Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device
Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD)...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 231 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 224 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Kleinosowski, K. Ruwart, T. Lilja, D.J. |
description | Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD) specification. We look at OSD's ability to provide QoS guarantees for consistent bandwidth with predictable latency. Included in this paper is a description of QoS requirements of a sample application and how these requirements are translated into parameters that are then communicated to, and interpreted by, the OSD. Implementation problems lead to the failure of a hard real-time QoS model, but this failure is not due to the OSD protocol. The paper concludes with a description of how well the revision 9 OSD standard (OSDR9) is able to accommodate QoS. We provide suggestions for improving the OSD specification and its ability to communicate QoS requirements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/MSST.2005.7 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1410740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1410740</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1410740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-9fccdfa0641790851b31811050a60da8e9a02d9f6fc74099c3c42cb452d528733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jz1PwzAYhC0-JErpxMjiP5Dw2rETe0QVFKSiDs3AVjn2m8pVk1DbQeq_JwjELTfco9MdIfcMcsZAP75vt3XOAWReXZAZZyVkTJfqktxCVWrJC6bU1X8gP27IIsYDTNKCM85mZLMcum7svTXJ93t6Gs3RpzMdWhoxfHmLNOBp9AE77FOkaaCmp0NzQJuyxkR0NKYhmD1Shz_4HbluzTHi4s_npH55rpev2Xqzels-rTOvIWW6tda1BkrBKg1KsmZaOj2SYEpwRqE2wJ1uy9ZWArS2hRXcNkJyJ7mqimJOHn5rPSLuPoPvTDjvmGAw8cU3FkhPkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Kleinosowski, K. ; Ruwart, T. ; Lilja, D.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kleinosowski, K. ; Ruwart, T. ; Lilja, D.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD) specification. We look at OSD's ability to provide QoS guarantees for consistent bandwidth with predictable latency. Included in this paper is a description of QoS requirements of a sample application and how these requirements are translated into parameters that are then communicated to, and interpreted by, the OSD. Implementation problems lead to the failure of a hard real-time QoS model, but this failure is not due to the OSD protocol. The paper concludes with a description of how well the revision 9 OSD standard (OSDR9) is able to accommodate QoS. We provide suggestions for improving the OSD specification and its ability to communicate QoS requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2160-195X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769523188</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769523187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-1968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MSST.2005.7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Bandwidth ; Computer interfaces ; Delay ; Internet ; NASA ; Protocols ; Quality of service ; Space technology ; Storage area networks ; System testing</subject><ispartof>22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST'05), 2005, p.224-231</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1410740$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1410740$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kleinosowski, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruwart, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilja, D.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device</title><title>22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST'05)</title><addtitle>MASS</addtitle><description>Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD) specification. We look at OSD's ability to provide QoS guarantees for consistent bandwidth with predictable latency. Included in this paper is a description of QoS requirements of a sample application and how these requirements are translated into parameters that are then communicated to, and interpreted by, the OSD. Implementation problems lead to the failure of a hard real-time QoS model, but this failure is not due to the OSD protocol. The paper concludes with a description of how well the revision 9 OSD standard (OSDR9) is able to accommodate QoS. We provide suggestions for improving the OSD specification and its ability to communicate QoS requirements.</description><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Computer interfaces</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>NASA</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Space technology</subject><subject>Storage area networks</subject><subject>System testing</subject><issn>2160-195X</issn><issn>2160-1968</issn><isbn>0769523188</isbn><isbn>9780769523187</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jz1PwzAYhC0-JErpxMjiP5Dw2rETe0QVFKSiDs3AVjn2m8pVk1DbQeq_JwjELTfco9MdIfcMcsZAP75vt3XOAWReXZAZZyVkTJfqktxCVWrJC6bU1X8gP27IIsYDTNKCM85mZLMcum7svTXJ93t6Gs3RpzMdWhoxfHmLNOBp9AE77FOkaaCmp0NzQJuyxkR0NKYhmD1Shz_4HbluzTHi4s_npH55rpev2Xqzels-rTOvIWW6tda1BkrBKg1KsmZaOj2SYEpwRqE2wJ1uy9ZWArS2hRXcNkJyJ7mqimJOHn5rPSLuPoPvTDjvmGAw8cU3FkhPkA</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Kleinosowski, K.</creator><creator>Ruwart, T.</creator><creator>Lilja, D.J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device</title><author>Kleinosowski, K. ; Ruwart, T. ; Lilja, D.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-9fccdfa0641790851b31811050a60da8e9a02d9f6fc74099c3c42cb452d528733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Computer interfaces</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>NASA</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Space technology</topic><topic>Storage area networks</topic><topic>System testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kleinosowski, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruwart, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilja, D.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kleinosowski, K.</au><au>Ruwart, T.</au><au>Lilja, D.J.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device</atitle><btitle>22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST'05)</btitle><stitle>MASS</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>224</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>224-231</pages><issn>2160-195X</issn><eissn>2160-1968</eissn><isbn>0769523188</isbn><isbn>9780769523187</isbn><abstract>Obtaining consistent bandwidth with predictable latency from disk-based storage systems has proven difficult due to the storage system's inability to understand quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this paper, we present a feasibility study of QoS with the object-based storage device (OSD) specification. We look at OSD's ability to provide QoS guarantees for consistent bandwidth with predictable latency. Included in this paper is a description of QoS requirements of a sample application and how these requirements are translated into parameters that are then communicated to, and interpreted by, the OSD. Implementation problems lead to the failure of a hard real-time QoS model, but this failure is not due to the OSD protocol. The paper concludes with a description of how well the revision 9 OSD standard (OSDR9) is able to accommodate QoS. We provide suggestions for improving the OSD specification and its ability to communicate QoS requirements.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MSST.2005.7</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2160-195X |
ispartof | 22nd IEEE / 13th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST'05), 2005, p.224-231 |
issn | 2160-195X 2160-1968 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1410740 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Bandwidth Computer interfaces Delay Internet NASA Protocols Quality of service Space technology Storage area networks System testing |
title | Communicating quality of service requirements to an object-based storage device |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Communicating%20quality%20of%20service%20requirements%20to%20an%20object-based%20storage%20device&rft.btitle=22nd%20IEEE%20/%2013th%20NASA%20Goddard%20Conference%20on%20Mass%20Storage%20Systems%20and%20Technologies%20(MSST'05)&rft.au=Kleinosowski,%20K.&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=224-231&rft.issn=2160-195X&rft.eissn=2160-1968&rft.isbn=0769523188&rft.isbn_list=9780769523187&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MSST.2005.7&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1410740%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1410740&rfr_iscdi=true |