Comparison between two methods of measurement of the surface tension in presence of electric charges
In previous articles we have proved that it was possible to modify the hydrodynamic parameters of high speed jets of diesel oil with electrical processes (with injection of charges for instance). In this article we try to measure the interaction between the repulsion Coulombic forces and the surface...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 485 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 482 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Baudel, P. Louste, C. Romat, H. Agneray, A. |
| description | In previous articles we have proved that it was possible to modify the hydrodynamic parameters of high speed jets of diesel oil with electrical processes (with injection of charges for instance). In this article we try to measure the interaction between the repulsion Coulombic forces and the surface tension ones with two experimental techniques. The first one is the "pendant droplet" technique and the second one is based on the properties of the propagation of waves at the surface of the liquid. We present the results obtained with both experimental techniques of measurement of the equivalent surface tension of an electrically charged surface. We analyse the results and compare both techniques. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/CEIDP.2005.1560725 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1560725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1560725</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1560725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-4b5749839bf298550c3f3a5564dc9cc80dd0b5070c6af92a0dd29db5806107753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkN1OwzAMhSN-JKaxF4CbvECHk9RNc4nKGJMmwQVcT2nqsqC1nZKgibcniFmW7O_Ix7LM2J2ApRBgHprV5ultKQFwKbACLfGCzSTqqpDK6Eu2MLqGnMpkUVyxGUBdFkZU8oYtYvyCHCUqXZoZ65ppONrg4zTyltKJaOTpNPGB0n7qIp_63Nr4HWigMf1h2hPP3FtHPNEYfXb6kR8DRRqzlkfoQC4F77jb2_BJ8ZZd9_YQaXGuc_bxvHpvXort63rTPG4LLzSmomwx31Qr0_bS1IjgVK8sYlV2zjhXQ9dBi6DBVbY30maWpmuxhkqA1qjm7P5_ryei3TH4wYaf3flH6hepfFl7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison between two methods of measurement of the surface tension in presence of electric charges</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Baudel, P. ; Louste, C. ; Romat, H. ; Agneray, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baudel, P. ; Louste, C. ; Romat, H. ; Agneray, A.</creatorcontrib><description>In previous articles we have proved that it was possible to modify the hydrodynamic parameters of high speed jets of diesel oil with electrical processes (with injection of charges for instance). In this article we try to measure the interaction between the repulsion Coulombic forces and the surface tension ones with two experimental techniques. The first one is the "pendant droplet" technique and the second one is based on the properties of the propagation of waves at the surface of the liquid. We present the results obtained with both experimental techniques of measurement of the equivalent surface tension of an electrically charged surface. We analyse the results and compare both techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0084-9162</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780392571</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780392574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2576-2397</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/CEIDP.2005.1560725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Current measurement ; Electric variables measurement ; Electrostatics ; Equations ; Force measurement ; Hydrodynamics ; Permittivity ; Petroleum ; Surface tension ; Surface waves</subject><ispartof>CEIDP '05. 2005 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 2005, 2005, p.482-485</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1560725$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,777,781,786,787,2052,4036,4037,27906,54901</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1560725$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baudel, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louste, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romat, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agneray, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between two methods of measurement of the surface tension in presence of electric charges</title><title>CEIDP '05. 2005 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 2005</title><addtitle>CEIDP</addtitle><description>In previous articles we have proved that it was possible to modify the hydrodynamic parameters of high speed jets of diesel oil with electrical processes (with injection of charges for instance). In this article we try to measure the interaction between the repulsion Coulombic forces and the surface tension ones with two experimental techniques. The first one is the "pendant droplet" technique and the second one is based on the properties of the propagation of waves at the surface of the liquid. We present the results obtained with both experimental techniques of measurement of the equivalent surface tension of an electrically charged surface. We analyse the results and compare both techniques.</description><subject>Current measurement</subject><subject>Electric variables measurement</subject><subject>Electrostatics</subject><subject>Equations</subject><subject>Force measurement</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Permittivity</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Surface tension</subject><subject>Surface waves</subject><issn>0084-9162</issn><issn>2576-2397</issn><isbn>9780780392571</isbn><isbn>0780392574</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkN1OwzAMhSN-JKaxF4CbvECHk9RNc4nKGJMmwQVcT2nqsqC1nZKgibcniFmW7O_Ix7LM2J2ApRBgHprV5ultKQFwKbACLfGCzSTqqpDK6Eu2MLqGnMpkUVyxGUBdFkZU8oYtYvyCHCUqXZoZ65ppONrg4zTyltKJaOTpNPGB0n7qIp_63Nr4HWigMf1h2hPP3FtHPNEYfXb6kR8DRRqzlkfoQC4F77jb2_BJ8ZZd9_YQaXGuc_bxvHpvXort63rTPG4LLzSmomwx31Qr0_bS1IjgVK8sYlV2zjhXQ9dBi6DBVbY30maWpmuxhkqA1qjm7P5_ryei3TH4wYaf3flH6hepfFl7</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Baudel, P.</creator><creator>Louste, C.</creator><creator>Romat, H.</creator><creator>Agneray, A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Comparison between two methods of measurement of the surface tension in presence of electric charges</title><author>Baudel, P. ; Louste, C. ; Romat, H. ; Agneray, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-4b5749839bf298550c3f3a5564dc9cc80dd0b5070c6af92a0dd29db5806107753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Current measurement</topic><topic>Electric variables measurement</topic><topic>Electrostatics</topic><topic>Equations</topic><topic>Force measurement</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Permittivity</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Surface tension</topic><topic>Surface waves</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baudel, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louste, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romat, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agneray, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baudel, P.</au><au>Louste, C.</au><au>Romat, H.</au><au>Agneray, A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison between two methods of measurement of the surface tension in presence of electric charges</atitle><btitle>CEIDP '05. 2005 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 2005</btitle><stitle>CEIDP</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>482</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>482-485</pages><issn>0084-9162</issn><eissn>2576-2397</eissn><isbn>9780780392571</isbn><isbn>0780392574</isbn><abstract>In previous articles we have proved that it was possible to modify the hydrodynamic parameters of high speed jets of diesel oil with electrical processes (with injection of charges for instance). In this article we try to measure the interaction between the repulsion Coulombic forces and the surface tension ones with two experimental techniques. The first one is the "pendant droplet" technique and the second one is based on the properties of the propagation of waves at the surface of the liquid. We present the results obtained with both experimental techniques of measurement of the equivalent surface tension of an electrically charged surface. We analyse the results and compare both techniques.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/CEIDP.2005.1560725</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0084-9162 |
| ispartof | CEIDP '05. 2005 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 2005, 2005, p.482-485 |
| issn | 0084-9162 2576-2397 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1560725 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | Current measurement Electric variables measurement Electrostatics Equations Force measurement Hydrodynamics Permittivity Petroleum Surface tension Surface waves |
| title | Comparison between two methods of measurement of the surface tension in presence of electric charges |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A24%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20two%20methods%20of%20measurement%20of%20the%20surface%20tension%20in%20presence%20of%20electric%20charges&rft.btitle=CEIDP%20'05.%202005%20Annual%20Report%20Conference%20on%20Electrical%20Insulation%20and%20Dielectric%20Phenomena,%202005&rft.au=Baudel,%20P.&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=482&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=482-485&rft.issn=0084-9162&rft.eissn=2576-2397&rft.isbn=9780780392571&rft.isbn_list=0780392574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/CEIDP.2005.1560725&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1560725%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1560725&rfr_iscdi=true |