsakoumis, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biskas, P.N.</au><au>Ziogos, N.P.</au><au>Tellidou, A.</au><au>Zoumas, C.E.</au><au>Bakirtzis, A.G.</au><au>Petridis, V.</au><au>Tsakoumis, A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two metaheuristics with mathematical programming methods for the solution of OPF</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on, Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems</btitle><stitle>ISAP</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>6 pp.</spage><pages>6 pp.-</pages><isbn>9781599751740</isbn><isbn>1599751747</isbn><abstract>This paper presents a comparison of different optimization methods developed for the solution of the nonlinear OPF problem with both continuous and discrete variables. Two mathematical programming methods are compared with two metaheuristics, a particle swarm optimization implementation and an enhanced genetic algorithm. Test results from the application of the methods to several IEEE systems are presented and compared. Useful conclusions are drawn concerning the execution times and the "optimum" costs provided by all four tested methods</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ISAP.2005.1599316</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISBN: 9781599751740 |
| ispartof | Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on, Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems, 2005, p.6 pp. |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1599316 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | Admittance Costs Genetic algorithms Genetic programming Load flow Mathematical programming Optimization methods Particle swarm optimization Programming profession System testing |
| title | Comparison of two metaheuristics with mathematical programming methods for the solution of OPF |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A16%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20metaheuristics%20with%20mathematical%20programming%20methods%20for%20the%20solution%20of%20OPF&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%2013th%20International%20Conference%20on,%20Intelligent%20Systems%20Application%20to%20Power%20Systems&rft.au=Biskas,%20P.N.&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=6%20pp.&rft.pages=6%20pp.-&rft.isbn=9781599751740&rft.isbn_list=1599751747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ISAP.2005.1599316&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1599316%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1599316&rfr_iscdi=true |