Transparency of a Phantom premium haptic interface for active and passive human interaction
This paper compares two methods for determining the transparency bandwidth of an impedance based haptic interface with a Phantom 1.0 A haptic device. Active user induced (AUI) interaction tests, where the system excitation is generated by a human user, show that transparency bandwidth is limited to...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3065 vol. 5 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 3060 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | McJunkin, S.T. O'Malley, M.K. Speich, J.E. |
description | This paper compares two methods for determining the transparency bandwidth of an impedance based haptic interface with a Phantom 1.0 A haptic device. Active user induced (AUI) interaction tests, where the system excitation is generated by a human user, show that transparency bandwidth is limited to approximately 2 Hz. Passive user induced (PUI) interaction tests, where the system excitation is generated by the haptic device with a passive human operator, show that bandwidth can extend up to 50 Hz. Experimental results show that the apparent bandwidth limitations for the AUI interaction tests are dependent on the human user's inability to excite higher frequencies. Consequently, this measurement approach is insufficient for determining system bandwidth of the human operator-haptic interface system. Furthermore, data seem to indicate that there is no appreciable difference in the ability of the Phantom manipulator to display environmental impedances in either AUI or PUI interactions regardless of the user. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ACC.2005.1470441 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1470441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1470441</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1470441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-dffa82f77e2f4e07a526b2282c471c1d1af649a9ccfb1f5d392430dfa6e8da573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtqwzAURNUXNEmzL3SjH3B6ryRb0jKYviDQLtJVF-FGlohKLRvZKfTv25AUBmbgDLMYxm4RFohg75d1vRAA5QKVBqXwjM2tNvAnacFafc4mQmpTlKbCCzb9B8ZesgloJQus0F6z6TB8AqC1FUzYxzpTGnrKPrkf3gVO_G1Haexa3mffxn3Ld9SP0fGYRp8DOc9Dlzm5MX57TqnhPQ3DIe_2LaVj7UC7dMOuAn0Nfn7yGXt_fFjXz8Xq9emlXq6KiLociyYEMiJo7UVQHjSVotoKYYRTGh02SKFSlqxzYYuhbKQVSkITqPKmoVLLGbs77kbv_abPsaX8szmdJH8BgXVYSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Transparency of a Phantom premium haptic interface for active and passive human interaction</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>McJunkin, S.T. ; O'Malley, M.K. ; Speich, J.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>McJunkin, S.T. ; O'Malley, M.K. ; Speich, J.E.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares two methods for determining the transparency bandwidth of an impedance based haptic interface with a Phantom 1.0 A haptic device. Active user induced (AUI) interaction tests, where the system excitation is generated by a human user, show that transparency bandwidth is limited to approximately 2 Hz. Passive user induced (PUI) interaction tests, where the system excitation is generated by the haptic device with a passive human operator, show that bandwidth can extend up to 50 Hz. Experimental results show that the apparent bandwidth limitations for the AUI interaction tests are dependent on the human user's inability to excite higher frequencies. Consequently, this measurement approach is insufficient for determining system bandwidth of the human operator-haptic interface system. Furthermore, data seem to indicate that there is no appreciable difference in the ability of the Phantom manipulator to display environmental impedances in either AUI or PUI interactions regardless of the user.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-1619</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780390989</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780390980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2378-5861</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9780780390997</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 0780390997</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACC.2005.1470441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Admittance ; Bandwidth ; Displays ; Haptic interfaces ; Humans ; Imaging phantoms ; Impedance ; Manipulator dynamics ; Mechanical engineering ; System testing</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005, 2005, p.3060-3065 vol. 5</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1470441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,4036,4037,27904,54897</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1470441$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>McJunkin, S.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speich, J.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Transparency of a Phantom premium haptic interface for active and passive human interaction</title><title>Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005</title><addtitle>ACC</addtitle><description>This paper compares two methods for determining the transparency bandwidth of an impedance based haptic interface with a Phantom 1.0 A haptic device. Active user induced (AUI) interaction tests, where the system excitation is generated by a human user, show that transparency bandwidth is limited to approximately 2 Hz. Passive user induced (PUI) interaction tests, where the system excitation is generated by the haptic device with a passive human operator, show that bandwidth can extend up to 50 Hz. Experimental results show that the apparent bandwidth limitations for the AUI interaction tests are dependent on the human user's inability to excite higher frequencies. Consequently, this measurement approach is insufficient for determining system bandwidth of the human operator-haptic interface system. Furthermore, data seem to indicate that there is no appreciable difference in the ability of the Phantom manipulator to display environmental impedances in either AUI or PUI interactions regardless of the user.</description><subject>Admittance</subject><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Displays</subject><subject>Haptic interfaces</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging phantoms</subject><subject>Impedance</subject><subject>Manipulator dynamics</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering</subject><subject>System testing</subject><issn>0743-1619</issn><issn>2378-5861</issn><isbn>0780390989</isbn><isbn>9780780390980</isbn><isbn>9780780390997</isbn><isbn>0780390997</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtqwzAURNUXNEmzL3SjH3B6ryRb0jKYviDQLtJVF-FGlohKLRvZKfTv25AUBmbgDLMYxm4RFohg75d1vRAA5QKVBqXwjM2tNvAnacFafc4mQmpTlKbCCzb9B8ZesgloJQus0F6z6TB8AqC1FUzYxzpTGnrKPrkf3gVO_G1Haexa3mffxn3Ld9SP0fGYRp8DOc9Dlzm5MX57TqnhPQ3DIe_2LaVj7UC7dMOuAn0Nfn7yGXt_fFjXz8Xq9emlXq6KiLociyYEMiJo7UVQHjSVotoKYYRTGh02SKFSlqxzYYuhbKQVSkITqPKmoVLLGbs77kbv_abPsaX8szmdJH8BgXVYSA</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>McJunkin, S.T.</creator><creator>O'Malley, M.K.</creator><creator>Speich, J.E.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Transparency of a Phantom premium haptic interface for active and passive human interaction</title><author>McJunkin, S.T. ; O'Malley, M.K. ; Speich, J.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-dffa82f77e2f4e07a526b2282c471c1d1af649a9ccfb1f5d392430dfa6e8da573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Admittance</topic><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Displays</topic><topic>Haptic interfaces</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging phantoms</topic><topic>Impedance</topic><topic>Manipulator dynamics</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering</topic><topic>System testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McJunkin, S.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speich, J.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McJunkin, S.T.</au><au>O'Malley, M.K.</au><au>Speich, J.E.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Transparency of a Phantom premium haptic interface for active and passive human interaction</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005</btitle><stitle>ACC</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>3060</spage><epage>3065 vol. 5</epage><pages>3060-3065 vol. 5</pages><issn>0743-1619</issn><eissn>2378-5861</eissn><isbn>0780390989</isbn><isbn>9780780390980</isbn><eisbn>9780780390997</eisbn><eisbn>0780390997</eisbn><abstract>This paper compares two methods for determining the transparency bandwidth of an impedance based haptic interface with a Phantom 1.0 A haptic device. Active user induced (AUI) interaction tests, where the system excitation is generated by a human user, show that transparency bandwidth is limited to approximately 2 Hz. Passive user induced (PUI) interaction tests, where the system excitation is generated by the haptic device with a passive human operator, show that bandwidth can extend up to 50 Hz. Experimental results show that the apparent bandwidth limitations for the AUI interaction tests are dependent on the human user's inability to excite higher frequencies. Consequently, this measurement approach is insufficient for determining system bandwidth of the human operator-haptic interface system. Furthermore, data seem to indicate that there is no appreciable difference in the ability of the Phantom manipulator to display environmental impedances in either AUI or PUI interactions regardless of the user.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACC.2005.1470441</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0743-1619 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005, 2005, p.3060-3065 vol. 5 |
issn | 0743-1619 2378-5861 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1470441 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Admittance Bandwidth Displays Haptic interfaces Humans Imaging phantoms Impedance Manipulator dynamics Mechanical engineering System testing |
title | Transparency of a Phantom premium haptic interface for active and passive human interaction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A33%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Transparency%20of%20a%20Phantom%20premium%20haptic%20interface%20for%20active%20and%20passive%20human%20interaction&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%202005,%20American%20Control%20Conference,%202005&rft.au=McJunkin,%20S.T.&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=3060&rft.epage=3065%20vol.%205&rft.pages=3060-3065%20vol.%205&rft.issn=0743-1619&rft.eissn=2378-5861&rft.isbn=0780390989&rft.isbn_list=9780780390980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACC.2005.1470441&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1470441%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9780780390997&rft.eisbn_list=0780390997&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1470441&rfr_iscdi=true |