The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation
Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 289 Vol.1 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Zou Bin Yan Maosong Xie Xianya |
description | Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based simulation model is developed in this paper to compare the market characteristics under different pricing methods. In this model the generators learn bidding strategy using reinforced learning algorithm in repeated bidding game to seek for their maximum profits. Simulation result is presented based on the data from IEEE Reliability Test System, showing that the EVE pricing method has many market characteristics better than other pricing methods. For example, when EVE is used in market pricing, there exists little room for a power supplier to raise the market price by his strategic bidding and the market becomes robust in some sense. And also EVE provides an intrinsic and reasonable mechanism to compensate the capacity investment automatically. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/DRPT.2004.1338508 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1338508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1338508</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1338508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i173t-6951351fd2e8dec80e4cc11db6dc599f81c1714989728050188464707ea875513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkF9LwzAUxQMiqHMfQHzJF2jNbdLm5lHmnwkDRerzyNLbLdo2o8mQfXs73H25cPmdyzmHsTsQOYAwD0-fH3VeCKFykBJLgRfsRmgUEgup1RWbx_gtppFGVRKvGdU74i70ezv6GIbIN5R-iQa-H73zw5b3lHahiTxMpxC6bGMjNZw6culEpCPv7fhDiR_iCbdbGtIZir4_dDb5MNyyy9Z2kebnPWNfL8_1Ypmt3l_fFo-rzIOWKatMCbKEtikIG3IoSDkH0GyqxpXGtAgONCiDRhcoSgGIqlJaaLKoy0k7Y_f_fz0RracIk7fj-tyE_AOrulUV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Zou Bin ; Yan Maosong ; Xie Xianya</creator><creatorcontrib>Zou Bin ; Yan Maosong ; Xie Xianya</creatorcontrib><description>Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based simulation model is developed in this paper to compare the market characteristics under different pricing methods. In this model the generators learn bidding strategy using reinforced learning algorithm in repeated bidding game to seek for their maximum profits. Simulation result is presented based on the data from IEEE Reliability Test System, showing that the EVE pricing method has many market characteristics better than other pricing methods. For example, when EVE is used in market pricing, there exists little room for a power supplier to raise the market price by his strategic bidding and the market becomes robust in some sense. And also EVE provides an intrinsic and reasonable mechanism to compensate the capacity investment automatically.</description><identifier>ISBN: 0780382374</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780382374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/DRPT.2004.1338508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Computational modeling ; Costs ; Economies of scale ; Electricity supply industry ; Investments ; Power generation ; Power supplies ; Power system reliability ; Pricing ; System testing</subject><ispartof>2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings, 2004, Vol.1, p.285-289 Vol.1</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1338508$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2057,4049,4050,27924,54919</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1338508$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zou Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan Maosong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie Xianya</creatorcontrib><title>The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation</title><title>2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings</title><addtitle>DRPT</addtitle><description>Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based simulation model is developed in this paper to compare the market characteristics under different pricing methods. In this model the generators learn bidding strategy using reinforced learning algorithm in repeated bidding game to seek for their maximum profits. Simulation result is presented based on the data from IEEE Reliability Test System, showing that the EVE pricing method has many market characteristics better than other pricing methods. For example, when EVE is used in market pricing, there exists little room for a power supplier to raise the market price by his strategic bidding and the market becomes robust in some sense. And also EVE provides an intrinsic and reasonable mechanism to compensate the capacity investment automatically.</description><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economies of scale</subject><subject>Electricity supply industry</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>Power supplies</subject><subject>Power system reliability</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>System testing</subject><isbn>0780382374</isbn><isbn>9780780382374</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkF9LwzAUxQMiqHMfQHzJF2jNbdLm5lHmnwkDRerzyNLbLdo2o8mQfXs73H25cPmdyzmHsTsQOYAwD0-fH3VeCKFykBJLgRfsRmgUEgup1RWbx_gtppFGVRKvGdU74i70ezv6GIbIN5R-iQa-H73zw5b3lHahiTxMpxC6bGMjNZw6culEpCPv7fhDiR_iCbdbGtIZir4_dDb5MNyyy9Z2kebnPWNfL8_1Ypmt3l_fFo-rzIOWKatMCbKEtikIG3IoSDkH0GyqxpXGtAgONCiDRhcoSgGIqlJaaLKoy0k7Y_f_fz0RracIk7fj-tyE_AOrulUV</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Zou Bin</creator><creator>Yan Maosong</creator><creator>Xie Xianya</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation</title><author>Zou Bin ; Yan Maosong ; Xie Xianya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i173t-6951351fd2e8dec80e4cc11db6dc599f81c1714989728050188464707ea875513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economies of scale</topic><topic>Electricity supply industry</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>Power supplies</topic><topic>Power system reliability</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>System testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zou Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan Maosong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie Xianya</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zou Bin</au><au>Yan Maosong</au><au>Xie Xianya</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation</atitle><btitle>2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings</btitle><stitle>DRPT</stitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>1</volume><spage>285</spage><epage>289 Vol.1</epage><pages>285-289 Vol.1</pages><isbn>0780382374</isbn><isbn>9780780382374</isbn><abstract>Because of the existences of market power and economies of scale, there have been various pricing methods proposed for pool-based electricity market, for example, uniform clearing pricing method (UCP), pay as bid pricing (PAB) and the electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing method. An agent-based simulation model is developed in this paper to compare the market characteristics under different pricing methods. In this model the generators learn bidding strategy using reinforced learning algorithm in repeated bidding game to seek for their maximum profits. Simulation result is presented based on the data from IEEE Reliability Test System, showing that the EVE pricing method has many market characteristics better than other pricing methods. For example, when EVE is used in market pricing, there exists little room for a power supplier to raise the market price by his strategic bidding and the market becomes robust in some sense. And also EVE provides an intrinsic and reasonable mechanism to compensate the capacity investment automatically.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/DRPT.2004.1338508</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISBN: 0780382374 |
ispartof | 2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings, 2004, Vol.1, p.285-289 Vol.1 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1338508 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Computational modeling Costs Economies of scale Electricity supply industry Investments Power generation Power supplies Power system reliability Pricing System testing |
title | The comparisons between pricing methods on pool-based electricity market using agent-based simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A18%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=The%20comparisons%20between%20pricing%20methods%20on%20pool-based%20electricity%20market%20using%20agent-based%20simulation&rft.btitle=2004%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Electric%20Utility%20Deregulation,%20Restructuring%20and%20Power%20Technologies.%20Proceedings&rft.au=Zou%20Bin&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=1&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=289%20Vol.1&rft.pages=285-289%20Vol.1&rft.isbn=0780382374&rft.isbn_list=9780780382374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/DRPT.2004.1338508&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1338508%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1338508&rfr_iscdi=true |