The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation

Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zou Bin, Yan Maosong, Xie Xianya
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 289 Vol.1
container_issue
container_start_page 285
container_title
container_volume 1
creator Zou Bin
Yan Maosong
Xie Xianya
description Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based simulation model is developed in this paper to compare the market characteristics under different pricing methods. In this model the generators learn bidding strategy using reinforced learning algorithm in repeated bidding game to seek for their maximum profits. Simulation result is presented based on the data from IEEE Reliability Test System, showing that the EVE pricing method has many market characteristics better than other pricing methods. For example, when EVE is used in market pricing, there exists little room for a power supplier to raise the market price by his strategic bidding and the market becomes robust in some sense. And also EVE provides an intrinsic and reasonable mechanism to compensate the capacity investment automatically.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/DRPT.2004.1338508
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1338508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1338508</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1338508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i173t-6951351fd2e8dec80e4cc11db6dc599f81c1714989728050188464707ea875513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkF9LwzAUxQMiqHMfQHzJF2jNbdLm5lHmnwkDRerzyNLbLdo2o8mQfXs73H25cPmdyzmHsTsQOYAwD0-fH3VeCKFykBJLgRfsRmgUEgup1RWbx_gtppFGVRKvGdU74i70ezv6GIbIN5R-iQa-H73zw5b3lHahiTxMpxC6bGMjNZw6culEpCPv7fhDiR_iCbdbGtIZir4_dDb5MNyyy9Z2kebnPWNfL8_1Ypmt3l_fFo-rzIOWKatMCbKEtikIG3IoSDkH0GyqxpXGtAgONCiDRhcoSgGIqlJaaLKoy0k7Y_f_fz0RracIk7fj-tyE_AOrulUV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Zou Bin ; Yan Maosong ; Xie Xianya</creator><creatorcontrib>Zou Bin ; Yan Maosong ; Xie Xianya</creatorcontrib><description>Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based simulation model is developed in this paper to compare the market characteristics under different pricing methods. In this model the generators learn bidding strategy using reinforced learning algorithm in repeated bidding game to seek for their maximum profits. Simulation result is presented based on the data from IEEE Reliability Test System, showing that the EVE pricing method has many market characteristics better than other pricing methods. For example, when EVE is used in market pricing, there exists little room for a power supplier to raise the market price by his strategic bidding and the market becomes robust in some sense. And also EVE provides an intrinsic and reasonable mechanism to compensate the capacity investment automatically.</description><identifier>ISBN: 0780382374</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780382374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/DRPT.2004.1338508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Computational modeling ; Costs ; Economies of scale ; Electricity supply industry ; Investments ; Power generation ; Power supplies ; Power system reliability ; Pricing ; System testing</subject><ispartof>2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings, 2004, Vol.1, p.285-289 Vol.1</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1338508$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2057,4049,4050,27924,54919</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1338508$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zou Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan Maosong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie Xianya</creatorcontrib><title>The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation</title><title>2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings</title><addtitle>DRPT</addtitle><description>Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based simulation model is developed in this paper to compare the market characteristics under different pricing methods. In this model the generators learn bidding strategy using reinforced learning algorithm in repeated bidding game to seek for their maximum profits. Simulation result is presented based on the data from IEEE Reliability Test System, showing that the EVE pricing method has many market characteristics better than other pricing methods. For example, when EVE is used in market pricing, there exists little room for a power supplier to raise the market price by his strategic bidding and the market becomes robust in some sense. And also EVE provides an intrinsic and reasonable mechanism to compensate the capacity investment automatically.</description><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economies of scale</subject><subject>Electricity supply industry</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>Power supplies</subject><subject>Power system reliability</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>System testing</subject><isbn>0780382374</isbn><isbn>9780780382374</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkF9LwzAUxQMiqHMfQHzJF2jNbdLm5lHmnwkDRerzyNLbLdo2o8mQfXs73H25cPmdyzmHsTsQOYAwD0-fH3VeCKFykBJLgRfsRmgUEgup1RWbx_gtppFGVRKvGdU74i70ezv6GIbIN5R-iQa-H73zw5b3lHahiTxMpxC6bGMjNZw6culEpCPv7fhDiR_iCbdbGtIZir4_dDb5MNyyy9Z2kebnPWNfL8_1Ypmt3l_fFo-rzIOWKatMCbKEtikIG3IoSDkH0GyqxpXGtAgONCiDRhcoSgGIqlJaaLKoy0k7Y_f_fz0RracIk7fj-tyE_AOrulUV</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Zou Bin</creator><creator>Yan Maosong</creator><creator>Xie Xianya</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation</title><author>Zou Bin ; Yan Maosong ; Xie Xianya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i173t-6951351fd2e8dec80e4cc11db6dc599f81c1714989728050188464707ea875513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economies of scale</topic><topic>Electricity supply industry</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>Power supplies</topic><topic>Power system reliability</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>System testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zou Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan Maosong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie Xianya</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zou Bin</au><au>Yan Maosong</au><au>Xie Xianya</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation</atitle><btitle>2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings</btitle><stitle>DRPT</stitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>1</volume><spage>285</spage><epage>289 Vol.1</epage><pages>285-289 Vol.1</pages><isbn>0780382374</isbn><isbn>9780780382374</isbn><abstract>Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based simulation model is developed in this paper to compare the market characteristics under different pricing methods. In this model the generators learn bidding strategy using reinforced learning algorithm in repeated bidding game to seek for their maximum profits. Simulation result is presented based on the data from IEEE Reliability Test System, showing that the EVE pricing method has many market characteristics better than other pricing methods. For example, when EVE is used in market pricing, there exists little room for a power supplier to raise the market price by his strategic bidding and the market becomes robust in some sense. And also EVE provides an intrinsic and reasonable mechanism to compensate the capacity investment automatically.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/DRPT.2004.1338508</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 0780382374
ispartof 2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings, 2004, Vol.1, p.285-289 Vol.1
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_1338508
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Computational modeling
Costs
Economies of scale
Electricity supply industry
Investments
Power generation
Power supplies
Power system reliability
Pricing
System testing
title The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A18%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=The%20comparisons%20between%20pricing%20methods%20on%20pool-based%20electricity%20market%20using%20agent-based%20simulation&rft.btitle=2004%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Electric%20Utility%20Deregulation,%20Restructuring%20and%20Power%20Technologies.%20Proceedings&rft.au=Zou%20Bin&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=1&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=289%20Vol.1&rft.pages=285-289%20Vol.1&rft.isbn=0780382374&rft.isbn_list=9780780382374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/DRPT.2004.1338508&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1338508%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1338508&rfr_iscdi=true