Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device

Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kleinosowski, K., Ruwart, T., Lilja, D.J.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue
container_start_page 224
container_title
container_volume
creator Kleinosowski, K.
Ruwart, T.
Lilja, D.J.
description Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD) specification. We look at OSD's ability to provide QoS guarantees for consistent bandwidth with predictable latency. Included in this paper is a description of QoS requirements of a sample application and how these requirements are translated into parameters that are then communicated to, and interpreted by, the OSD. Implementation problems lead to the failure of a hard real-time QoS model, but this failure is not due to the OSD protocol. The paper concludes with a description of how well the revision 9 OSD standard (OSDR9) is able to accommodate QoS. We provide suggestions for improving the OSD specification and its ability to communicate QoS requirements.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/MSST.2005.7
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1410740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1410740</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1410740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-9fccdfa0641790851b31811050a60da8e9a02d9f6fc74099c3c42cb452d528733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jz1PwzAYhC0-JErpxMjiP5Dw2rETe0QVFKSiDs3AVjn2m8pVk1DbQeq_JwjELTfco9MdIfcMcsZAP75vt3XOAWReXZAZZyVkTJfqktxCVWrJC6bU1X8gP27IIsYDTNKCM85mZLMcum7svTXJ93t6Gs3RpzMdWhoxfHmLNOBp9AE77FOkaaCmp0NzQJuyxkR0NKYhmD1Shz_4HbluzTHi4s_npH55rpev2Xqzels-rTOvIWW6tda1BkrBKg1KsmZaOj2SYEpwRqE2wJ1uy9ZWArS2hRXcNkJyJ7mqimJOHn5rPSLuPoPvTDjvmGAw8cU3FkhPkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Kleinosowski, K. ; Ruwart, T. ; Lilja, D.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kleinosowski, K. ; Ruwart, T. ; Lilja, D.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD) specification. We look at OSD's ability to provide QoS guarantees for consistent bandwidth with predictable latency. Included in this paper is a description of QoS requirements of a sample application and how these requirements are translated into parameters that are then communicated to, and interpreted by, the OSD. Implementation problems lead to the failure of a hard real-time QoS model, but this failure is not due to the OSD protocol. The paper concludes with a description of how well the revision 9 OSD standard (OSDR9) is able to accommodate QoS. We provide suggestions for improving the OSD specification and its ability to communicate QoS requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2160-195X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769523188</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769523187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-1968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MSST.2005.7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Bandwidth ; Computer interfaces ; Delay ; Internet ; NASA ; Protocols ; Quality of service ; Space technology ; Storage area networks ; System testing</subject><ispartof>22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST'05), 2005, p.224-231</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1410740$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1410740$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kleinosowski, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruwart, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilja, D.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device</title><title>22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST'05)</title><addtitle>MASS</addtitle><description>Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD) specification. We look at OSD's ability to provide QoS guarantees for consistent bandwidth with predictable latency. Included in this paper is a description of QoS requirements of a sample application and how these requirements are translated into parameters that are then communicated to, and interpreted by, the OSD. Implementation problems lead to the failure of a hard real-time QoS model, but this failure is not due to the OSD protocol. The paper concludes with a description of how well the revision 9 OSD standard (OSDR9) is able to accommodate QoS. We provide suggestions for improving the OSD specification and its ability to communicate QoS requirements.</description><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Computer interfaces</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>NASA</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Space technology</subject><subject>Storage area networks</subject><subject>System testing</subject><issn>2160-195X</issn><issn>2160-1968</issn><isbn>0769523188</isbn><isbn>9780769523187</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jz1PwzAYhC0-JErpxMjiP5Dw2rETe0QVFKSiDs3AVjn2m8pVk1DbQeq_JwjELTfco9MdIfcMcsZAP75vt3XOAWReXZAZZyVkTJfqktxCVWrJC6bU1X8gP27IIsYDTNKCM85mZLMcum7svTXJ93t6Gs3RpzMdWhoxfHmLNOBp9AE77FOkaaCmp0NzQJuyxkR0NKYhmD1Shz_4HbluzTHi4s_npH55rpev2Xqzels-rTOvIWW6tda1BkrBKg1KsmZaOj2SYEpwRqE2wJ1uy9ZWArS2hRXcNkJyJ7mqimJOHn5rPSLuPoPvTDjvmGAw8cU3FkhPkA</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Kleinosowski, K.</creator><creator>Ruwart, T.</creator><creator>Lilja, D.J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device</title><author>Kleinosowski, K. ; Ruwart, T. ; Lilja, D.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-9fccdfa0641790851b31811050a60da8e9a02d9f6fc74099c3c42cb452d528733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Computer interfaces</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>NASA</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Space technology</topic><topic>Storage area networks</topic><topic>System testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kleinosowski, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruwart, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilja, D.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kleinosowski, K.</au><au>Ruwart, T.</au><au>Lilja, D.J.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device</atitle><btitle>22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST'05)</btitle><stitle>MASS</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>224</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>224-231</pages><issn>2160-195X</issn><eissn>2160-1968</eissn><isbn>0769523188</isbn><isbn>9780769523187</isbn><abstract>Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD) specification. We look at OSD's ability to provide QoS guarantees for consistent bandwidth with predictable latency. Included in this paper is a description of QoS requirements of a sample application and how these requirements are translated into parameters that are then communicated to, and interpreted by, the OSD. Implementation problems lead to the failure of a hard real-time QoS model, but this failure is not due to the OSD protocol. The paper concludes with a description of how well the revision 9 OSD standard (OSDR9) is able to accommodate QoS. We provide suggestions for improving the OSD specification and its ability to communicate QoS requirements.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MSST.2005.7</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2160-195X
ispartof 22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST'05), 2005, p.224-231
issn 2160-195X
2160-1968
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_1410740
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Bandwidth
Computer interfaces
Delay
Internet
NASA
Protocols
Quality of service
Space technology
Storage area networks
System testing
title Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Communicating%20quality%20of%20service%20requirements%20to%20an%20object-based%20storage%20device&rft.btitle=22nd%20IEEE%20/%2013th%20NASA%20Goddard%20Conference%20on%20Mass%20Storage%20Systems%20and%20Technologies%20(MSST'05)&rft.au=Kleinosowski,%20K.&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=224-231&rft.issn=2160-195X&rft.eissn=2160-1968&rft.isbn=0769523188&rft.isbn_list=9780769523187&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MSST.2005.7&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1410740%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1410740&rfr_iscdi=true